Why am I NOT shocked by this:

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-claims-google-...

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange claims that Google has been working closely with US presidential hopeful Hilary Clinton's campaign in efforts to promote the candidate in the race to the White House. Speaking from the Ecuadorean embassy in London, via video conference as part of a two-day media event named "New Era of Journalism: Farewell to Mainstream", he said: "Google is directly engaged with Hillary Clinton's campaign," the Sputnik reported.

Pointing out that Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt is now heading the Pentagon's innovation branch, Assange said: "Google is heavily integrated with Washington power, at personal level and at business level... Google which has increasing control over the distribution channels... is intensely allying itself with the US exceptionalism."

And yet people (the #ImWithHer crowd) constantly state that Bernie supporters are just making wild accusations that Hillary is bought and paid for by the big multi-national corporations. And also the connections to the MIC, lest we forget the war-mongering of Hillary and who profits from it.

According to a report by RT, Assange is not the only one to have identified a connection between Clinton's campaign and Google. Behavioural psychologist Dr Robert Epstein said in an interview that Schmidt has set up a little-heard-of start-up called Groundword, the sole purpose of which is "to put Clinton in office".

"It's a very secretive organisation, super high-tech stuff, and [it's] very likely they're using these techniques that we've been studying in our research to make sure that votes are shifted to Clinton in November," he added.

When a high-tech internet company like Google is in the bag for Hillary, is it really so hard to believe the number of PAID internet trolls there are out there for Hillary? And the possibility that electronic voting machines HAVE BEEN hacked to deliver more votes to Hillary?

I found this story covered by multiple sources, but when it comes from a tech site (usually apolitical) this lends credence to it IMHO.

http://www.techworm.net/2016/06/google-helping-hillary-clintons-presiden...

Speaking about ongoing presidential campaign, Assange said: “Google is directly engaged with Hillary Clinton’s campaign” and claimed the technology giant used the US State Department on a “a quid pro quo” basis.

“Of course when she is in power… she is a problem for freedom of speech. We know what she is going to do. And she made the chart for the destruction of Libya, she was involved in the process of taking the Libyan armoury and sending it to Syria.”

The coronation has truly been planned out in advance, we of the #BernieOrBust have been fighting an even greater giant (Google) than we though (DNC).

There is no choice, choice is an illusion. Otherwise we would have ANYTHING better than Hillary versus "the only person they could get to act such a fool that people would reject them over the most corrupt politician in American history"