Open Thread - Tuesday - 11/03/2015

Good Morning all,

I am a bit helpless about what I should write in an Open Thread. (I defnitely think I shouldn't write at all here, and as I often do in my life I go against my own instincts just to try to be nice and help someone out). Please go ahead and share what you find important or enjoy to share. I could offer some "Wagner" music for JtC, but ... Scratch one-s head ... I don't enjoy that. Nea

I thought I show you some article about how a German and an American disagree about the image they have about Germany. Yeah, well, what else is new. But I never get used to it. So here it goes: The American is Roger Cohen (born 1955), today a columnist of the NYT. I admit I don't read the NYT unless some diary points to a specific story in there. Here is a short description:

Roger Cohen joined The New York Times in 1990. He was a foreign correspondent for more than a decade before becoming acting foreign editor on Sept. 11, 2001, and foreign editor six months later.
Since 2004, he has written a column for The International New York Times, formerly known as The International Herald Tribune. In 2009 he was named a columnist of The New York Times. His columns appear every Tuesday and Friday.
Raised in South Africa and England, he is a naturalized American.

The German is Jochen Bittner (born 1973)

Since 2001 he has been Political Editor at the Time. From 2007 to 2011 he was its European and NATO correspondent in Brussels. Since fall of 2013, he writes as guest author for The International New York Times. [1] Jochen Bittner is also editor at the German weekly newspaper "Die Zeit", for the online edition.

I don't know any of the two and just ran in the article both of them wrote together as a correspondence exchange between them. One should not forget that both are of different generations aside from being from different "planets". I searched around a bit of Bittner's writings and wouldn't say that I am really sure if I would agree with him on a couple of issues, but that's just the impression after gazing around for an hour or so on the bit I saw online.

But in this specific exchange, I believe he shows the difference in perception of a younger generation of Germans versus the one of the elderly American Roger Cohen, who is responding graciously and what I consider in a predictable manner as well. I found the article interesting as it touches many question I asked myself often and which affect imo today's problems of Germany's role (including the Ukraine and Palestina and Syria conflicts) more than I would like to see.

Let's start with Jochen Bittner's part:
Is Germany complacent? - Yes, claims american journalist and columnist of the "New York Times", Roger Cohen. Jochen Bittner, editor of DIE ZEIT, disagrees. - A correspondence - By Jochen Bittner und Roger Cohen

Dear Roger Cohen,

I felt I had to write to you because we need to hear your opinion – and that's still the case. Since your time as the Berlin correspondent for the New York Times at the turn of the century, you have been the most important overseas voice on Germany. .... With your view from the outside looking in you've sounded out the depths of Germany's strengths and weaknesses, which we, blinded by habit, have struggled to recognize.
...
However, I have recently been more astonished at you than you yourself have been at Germany - at least that’s how it feels. Is it possible that the courage to give your unequivocal opinion has since fallen into stereotypes? Or is there something else in it, perhaps a historical disappointment? A projection? In any case the picture you paint of Germany and the reality which I see, are drifting further and further apart.
...
When reading your analysis of Germany from the last few months, I get the underlying impression that you see a kind of uneasy 'wannabe' hegemon which, irritatingly, has emerged from America’s tutelage at such a premature stage. Back in July you wrote that after reunification and the introduction of the Euro, America believed it could unload its "European burden." You state that instead of binding Germany to Europe, the euro has led to "German diktats of discipline, predictability and austerity." All of a sudden countries with a "more flexible Mediterranean culture" were tied down. You conclude by saying, "German methods are good for Germans. But if Berlin now wants all Europeans to follow those methods, the Europe that offered postwar Germany a path to salvation will break apart."
...
In August you added some more historical weight to your argument: "There is the euro. Then there is war and peace and that other kind of debt." You then go on to say that the Holocaust is Germany's deepest debt which can never be repaid.

...
Finally, in light of the VW scandal we learn in September that "there is something peculiarly German about the chasm between professed moral rectitude and reckless wrongdoing, between high culture and low conduct."
...
I agree with you on a lot of issues ....A full-blooded north-south conflict in Europe started by the Eurozone crisis, which created two closed narratives, in which each side is solely to blame for the misery.
...
The "German Question", I think, was resolved 25 years ago. There is also, in my opinion, no German diktat.
...
Given that leading politicians are failing to publicly bridge the resulting divide across Europe, do we journalists not then have an even bigger responsibility to prevent resentment spreading?
...
But it seems to me as if you don't think it's really worth the effort. What, for example, did the Holocaust lose during the Euro crisis? Do you really want to make up for historic guilt with Euros?
...
I also find it disconcerting to judge a nation's character based on Volkswagen's foul deception. Personally, it wouldn't occur to me to consider Facebook happily passing on users' data to the US secret services as a symbol of America forgetting her own constitutional rights.
...
Playing the role of the hegemon is a thankless task. No-one knows this better than America. Therefore, I have one sincere request: use your insightful views to help us find new ways of thinking rather than recycling the old ones.

Best wishes,
Jochen Bittner

And here excerpts of Roger Cohen's response:

Dear Jochen Bittner,

Thank you for your letter and the kind words with which it begins. My years in Germany were rich and rewarding. I arrived in Berlin in 1998, before the capital had returned there from Bonn, and left in 2001.
...
The openness of Germans, including politicians like Joschka Fischer and Otto Schilly, was astonishing. They revealed themselves to me in a way I had seldom encountered outside war zones, where all the protective layers of personality are stripped away. If the true subject of any foreign correspondent is the soul of the country they cover, Germany uncovered its own with a frankness that sometimes took my breath away.
...
Another woman told me, deadpan, that in every German family there is a locked drawer, and that drawer contains a shameful secret. In such ways, I came to understand Germany’s confrontation with its past, of which the return to Berlin was of course an important element. I came to admire the honesty and courage of this reckoning with the collapse of an entire civilization.
...
This intense self-interrogation was uplifting, at least to me. It suggested how, after the Holocaust, Germans saw the conduct of their lives and of their nation with a particular moral rigor.
...
How better, after all, to atone for the destruction of Europe and the near annihilation of European Jewry than through European unity?
...
If I have experienced a "historical disappointment," as you put it, it is that this Germany I knew seems to me have faded. The self-interrogation that brought out the best has given way to forms of complacency, even amnesia.
....
That is inevitable, you will tell me: the years pass, new generations arrive, they cannot – and perhaps should not – feel the past with the same acuity.
...
Germans no longer worry about their right to be proud or their sense of being a normal nation
....
Germans are enjoying being Europe’s most prosperous and powerful nation... Blithe, device-obsessed self-regard has come to normal Germany, too. It can give lessons. Look at its mighty economy. It’s earned the right!
...
Perhaps that is a happy ending. Certainly it is an unexpected one. Much of the post-war energy of the United States and other European states went into trying to ensure that the German dominance of today would not reoccur.
...
Personally I am at ease with German power. ... But I think a special German debt endures that applies to European unity and the nation’s conduct as a whole.
...
The Greek crisis and the euro crisis as a whole have been a test of this German commitment to Europe. The results have been mixed.
...
The euro was a political creation above all. Germany’s deepest obligation, in my view, is to that political creation, which cannot be nickel-and-dimed. There is no such thing as inherited guilt. But there is inherited responsibility. German leadership cannot be divorced from Germany’s past. The shame cannot be effaced.
....
Its close alliance with Poland, built over terrible wounds, is inspiring. But it has changed since I was there in ways that sometimes trouble me.
...
Perhaps I’ve changed, too. If Germany with the years distances itself from its great 20th-century crime, I feel it closer as I grow older. I see its reverberations in my own family... [personal family and friends memories about the effects of the holocaust on them follow here]
...
The mystery that struck me with such force when, as Berlin correspondent, I first visited Buchenwald and saw its proximity to Goethe’s home town remains: How the nation of Goethe and Schiller and Kant and Beethoven could fall for such garbage and wreak such horror. But it did. And so I stand by the phrase you cite: "There is something peculiarly German about the chasm between professed moral rectitude and reckless wrongdoing, between high culture and low conduct."

Exchanges like this one have always interested me, because I find the diverging view points repeated in many other conflicts between the "sinner" nation, ethnic minority or majority or tribe and the "victim" nation, ethnic minority or tribe repeated over and over again. And how those tensions pass from one generation to the next and how they change, recur and generate new conflicts of the same sort. Exactly what everyone is trying to avoid but never succeed in.The opposite is happening. New atrocities surface again.

Roger Cohen says, there is no inherited guilt, but inherited responsibility. I think he means the responsibility to not engage in the same evils your forefathers or anchestors or parents have committed. "Never again" is the guiding code of conduct we are supposed to adhere to. Yet rarely it happens. If you mention this code of conduct, usually the discussion goes around the appropriateness to compare one evil with another, making sure to be reasonable and not compare the atrocities committed on a couple of thousand people with the atrocities on a couple of million people or a couple of hundred people. Yet for the victims the atrocities their fathers or anchestors had to endure is all the same, independent of how many had to endure them.

The native American's genocide and exploitation and killing of their culture is to them as painful and grave and the African slaves exploitation in the US or the outcry of slaughtered and murdered Tutsis or Hutus or other atrocities based on interethnic domination and enslavement or exploitatin among African tribes. What is caused by racism or tribalism or fanatism among same ethnic, but different religious groups, it all ends up with the victims crying out for justice, reparation and the perpetrators hesitance to admit their "sins", feeling overwhelmed with guilt (you guys here quite often self-flaggellate about the US political war crimes too) and their feeling of being themselves exploited by the insistence of the victims, who will never stop asking for righting a wrong that has been done decades or centuries ago.

So, my question is, how do you escape that cycle? It's one of the subjects I really like to study and read about. I have accumulated many books over the years which supposedly tackle this issue. They are the ones I want to read first. Tribalism is a phenomenon I like to understand, where it comes from, in how far people need it, what kind of conflicts they generate, if tribalism or racism is inate etc.

I have three and a half decades behind me, in which I couldn't educate myself and feel I have a lot of catch up with. So, I will be reading about issues that all are historical or at least happened during the last five decades, issues many of you know in detail. They are all issues that are not news related. So, I don't feel that what I would like to read is something I could use to contribute to this forum, as I risk to tell you what we call in German "Schnee von gestern" (news from yesterday).

I mention my reading priorities here, because I was asked by DonMidwest several times, which books are on my reading list and I just want to apologize that what interests me more is not ideology, economy or news related. I hope he forgives me for my head being oriented towards other issues.

With regards to the letter exchange, I have to say that Bittner himself is in no way "a left leaning journalist" of the kind I would like to see in Germany. So if Cohen sees in him a young German who has amnesia about Germany's past or is not willing anymore to consider some of his arguments, it's not meant to be seen as a "progressive" sign. There are not many voices that would be courageous enough to strongly support the rights of the Palestinians (as Max Blumenthal has rightfully complained about), the only ones left would be the German voices from the left, but I don't think they are strong enough to even be heard over here in the US or they simply don't exist. So, that's where my discouragement and disillusionment comes from thinking about Germany.

Ok, so I can't let you go without some song. Here is one, I sang with compassion when I was young. I know it's out of your world probably, but I guess you have just to bare with me. I still like "the other Cohen" ...This I think was the version I listened to. Smile
[video:https://youtu.be/cZI6EdnvH-8]
Then you might like this too:
[video:https://youtu.be/TNvRyzUPm-Y]
And this I think is hilarious:
[video:https://youtu.be/wMhgQOdMdJ4]
An Honest Cohen. Smile

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

mimi's picture

a new day, a bit of sunshine, leaves turning colors and dropping shamelessly into the wickedest corners of my backyard, where I will never be able to rake them together, and I am off and out of here, because I wanna listen to Democracy NOW from the cozy warm bed I just left to go downstairs to my clunky, super heavy PC to login and say hallo.

I am sure you will never run out of news. So, please share them. And thanks for putting up with me.

Have a good, jolly day and don't let the news get at you. Beat 'em out of your life ! Smile

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

https://www.facebook.com/sigmar.gabriel/posts/369095839789811?_fb_noscri...

mimi wrote:

There are not many voices that would be courageous enough to strongly support the rights of the Palestinians (as Max Blumenthal has rightfully complained about), the only ones left would be the German voices from the left, but I don't think they are strong enough to even be heard over here in the US or they simply don't exist.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

that at least is something. I have never followed German politicians from here (US) on twitter or facebook. Too much else going on for me to have space left for it. It took me a while til I finally listened to a couple of Gysi's speeches in the Bundestag.

I kind of regretted it that Max Blumenthal and David Sheen attacked the only German people, I believed would be courageous enough to handle the Israel/Palestina conflict in a thoughtful and fair way, ie Germany's left.

I never could figure out, who in the German public thought that Blumenthal was "right", because the "Toiletgate" incidence was kind of an "absurd theater" and may be more disregarded for its "show business" effect than for its actual content. If he just could have attacked our foot licking appeasers, of which we have plenty more and better representantives than the German left. But then I really don't know anything about the German left. There is the problem for me.

All those people are unknown to me, a new generation or people (I can't relate to anymore from here) from persons former East Germany. I always thought I have to figure out who Gysi is and what's all about the German "Die Linke", but really didn't try hard enough. I have seen a couple of interviews Max Blumenthal has conducted and though I think he has his heart on the right spot content wise, I find him a tad bit hyperactive sometimes.

I just googled again links with regards to that toiletgate incidence in Germany and Max Blumenthal. When I first heard about it I tried to grasp what this was all about, but gave up. I have Blumenthal's book but have not read it yet. I just had not much appetite to stomach the issue.

Since these days we have Max Blumenthal saying that Israel resembles Nazi Germany and Netanyahu saying Palestinian mufti was the inciter and enabler of the Nazi's holocaust, I just said to myself to leave it all up to them and fuck it. (They may need to apply a bit of the Godwin rule to themselves). Can't really handle all that. If you have the inclination to read through the links, which all talk about it from different povs, and you can put some light on it, I welcome an enlightening comment.

'Toiletgate': anti-Israel activists chase down German Left Party chairman (just the incidence itself with a video)

Left party politicians on anti-Semitism top 10 list (didn't know that until now)

Analysis: Making sense of Germany’s anti-Semitic ‘Toiletgate’ scandal (critical about Blumenthal)

Who Is Max Blumenthal, and What Does He Want From Us" (critical about Blumenthal)

Why I confronted Gregor Gysi (David Sheen explains his actions - Mondoweiss)

Jerusalem and Babylon And Never the Narratives Shall Meet - 'Like Dreamers' and 'Goliath' tell completely different stories of Israel - to completely different audiences.

Ok, this is all a bit beyond my paygrade. So, I stay a confused bystander and play the ignorant "Good German". My mind tells me to protect Palestinians from occupation and their civil rights violations. But then I don't know how the Germans can get out of being between a rock and a hard place, when it comes to deal with Jews who hate each other, at least that's how it feels to me. Netanyahu made it a bit easier for me to choose sides in opposition to Israel. But I still have the urge to not get involved. Coward that I am.

up
0 users have voted.

Nothing to see here

Fresh off his election victory, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is once again stepping up the rhetoric against the Kurdish YPG, the largest Kurdish faction in Syria, vowing “all necessary measures” to keep them advancing deeper into ISIS territory.
While the US is continuing to expand its support for the YPG, Turkey has become increasingly more bellicose, insisting they are prepared to use force against the US-armed faction to prevent them gaining any more territory, particularly spreading west across the Euphrates River.

Just a reminder, U.S. special forces are embedded in those Kurdish forces.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

One NATO member defying the rest of the alliance has happened before though. I remember when NATO was trying to enforce an embargo on the warring parties in Bosnia, Greece stubbornly continued to run supplies to their Orthodox Serb brethren.

up
0 users have voted.
enhydra lutris's picture

Nobody has clean hands.

As an aside, when I was a kid I was instructed that if I really wanted to know and understand what the hell was going on, I had to read multiple papers, and preferably multiple foreign papers. Die Zeit was highly recommended for inclusion among papers one really needed to read.

up
0 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

mimi's picture

to read on several sides of the ideological tainted aisles and from different countries' perspectives. Online reading takes as much time away from it, as it is providing the sources. What a two-sided sword.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

my far away garage into my living room to go through them and get rid at least of half of them. Sigh. I so hate doing this.
See you later.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

please stay "grumpy" and don't give journalists anything that makes their job easy.
The Case for Bernie Sanders
His critics say he’s not realistic – but they have it backwards - By Matt Taibbi November 3, 2015

Bernie Sanders bluntly fails the Rick Perry test. In fact he pretty much defines what it means to fail that test. It isn't just that he doesn't kiss babies or comb his hair or "deftly evade answers." He's also unapologetically described himself as a socialist, which makes him a giant bespectacled block of Kryptonite for Beltway donors and mainstream journalists alike.

If questioned, most reporters would justify this by noting that an effective president must be able to bridge the gap between powerful interests and populist concerns. So it makes some sense to interrogate candidates accordingly, to make sure they're acceptable to both sides.

The flaw in this reasoning is that it assumes that Wall Street and Silicon Valley and Big Pharma and the rest need the help of us reporters to weed out the undesirables.

They don't, of course.

up
0 users have voted.