How to win a Grotesque

First off, relax if you don't know what a Grotesque is. A Grotesque is a chess puzzle wherein White fights with a much smaller force against a much larger and well positioned force. Usually it's an "End-game" problem, after much of the battle has already been fought and the White player is fully expected to lose.

The first thing to remember when you're in a grotesque scenario, is to remember, to not take it so freaking seriously. Yes, it's a dire situation, but panicking will only result in you losing faster. You have to look at what you CAN control, and what you can do to hurt the other side. You're not going to necessarily win, but you sure as hell can do major damage, and perhaps even eke out a victory.

First, you have to change your mindset. We are not the losers, despite the enemy yelling at us non-stop 24-7 that nobody is on our side and that we're going to lose. That of course is what they want us to do, so by simply not doing what you are told, you've already won a minor victory. Yes, we're up against a situation where we have been outmaneuvered time and time again by divide and conquer tactics, but what we have left is a rock solid core of those who do not bow to lies.

Second, cultivate the "Wasp" mentality. It's already working, and yet the PTB don't see it. Every time they talk about how evil we are here, and every time they make reference to us, they paint us as their "Wasp". Think about what happens when a Wasp is inside a moving automobile. Everybody panics. Not because of the damage that can be done, but because of the perceived threat. Yes, this is the exact same reason Terror attacks are so effective on the Americans. They can't REALLY hurt us, but they will scream, and jerk the country around trying to destroy the Wasp, which will probably fly free unharmed from the wreckage of the vehicle when all is said and done.

Third, Hit em Where They Ain't. Rule one for Guerilla Warfare, and also the most important rule for battling in any asymmetrical situation. The enemy will ALWAYS have more resources to throw at any possible situation. As a result, you will have to choose your battles wisely. DO NOT throw away time, effort, materiel and morale by attacking fortified enemy positions. You won't win, and will just end up hurting your own positions. For example, don't bother trying to respond to DNC attacks on Sexism, Racism, LGBTQ Rights, or Religions. Those are VERY strongly fortified positions, and they will constantly attempt to make every single battle on those terms.

Fourth, Hit and Fade. This is one that's hard to adjust to mentally, but needs to be emphasized, especially when you win a small victory. The temptation to stick around and solidify the position will be enormous. For example, say you win a small victory, like Abbie Hoffman Did with the water project he protested. He did NOT stick around and attempt to make water the source of a new political movement. He did not make the issue about water, local politics, and all the baggage associated with him. Instead he moved on to a different target, which had the potential to cause lasting harm to the FBI. He got documents to the people who HAD the ability to make change. Unfortunately, the media had been co-opted at this point, (They learned FAST from Watergate) And as such the damage from the revelation of COINTELPRO was minimized. The concept however, was solid, just hadn't obeyed the next rule.

Fifth, Don't repeat yourself. If you Win, expect that tactic not to work again. Feel free to try, if you think the enemy is dumber than you are, but chances are you just won against a position they hadn't fortified. Attempting to attack it again will result in the full retaliation. The Enemy is not as dumb as they think YOU are.

These are just my Wargaming/Military rules of thumb for asymmetrical conflict. It's cheerfully cribbed from the best, like Mao and Guevara. As Von Clausewitz said, War is Just Politics carried out through other means. I consider that to be an equation. As such both sides are equal, and the lessons of war can be applied to politics.

So, if you're interested in playing a few grotesque scenarios, just to get the feel of losing without taking it to seriously, there's a wide variety of ways to get into it. There's of course the classic Chess Problems, Which are the simplest way. If you're into more classic gaming, I recommend trying a tabletop game like Advanced Squad Leader, which often have scenarios that require the requisite thought. If you're more of the video game fan, there's plenty of interesting strategy games out there, most of them made by indie developers by modding popular games which usually are obsessed with US style overwhelming force. I recommend Europa Barbarorum for the historical fans, Jagged Alliance 2 v.1.13 for the Modern Fans, and XCOM 2: Long War 2 for those interested in a scenario involving an enemy with total control over the media and infrastructure, where even the populace for the most part are against you... Smile (My personal favorite. Still Can't win in Ironman Mode, but doesn't stop me trying.)

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGIDNPTIx08]

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

dervish's picture

It's not truly a "grotesque" scenario, because ultimately the Russian player has the advantage, if he can survive the first year or two. The idea is to let the German player grind themselves down in a series of costly victories, and then count on higher replacement rates to eventually overpower him in the long run. The Russian player will almost always win, if the players are evenly matched.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

detroitmechworks's picture

@dervish Of course, my personal favorite of the AH games was the SF game, "Time Agent" where the entire point of the game was to make it so time travel was NEVER invented... but only after your team was on top. Smile

Never played Stalingrad, but It does sound like an interesting game. Will have to look it up next time I'm at a gaming library.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

@detroitmechworks
Stalingrad. It was one of the earliest of AH's games. (Maybe Kriegspiel and Outdoor Adventure were their originals? I don't remember anymore.) Very simple game mechanics, compared to something like 3rd Reich or ASL.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

detroitmechworks's picture

@UntimelyRippd In the mid-90s when most were out of print. (My folks highly disapproved of it, and as a result, only was allowed fantasy wargaming, and only for a very brief period. I was born in 1976...)

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

gendjinn's picture

@detroitmechworks It's been a massive hit with the Millennials at work, I wish they'd bring it back into print but Hasbro owns it now and that is that.

GMT games if you haven't been checking them out have some fantastic old school hex games and a slew of card-driven strategic games such as The Napoleonic Wars in pretty much every single historical period.

up
0 users have voted.

@dervish
The Russian Campaign.

For the Russian, it's all about surviving through the first 18 months. For the German, it's all about surviving everything after the first 18 months, if you've failed to knock the Russians out.

Thus, it starts out as a Grotesque for the Russian -- but if the Russian can hold Stalingrad and Leningrad into December '42 or thereabouts, it transforms into a Grotesque for the German

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

detroitmechworks's picture

@UntimelyRippd I admit I'm a bit Anglocentric in my WW2 studies. It's only recently that I've learned much about the eastern front, mainly because there's so much less attention paid to it, even though it's where the war was won.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

dervish's picture

@UntimelyRippd It was one of SPI's "monster games". I only played it once, on a team, but it took us weeks.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

Steven D's picture

And an apt word for our situation - a grotesque indeed.

Thank you for this. We need to think of tactics and strategies that are unfamiliar for many of us. We are fighting an asymmetrical conflict.

up
0 users have voted.

"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott

detroitmechworks's picture

@Steven D Making alliances, etc... but the truth remains that until such things bear fruit, there needs to be action against the enemy. (Rethugs, DNC, Etc...) Failure to do so will result in them solidifying their positions even further. Even with such alliances, do we really want political "Cannon Fodder"? That's playing by the Establishment's rules, and they have far more troops to throw away.

I respectfully suggest that playing politics by their rules (MSM, Establishment "Ally" Polticians, etc...) will only throw away energy and time against a target that will at BEST result in a tiny gain. (Essentially, using WW1 tactics...)

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rblfKREj50o]

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

dervish's picture

@detroitmechworks It was the most successful bloodless (nearly) revolution that I'm aware of.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

detroitmechworks's picture

@dervish Still can't believe the DNC is trying to equate their little pink hats with peoples who rose against the greatest military powers, admittedly with mixed successes, but still far more courageous than anything one of those pampered neoliberals has done in their entire life.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

dervish's picture

@detroitmechworks Solidarnosc is given here. The Cold War victory is attributed exclusively to Reagan's military spending,and while that was a factor, few know the real story. Solidarnosc was an active poison pill that destroyed Communism in Europe. It literally flipped the consciousness of Eastern Europe.

Pink hats, Resistance, etc, God bless them, aren't anywhere near what Solidarnosc built.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

thanatokephaloides's picture

@dervish

Solidarnosc was an active poison pill that destroyed Communism in Europe. It literally flipped the consciousness of Eastern Europe.

I knew that while it was happening.

Of course, my late teens and early twenties were rich in Polish people. It is from this period of my life that I learned "there are more Poles in Denver than in Gdansk". This is a Colorado adaptation of the saying "there are more Poles in (Mil)'Waukee than in Warsaw". Cars around here had Solidarnosc bumper stickers. Lech Walesa was a household name and much venerated. (He was a freakin' rock star!) People invented snacks which they nicknamed "solid darn nosh".

Of course, it didn't hurt that I grew up Irish Catholic, and the sitting Roman Pontiff, John Paul II (Karol, Cardinal Wojtyla) was a Pole. The Holy Father did a lot more of the heavy lifting, both as Pope and before, than Ronnie Ray-Gun ever thought of doing.

Smile

up
0 users have voted.

"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar

"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides

dervish's picture

@thanatokephaloides but in the final stages, Polish doctors and lawyers could earn ten times more money smuggling goods back and forth to Vienna and Turkey than they could at building their version of Socialism. That was the final nail in the coffin, the establishment no longer believed in the vision, and Communism disappeared, overnight.

I was there, it was incredible.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

detroitmechworks's picture

repeatedly, here's a prime example:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/world/europe/hackers-came-but-the-fre...

The Establishment is rapidly coalescing around defense on any "Hacked" or "Leaked" documents. Essentially, they're going Octopus on that particular tactic. Even if you're happy with the results of the election, the fact remains that if there is wrongdoing in the future, it will be buried under an avalanche of fake and edited documents that purport far worse, to "Fool Hackers".

Bottom Line: They're going after the internet, and the power it has. They're deliberately creating bad information and hiding the truth under layers of obfuscation, all under the lie that Russia hacked the election.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

detroitmechworks's picture

Totally off topic, but I decided to head on over to TOP to see what all the fuss was about... First time in almost a year...

Right on the top of the c99 comments (Search: c99) is a nice little comment by one of my old debating partners who has decided to state that I am a beggar who stopped posting at DKOS ONLY when the money dried up.

I am laughing, because it is such a gross distortion of events that I honestly cannot believe that he's getting props for it.

Anyone who cares to look at my history there and my history here... oh you all know it, and I don't have to bother going into it. Full Disclosure: I did get some money from individuals at DKOS, as well as 2 months of housing assistance while I was looking for a place, AFTER Markos declared that anybody who was asking for money was a scammer.

Almost 2 years gone, and some guys can't let some shit go.

For those over there, who wanted a GBCW, I posted it here.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

thanatokephaloides's picture

@detroitmechworks

Anyone who cares to look at my history there and my history here... oh you all know it, and I don't have to bother going into it. Full Disclosure: I did get some money from individuals at DKOS, as well as 2 months of housing assistance while I was looking for a place, AFTER Markos declared that anybody who was asking for money was a scammer.

The most recced Diary I ever wrote over there was entitled "I need a little help -- But Please Send NO Money!"

I asked for a cast-off laptop. And got a rather nice one, all things considered. I am still exceedingly grateful for it. And typing this very Comment thereon.

That was back in the old pre-Ichabod days. Today, it seems that Markos only wants the wealthy and the materially secure on the website at all.

With all due respect to those who still command it, screw him. The parallels of "back the best and fuck the rest" with the $cientology crime syndicate are accumulating at a downright scary rate!

Bad

up
0 users have voted.

"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar

"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides

Dragonkat's picture

Complete with incendiary grenades and the biggest booms perk (May be a bit of a long war fan myself) Would certainly make my dream of the Democrat party dying in the nearest fire a bit easier too.

Though it brings to mind also a tangent question that's been bugging me, which i'm sure has come up in other posts too (I'll admit I haven't read c99 much the last few weeks). Everyone including her heinous has been saying they're part of "the resistance." But the question that keeps coming up for me is. "A resistance implies a fight for a change or an overthrow of the status quo. But if you're replacing their dictator with your dictator, what's changed?"

Or a shorter version colored by own personal bias. "The republicans have to go, obviously, but are the democrats and the potemkin progressive values they have the bigger threat and have to go first?"

For the record I firmly lump senator sheepdog Sanders in that crowd, if he allies himself with the party for any reason, he's an enemy far as i'm concerned. And I think his message of unity reeks about as much as a certain other speaker we both know.

In Xcom terms, (can't resist) what's it gonna take hack the network tower to show people the truth?

up
0 users have voted.

See, their morals, their code... it's a bad joke. Dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be.

-The Joker-

detroitmechworks's picture

@Dragonkat People don't want things to fundamentally CHANGE, they want improvements in their life, comparable to what the wealthy class gets.

If the Aliens in XCOM2 had just been a little smarter... and instead of disappearing people from the city centers, had gone with the poor disaffected as their victims, the well off in the city centers would have turned a blind eye. But they're aliens, after all, and they hit the rich where they live, and as such when that was revealed... hell yeah the upper class ALWAYS HATED THE EVIL ALIENS!!!!

Personally, I like to go with the Shinobi class along with Specialists. I like to get in, get out, and complete the objective, sometimes without firing a shot. (Have pulled it off about 4 or 5 times.)

Honestly, I think an American equivalent of the end-game in LW2 is not dissimilar to the end game in RL. The only way you get the upper classes on your side is when the entire rest of the lower class is united. The upper class will then of course, immediately claim they were always behind the revolution, and you'll get a new oligarch from the upper class... (Although the gene harvesting and avatar creation will continue, because we need those weapons against the NEXT alien threat! )

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.