Trump is still a warmongering monster

I've given President Trump a lot of credit lately for his decision to pull out of Syria, and I don't regret doing so.
But let's not forget the Drone War that Bush started, Obama made worse, and Trump has pumped up to record levels of carnage.

During the first two years of Donald Trump’s presidency, the US has carried out far more drone strikes in the undeclared battlefields of Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan than his predecessor, Barack Obama, during the same period of his first term. One reason for this is relaxed restrictions introduced late in Obama’s tenure.

When Obama took office in January 2009, he began a dramatic increase in drone warfare compared to George W Bush, his immediate predecessor. Bush carried out 57 attacks in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia between 2001 and 2009 using unmanned aerial vehicles — drones — but by the time Obama left the White House in 2017, he'd launched almost 10 times that many strikes: 563, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
...
Trump's first year saw an escalation of strikes in those countries, too. In 2016, Obama launched 36 drone strikes in Yemen, three in Pakistan and 14 in Somalia. But in 2017, Trump sent drones out on kill missions 130 times in Yemen, five times in Pakistan and 35 times in Somalia.

A big part of the reason for so many more drone strikes is that Trump removed the rules that sometimes protected civilians from being killed.
With that rules change came predictable results.
Let's look at Yemen, since they are the primary recipient of our high explosives.

For many years, we at the Mwatana Organization for Human Rights documented the impact of U.S. drone strikes in Yemen through detailed field research. In 2017 we investigated eight drone strikes and ground operations and found that U.S. operations were responsible for the deaths of at least 32 civilians – including 16 children and six women – and injured ten others, including five children.

That's from just eight of the 130 drone strikes, and from those eight drone strikes we get 16 dead children. Or two dead children for every drone strike, which is the sort of math used by people going to Hell.
AP did a larger study and found damning evidence that at least "a third of all those killed in drone strikes so far in 2018...did not belong to al-Qaida."

While Yemen occasionally gets on the radar of Americans, for some reason Somalia never does, despite there being over 500 American troops currently stationed there.
With those troops came drone strikes.

Since taking office, the Trump Administration has dramatically increased lethal strikes in Somalia. U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) has carried out more than 30 strikes in each of 2017 and 2018, more than twice the previous highest total during the Obama presidency.
...
Take, for example, two well-documented attacks in August 2017 and May 2018. Local farmers accused Somali Special Forces, who were accompanied by U.S. forces, of killing innocent civilians. In the past year alone, reports of alleged civilian harm were accompanied by claims of damage to homes, agricultural infrastructure, and livestock.

So how effective are these drone strikes?
Well, the simple fact that we continue to increase the number of drone strikes in these countries year after year is evidence that this isn't working. At a certain point we will run into a limit of how much destruction we can rain down on these defenseless nations.

Fortunately, there was a long-term study on drone strikes v. terrorist attacks recently completed.

Drone strikes have a bigger impact on Taliban and Al Qaeda violence in Pakistan than in Afghanistan, researchers have found when looking at data from 2007 to 2011.

An attack by the Taliban in Pakistan is 9% more likely to occur 5 days after a drone strike and 7.4% more likely to occur 6 days after a drone strike.

“We also find that Taliban violence in Pakistan is negatively associated with Taliban violence in Afghanistan,” they said, “[as] 0.02 fewer terrorist attacks occur 16 days after one terrorist attack in Afghanistan.”

Put another way, terrorists in Pakistan are significantly MORE likely to attack because of a drone strike, while it has virtually no effect on terrorists in Afghanistan.
So if your objective is to cause more terrorist attacks, then our current methods are effective.

While the Global Drone War is an obvious case of a criminal war against civilians under Trump, it isn't the only example.
Amnesty International says US-led coalition committed war crimes when it destroyed Mosul in Iraq, and Raqqa in Syria.

If only there was a way to make Americans care about who we are killing in their name.

Share
up
18 users have voted.

Comments

During the first two years of Donald Trump’s presidency, the US has carried out far more drone strikes in the undeclared battlefields of Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan than his predecessor, Barack Obama, during the same period of his first term. One reason for this is relaxed restrictions introduced late in Obama’s tenure.

When Obama took office in January 2009, he began a dramatic increase in drone warfare compared to George W Bush, his immediate predecessor. Bush carried out 57 attacks in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia between 2001 and 2009 using unmanned aerial vehicles — drones — but by the time Obama left the White House in 2017, he'd launched almost 10 times that many strikes: 563, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

I am not sure that Trump's serial drone murdering more people during the first two years of Trump's Presidency than Obama serial drone murdered during the fdirst two years of Obama's Presidency because Obama was then under stricter rules equates to Trump being a bigger drone murderer than Obama was.

That, however, is a technicality. Is Trump a war mongering monster? Yes. Was Obama? Yes. Was Bush? Yes. Would Hillary have been, had she been elected? While no one can say for absolute certain what would have gone on during an imaginary Presidency, I personally think she would have been at least as awful as Trump and Obama and Bush in that respect.

If only there was a way to make Americans care about who we are killing in their name.

I care who is being killed in the name of America. If I could stop it, I would. I'm sure I am not the only one.

I have to believe that most adults in the world realize that citizens of a nation have precious little to do with decisions their respective governments make.

up
10 users have voted.
Pluto's Republic's picture

@HenryAWallace

Actually, I wish I spoke that well.

The only divide I have — and it is a constant one — is that I find it impossible to pretend that US foreign policy (ie. kill numbers) have anything whatsoever to do with the token human who is elected president. I would love to compare Presidents in that metric because that would imply there was a democracy and a choice that could change the size of the annual slaughter. I try, but no luck. Instead, I find myself trying to guess what President Gore's kill-count would have been....

As for the moral burden of the American people as a whole: I think everyone has access to the knowledge that the US military is off murdering people just like them. Just like them in that they did not attack the United States. I think the People care as much as they are able to. American caring is at full capacity and I now accept that.

up
8 users have voted.

The purpose of a writer is to keep civilization from destroying itself.
– Albert Camus

@Pluto's Republic

American caring is at full capacity and I now accept that.

No, no, no. I refuse to accept that.

up
5 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@HenryAWallace

The world came out to protest against the Iraq war and the left did continue protesting against the things that were happening there, but that all went away when Obama was elected and I saw very few people upset about him going into Libya. Not many even said anything when he went into Syria and those of us that did were told to shut up about it. Using drones saves the troops lives don't you know. No pushback on the use of them in the first place.

And how did people react when Obama killed the American mullah because it was easier to just kill him than bring him back here for trial? Then Obama killed that man's son. Trump then killed the daughter.

Like you I'm appalled at what this country is doing, but I can't stop it either. People are just shrugging off the genocide that we are participating in. Wish I had some answers to what to do, but everything I have tried has been ignored by my congress creatures. Killing for profits is what the country is doing. Gotta sell those weapons don't you know? Jobs depend on it.

up
9 users have voted.

America is a pathetic nation; a fascist state fueled by the greed, malice, and stupidity of her own people.
- strife delivery

thanatokephaloides's picture

@snoopydawg

Like you I'm appalled at what this country is doing, but I can't stop it either. People are just shrugging off the genocide that we are participating in.

Largely, if not entirely, because they "can't stop it either", and the ongoing over-hard struggle to simply make an effin' living takes everything they've got.

And, as HenryAWallace pointed out upstream, no modern adult expects any ordinary working person to have any impact on the decisions governments make in hir name.

Wish I had some answers to what to do, but everything I have tried has been ignored by my congress creatures. Killing for profits is what the country is doing. Gotta sell those weapons don't you know? Jobs depend on it.

Gakkk!!
Bad

up
4 users have voted.

"I say enough! If Israel wants to be the only superpower in the Middle East then they can put their own asses on the line and do it themselves. I want to continue to eat."
-- snoopydawg

thanatokephaloides's picture

@HenryAWallace

If only there was a way to make Americans care about who we are killing in their name.

I care who is being killed in the name of America. If I could stop it, I would. I'm sure I am not the only one.

I have to believe that most adults in the world realize that citizens of a nation have precious little to do with decisions their respective governments make.

No reason not to believe it; after all, it's fact....

And worse today than at any other time since World War II, btw.....

Bad

up
2 users have voted.

"I say enough! If Israel wants to be the only superpower in the Middle East then they can put their own asses on the line and do it themselves. I want to continue to eat."
-- snoopydawg

wendy davis's picture

@HenryAWallace

bullshit on the daily beast's claims, as well. 'trump relaxed obomba's rules'. but then that lofty media site has also smeared julian assange quite religiously.

up
1 user has voted.
dystopian's picture

Here comes Blackwater. Or whatever the blood-thirsty profiteer mercenary Eric Prince calls his outfit this year. I think it is a feel good ruse in some ways. Sure its great. Who could not like less war, besides warmongering Dems and Repubs? But I think it is merely clearing the path for us to pay much more for the same via private contractors. At least the low paid troops are out. But we will still be paying, just more, probably for less. I hope I am wrong.

up
7 users have voted.

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.
both - Albert Einstein