Rice comes in all varieties, including black, also known as Imperial rice.

There is at least one variety, found in Washington D.C. that you won't see in your local grocery store: crooked Rice. What's crooked Rice? Anybody who was following the interminable Benghazi hearings (which, for your info ain't over yet) may remember Susan Rice of the National Security Apparatus (Obama's and Medusa's chief henchperson on national security matters). Susan Rice went on all 5 of the MSM Sunday talk shows days after the attack and knowingly lied about the cause--i.e., stating it was due to Islamic rage about an insulting video to the Prophet. She did this with a straight face, full of earnestness and conviction.

Trey Gowdy eliciting evidence of Rice's lies during one of the Benghazi hearings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYX-g6zmbwY

It wasn't until months or years after the fact that it was revealed what an accomplished liar Susan Rice was, and still is. I use the present tense because of the recent "unmasking" of Susan Rice for showing what she does--and of course lies about it.

H.A. Goodman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QJavW8If6g

Unmasking: revealing the name of a U. S. citizen whose identity is captured incidental to surveillance of a foreign power. This is a limited power of the higher echelons of the intelligence agencies--and the White House. Each intelligence collection agency has a certain but limited number of persons authorized to "unmask", i.e., reveal true identities of the U.S. citizen(s) involved. This is supposed to be done in the case where either a crime has been committed or illegal activities occurs between U.S. Citizen 1 (the "masked" name) and a foreign government or individual. To unmask a person's identity without expectation of revealing either a crime or foreign collusion is a felony.

Trump, as much as I dislike him, is still an American citizen, subjected to and protected by the same laws as the rest of us. About 6 weeks ago, he said inartfully, the Trump Tower was wiretapped. Fake News! Fake News! screamed the MSM. Crazy Trump! (That appellation may be fitting but doesn't mean he was incorrect about the claim.)

In fact, the cry of Fake News was repeated on '60 Minutes'. Oops! Then the other shoe dropped.

Reporter Cernovich scooped the Nation, giving the facts of the discovery of the unmasking and naming the perpetrator as none other that Seditious Susie Rice.

The information he released was already known by reporter Eli Lake of Bloomberg who just "sat" on it. This is a euphemistic way to say that Lake wouldn't have released the story until much later if at all.

Rice's involvement involvement came to light when a Trump staffer was checking on unmasking policies about the time Trump made his surveillance charge. The staffer noted that an unusual pattern of requests for unmasking had come from National Security Adviser Susan Rice. This was reported to superiors--and the information was leaked to Devin Nunes (R-CA), chairman of the Intelligence Oversight Committee. Then the news was presented to Trump at the WH. It is unclear whether Adam Schiff (D-NY) was to be notified about this although that is highly doubtful. Mr. Schiff, like most politicians, is an accomplished liar.

Cohen-Watnick was in the news last week after it was revealed that he was one of the White House officials who was in contact with House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes about surveillance that may have been conducted against Trump’s campaign. While Nunes has been heavily criticized for withholding information about his interactions with the White House, Rice’s involvement in the unmasking request does appear to support his concerns about potentially improper meddling by the Obama White House.

The question that now needs to be answered about Rice’s requests is whether she unmasked the Trump advisers out of legitimate national security concerns or for political reasons.

Joseph diGenova, a former U.S. attorney, believes it is the latter.

“This is now at a point where Ms. Rice and three other people are going to need lawyers. This is going to make the General Flynn look like a picnic. These folks are in very, very serious trouble,” diGenova said during an interview with WMAL radio station. Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/unmasked-susan-rice-requested-intellig...

Tucker Carlson has a nice summaryof the Watergate-like importance of this felonious activity.

Eli Lake was interviewed by Hannity (10:01) on background and ramifications.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7WmsWiporg width:450]

Let's travel in the Wayback Machine to the time of R. Nixon and Plumbers and Watergate. Watergate is the name given to a break-in at George McGovern's campaign headquarters in the Watergate office/apartment complex. The theft was discovered when one of the burglars forgetfully left tape over a door lock after the deed was done.

The amount of information yielded by the actual theft was trivial as was its importance. But it was the cover-up which brought Nixon down.

The Trump surveillance, by which I include his transition team, is far more complete and revealing than anything the Plumbers gleaned.

"It isn't the crime, it's the Cover-up." This is what is going to happen again. Can anyone believe Opaque Obama and Lying Loretta Lynch or Eric Holder or Hillary Klinton on anything they say will mitigate the mounting tidal wave about to smite Obama and his precious, illusional, legacy (other than ACA)?

These are indeed "interesting times". It is not unreasonable to assume that Trump is so enraged, that he will push Sessions into an investigation which will make Benghazi look like a game of hide and seek? Comey is a weak, opportunistic, self-important man. At the first sign of Comey's foot dragging on this coming investigation, Trump will promptly replace him with Trey Gowdy, whom it is rumored will replace Comey next year.

Rice's head will be first, but not last, on the block. Now that no one in the upper echelons of government can rely on Barack's Benevolent Bullshit obstruction, the fall out will be allowed to proceed without effective opposition. Democrats, you have done it to yourselves. Attrition has so depleted their numbers that the House of Representatives is under the complete control of Republicans. The Senate is a bit better. But not much.

Republicans, even anti-Trump Republicans, will relish the opportunity to drive knives into the Democrats. After skewering their ineffective opponents, Repugs will go back to their internal quarrels. Democrats should not mistake Republican disunity as a sign of growing promise for the Blue Team. The Democrats could possibly be wiped out. (yay).

Question: who was Susan Rice's boss?

Answer: that was a rhetorical question.

It IS WITHIN the realm of probability that Obama, while no longer in office, could be impeached. Impeachment is a punishment not only for serving governmental officials but also those no longer in government persons. Where is the love lost between Trump and Obama: maybe the Hubble telescope can detect it. It would take the massive radar telescope array in Arecibo to detect any positive sentiment between Trump and Clinton.

So Susan, how does it feel to be unmasked?