Three Facts to Keep in Mind in the Time of Impeachment

Wherever I write, I am aware that I represent a minority of one, who regards the US Constitution with total distain for the injustice and corruption that it has introduced into the lives of modern Americans. It has made it possible for their lives to be trashed morally, economically, and legally inside their own country, while pitting citizen against citizen as they are forced down into a cruel, god-foresaken, social dystopia. And the Constitution's cluelessness about the modern world has allowed the people's tormentors to be elevated to the highest positions of authority in the land, where they legally hide their abuses behind their classified documents. Yet it is a rare human being that will put the blame where it clearly belongs.

Daniel Lazare is one of the rare ones.

He blogs with uncommon intellectual-honesty about constitutions and explains how ours misleads us and subverts our democracy. His articles appear in a number of national magazines — Le Monde diplomatique, the New Left Review, The Nation, Harper's, The London Review of Books, The American Conservative — athough he is often the lone voice of unflattering truths. Lazare is the author of several books on U.S. politics, among them "The Frozen Republic: How the Constitution is Paralyzing Democracy." On January 1, 2020, he released what I think of as Cliff Notes for watchers of Impeachment 2020, published by Strategic Culture. Lazare's brief essay 'American Collapse' is excerpted, below. It offers helpful context for the government's latest and greatest folly, which has heretofore been televised with absolutely no context at all.

On the receiving end are American minds that have been soaked in a brine of cloying patriotic narratives designed to foster self-deception. Terrorized by abstract enemies from a young age, the people often compete to denegrate their own humanity, which is seen as a weakness. They blind themselves when the ugly truth reveals that they are clinging to lies and hypocracy. They readily rationalize the atrocities that are being committed around the world in their names. The US Constitution has shown them the American way.

American Collapse

 

In order to understand the great impeachment charade, it’s important to keep three facts about the strange bird known as the United States uppermost in mind.

The first is that the US is the ultimate law-based society, one whose structure derives entirely from a single four-thousand-word document created in 1787. The second is that while Americans think of the Constitution as the greatest plan of government known to man, it’s actually the opposite: a grotesque pre-modern relic that grows more unrepresentative and unresponsive with each passing year. A pro-rural Electoral College that has overridden the popular vote in two of the last five presidential elections; a lopsided Senate that allows the majority in ten urban states to be outvoted four-to-one by the minority in the other forty; lifetime Supreme Court justices who can veto any law at variance with an ancient constitution that only they understand – it’s a broken-down old rattletrap in need of a top-to-bottom overhaul. Yet it’s so thoroughly frozen that structural reform is all but unthinkable.

The third thing to keep in mind is that as the constitutional system grows more and more undemocratic, the two-party system that grew out of it in the nineteenth century grows more undemocratic as well. The result is a bipartisan race to the right. Sometimes, the Republicans seem to be in the lead as Trump imprisons thousands of immigrants fleeing murderous conditions in Central America that the US war on drugs helped create. Other times it’s the Democrats as they beat the drums for imperialist war against Russia.

Take all these factors – xenophobia, mindless obeisance to ancient law, a president imposed against the popular will, etc. – mix thoroughly, place in a super-hot oven due to a growing imperial crisis, and impeachment is what pops out. The process itself is very old, a by-product of fourteenth-century Anglo-Norman law. (Impeachment derives from the Old French empeechier, meaning to ensnare or entrap.) The British abandoned it in the late eighteenth century when Edmund Burke wasted seven years impeaching an Indian colonial governor named Warren Hastings on grounds of corruption. (The House of Lords finally acquitted him in 1795). But then the Americans took it up and now, two centuries later, are immersed in the same brainless exercise.

The results were all too evident in mid-December 2019 when one Democrat after another took to the House floor to denounced Donald Trump for violating the ancient constitution by withholding lethal military aid from the neo-Nazis of the Ukraine’s Azov Battalion....

Follow the link for the rest.

"If the US staggers from one imperial disaster to another even while descending into civil war," says Lazare, "It's because the US is locked in an ancient mindset that is increasingly divorced from reality. It’s lost in a constitutional labyrinth of its own making, and impeachment is leading it deeper and deeper into the maze."

Share
up
29 users have voted.

Comments

Good site as well. You're not a minority of one as I agree with your thoughts on our Constitution, so at least there's that, heh. Thanks, I am now busy reading other articles on Strategic Culture. A new addition to my reading repertoire. I am many times tempted to send some of your comments to friends, if only they'd read them.

up
18 users have voted.

Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur

Bisbonian's picture

@lizzyh7

up
11 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

Pluto's Republic's picture

but
empathetic
reaction:


A lot of people want desperately to believe that our government is a bunch of really good guys simply doing their best to keep us safe from the terrorists. It's understandable that people want to believe that but pretty fucking outrageous that anyone actually does.

— OPOL

up
19 users have voted.

____________________

The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato
snoopydawg's picture

@Pluto's Republic

Lots of great articles on it but I missed this one.

I'm with OPOL on the government. Is beyond corrupt and it can't be fixed. I don't know if it's ever been a representative one. Seems like the powerful just keeps getting more powerful at our expense. If the rumors are true about what happened in Ukraine I hope the truth gets out and it's enough to wake people up to see them for what they really are.

That no one is speaking out about what's happening to Assange and Manning is disgusting. "People should not be afraid of their government...the government should be afraid of the people." V

up
12 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

he pulled out that old lie about "2 out of the last 5 elections". Ironically that is almost true, but it's not the point. 2000 was simply a coup. Period. Saying that the Supreme Court overruled the voters is technically true, but they actually gave Bush the presidency as an act of usurpation. There was no constitutional loophole involved. 2004 was essentially the same. Bush supporters controlled the vote count and simply proclaimed Bush the "winner". In 2016 Hillary actually probably won the popular vote, though that is questionable, but the Electoral College appointed Trump the winner in keeping with rules it's developed over time, not rules that were assumed at the writing of the constitution. Originally no electors were committed to any candidate, they were individuals elected independently on the supposition that they were wise enough to back the best candidate, regardless of the "will of the voters" - like was done in 1824(?) with J.Q. Adams.
Funny, but the only 2 times the Electoral College elected someone who did not win the popular vote (there were other examples, but I absolve the EC of Bush/Kerry, Hayes/Tilden and Cleveland/Harrison, because in those the vote was tainted) the EC refused to elect a psychopathic murderer. Getting back to my point the constitution is not to blame, especially not for seeing that Trump was actually the lesser of two evils.
As for the Senate, it is indeed an undemocratic institution, and it's proclaimed reason - to protect the interests of less populous states - is temporarily obsolete, but that could always, in fact almost certainly will, be relevant again, and soon.
A valid criticism of the constitution is that having spent so much time and philosophical energy on checks and balances it was unable to assume the problem of multifactionalism and shared power. Naturally we should have berniecrats and corporatists and neocons and fundamentalists and tea partiers and libertarians and add to the list as much as you want, forming coalitions issue by issue. Instead our first past the goal takes all elections have resulted in hard wired coalitions (with junior members frozen out of actual influence) leading to universal corruption.

up
10 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

travelerxxx's picture

@doh1304

You make some valid points doh1304, but you've got me wondering about this statement:

As for the Senate, it is indeed an undemocratic institution, and it's proclaimed reason - to protect the interests of less populous states - is temporarily obsolete, but that could always, in fact almost certainly will, be relevant again, and soon.

Particularly, I'm wondering why you say that the Senate's "... proclaimed reason - to protect the interests of less populous states," which you feel is "... temporarily obsolete," will soon become once again relevant.

What is it that makes you think this relevancy will soon occur? Curious.

up
3 users have voted.

@travelerxxx
just as there have always been 2 worlds in capitalism. For capitalism the 2 worlds have always been the industrialized world, which is wealthy and exploits large populations of workers, and the far less wealthy world of raw material suppliers, historically farmers, who also had to be numerous and were even more exploited.
Modern America is different. Our wealthy states have retained and recruited a high population because modern capitalism needs a large base of exploitable consumers, while areas with natural resources need (and historically have) fewer people. Those states have responded to social isolation and exploitation with resentment and racism - in short Trumpism.
If we somehow manage to avoid WW3 and reduce our racial divide to a dull roar we will then be forced to address the large state/small state divide, as the ranchers and miners demand what they consider fair treatment. We don't see it, since it doesn't trickle down, but CA, NY, MA, et all actually do exploit the south and west.
And then the inevitable ecological meltdown will produce waves of refugees, which the wealthy states will try to foist off on the less populous states.

up
3 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

Situational Lefty's picture

if not just for his epic comb-over.

A strong wind could lead that fucking moron and his stupid fucking hair into a war with Iran.

up
5 users have voted.

"The enemy is anybody who is going to get you killed, no matter which side he's on." Yossarian

Raggedy Ann's picture

@Situational Lefty
Here we go with Iran! We're in trouble now -

up
3 users have voted.

"The “jumpers” reminded us that one day we will all face only one choice and that is how we will die, not how we will live." Chris Hedges on 9/11

WaterLily's picture

@Raggedy Ann The Orange Buffoon just took longer to get to it than Hillary would have.

Anyone know where to buy iodine pills? Asking for a friend.

up
5 users have voted.