The bottom line on censorship
Submitted by The Liberal Moonbat on Fri, 09/04/2020 - 11:16pm
https://www.jta.org/2020/09/03/opinion/former-aclu-president-says-censor...
Bummer of a last line, though; maybe a sufficient propagation would ameliorate it?
If you're reading this, do what I did and try sending it to as many people as is reasonable for you to do; it might just turn the tide.
![Share](/sites/all/modules/addtoany/images/share_save_171_16.png)
Comments
Facebook again.......
source
And no "reforms" will fix that problem; it would cut too far into profits, snd frankly, I think Mark Zuckerberg enjoys having that power to lord it over all the rest of us.
Ceterem censeo: Facebook delendum est. (And further, I opine: Facebook must be destroyed.)
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
Thannks Moonbat.
be well and have a good one
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
Censorship is everywhere
Every two-bit message board claims the right to remove messages and ban people who "violate community standards" - an elastic term which basically means "Don't say anything that might upset the Owners".
At least one of them takes it a lot farther than that. If you say anything that the moderators don't like, they will FRAME you and arbitrarily ban you on the specious excuse of "having multiple accounts" - when you DON'T. And from this decision there is no appeal. (Ironically, that isn't even a political board - it's a place to discuss f'n comic books. But they still will not allow any dissent.)
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
Very disappointing
that no one has chosen to comment on this. It may seem like a minor and unimportant instance of injustice to you, but it wasn't to me.
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
Hard to fight against
I don't know what you do in a situation as you described above. In a way, it's the old "freedom of the press only for those with the press" type thing. Short of not dealing with jerks (at least if you know ahead of time they're jerks), you're at their mercy.
In my time, I've written plenty of letters-to-the-editor. Evidently, most hit the circular file. Of those published, only a few were not either edited, truncated, or used in a way that made an opposite point. What could I do about it? Not jack.
I've seen no good solution, whether it's corrupt dealings in regard to a web site, a newspaper that is concerned only with selling real estate and Buick advertising, or even petitioning our government. The only thing I can think of that can effect a change would be a mass of people rising up against whatever eninty is causing the problem. In most cases, that's not so likely ...not that it occasionally doesn't happen.