If you have not seen this, I highly encourage you to take some time and view it.

To sum up:

State of Illinois requires a 5% audit of the vote. Which is statistically relevant.

A group of citizens audited the audit. What they testify to is incredible. The audit was not an audit at all. The election 'auditors' were altering the results by adding or erasing tallies to match the machine or precinct totals from the election. Some audit! In one case the citizens were able to witness, an electronic voting machine's audit produced a staggering difference 20% swing to Hillary. i.e. The paper trail for this machine showed completely different results than what was counted. A Bernie win at roughly 57% became a loss at roughly 48%.

Totally unacceptable.

When I first saw this video it was around 300 views. It now has over 26k. Please view and share!

The fun begins around 24 minutes:

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSNTauWPkTc&sns=em]

There is a gofundme page for Who's Counting Chicago.

https://www.gofundme.com/auditchicagovote?utm_source=internal&utm_medium...

excerpt from the gofundme site:

What we are we doing:

Chicago has a well-deserved reputation for stealing elections that goes back before anyone reading this was born. And many of us opposed to "black box" voting machines know that they have been used to steal elections other than just Ohio for Bush in 2004.

In the rest of the world and especially third world countries, when exit polls don't match "actual results," everyone agrees that this is due to vote fraud and is evidence of a stolen election. In the U.S., the media chalks it up to the exit polls being just "wrong" and the polls are "smoothed over" with "actual results" spit out by unverifiable, black box vote counting machines.

In Chicago, a group of 20 volunteers from Who's Counting Chicago lead by Dr. Lora Chamberlain, monitored the recent 5% audit/recount of Chicago's Board of Elections (CBOE) vote mandated by the State Board of Elections. The audit is done as a test or check that the electronic, scan machines are counting the vote correctly. It represents a rare opportunity to see the actual, physical ballots voters marked on primary day. as the ballots were hand counted. The CBOE was required to count these ballots using a method other than the scan machines used on election day or in early voting.

But election officials refused to recognize any discrepancies -- of which we documented many -- between the hand counted numbers and the previous "machine" numbers and always reverted to the machine numbers. Some audit. One table repeatedly found the same discrepancy and was made to re-count the ballots 5 times! Also, the CBOE deliberately made it dificult for us to monitor the count.

This litigation and audit represents one of the few opportunities to audit the actual vote and ballots cast and compare them to what the "block box" voting machines say the vote was. This is extremely rare. We need help to make this happen. If we can prove these machines can't reliably count the votes, we can potentially see real change in how Chicago, and maybe even the United States, votes.

This litigation may also set some "ground rules" for how future audits are conducted (like in November) to ensure that volunteers with organizations like Who's Counting Chicago will have proper access to the count. We need your help.