Can we stop pretending that norms have not changed?

Not for the first time, I find myself shaking my head at the apparent either:

A. lapse in recollection
or
B. somewhat startling contemporary obliviousness

exhibited by a whole lot of people with respect to "norms" of social-sexual behavior, and especially, what those norms were back in the 60s, 70s and 80s.

last night while driving home from work, i was listening to the odious, rude, and remarkably stupid Alan Colmes "conversing" with a caller who was trying to assert that in fact, much of what Trump has said over the years (or has been accused of saying or doing in the past) was not that extraordinary for its time. Colmes, as is his wont, dismissed this claim out of hand, reframing it as an accusatory black-and-white question and refusing to allow the caller to respond in a thoughtful way, demanding a "Yes" or a "No". "WAS IT NORMAL FOR A MAN TO PUT HIS HAND UP A WOMAN'S SKIRT??!? NO, I'M ASKING YOU, WAS IT NORMAL FOR A MAN TO PUT HIS HAND UP A WOMAN'S SKIRT??!?!?! YARGLE BARGLE ARGLE BARGLE!!!"

well, I'm here to tell you folks, whether you want to face it or not, that in fact, back in the day, yes, it was fucking "normal". this stuff was far more routine than people seem to want to believe. i know this isn't a popular thing to say. i recall that sometime in the last several months, some semi-conservative female commentator of some sort or another was reviled for suggesting that if you really want to crucify every male public figure for the crimes of a not all that distant cultural milieu, you'd better be prepared to crucify your own fathers and grandfathers. howls of outraged senses of decency ensued, and the woman's point was carried off in the huffed and puffed storm of indignation.

the problem is that the commentator was absolutely fucking right. i mean, What the Actual Fuck? have people really lost track of the conditions of pre-feminist western culture? Jesus! In a world where:

the law officially held that the phrase "rape of a wife by her husband" was a legal nonsense;

where a woman who had ever had sex outside of wedlock was effectively presumed by judges and juries to have consented to, well, just about anything else that might have happened to her in the "company" of any random man;

where more generally, any inappropriate physical contact between a man and a woman -- and especially a married man and a woman not his wife -- was presumed to be the result of Naughtiness and Imprudence on the woman's part;

where bizarre homoerotic hazing rituals were established traditions in the US Navy (google up "shellback homoerotic" if you want a taste -- or fuck it, go to this page, where a particularly damaged fuckwit defends these now-banned rituals -- ironically, given that in the immediately preceding part of his essay he praises Ross Perot, who as a Navy officer refused to submit to the ordeal, cementing his outsider status.);

where criminal violent sexual battery was a routine element of male athletic culture -- and i'm not talking about million-dollar athletes assaulting women in bars, or high school golden boys raping cheerleaders while parked up at the submarine races (not that those weren't appalling and common, as they are yet today), i'm talking about athletes -- from high school varsity right through into the pros -- physically sexually assaulting their teammates as part of established hazing traditions;

where "we" were much less sensitive (indeed, almost entirely ignorant of) such concepts as "personal space" and "ownership of one's own body" and so on, such that, other than bible-thumping cranks, nobody imagined it was a meaningfully traumatic psychological experience if a male -- a boss, a "coworker" (quoted because men and women rarely worked in conditions where the women enjoyed a status that legitimately warranted the prefix "co"), a guy at school, some asshole on the subway, or, yes, a "celebrity" -- "copped a feel" as the expression went;

etc. etc. etc.;

in that world, one well within the living memory of anyone more than 45 years old, the kind of shit Donald Trump is accused of (or has bragged about) was absolutely fucking commonplace. i simply cannot abide the fucking denial going on about this. for god's fucking sake, talk to your fucking grandmothers! Have so many people really forgotten the true nature of the battles that women like Gloria Steinem were fighting? Do you really not get the simple reality that up until about 15 years ago, some form or another of droit de seigneur was presumed to be the natural and well-earned reward -- indeed, one of the primary motivating factors -- for any male achieving high socioeconomic status? And that to a large extent it still is? Who the fuck do you think constitutes the clientele of the sex tourism industry? Do you think the planes to the Dominican Republic are filled with slope-browed open-mouthed-drooling perpetually-single basement-masturbating middle-aged virgins? If you socialize at all in circles that include "successful businessmen", then the Who the Fuck in question is, men with whom you are acquainted.

Get a fucking grip, people. It reminds me of all those folks, mostly but not exclusively women, who went to see Saving Private Ryan and were stunned to get, for the first time in their lives, some tiny little clue about what war is about, and what it looks like, and what the men in their lives -- husbands, fathers, sons, grandfathers -- had gone through. The information is not new and it's not a secret -- the literature, fiction and nonfiction, is abundant -- and nobody has an excuse for being unaware of its reality. If your father or grandfather or husband was, prior to 1990 or so, a varsity athlete (particularly, from what I've read over the years, in football, wrestling and hockey), or belonged to a fraternity at college, there's a much better chance than most people seem to want to accept that he was either a perp or a victim or both. I appreciate Chris Whatsisname's essay upbraiding Trump on the matter of modern locker-room talk, but I've also heard the songs sung by British rugby teams, and I can tell you this: If an offhand ironic reference to pussies turns your stomach, the lyrics to those songs would hospitalize you.

Further, as I've written elsewhere in the past, at least a third of the guys in my class in junior high -- myself included -- did things "to" girls that would nowadays be viewed as felonies; whether they would be prosecuted would be largely up to the discretion of the judicial authorities, but if so, the result would be to descend into the waking nightmare of modern life that awaits the classified "sex offender". (And "one third" isn't one of those randomly generated statistics folks like me throw around on blogs, that's a number I generated by iterating through a list of my classmates.)

Trump brays about "grabbing their pussies" and everybody collectively gasps as if every time in the past 50 years that a rock star or athlete or movie star or powerful politician put his hand up a woman's skirt, he either had asked permission, or he was thrown in jail. Well that's fucking bullshit. Men with that kind of status used to take such liberties as a matter of course, and, if the contact were unwanted, about the worst they usually got was a slap in the face. That may be hard to believe in an era when an NBA star might find himself facing charges AND a lawsuit for grabbing a woman's breasts in a bar -- and I say might because it still goes on plenty; one supposes that most women would rather just walk away than put themselves in the middle of a public furor -- but that's really how it was, and any conversation about how relatively horrible Der Trumpf is wrt The Clenis or Her Heinous needs to start with an acknowledgement of the cultural reality. Trump is a loathsome pig for certain, and he might indeed be a loathsome criminal pig, just as WJC appears likely to be, but there's a very wide spectrum between loathsome pig and monstrous sexual predator, and from the information we have at the moment, we cannot assign either of those two pigs a fixed position on that spectrum.

For myself, it's a non-issue. Both of the duopoly candidates are morally unfit to hold any office at all, and they would be just as much so even if they didn't both have disgusting public records of treating certain women in certain circumstances with a level of disregard that is unacceptable.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

lotlizard's picture

Saudi Arabia and similar places.

The U.S. and Europe only go to war to effect regime change against secular republics. Theocratic absolute monarchies, on the other hand, can get away with literally anything.

As far as the U.S.–European elite and media are concerned, being feudal, fundamentalist, and proud of it gives rulers a moral blank check.

Nice cuddly Saudis and their excellent, genocidal Yemeni adventure — after all, the Saudis are now lining up behind nice Netanyahu and his Greater Israel project. But scary, scary Trump.

That’s the “moral standard” of the Western elite and media in October 2016.

up
0 users have voted.
Wink's picture

Trumpster grabbing female crotch was yeah, so? Men of his "status," be they rock stars, sports stars or multi Millionaire celebrities carry a "I can do any goddamn thing I please" card. Everyone knows that.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

riverlover's picture

of all strata thinking "asshole". Money can buy insulation from that.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

Flowergirl58's picture

That was definitely the reality then(60s,70s,80s), especially if you were a women of the supposed lower classes. You had no power. No money. You were on your own. If you objected, you were usually ostracized and labeled as a B...h, C..t, Tease, etc. The objection might bring worse behavior to the objecting female. Getting away as fast as possible was the safest action to take.
It seemed that the situation had gotten a little better for the last 20 years or so, but like racism, it has always bubbled below the surface.
It was/is NOT Normal or Right, just reality, unfortunately. This country has always allowed men & their wants & attitudes to come first. Women are treated as second class citizens. Heck, we still don't get equal pay for equal work! We are not valued equally even in 2016!
I'm a 58 year old female. I've had to deal with that crap at every stage of my life. If you have not, you should count yourself very lucky!
That being said...Both candidates of the Duopoly are completely unacceptable. I have Gone Green in 2016 and will be voting for Jill Stein!

up
0 users have voted.

AMERICAN ends in I CAN!

lunachickie's picture

SAME HERE!!

Both candidates of the Duopoly are completely unacceptable. I have Gone Green in 2016 and will be voting for Jill Stein!

And this is EXACTLY WHY I refuse to get all upset over Der Trumpsky, because the Duopoly Enablers want me to be upset and fight with you and him and her and them over it. That crap leads everyone away from discussions that actually must take place and thrust into these useless arguments that are never agreed on and never resolved--and most importantly, can never be resolved in one online discussion.

We really, seriously have got to work on not being so goddamned reactionary all the time. Is that me, saying the concept or discussion about sexual abuse, sexual predators, etc. are not important? No. It's me saying we all let ourselves get pulled in a useless direction when we try to talk about it. It's ridiculous. JtC nailed it upthread, and I really wish more people here would take that to heart.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

We're really good (OK,pretty good) at seeing through one effect of propaganda--its tendency toward lies--but not as good at resisting its camera-eye effect: the part of propaganda whose job is to direct our attention toward some stories and issues, not others.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

shaharazade's picture

are sexist pervy pigs. Mostly all male politicians have zipper problems. Trump is however one of the more spectacular sleazy sexist racist pigs. As for this being the norm I don't think it is. I asked shah if men talked like this, say on the golf course where he used to partner up with a variety of men. He said no not normal men. If men talk like this there is nothing 'normal' about them they are deviants. Look at Cameron fucking a dead pig head as a upper class bully boy initiation right.

I think male pols like Trump and B Clinton are into power on a sick sexual level. I think Killary is an enabler who is not at all a liberated woman. I do not diminish any woman's experiences who have been sexually assaulted as I too have been a victim of such males. I'm lucky as I did not have men like this in my family or community. I also did not experience white frat boy mentality as I steered clear because I figured out in high my 'country club' richie rich high school that these types were often physical bullies, dangerous and nasty. It always weirded me out because my parents thought these were the boys I should date as they were nice clean boys .Yeah right.

In college I was an arty nerdy hippie type who hung out with sissy boys. As a DFH I joined in the 70's a feminist woman's group that met once a week. It was really helpful as even hippie men tended to be sexist pigs In my art school the women would write the names of the sexual predators to avoid on the bathroom walls. .They were usually faculty. Once I had live to out in the real world like most women I had to deal with these dangerous assholes pervs. I was a waitress in Hollywood for 7 years. The more high end places in Beverly Hills where I worked were the worst as far as groping and unwanted sexual advances went. Money and power?

I was not shocked to my core about Trump's disgusting tape. Who didn't know what he was? I mean the man's just a pig. Do I think this kind of talk and behavior is the norm? No thank god. I come upon sexist, privileged men a lot but they are not sexual predators or abusers, just your normal oblivious men.

For some reason I feel the woman's liberation movement has gotten on the wrong track. It seems to equate liberty, and equality to power, wealth and 'achievement'. Hillary for instance exemplifies to me the worst of male power lust, violence, testosterone run amok and called strength. Breaking corporate glass ceiling and bombing villages of women and children or killing humans is not any movement that is going to promote any kind of equality or feminism.

I'm shocked that this 'election' has become a mud wresltin' debacle. It's using the abuse of women as a smoke screen to distract from the real issues of racism and sexism that are systemic in our culture. They are carefully cultivated by people with power like Trump and the Clinton's. No justice No peace.

up
0 users have voted.
shaharazade's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Pages