News Dump Friday: Hillary's Only Slightly Corrupt Campaign

Most of Hillary's emails won't be released until after election

Most of Hillary Clinton’s emails recovered during a Federal Bureau of Investigation probe into practices from her time as secretary of state won’t be made public until after Election Day, according to a new timetable set Friday by a federal judge.
Judge James Boasberg on Friday ordered the State Department to finish processing 1,050 pages of material for release by Nov. 4—just a fraction of what could be as much as 10,000 pages of material....
After the judge’s order, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said that “the American people could be deprived of this information at this essential time.”
“This is an absolutely corrupt process the State Department has come up with,” he said, blaming the department for the continuing delays.

FYI: Robert Rubin is part of Hillary's Team

In a 20-page letter to the Inspector General of the Department of Justice, Michael E. Horowitz, Senator Warren asked for an investigation into why the DOJ had failed to indict any of the Wall Street executives that had been referred to it for potential criminal prosecution by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC). In a separate letter, Warren asked FBI Director James Comey for his related files.

The FCIC released thousands of documents in March of this year, showing that it had made multiple criminal referrals to the DOJ. Warren wrote in her letter:

“A review of these documents conducted by my staff has identified 11 separate FCIC referrals of individuals or corporations to DOJ in cases where the FCIC found ‘serious indications of violations[s]’ of federal securities or other laws. Nine individuals were implicated in these referrals (two were implicated twice). The DOJ has not filed any criminal prosecutions against any of the nine individuals. Not one of the nine has gone to prison or been convicted of a criminal offense. Not a single one has even been indicted or brought to trial. Only one individual was fined, in the amount of $100,000, and that was to settle a civil case brought by the SEC.”

This particular paragraph is a Pandora’s Box by a factor of $2.5 trillion. The two individuals Warren refers to who were “implicated twice” in the FCIC’s criminal referrals are Robert Rubin, the former Treasury Secretary in the administration of Bill Clinton, who in the lead up to the crash of Citigroup in 2008 served as Executive Committee Chair of Citigroup’s Board of Directors. (After advocating for the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which allowed Citigroup to own both an insured depository bank, an investment bank and brokerage firm, Rubin went straight from his post as Treasury Secretary to the Board of Citigroup, where he collected $126 million in compensation over the next decade.)

Scary Putin #386

Capping off a summer in which a substantial part of the Democratic Party’s campaign for president has been accusing Russia of plotting to get the Republican nominee elected, a pair of Democrats who are ranking members on their respective intelligence committees, Rep. Adam Schiff (D – CA) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D – CA), are once again, despite any publicly available evidence to support the allegations, presenting claims Russia is hacking the US election as an unquestionable fact.
They went on in the statement to claim that the only “the very senior levels” could’ve ordered such a plot, which again isn’t proven to exist, and followed it up with a demand that Russian President Vladimir Putin immediately stop all efforts to try to hack and/or influence the US elections.

Scary Obamacare

As concerns about the survival of the Affordable Care Act’s markets intensify, the role of nonprofit “co-op” health insurers -- meant to broaden choices under the law -- has gained prominence. Most of the original 23 co-ops have failed, dumping more than 800,000 members back onto the ACA markets over the last two years.
Many of those thousands of people were sicker and more expensive than the remaining insurers expected -- and they’re hurting results. With more of the nonprofits on the brink of folding, the situation for the remaining providers looks dire. Anthem Inc., for example, is facing an estimated $300 million in losses on its exchange business for individual plans this year, after turning a profit in 2014 and almost breaking even on the program in 2015, according to the company.
“These co-ops have attracted, we think, disproportionately high health-care utilizers,” Gary Taylor, an analyst with JPMorgan who follows the industry, said in a telephone interview. Their former members “are now enrolled in these for-profit health plans. That’s been a factor driving the deterioration in their profitability.”

co-ops1.png

“Are we in an Obamacare ‘death spiral?’” health insurance consultant Robert Laszewski asked in a Sept. 9 bulletin to clients, where he described the grim scenario. In a death spiral, as options for coverage shrink, insurers attract increasingly sick patients and suffer losses. That forces them to raise rates, driving away healthy, profitable customers. Facing more losses, they raise rates again, causing more healthy people to leave, and so on -- until all that’s left are high premiums and a small pool of the unwell.

co-ops.png
Small business in crisis

The companies in question may be small, but they represent an outsized share of the U.S. economy. According to the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council, they account for roughly 50 percent of gross domestic product and more than 50 percent of new job creation — a metric that's closely watched by the Fed in determining whether the economy can withstand a constriction in financing conditions. Yet even though they're contributing a great deal to the economy there remains ignorance about their financial health, Farrell added.
On average, the companies surveyed have just 27 days worth of cash reserves — or money to cover expenses if inflows suddenly stopped — according to the JPMorgan study, which analyzed 470 million transactions by 570,000 small business last year. Restaurants typically hold the smallest cash buffers, with just 16 days of reserves, while the real-estate sector boasts the biggest, at 47 days.
Small businesses attempting to expand (or just keep their head above water) may find it difficult to build up reserves, with daily income outpacing expenditure by just $7, according to JPMorgan's study.

buffer.png
small business and middle class

The CEO of Gallup.com, perhaps the nation’s oldest and most trusted polling company, wrote an op-ed, drawing from fresh polling data, that should give every American pause.
According to Jim Clifton:

The percentage of Americans who say they are in the middle or upper-middle class has fallen 10 percentage points, from a 61% average between 2000 and 2008 to 51% today.

According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, 65% of all new jobs are created by small businesses, not large ones.

Here’s the crisis: The deaths of small businesses recently outnumbered the births of small businesses. The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the total number of business startups and business closures per year crossed for the first time in 2008.

China is still a big problem

A warning indicator for banking stress rose to a record in China in the first quarter, underscoring risks to the nation and the world from a rapid build-up of Chinese corporate debt.
China’s credit-to-gross domestic product “gap” stood at 30.1 percent, the highest for the nation in data stretching back to 1995, according to the Basel-based Bank for International Settlements. Readings above 10 percent signal elevated risks of banking strains, according to the BIS, which released the latest data on Sunday.
The gap is the difference between the credit-to-GDP ratio and its long-term trend. A blow-out in the number can signal that credit growth is excessive and a financial bust may be looming.

Put another way

The Bank for International Settlements warned in its quarterly report that China’s "credit to GDP gap" has reached 30.1, the highest to date and in a different league altogether from any other major country tracked by the institution. It is also significantly higher than the scores in East Asia's speculative boom on 1997 or in the US subprime bubble before the Lehman crisis.
China’s total credit reached 255pc of GDP at the end of last year, a jump of 107 percentage points over eight years. This is an extremely high level for a developing economy and is still rising fast .
Outstanding loans have reached $28 trillion, as much as the commercial banking systems of the US and Japan combined. The scale is enough to threaten a worldwide shock if China ever loses control. Corporate debt alone has reached 171pc of GDP, and it is this that is keeping global regulators awake at night.

Real Estate: How China keeps the party going

Average new home prices in China's 70 major cities rose 9.2 percent in August from a year earlier, accelerating from a 7.9 percent increase in July, an official survey from the National Bureau of Statistics showed Monday. Home prices rose 1.5 percent from July.

But according to Donna Kwok, senior China economist at UBS, the importance of the property sector to China's overall economic health, posed a challenge. It contributes up to one-third of GDP as its effects filter through to related businesses such as heavy industries and raw materials.

"On the one hand, they need to temper the signs of froth that we are seeing in the higher-tier cities. On the other hand, they are still having to rely on the (market's) contribution to headline GDP growth that property investment as the whole—which is still reliant on the lower-tier city recovery—generates…so that 6.5 to 7 percent annual growth target is still met for this year," Kwok told CNBC's "Street Signs."

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

veto

President Obama on Friday vetoed legislation that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia in U.S courts, setting up a high-stakes showdown with Congress.

“I recognize that there is nothing that could ever erase the grief the 9/11 families have endured," Obama wrote in his veto message. "Enacting JASTA into law, however would neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks."

Obama’s move opens up the possibility that lawmakers could override his veto for the first time with a two-thirds vote in both chambers.

Republican and Democratic leaders have said they are committed to holding an override vote, and the bill’s drafters say they have the support to force the bill to become law.

The Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) unanimously passed through both chambers by voice vote.

up
0 users have voted.

Thumb's picture

It's as if John Podesta doesn't exist or the Panama Papers were never leaked.

up
0 users have voted.

"Polls don't tell us how well a candidate is doing; Polls tell us how well the media is doing." ~ Me

snoopydawg's picture

image_185.jpeg

I have no idea how people can overlook the things that Hillary has done her entire political career such as her Iraq vote, her support of the military actions in Afghanistan, Libya and Syria which has seen millions of people either killed or displaced.
Her support of the coup in Honduras which has made the country more corrupt and violent.
The coup in Ukraine and the support for the neo nazis.
And especially what she and Bill have done to the people in Haiti.
But somehow those people call these words right wing talking points, don't know about it or even worse, know about all of this and more but don't care.
image_186.jpeg

up
0 users have voted.

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

Not going there right now, as I hope to eat dinner soon as would rather not do so dripping sewage. Any hints from the Intrepid Traveler?

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

up
0 users have voted.

This clip is way below your usual standard. The Democrats have not moved left except rhetorically in a way that you'd have to be a GOS front pager to take seriously. Tim Kaine is not of the left. There is no moderately liberal agenda that could have passed. Not one Republican vote for Romneycare.

On a number of significant issues including social security and health care the majority of Americans are to the left of both parties. Democrats are losing because they aren't saying anything to excite their base and bitter experience suggests they don't mean the little they do say. What about all the independents and young voters who went enthusiastically for Bernie and who may or may not drag themselves to the polls to vote for Hillary?

And Hillary telling Republicans to save their party by voting against Trump isn't doing a lot for down ticket Dems either.

up
0 users have voted.

I was more interested in the first 2/3rd of the video.

I don't have to agree with everything someone says to recognize that they can be right about something.
That's what always bugged me about TOP.

up
0 users have voted.

We need to be discussing how to keep her from destroying the nation with her greed.

up
0 users have voted.

Vowing To Oppose Everything Trump Attempts.

I have no idea how to impact a sitting President and I don't know anyone who does. During the ACA, people called, emailed, wrote, demonstrated, etc. I personally called or emailed both my Senators and my Rep and the White House at least once a week for months. And the response liberals got was sarcasm and scolding from Obama, Rahm, Gibbs and other denizens of the Obama administration. Obama would not even meet with the House Progressive Caucus until the terms of the ACA were locked in. During the town meeting era, he told us to sit down and shut up and get out of his way while he did the important stuff because the strong public option that he campaigned on as the only way to keep down costs, was "only a sliver."

So, again, if you know how to make the POTUS do anything he or she doesn't already want to do, or how to stop a POTUS from doing what he or she wants to do, I would appreciate specifics.

We may already be FUBAR, which is my biggest political fear. If we still have any chance at all, though, we need to abandon things that are fictitious pacifiers, like "make me do it" and start dealing with reality.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

Form a united front with the anti-war, anti-surveillance, anti-trade-deal, anti-bankster, anti-Beltway-elite countercurrents on the Right.

up
0 users have voted.

the greater threat to world peace, Russia or the USA? The answer is quite obvious to anyone who has not been bamboozled by "Western" media conglomerates. The SVR and GRU are in no way comparable to the CIA in the amount of damage they have done, and are now doing to other nations.

TOP's loyalists seem to have no idea of the extent to which their opinions have been, and are being manipulated.

up
0 users have voted.

native

Amanda Matthews's picture

"going all Godwin" on everyone BUT this clown was a part of a group that were absolute masters of manipulating the masses. The manipulation starts with the lies that they tell while taking 'power'.

***
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/goering.asp
***

up
0 users have voted.

I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks

Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa

thanatokephaloides's picture

Oh good grief, I HATE using this as an example and I know it's
"going all Godwin" on everyone BUT this clown was a part of a group that were absolute masters of manipulating the masses. The manipulation starts with the lies that they tell while taking 'power'.

It's high time and then some to give "Godwin's Law" a well deserved retirement on a sunny beach in the Caribbean somewhere. Smile

I am 58 years of age; Counselor Mike Godwin is 60. When we were in school, members of "The Greatest Generation" ran the effing joint. They were the teachers, the administrators, the mayors, the police chiefs, the Governors, the Legislators, the Presidents. These people (or at least the males among them) actually held the original Nazis and Fascists in their own hot little hands. Therefore, folks our age could afford the luxury of "Godwin's Law", because any real threat in the fascistic direction would be identified as such by those who knew what it really was. (Example: the political neutralization and defeat of Senator Joe McCarthy, who was neutralized by members of this very generation.)

Today, fewer than 1% of that American generation is still living among us. The few who are left are far too old and frail to fight any more battles. But we who are their descendents have inherited an obligation from them: Never again! And it is our duty to that obligation, the just and rightful obligation of all humanity, to snuff out fascism in its earliest manifestations whenever we see it. And to do that, we need to be free to make that identification, in public, when it's appropriate.

The day and age we could wallow in the "Godwin's Law" luxury are over.

up
0 users have voted.

"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar

"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides

Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Nazi analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazism or Hitler approaches 1"[2][3]—​​that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler or Nazism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

And I never gave a fig about it anyway.

If we have to pretend to repeal it in order to have people feel free to point out who is behaving badly, then I hereby repeal it.

up
0 users have voted.
riverlover's picture

I want no references to my lastname.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

LA Times: Hillary Clinton campaign wants debate moderator to correct any lies

[...] The campaign released a long list of Trump statements that were ruled false by fact checkers, such as his claim he opposed the 2003 Iraq war before it started or that Clinton wants to abolish the 2nd Amendment.

"Any candidate who tells this many lies clearly can’t win the debate on the merits," Palmieri said.

She added, “His level of lying is unprecedented in American politics."

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/debate
5.to engage in argument or discussion, as in a legislative or public assembly:

Trump has said moderators shouldn't try to correct the candidates.

"I don’t think you want that," he told Fox News on Thursday. "No, I think you have to have somebody that just lets ’em argue it out."

"it"? What is this "it" he speaks of? Will they have corners to go to at the end of each round like a boxing match or what?

Thanks
Peace & Love

up
0 users have voted.

how much the moderators know and how fast the moderators think on their respective feet?

Isn't that what post-game commentary is for? Isn't that what MSNBC and CNN already do for Hillary 24/7?

up
0 users have voted.

to correct Trump's lies herself? Insisting that moderators to do it for her seems to indicate a certain lack of confidence.

up
0 users have voted.

native

riverlover's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

I have never held public office, but my activities have been variously recorded in newspapers, op eds, public speeches, and so forth.
But when I think of politicians and their "record", I think of their voting record, or going on the record speaking to the House, the Senate, or the press.
I guess I am splitting hairs, but publicly recorded history as a private citizen is a little bit different from a public servant's record.
Trump has none, Hillary's is shitty.
Discuss.
Please talk me down.

up
0 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

Sorry, can't talk you down. All I can say is, vote against evil. Always.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

snoopydawg's picture

As Jill Stein said,"We know what Trump says he will do but we know what Hillary has done"
That is the problem I have with Hillary. I know what she has done since she was a lawyer at the Rose law firm when she laughed about how she got her client a not guilty verdict for raping the 12 years old girl.
The many accusations against her and Bill when they lived in Oklahoma and when he was the governor.
Her actions in getting a lot of heinous bills passed when she was FLOTUS.
Her votes in congress.
Her actions when she was Secretary of State which is the most telling of what actions she will take in regards to the military if she becomes president.
The actions she, Bill and her foundation did to Haiti.
And the many times she has said what she has done was a mistake.
Sorry, I can't talk you down either.
Shitty is the polite word

up
0 users have voted.

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

riverlover's picture

I sense a new movement, still a-birth.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

that is so infuriating. Trump has no "record", but today's politics would suggest his support or non-support for anything mattered to the country.
For a fact, mine usually didn't.

up
0 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

aa.jpg
aa1.jpg

up
0 users have voted.

Holy cow, look at that average wage! How much of that was averaged from CEOs earning thousands a hour?

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Hawkfish's picture

It is really showing that the populations as a whole (black vs white) had an increasing gap in the share of national income. In other words, under Obama, there was a shift in national income towards white wage earners.

The Gini coefficient is more sensitive to the shape of the distribution. That graph shows that even as the black share of income decreased, it was distributed even more unfairly within the black community. In other words, not only did blacks take home less of national income, but even that lower amount got redistributed towards higher income black professionals (including Picketty's "super-managers" which you call CEOs), resulting in even more loss of income for lower-income black wage earners.

up
0 users have voted.

We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg

Thanks, yes, appreciate the explanation and totally agree, even though I know nothing of this myself. Just thinking that if that was the median wage, instead of everything being sucked up to the relative few, things would be a lot different all round... even with the increasing disparity noted, to which I obviously object.

Edit: and in that case, perhaps the very greediest and most ruthless would not now be trying to take it all just for themselves via Trojan Horse 'trade deals' illegally and unconstitutionally giving all rights/domestic law/governance to such destructive hostiles.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

snoopydawg's picture

and she finally decides to ask for an investigation into why the DOJ had failed to indict any Wall Street executives that had been referred to it for potential criminal prosecution by the FCIC?
Gee Elizabeth what's the rush? Holder was the head of the DOJ for over 6 years and he was the person who was in charge of the investigations.
And I'm sure that you know that he did hold them accountable. He fined a few of the banks millions although they had made billions in profits but no one had to admit any wrongdoing.
And Elizabeth, did you vote to confirm Lynch as the new head of the DOJ knowing that she investigated the bank that got caught laundering money for the drug cartels and again not one person was referred for criminal prosecution.

I'm sorry Elizabeth but you have lost your credibility with me when instead of endorsing the candidate that holds the values that you say you stand for and instead endorsed the one who is against your values.
And Obama, I don't even know what to say after you said this:
"Enacting JASTA into law, however would neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks." That wasn't the reason why people want to sue Saudi Arabia, you idiot. It was to hold them responsible for aiding and abetting the Saudi terrorists. But you know this, don't you? Just like you know that they are financing the terrorists groups that attacked other countries as do our other allies.
You helped withhold the evidence in those 28 pages that showed that the some members of the Saudi government were complicit in the 'attacks' on this country for over 15 years and your excuse for vetoing the bill is because you think we are dumb enough to buy your excuse that it "won't stop terrorists attacks"?
Isn't that the job of the over 800 private contractors that are helping you illegally spy on us for?
Yes illegally because The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
It's my understanding that in order to overturn this amendment, then it will need a constitutional amendment to do so. Not a bunch of paid off congress members voting to do so.
And if this bill opens doors for people who have been attacked by the United States to be able to sue the United States then I'm for that. Maybe it would finally get the United States to stop killing innocent civilians who have nothing to do with the war on terror which is just a scam on the American people.
I celebrated the day when Bush and Cheney left office and I will celebrate the day that you do too.
You have done a lot of damage to the people in this country because millions lost their homes and pensions and you didn't hold anyone accountable for that or help those people. You have done a lot of damage to the people in the Middle East and if you get the TPP passed then you will do more damage to the people in this country and others then Clinton did when he passed NAFTA.

up
0 users have voted.

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

Applauds loudly.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

snoopydawg's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

Thank you (yet again) snoopydawg!

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

riverlover's picture

I am with you, Solidarity. And peace, something very few have lived through.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

Hell, I was jumping up and down CHEERING! My wife knows I'm wound a bit tight, but I just re-proved it to her.
WELL said, Snoopydawg!

up
0 users have voted.

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

snoopydawg's picture

I am so disgusted with Obama and the people in this country who say that he has been the best president since FDR.
These people write that he has ended two wars and hasn't started any new ones.
Or they stayed quiet when he continued to do the same things that they were against when Bush was president.
Or they have forgotten that he hasn't brought any charges against the bankers or the war criminals.
And are now supporting Hillary even though they know that she will continue everything Obama has done and more while they refuse to see that she IS A WARMONGER!
Too many people in this country approve of our actions in the Middle East either because they believe that the military is fighting for our freedoms and to protect our country or that they don't know that terrorists were created by our government and our allies.
It's just so damned mind boggling, isn't it?

up
0 users have voted.

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

...It's just so damned mind boggling, isn't it?

So much of the corporate media is propaganda intended to boggle minds into subservience to whatever 'their betters' desire...

What will we do once the internet is controlled by them, as the handing-over process has already begun with the privatization of Domain Names by Obama and dirty judge's rulings such as that allowing Google to demonetize/remove Youtube content (news) corporations don't like?

Personally, I need an alternative to Youtube, both to use and to promote so far as I can in comments, and there were some listed in comments by someone on here, which I can't locate and thought I'd saved but can't find in my drafts.

And we need actual news, such as Redacted Tonight, to at least twin on one or more of those alternatives so that material censored on Youtube can still be publicly viewed before the whole mess goes down.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

riverlover's picture

My meteor tee is in the mailbox, reminder.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

1. Putin. I used to post on a board where many DNC/Third Way shills posted, as well as many liberals. There, liberal posters have, for years, been met with accusations of loving Putin. And, now, the DNC and Third Way "Democrats" there as well as in real life are claiming Putin has been interfering with the primary and the general campaigns against Hillary. I note that coincidence as a fact, not a theory. What it means, I leave to those more creative than I. The only thing I'm saying is that I am not a fan of red baiting.

2. Warren (and other members of Congress). During the primary campaign, I learned that the Senate average for a bill written by a Senator that becomes law is all of 2.5 bills a year and maybe zero amendments. Moreover, even that paltry number may consist of nothing more than re-naming a post office or remembering the American revolution (thanks, anyway, Hillary, but the fireworks and parades usually suffice to remind me). (Sanders did get some great amendments passed in his 24 years in Congress, but not many. In general, we need to set the bar higher for everyone.)

Elizabeth Warren has done a lot of self-righteous yammering of applause lines, both during televised Senate hearings and on the campaign trail for herself and others (cough, Alison Grimes, Hillary Clinton, cough). Since 2010, however, I haven't been as appreciative of political applause lines as I was when younger and much more ready to fall in love. Now, I'm looking for actual accomplishments that make more a difference in the lives of Americans than being allowed the privilege of applauding Warren during televised hearings.

So, what has Warren accomplished in her almost four years in the Senate, other than establishing a reputation for herself as a "take no prisoners" liberal firebrand? Let's take the 113th Congress, for example: Bills Introduced 15, the 4th lowest among Senate Democrats; tied with 1 other. Bills passed: zero. If that is representative of her almost four years--and I believe it is: At a salary of $174,000 per year, that's almost $700,000 just for her salary for zero (count 'em, zero) bills that she wrote that got passed. And that's before we pay for Warren's office space, the light bill the phone bill and, oh, her staff and their space, phones, light bills, travel expenses, etc. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/elizabeth_warren/412542/report-...

Oh, and while Warren gets high marks for writing bipartisan bills, even though none have passed, she gets low marks on voting in a bipartisan manner. IOW, she wants to maximize the chances of her own bills passing, even though they don't, but she wants to keep her voting record pristine. Well, I guess a pristine yea and nay record, plus applause lines is better than nothing.

With that record of actual "accomplishment" in the private sector, where most of us have to struggle, she would have been applying for unemployment after one year or less. In the United States Senate, though, she's some kind of liberal heroine legend. God, we're easy. If I had been that easy in high school, I probably would have had a hell of a lot more fun in school, or an STD, whichever came first. Now, multiply what we spend on Warren per year by 100 and then do a counterpart calculation for the House. But, of course, it's "entitlements" that are killing us. Damned all those useless eaters, anyway. Thank heaven we don't give them a cost of living increase when food prices go up. That was genius! /acid sarcasm

Anyway, all in all, excuse me if I didn't applaud Warren a whole lot, even before she failed to endorse Sanders, then hit the campaign trail hard for Hillary, to even more applause from Democrats and media.

3. Podesta. IIRC, Game Change claims that Hillary got Podesta to found Center for American Progress, yet another Third Way think tank. I am certain that Game Change stated that Hillary thought that Democrats needed more think tanks. (That's our Hills all the way! Find a parade, push its actual leaders out of the way, get in front of it and then pretend you're suited to lead.)

4. Repeal of Glass, Steagall (v. the Financial Services Modernization Act of 2000). I don't know why people keep focusing on repeal of Glass, Steagall without mentioning the FSMA of 2000. Yes, the Clinton White House lobbied Democratic Senators hard for repeal, so that Bubba could sign it, secure in the knowledge that he could later claim a "veto-proof majority," which is one of his favorite ploys/plays. (Of course, Bubba could have lobbied Democratic Senators instead for a filibuster and making sure cloture never happened.) However, the FSMA of 2000, for which his White House also lobbied hard for the same reason, was a much more direct cause of the 2008 crash in the US, the UK, Spain, Portugal and Greece.

The FSMA of 2000 left mortgage derivatives unregulated and crap mortgage derivatives figured directly and hugely in the 2008 collapse, while Gramm, Leach, Blilely figured incidentally and to a lesser degree. Focusing solely on Glass Steagall allows economists that suck up to the Clintons (cough, Krugman, among others,cough) to rebut. Citing the White House involvement in the combination of Gramm, Leach, Blilely and the FSMA of 2000, however, makes their tap dancing much more difficult, if not impossible.

To review, Sanders voted for that bill in the House, but it was a Senate compromise, after passage by the House, that poisoned it. Moreover, it did not pass as a stand-alone bill, but got folded into a 2000-page package that supposedly had to pass or Republicans would shut down government, something then considered unthinkable. Clinton signed it in January of 2000, practically on his way out the door, as a parting gift to Wall Street and thousands of others. (Heck, he still had to pay for his Presidential library, get those speaking fees, fund the Clinton Foundation and make sure Hillary's campaigns got money!)

During the 2016 debates, Hillary had the brass to hit Sanders for voting for the FSMA (and, of course, without mentioning Bubba's role or the threat of shutown)! As First Lady in 1999 and 2000, Hillary neither opposed the FSMA nor was eligible to vote for it. However, the notion that she would even have considered voting against it had she been in the Senate then is downright Hillarious, especially now that she has promised to give Bubba a huge role in fiscal matters in her administration. But, hypocrisy, too, is "our" Hills.

Edited to add a fifth point.

5. Suing Saudi Arabia. Sovereign immunity is a doctrine created by courts long long ago to protect kings from legal liability for their acts and omissions. Now, of course, it shields entire governments. To give permission to sue Saudi Arabia, Obama would have had to make inroads into the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Like torture, that invites others in other nations to do to us what we do. Now, why would Obama want to risk exposing the U.S. government to lawsuits from citizens we have injured? Good grief, the drone killings at weddings alone would cost us a bundle. So, no, Obama did not side with Saudi Arabia, per se, though I have little doubt he would have. He protected the US, which has done more damage abroad than Saudi Arabia. Unless you count oil prices, but we don't punish people for getting rich, either. Au contraire, mon frère!

Dash 1

Help

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

Yes we are hearing a lot about how Putin is the bad guy from interfering with the election, not honoring the temporary cease fire in Syria, invading both Crimea and Ukraine and being so aggressive that the United States and NATO need to put troops in 20 countries that surround Russia.
People are buying this propaganda too. I recently spoke to someone about how if Hillary is elected then war with Russia is inevitable. He parroted the talking points you and I mentioned.

I too have been asking if Warren has gotten any bills passed or has she just been yammering
. She does a great job yammering, but look at if she has gotten any results.
And people are seeing that she isn't who they thought she was after she didn't endorse Bernie and went with Hillary (and Bill) who does the things that she's against. We are going to make history by electing the first co-presidents ever. Smile

Hillary was instrumental in getting a lot of Bill's agenda passed such as welfare reform, the crime bill and other bills that helped the banks and hurt we the people.
Plus if he was hesitant about bombing or invading countries, she encouraged him to do it.
I have a link if anyone needs it.

And just like Clinton needed the republican votes to pass the financial bills, he also needed them to pass NAFTA.

And IMO, the reason DWS didn't lose her job after losing both houses of congress and many state's governors was because Obama knew that he would need the republicans to pass the TPP and continue to pass any legislation that will help us.
Even when they were in the minority, he let them set his agenda.
He would pre-cave on a lot of bills or hide behind the 'mean' republicans.
Not one of them voted for the ACA and the democrats knew that they weren't going to, so why did they let them water down the ACA saying that they were trying to get the republicans to vote for it?
And during the 6 months that they were working on it and we were calling, petitioning and emailing them to pass a decent health care bill, Obama had already made the deal with the insurance and pharmaceutical companies!
And still people say that he is The best president since FDR
Oh, and isn't his family beautiful?

up
0 users have voted.

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

And just like Clinton needed the republican votes to pass the financial bills, he also needed them to pass NAFTA.

The real evil of centrist Democrats: The Republican votes to pass NAFTA, Gramm, Leach, Bliley (repeal of Glass Steagall) and the Financial Services Modernization Act of 2000 were never the problem. The danger was the sixty vote requirement. With the POTUS/head of the Democratic Party, then Bill Clinton, lobbying Democrats hard, though, the Republicans got their way, though Democrats could have stopped them. And, to get a so-called veto proof majority to give himself cover, he really had to twist a lot or arms hard. But, bless his heart, he got 'er done, both times. (On culture war betraryals, like DADT and DOMA, his bs excuse was avoiding a Constitutional amendment that was never going to pass and get ratified anyway.)

up
0 users have voted.

Thank so much, HenryWallace!

Timely for me especially regarding Elizabeth Warren, as well. Since I've been paying attention to her, I've been admiring the lovely things she said in a limited area, discovering, among other things, that she's OK with GMOs, or at least the ruthless food-monopoly-seeking polluters who profit from poisoning the people and planet - doubly, as they stand to profit from patented GMO/nanotech 'medical fixes' for what they cause to human and domestic animal health and to hell with expendable wildlife they think they can replace with patented genetically engineered organisms.

And I've noticed that other than the admirable tirades against criminal bankster greed/depredation, not much seems to have been achieved, which may be due to to the Wall of Corruption. Just haven't been sure for some time whether or not she's hiding within it and only periodically parading a populist face in that area to fool the people into thinking that Bernie's not the only one fighting for sanity in at least some area of government. Never could figure out why anyone would have wanted her as President, since her good area seemed so limited, effectively (as far as I could see) to not crashing the market and economy by unrestrained greed and stupidity, preserving which also served the people she railed against, if their self-interest had only been that enlightened.

Edit: drat, will I ever actually reconstruct a sentence in full before noticing after hitting post that I haven't? Need that 2nd coffee...

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

history. A Republican for all those years? Really?

And when did she change? In 1995, several years into the first term of Bill Clinton, the first DLC President, the guy who campaigned on ending welfare as we know it; the guy responsible for DADT, the guy who signed NAFTA into law in 1994, after Poppy Bush left office without closing the deal.

And why did she change in 1995? Because she thought Democrats had become better for markets than Republicans!

Political affiliation

Warren voted as a Republican for many years, saying, "I was a Republican because I thought that those were the people who best supported markets".[22] According to Warren, she began to vote Democratic in 1995 because she no longer believed that to be true, but she states that she has voted for both parties because she believed that neither party should dominate.[34]

Then, there were Republicans who were teaching with her at Harvard until she went to Washington saying, "Don't worry about her. She's really still a conservative at heart." (Not exact words.) http://www.weeklystandard.com/elizabeth-warren-closet-conservative/artic...

She administered the TARP. Big whoop. She was supposedly responsible for the Dodd Frank legislation, which was weak, and the regulations did not get written until after she left D.C. The Daily Show even did a segment mocking it. Her big issue on financial "reform" seemed to be disclosure. I am a huge fan of disclosure, but disclosure alone is not enough.

Anyway, I had reservations from the first time I heard of her. My concerns were not allayed when she began exploring a Senate run and posters I'd considered DNC shills, posters who never praised a liberal, were gushing over her. Thing is, posters I considered very much like me were gushing, too. So, at some point, I became quietly uncertain and adopted a "wait and see" attitude.

I think, at some point, liberals were hoping she would run because who else was there before Sanders flashed his ankle circa 2014? Anyway, when Warren signed that letter all Democratic female Senators signed, urging Hillary to run, I was not surprised. I was not surprised that she did not endorse Sanders in the primary. And I am not surprised to see her campaigning her heart out on behalf of Hillary. Finally, I am saddened, though not surprised, that she gets to be some sort of Democratic icon simply by showboating during televised hearings. The left is so easy because it is desperate for heroes in office and there are almost none!

Last, but most importantly, I recently saw a T shirt bearing the legend, "Life is too short for weak coffee." I could not agree more. And, it also takes me at least two mugs before I am awake. Unfortunately, I have not learned to hold off doing stuff until after I've finished the second mugful.

up
0 users have voted.
riverlover's picture

something then considered unthinkable

So many of us have thought it all. May have been unspeakable in polite company, but we are NOW THERE.

edit: a before e.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.