A catastrophe in Syria's Afrin

Turkey's military operation with the Orwellian name of "Olive Branch" has reached the outskirts of the city of Afrin, and has taken 850 kilometres of the province.
There are three potentially catastrophic outcomes to what is about to happen. The first involves what happens during the fall of Afrin itself.

But for the Syrian rebels, who are mostly Arabs, participation in the Turkish offensive is personal.
“This is about revenge,” said Waleed al-Mahal, a former rebel fighter who says he has sent dozens of his relatives to Turkish recruitment offices to join the push and hopes to be called up soon himself. “We’re taking our land back.”
His rhetoric echoes a video circulated online this week, apparently showing rebel fighters discussing plans to loot houses in Afrin. “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” says a fighter who is apparently in charge.

It doesn't take much imagination to picture what this means. Especially since these Turkish-backed rebels are often former al-Qaeda jihadists.

The second involves what happens shortly after the fall of Afrin.

Heydemann was also firmly against suggestions that refugees hosted by Turkey could be moved back into the northern Syrian territories occupied by Turkey.
“Demographic changes by military forces are considered against international laws and these are crimes under international human rights law,” he said, adding that forcing refugees to return would be against international law.
There is a precedent for such a misguided action in the region: Syrian dictator Hafez al-Assad displaced Kurds from the area during the 1970s and sent in Arab settlers. If this is done again, it could lead to “generations of conflict,” said Heydemann.

However, the third scenario is the one that will matter to the U.S.
It involves out relations with Turkey and our Syrian Kurd allies.

Erdogan said Turkey’s armed forces will push on after operations in Afrin and Manbij, further east, to sweep Syrian Kurdish fighters from the length of Turkey’ border with Syria.
“We are in Afrin today, we will be in Manbij tomorrow. The next day we will ensure that the east of Euphrates will be cleared of terrorist up to the Iraqi border.”

It's bad enough that we are looking away while our Kurdish allies are being slaughtered by al-Qaeda jihadists in Afrin, but it appears that we intend to allow the Turks to launch a major new offensive against the Kurds throughout Syria.

In an effort to repair tattered relations, the Trump administration has told Turkey it will move to rein in Kurdish fighters that have been the backbone of the U.S. campaign against the Islamic State in Syria, according to U.S. and Turkish officials.
The first step and “the crux of the matter,” a senior Turkish official said, is to withdraw the Kurds from the Syrian town of Manbij and relocate them east of the Euphrates River. The town, about 25 miles from Turkey’s border, has come to symbolize the fevered competition for territory and influence in northern Syria among the United States, Turkey, and other regional powers.
...U.S. commanders on the ground in and around Manbij have previously warned that several hundred American troops deployed there would defend the Kurds against any attack by Turkish troops, now massed a few miles away. Turkish officials were outraged last month when U.S. commanders touring the area with American journalists praised the Kurds and vowed to fight alongside them if there were a Turkish attack.

Turkish President Erdogan has called our bluff in Manbij and we folded. Not only that, Erdogan is now complaining about our lack of assistance in crushing the Kurds.

Turkey's president has criticized NATO for not supporting his country's ongoing military operation against Syrian Kurdish fighters in Syria.
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, speaking to reporters on Saturday, asked, "Hey NATO, where are you?" and accused the military alliance of double standards.

This leaves 2,000 U.S. troops in Kurdish areas while we are actively betraying the Kurds.
On top of that, the Kurds have already turned to Assad for help, and he responded. Which has led to fighting between Syrian government forces and Turkish-backed jihadists.
At some point the Kurds will be under pressure to turn on the U.S. troops. Then things will get very messy very fast.

15 users have voted.


CB's picture

other nations in the region. When they have served their purpose the are disposed of.

Pawns in the Game: A Brief History of America and the Kurds

The Kurds find themselves caught in the middle of a power struggle between the U.S., Russia, Turkey, Iran and Syria — a familiar situation that follows decades of geopolitical strife in their region, explains Ted Snider.

The only thing that has ever been faithful to the Kurds is history: it has faithfully, without fail, betrayed them. The Kurds have been cast in the role of the pawn in powerful countries’ games of chess. They do much of the hard work only to be sacrificed when checkmate is in sight.

Most recently, the U.S. rediscovered the Kurds as useful pawns in the war on the Islamic State. But, despite being one of the most effective forces fighting the Islamic State, now that the end is in sight, the Kurds are, once again, in danger of being abandoned.
Seventy years later, the Kurds are still being disappointed by the meaning of American assurances regarding actions taken based on those estimates. It is not known how America will negotiate being caught in the middle of its Kurdish ally in the war in Syria and its NATO ally in Turkey, but history is not exactly whispering assurances in the Kurds’ ears.

9 users have voted.

these rebels we care about

yrian government forces were close to splitting the besieged rebel-held enclave of Eastern Ghouta in two on Saturday, as rebel leaders said they had agreed with the government to evacuate fighters from a Qaeda-linked group.

Thirteen fighters from the Qaeda-linked group, known as the Levant Liberation Committee, were bused out Friday night, bound for the northern rebel-held province of Idlib, according to rebel statements and video footage. Those fighters were detained last year by the Army of Islam, the group that controls Douma, the main city in Eastern Ghouta.

5 users have voted.
CB's picture

Islamist's with bottles of bleach or maybe some pesticides. /s

Islamists in E. Ghouta plan to stage false flag chemical attack – Damascus
Published time: 10 Mar, 2018 21:17

Syria’s deputy foreign minister says militants plan a chemical attack in Eastern Ghouta on Sunday, will highlight the female victims and then pin the blame on Damascus. He accused the West of “only wanting to believe terrorists.”

“We have received information that militants plan to stage an attack between the districts of Mesraba and Beit Sawa. Tahrir al-Sham terrorists plan to sacrifice several women for this purpose and launch a disinformation campaign. The performance is thought to be scheduled for March 11,” Deputy Foreign Minister, Faisal Mekdad, told journalists in Damascus.

Earlier this week, the White Helmets, a self-proclaimed civil defense group, accused the Syrian government of staging a chlorine attack that affected 30 residents of Eastern Ghouta, a militant-held suburb of Damascus wrecked by intense fighting in the past month. The government, which regards the White Helmets as a foreign-funded terrorist propaganda organization, has rejected these claims.
Serkal also noted that most of the previous cases involving chemical weapons use in Syria suspiciously coincided with Russia’s efforts to bring peace to the country, and warned of the danger of a false-flag use of chemical weapons in the “densely populated” Damascus suburb where “civilians are being used as human shields.”

“We noticed a kind of a pattern. Whenever there is a Human Rights Council meeting or Security Council meeting, prior to this we see these kinds of attacks,” Serkal noted. “I believe this kind of pattern that takes place is just to divert the current peace talk[s] led by Russia into resolving this matter, especially in [the] East Ghouta issue.”

6 users have voted.