He was a bad man, or so they say...

I do not know if this Qassem Soleimani was a good or bad man, especially considering good and bad are relative terms to different parts of the world. Who the heck am I to judge?

What I do know is this, while VP Dumber was tweeting dumbass nonsense last Friday about how this Qassem Soleimani supposedly helped 11of the 12 hijackers (there were actually 19) transit Iran from Afghanistan, the US doesn't have one legal leg to stand on for being in Iraq over the last 17/18 years, in the first god damn place! Right?

I mean come on, shit, the lies that got this whole thing started have been obvious since day one. (The laws of physics don't change just because it's convenient.)

Gee if you invade a country, especially based on lies, and the population doesn't like you and gives you a bloody nose from time to time, don't go crying home to Mommie. Good heavens!

Every American killed since the illegal bombing of Afghanistan started in 2001, is on the US. Especially on every member of congress that voted on the unconstitutional legislation, AUMF, which gave GWB (and his successors) carte blanch to wage an illegal war on a “feeling”, all over the planet.

If Soleimani and or his forces killed American soldiers, well, they knew what they were in for by joining the military, especially after 9/11, and especially after learning that all the “justifications for war” were based on lies. It's on their commanders putting them in harms way because they didn't have the integrity to call out their chain of command on the bogus reason for the wars in the first place. And it's on themselves for not standing up to their chain of command as well.

Think for a moment, under our own constitution, not to mention the UN Charter, as well as international law, these so called wars, are wars of aggression, not pre-emptive defense.

Gee, by that stable super genius logic (Wiley Coyote anyone?) , I can go kill a cop, as a pre-emptive defense against that cop illegally killing unarmed citizens. And use as my defense, “he was a bad man”, “I saved lives!”, “Pre-emptive defense to prevent a crime” (killing unarmed suspects).

Gee, maybe if we hadn't committed major war crimes and crimes against humanity against the people of Iraq (and almost everywhere else...), fewer American lives would have been lost? Gee, maybe if we hadn't help overthrown their democratically elected prime minister in 1953, and then have to endure the brutality (CIA trained death squads) of the US supported Shaw of Iran for decades, things might be, just might be, a bit different today, no? But hey, oil profits...”Can't we take the oil?”

Here's some info about Soleiman:

From The GrayZone - Rania Khalek and Max Blumenthal discuss how the Trump administration's execution of top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani and Iraqi PMF commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis was a huge gift to ISIS and al-Qaeda. These military leaders defeated the so-called Islamic State, which was empowered by the US and its allies.

[video: https://youtu.be/vk7oZWnUVj4]

In summary, if it wasn't for Soleiman, the black flag of ISIS would be flying over numerous capitals in the ME. But hey, he was a bad man we're told by the “establishment”.

Share
up
27 users have voted.

Comments

Lookout's picture

Aren't they all? Our generals certainly are.

MSM will not admit his (nor Iran and Russia's) role in defeating ISIS (a Saudi creation in the first place). What an ill-informed populous we have.

The worst part to me is he was entrapped by a call from the US for negotiations.

Before the vote Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi told the parliament that he was scheduled to meet with Soleimani a day after his arrival to receive a letter from Iran to Iraq in response to a de-escalation offer Saudi Arabia had made. The U.S. assassinated Soleimani before the letter could be delivered by him. Abdul-Mahdi also said that Trump had asked him to mediate between the U.S. and Iran. Did he do that to trap Soleimani? It is no wonder then that Abdul-Mahdi is fuming.

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2020/01/iraqi-parliament-expels-foreign-mi...

up
29 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

RantingRooster's picture

@Lookout I saw something about that yesterday, but couldn't find it. (Dumbass me forgot to save the link). Thanks Drinks

up
9 users have voted.

C99, my refuge from an insane world. #ForceTheVote

@Lookout

The worst part to me is he was entrapped by a call from the US for negotiations.

Blood on a truce flag. Pompeo and Bolton should stand trial in the Hague for war crimes.

Trump has finally succeeded in making me ashamed of America.

up
15 users have voted.

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

mimi's picture

@The Voice In the Wilderness @The Voice In the Wilderness
John Bolton congratulates those involved in 'decisive' airstrike that killed Iranian general

Former national security advisor John Bolton on Friday congratulated those who led the airstrike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani.

Long in the making, this was a decisive blow against Iran's malign Quds Force activities worldwide," he tweeted of the strike ordered by President Trump that killed Soleimani and six others. "Hope this is the first step to regime change in Tehran."

considering Bolton said this in September Bolton was fired after disagreeing with Trump on Iran: Report

Bolton was fired after disagreeing with Trump on Iran: Report
The US president said he disagreed with Bolton, who 'forcefully' opposed easing of Iran sanctions, Bloomberg reports.
12 Sept 2019
The sacking of John Bolton, US President Donald Trump's former national security adviser, is tied to a fundamental disagreement over the possible easing of US sanctions on Iran, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday, citing three people familiar with the matter.

especially now as Bolton just announced he is willing to testify in the Senate's impeachment trial, if he is subpoenaed to do so.

Makes me wonder who is the President, tDrump or Polton? Is that a cock fight?

up
12 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@The Voice In the Wilderness

up
5 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Not Henry Kissinger's picture

@Lookout

The Iranians need to rewatch The Godfather.

DON CORLEONE: So, Barzini Trump will move against you first. He'll set up a meeting with someone that you absolutely trust, guaranteeing your safety. And at that meeting, you'll be assassinated.

Trump's nothing but a mafia thug at heart. Might as well have elected Al Capone.

up
17 users have voted.

The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?

CB's picture

@Not Henry Kissinger

[video:https://youtu.be/SeldwfOwuL8]

up
10 users have voted.
Mark from Queens's picture

@Not Henry Kissinger
Symbiosis Changed America”

...Word would soon begin to circulate that Cohn was battling AIDS. He denied it. He was also battling disbarment—under a cloud of fraud and ethical-misconduct charges. (Cohn, along with other misdeeds, had stiffed a client on a loan and altered the terms of a virtually comatose client’s will—in his hospital room—making himself its co-executor.)

Cohn tried to keep up a good face. But Trump, among other clients, began to shift his business elsewhere. “Donald found out about [Cohn’s condition] and just dropped him like a hot potato,” Cohn’s personal secretary, Susan Bell, was quoted as saying. (A White House spokesperson says this claim is totally false.)...

Cohn also had asked a favor of Trump: Could he give him a hotel room for his lover, who was dying of AIDS? A room was found in the Barbizon Plaza Hotel. Months passed. Then Cohn got the bill. Then another. He refused to pay. At some point, according to The New York Times’s Jonathan Mahler and Matt Flegenheimer, Trump would present Cohn with a thank-you gift for a decade of favors: a pair of diamond cuff links. The diamonds turned out to be fakes.

Tensions between the two became progressively strained. And the dying Cohn, as Barrett would describe him in those waning days, would say, “Donald pisses ice water.”

up
6 users have voted.

"If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:

THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS MUSIC"

- Kurt Vonnegut

ggersh's picture

tRump is only following orders from his masters, i.e. Adelson and company.
But as long as he profits from it he doesn't see himself as the puppet.

Anyone see the shadow of Epstein playing a part?

up
16 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

snoopydawg's picture

@ggersh

See my comment below with info on Epstein's death.

up
6 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

ggersh's picture

@snoopydawg @snoopydawg "I don't believe in coincidence? Neither do I.

up
11 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

CB's picture

@snoopydawg
and is hiding out somewhere in Israel. Ghislaine has joined him and they are enjoying the good life.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go9fVkbfW_0&feature=emb_logo]

Israel is a good place to emigrate for a convicted Jewish pedophile.

From Times of Israel:


Diaspora pedophiles increasingly use Israel as ‘a haven,’ activists charge

...
One of the country’s founding pieces of legislation, the Law of Return allows any Diaspora Jew to receive citizenship in Israel. But child rights activists contend there is a dark loophole to the law which allows Jewish pedophiles to effectively flee court-mandated supervision in their home countries and move to Israel with a clean slate.
...
“There’s a danger that Israel is becoming a safe haven for pedophiles and alleged perpetrators,” said Manny Waks, a survivor of child abuse and the founder of Kol V’Oz, an advocacy group addressing child sex abuse in the global Jewish community. “Of course, any criminal can flee to another country, but it’s about getting the visa to remain there. Because Israel welcomes all Jews, they’re protected from that perspective,” he said.
...

up
13 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@CB

She had been in the US for years and after Epstein's arrest she wasn't detained for some reason. Nor was she detained when he was first arrested and given that light sentence.'

Anyone think that the PTB didn't have a good reason to kill him? But it was after the big names dump came out. Surely there was enough info in those pages to start questioning a lot of people.

up
14 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

CB's picture

@snoopydawg
in Epstein's phone books. We don't know where the descriptions of the crimes to go along with those names are.

We also don't know where Epstein's dead man switch is. He would be very foolish not to have one. Possibly it was uncovered during searches and destroyed? That would allow TPTB to kill him and also be a reason for Epstein to kill himself.

If the dead man switch is still active it would allow Epstein to obtain outside help to surreptitiously spring him out of jail. I understand he had some pretty powerful people behind him - Mossad for one. This agency, with the help of their counterparts in the US, would have little trouble accomplishing this. The key person here is Epstein's brother. He claimed the body. I wonder where he is right now? I understand he is now a multimillionaire.

The whole autopsy situation stinks to high heaven.

up
12 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@CB

The woman who was pictured with Andrew gave either the court or her lawyer many names. I'd have to search my essays to find what I'm talking about. IIRC it talked about the ranch in New Mexico where lots of the names had ties with.

up
11 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Raggedy Ann's picture

gave us the coordinates to kill the fellow. Who's really the terrorist?

up
15 users have voted.

"The “jumpers” reminded us that one day we will all face only one choice and that is how we will die, not how we will live." Chris Hedges on 9/11

WaterLily's picture

@Raggedy Ann My Irish citizenship is looking more and more appealing. Then again, no one on the planet would survive a nuclear holocaust. Not even those fuckers with "inverted high-rises" in New Zealand, who are only postponing their demise.

up
16 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

According to Craig Murray, Qassem Soleimani wasn't responsible for most of the US troops deaths. That prize went to our Saudi ally who supports ISIS and Al Qaida as well as our other ally Israel and then of course the Great Obama admin along with all the goon societies included in our government. Lets stop repeating that this Guy was the biggest killer of troops. And then there's the story of him talking to the Saudis to reduce tensions after we killed lots of Iraqi troops. On Trump's recommendation. After we invaded Iraq and killed lots of Iraqis and ISIS rose up it was a direct threat to other countries in the region. People who have been invaded should have the right to defend their country dodn't you think? And Soleimani was helping them fight for their lives and to keep ISIS from attacking Iran.

Kyrstal hit back pretty well trying to debunk him, but Saagar seemed to just repeat talking points. Defense of Democracy is just another pro war think tank. Still wondering why they gave him a voice? (Defense of Democracies is a non-profit organization created in February 2008 to lobby the U.S. House of Representatives to approve the updated Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act passed by the U.S. Senate.) In other words not our friends.

The Dude thinks that this act will get Iran to fold and come back to the bargaining table. Krystal was having none of it.

Also there were reports last night that Iranian Americans were being detained at the US Canadian border. Either held and questioned or made to return to Canada because there were no beds in detention centers. Barbara Lee tweeted about it, but I still don't know if it was just a rumor. BTW... Nancy is going to try to pass a war powers resolution in the house and Kaine in the Senate along with Bernie and Ro. Place your bets that this will pass.

unless Congress votes to authorize further military operations

Hmmm why did CBS release these photos in the midst of the Iran news? Graphic picts

Ricky Gervais hosted the golden globes last night and got in, "Epstein didn't kill himself." The audience went wild.

ETA link to the Iranian Americans.

up
14 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Cassiodorus's picture

In this respect Elizabeth Warren et al. are cherry-picking when they declaim Soleimani as a "bad man."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is the confirmation bias. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. This fallacy is a major problem in public debate.

Here's what Warren said:

Soleimani was a murderer, responsible for the deaths of thousands, including hundreds of Americans. But this reckless move escalates the situation with Iran and increases the likelihood of more deaths and new Middle East conflict. Our priority must be to avoid another costly war.

So Trump, Obama, the Bushes, Clinton are responsible for how many deaths? If that's what you're trying to understand. Of course, the Iranians are cherry-picking too. Should we go to war over cherry-picking?

up
18 users have voted.

"The war on Gaza, backed by the West, is a demonstration that the West is willing to cross all lines. That it will discard any nuance of humanity. That it is willing to commit genocide" -- Moon of Alabama

snoopydawg's picture

"You know my favourite part of that war?" Carlins asks in the routine. "It's the first war we ever had that was on every channel plus cable… and the war got good ratings too, didn't it? Got good ratings! Well, we like war! We like war! We're a war-like people! We like war because we're good at it! You know why we're good at it? Cause we get a lot of practice. This country's only 200 years old and already, we've had 10 major wars. We average a major war every 20 years in this country so we're good at it!"

He goes on to describe that the U.S. government is especially fond of waging war against countries populated by brown people. He explains that bombing people is a good thing to be good at if you don't have any other national talents.

"Can't build a decent car, can't make a TV set or a VCR worth a fuck, got no steel industry left, can't educate our young people, can't get health care to our old people, but we can bomb the shit out of your country all right! Huh? Especially if your country is full of brown people—oh we like that don't we? That's our hobby! That's our new job in the world: bombing brown people. Iraq, Panama, Grenada, Libya, you got some brown people in your country, tell them to watch the fuck out or we'll goddamn bomb them!"

up
20 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

WaterLily's picture

@snoopydawg "Because I like to form my own opinions."

I miss George.

up
14 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

Yeah maybe not so much. This comes back to whether he was setup by the neocons after his meeting with the Saudis.

up
11 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

CB's picture

@snoopydawg @snoopydawg
finalized a month ago. The chain of command flowed from Netanyahu to Pompeo to Trump.


Netanyahu-Pompeo Meeting Solidifies War Plan on Iran

Finian Cunningham
December 10, 2019
...
Netanyahu met Pompeo in Lisbon, Portugal, on Wednesday, December 04. The meeting was called urgently and was unscheduled. Netanyahu – who is fighting for his political survival over corruption charges – tried to arrange discussions with Pompeo on the sidelines of the NATO summit near London, but according to Israeli media reports there was not enough time for security logistics to be put in place by the British. That indicates the Israeli leader was trying to meet Pompeo in a hurry.

When Netanyahu met with Pompeo in Lisbon, he said at the start of their discussions: “The first subject that I will raise is Iran. The second subject is Iran, and so is the third. And many more.

The Israeli premier added: “We have been fortunate as President Trump has led a consistent policy of exerting pressure on Iran. Iran is increasing its aggression in the region as we speak, even today, in the region. They are trying to have staging grounds against us and the region from Iran itself, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and Yemen and we are actively engaged in countering that aggression.”

Netanyahu also gloated that the “Iranian empire [sic] is tottering… let’s make it totter even more.”

For several months Iran has steadfastly refused to take the bait of war laid down by the Trump administration. But with pressures mounting both within the country and externally, it would be imperative for the Iranian authorities to marshall their defenses.

US intelligence and military officials are using contorted logic to accuse Iran of posing a threat, and the American corporate media are ably assisting in the propagation of this oxymoron.

Netanyahu’s hasty meeting with Pompeo last week suggests that the US and Israel are putting the final touches to their malignant masterpiece for provoking a war with Iran.

up
16 users have voted.

@snoopydawg
you had me going there for a minute.
As to the question as to whether trumpet is being set up by nutty yahoo and the bunch
the answer is probably yes. Soft putty that one. Knead and bake, you get a loaf
of stupid. Bread for the MIC. We are just the coals in the oven.

up
11 users have voted.
Wally's picture

@snoopydawg

He's Bernie's top foreign policy advisor.

Seems like they have decided to separate themselves from the rest of the field/party now. I kind of figured Bernie's game would be ratcheted up right after the holidays.

I see both the media of the right (Breitbart) and corporate centrists (MSM) going after Bernie incrasingly hard on his claim that the hit was an assassination (with Breitbart suggesting that Pelosi's letter "suggested" the same).

up
2 users have voted.

What gives the US military the right to bomb and assassinate people in foreign countries to begin with. It ain't our sandbox that some bully lives in. Precedence has been set with Bin Laden, Gaddhafi, and multiple leaders in other countries not our own. These acts fail the International treaties test that most countries abide by. Is this really in retaliation for 9/11 still in any thinking persons brain? No, this is US injustice writ large. Washington is asking for a nuke in our lap to justify killing off marketed enemies. How do we stop this monster? Ain't just trumpet or pentagon or alphabet soup agencies. We are about to be exterminated in the name of greed for a few bankers benefit.

Is anyone else perplexed by this? Please speak up if so.

up
17 users have voted.
Roy Blakeley's picture

@QMS Next you will be asking why Obama was not impeached for ordering the assassination of American citizens, or why Brennan isn't in jail for ordering a break in to examine the computers of the Senate Intelligence Committee to investigate CIA torture, or why Brennan and Clapper aren't in jail for lying to Congress, or why HRC is not in jail for crimes committed with respect to her private server, or why GW Bush was not impeached for lying us into war, or why Nancy Pelosi was not kicked out of office for willingly supporting the invasion of Iraq even though, from her on mouth, she new there were no WMD in Iraq, or what is the evidence that there were voting irregularities in the most recent election in Bolivia, or...., well you get the idea. These are not approved questions. No one asks them on television do they? Does anyone ask where in Donald Trump's famous phone conversation with Zelensky does he ask Zelensky to investigate Joe Biden? No. Clearly you have not been given the list of approved questions. Until you have been given the list, you should refrain from asking additional questions.

up
22 users have voted.

@Roy Blakeley
Never got on that serve list of places where the human mind was allowed to roam.
Or ask questions about the reality we are being force fed.
Almost as well as you, have been trained to keep it between the lines.
Every now and again, just ask to verify if any have noticed
we've left the space capsule and are being drawn into a
gravity field that is going to be the cause of our destruction.
Mental fluidity matters.

up
16 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

@QMS

up
8 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

@TheOtherMaven
orbiting a black hole thing
perhaps you would be so kind as to
clue us into what it is we should be seeing?
besides the black hole.
Maybe give a head's up
cause, for one, I would really like
a warning, or where not to look
when it all pops.
Thanks

up
4 users have voted.
mimi's picture

@Roy Blakeley
never, ever ask the right questions on C99p, that is just so 99percentishy.
I know you all need a snark tag now, because you all are such lovable stupidos. smart pants.

Nothing for Ungood. Bolton made me do that./s

up
5 users have voted.

@mimi
nothing for ungood, indeed
Understand your difficulty in parsing
the snarky ways
Was not chastised for asking the wrong question
so much as being educated as to why such a
question should be asked in the first place
it is a form of sarcasm meant to exemplify the
initial content
small change for Jtc
Cheers!

up
7 users have voted.
mimi's picture

@QMS
Smile
NOthing for Ungood. I think I should write in sign language from now on.

Have a beautiful new day. We need one, don't we?

up
3 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@Roy Blakeley

Also, QMS' questions smell non-partisan to me. And we can't have that.

up
4 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

@QMS

As a supporter of Tulsi Gabbard, I find her clearest statement to describe treason by our military industrial warlords to be, "The mission is unclear." It's not unclear. It's crystal clear.

Our military industrial cabal armed Hitler for the duration of WWII, under license by Franklin Roosevelt exempting them from the Trading With the Enemy Act. Allen Dulles was their lawyer and supported fascism before, during, and after the war. He supported fascist military groups in Ukraine from WWII onward. The CIA still supports them.

The military industrial power behind fascism is American. We, the American taxpayers, provide them with unlimited resources with which to oppose labor and individual rights throughout the world. Their frenzy of desperate moves to destroy any developments toward peace, nationalization of resources, or actual democracy are not new. They started in the 1930s and continue today to wreck havoc on working people and the planet. This desperation is not just about retaining power for wealth. It is also about retaining power to prevent their being brought to justice.

up
20 users have voted.

@Linda Wood
you got it!
Tears in my eyes.
Thanks

up
10 users have voted.
CB's picture

@Linda Wood
in bringing Hitler to power and then supplying the Nazis with both technology and oil in the hope that the Russians would be crushed in order they could regain the massive Baku oil fields in Caucasus.

"Getting along with their own business"

The secret pact of Standard Oil with the Nazis or: why did Adolf Eichmann have to disappear?
Gaby Weber
...
Standard Oil was founded in 1870 by John. D. Rockefeller. In 1879 he merged the Vacuum Company and many other firms until the Trust was dissolved in 1911 and broke into many smaller companies. But the Rockefeller family maintained power in the oil business.

At that time, petroleum was produced in two places, in Texas and in Baku,in the Caucasus. But after the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Nobel and Rothschild families lost their assets. And after WW1, the shares of the „Turkish Petroleum Company“, held by Deutsche Bank, were transferred as „enemy property“ to France. For many years, the Deutsche Bank tried to litigate against this expropriation, but finally they realized that there wouldn't be any chance on the legal front.

There is strong evidence to suggest that a approximately in 1927, Deutsche Bank and Standard Oil made a secret pact aimed at bringing Hitler to power in order to conquer the Oil of Baku. Standard Oil promised to supply the fuel.
...
While the men slaughtered each other in the battlefields in World War II, corporate America was looking for a way of „getting along with their own business“. It was not easy, after the decision of US Congress to enter in the War and to frustrate the pact of Big Oil with the Nazis. For Standard Oil it was a profound defeat. How did they continue with their "own business“? Maybe creating its own intelligence agency? An agency that cared above all for business and not for National Security?
...
The main problem for Germany 's attack on the Soviet Union was the need for fuel for tanks and airplanes. Thanks to the patents of Standard Oil, the Germans could produce fuel from their own coal, but this was not enough.

The Caucasus campaign lasted five and a half months. From the middle of 1942, when in the US Standard Oil suffered the official investigation and the Senate Hearing, the German military started to suffer lack of fuel. In January 43, defeat was complete. The Nazis Allies - American and British Big Oil - couldn't fulfil their part of the pact: the fuel supply.
...

The US was forced to invade Europe towards the end of the war to ensure Russia did not overrun Germany completely. By the time the US entered Europe, Germany was basically already defeated. Russia had already destroyed well over 80% of the Wehrmacht.

up
10 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@CB

He and others in his class were big time eugenists too and that was one reason they supported Hitler. People think it can't happen here...it already has. Numerous times, but history has been whitewashed and it has been deleted from our history books. I've recently read some articles on it and was beyond appalled. Would WWI have happened if Adolf hadn't gotten so much support from people in the USA? But then we weren't the only ones supporting him were we? Lots of dead people and for what?

up
7 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

snoopydawg's picture

@CB

How a Chase Bank Chairman Helped the Deposed Shah of Iran Enter the U.S.

The fateful decision in 1979 to admit Mohammed Reza Pahlavi prompted the seizure of the American Embassy in Tehran and helped doom the Carter presidency.

Less than two weeks later, on Nov. 4, 1979, vowing revenge for the admission of the shah to the United States, revolutionary Iranian students seized the American Embassy in Tehran and then held more than 50 Americans — and Washington — hostage for 444 days.
....
The hostage crisis doomed Mr. Carter’s presidency. And the team around Mr. Rockefeller, a lifelong Republican with a dim view of Mr. Carter’s dovish foreign policy, collaborated closely with the Reagan campaign in its efforts to pre-empt and discourage what it derisively labeled an “October surprise” — a pre-election release of the American hostages, the papers show.

Yep. Rockefeller was an evil bastard.

up
7 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

CB's picture

@QMS
is to cut off it's source of nourishment - the ubiquitous US$ as global (reserve) currency.

The US$ gained this superior position in global finances from two main causes. WWII decimated world production of goods and arms allowing America to fill this niche globally. A second factor was the US$ managed to force the world to purchase oil/gas, the largest traded commodity in the world, using US$.

Here's a historical record of how oil became the world's strategic commodity controlled to a great extent by America. It points directly to today's conflict in the ME.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TXG70xAnSU]

Distributed power generation by renewable's will eventually kill the beast but it won't go down without a fight.

up
15 users have voted.

@CB
are turning away from the petrodollar.
Realizing it being a trap.
We will suffer the consequence of
hegemony. IMF will not bail us out.

up
13 users have voted.
WaterLily's picture

@CB Six months ago I would have said "no," understanding that while Bezos and Zuck can get away with sheltering billions, we plebes could easily (and would readily) be harshly penalized for withholding a few thousands.

Today, I honestly have to wonder, what do we really have to lose?

up
14 users have voted.
CB's picture

@WaterLily
They don't give tax holidays for the plebs.

up
6 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

@CB

I knew someone very, very well who never submitted a tax return for years and years and years. The IRS never bothered about him. (Of course, he would have gotten (small) refunds from them rather than owing them money, so that may have been part of it.)

There's an official threshold below which you don't have to file a tax return (unless you would get a refund or an Earned Income Credit, in which case you still don't have to but you ought to).

up
6 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

@TheOtherMaven

(Of course, he would have gotten (small) refunds from them rather than owing them money, so that may have been part of it.)

That was probably all of it. I used to work for a tax attorney who had worked his way through law school doing audits at the IRS. The IRS is not a problem you want. They don't actually give a shit if people file their returns, which is part of why the non-filing threshold exists, they don't want to process more paper/data than they have to, they just want their money. If they think you owe them, they'll come for you. They'll levy your accounts, put liens on your property, garnish your wages. They'll put fines AND penalties AND interest on top of whatever back taxes you owe. Plus you'll have to pay the tax attorney. It's not worth it.

up
8 users have voted.

@Reverend Jane Ignatowski
he never filed for years, worked off the books for awhile. His employer convinced him to file one year. They socked it to him, but bad. They estimated his back taxes at the present rate of income, went back all of those years and started multiplying. Back taxes were only about $20K, but the fines and interest were like $50K. Oops. He doesn't make much to begin with. That hurt. Big time. Working for the man.

up
8 users have voted.

@QMS

So sorry that happened. They may very well have caught up with him sooner or later anyways, but suddenly filing after not filing will definitely attract attention. If he'd seen a good tax lawyer beforehand he might have been able to negotiate a deal, sometimes they'll take a cut rate but you need a good negotiator who understands the process. And of course you still have to pay the tax attorney, ugh.

Our tax laws are well and truly forked in favor of the ownership class, which I didn't really appreciate until I had a handful of years of work in that tax attorney's office -- we did estates too so while the rich howl about it and try to scare everyone, the estate tax laws were still way too easy on dynastic wealth even before BushCo & Congress relaxed them even further. (We did not do corporate tax work, just individuals and estates, but I know it's even worse there.)

up
6 users have voted.

@Reverend Jane Ignatowski

Who's there?
The fed. We're your friends.
Whatchya want?
What you got.

Doubt he sought legal council. Not the most trusting soul.
Thanks for the advice Reverend Jane.
Trying to keep things in perspective is easier with friendly help.

up
5 users have voted.
RantingRooster's picture

@QMS I was able to wait out the statute of limitations, 10 years, and they dropped all charges against me. I didn't pay any taxes on the stocks I cashed in 1996 and in 2013 I got square with the IRS on their "Fresh Start Program". There was much satisfaction hearing the IRS lady say "Oh, it appears these charges have been dropped because of the statute of limitations, you actually don't owe any taxes", fucking music to my ears....yeah buddy.

Of course that's about the only decent thing that's happened in the last decade. That and my truck still runs... Drinks

up
8 users have voted.

C99, my refuge from an insane world. #ForceTheVote

@RantingRooster

Always feels good to win one against Goliath. We had a client who chose an off-the-grid strategy and climbed down a hole somewhere out in the Rockies. We never knew exactly where he was, but we'd send these yearly updates to a PO Box about which charges were dropping off due to the statute of limitations. When I left the firm he still had something like another 7 years to hide out -- I always hoped he made it, heh.

May your truck run taxfree forever. Wink

up
8 users have voted.
RantingRooster's picture

@Reverend Jane Ignatowski at least 4 months to go for my other truck, that got repossessed, to fall off my credit report. My house foreclosure dropped off last year.

up
4 users have voted.

C99, my refuge from an insane world. #ForceTheVote

CB's picture

@QMS

Might makes right. History is written by the victors.

up
7 users have voted.

@CB
fright makes it right
either scare us to death
or blame it on mighty mouse.
The MIC made me do it!
Just ask Disney

up
8 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@QMS

He talks about the Bethlehem doctrine

It was created by Israel of course.

up
12 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

CB's picture

@snoopydawg

up
7 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@CB

I thought it was an excellent eye opener. I'm seeing lots of people saying that Solimeini sp was responsible for lots of our troops deaths, but that came from our dear Saudi friends. And I'm betting some were from the 'moderate rebels' backed by the CIA.

up
7 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

@QMS

up
5 users have voted.

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

Roy Blakeley's picture

VP Dumber's comments about the 11 hijackers was "laughable" and Wilkerson was in a position to know. Iran did help the US in fighting the Taliban until the "axis of evil" speech. You would at least think that VP Dumber would at least get the number of hijackers right. I guess President Dumb and VP Dumber don't even worry about plausibility. It is like they are ad-libbing in a bad movie. Actually it is more like they are ad-libbing in an elementary school play.

up
19 users have voted.

@Roy Blakeley at all to be actually credible. Their minions will swallow this lie whole along with the "killing of Americans" by Soleimani who was fighting an INVADING force of Americans but that is now lost to history, down the dustbin of people who even once used to KNOW that war was illegal from day one.

Today it keeps running through my head "We were there ILEGALLY!" like Ross in Friends saying over and over "We were on a break!" Dumb but there it is, a relentless loop playing over and over.

up
12 users have voted.

Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur

@lizzyh7
who funded ISIS to begin with?
They don't get their guns and armor
from the peaceful states of the ME
This is a war funded by US and Israel
interests and their proxies - Saudi and
oil multinationals.

up
11 users have voted.

@QMS

Biden said the following:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/unitedarabemirates...

… Mr Biden said that "our biggest problem is our allies" who are engaged in a proxy Sunni-Shiite war against Syrian President Bashar Assad. He specifically named Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

"What did they do? They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad – except that the people who were being supplied were (Jabhat) Al-Nusra and al-Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world," Mr Biden said at the time.

up
9 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@Linda Wood

cuz he wanted them to overthrow Assad. Even having them take control of the government wasn't a big deal to them.

And of course we know that the CIA armed and trained AQ to do the same thing. Rules don't mean jack to people who don't have to obey the laws.

up
12 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Roy Blakeley's picture

@QMS @lizzyh7 in the defeat of Isis and his death could result in an Isis resurgence (probably not but it is certainly helpful to Isis).

up
11 users have voted.