I saw a comment the other day where someone suggested contributing $29 for Stein because it rhymes and is a small contribution (well, depending on your income), and that sounded like a good idea. Then, I read that many of the donations to Jill Stein these past few days have been $27 reflecting the Revolution.

I also posted this idea at the Jill Stein Reddit, but I was thinking I might get a little more thoughtful discussion here.

The first point to me is that 29 or 27 or ? (other suggestions?) reflects the call for small donations. I is very important to persist with the concept that small donations make a difference.

So, "29 for Stein". I think this is my preference. It RHYMES, so people will remember it, maybe they will mention it to other people, and it will be contagious. "Hey, I just donated 29 for Stein." Maybe that will even get Stein a little more name recognition (maybe that's pushing it). I don't know, any thoughts on this?

The advantages of "27 for Stein" are obvious, recognition and popularity. It reflects a continuation of the revolution. But, I think that Bernie has kind of trademarked 27, and Jill needs her own number. "29 for Stein" would still be a small contribution, and then there is the rhyme.

Anybody, have any thoughts, other ideas, or suggestions for a different number? I'd like to hear them.

Maybe this is a bad idea all together and this would just be considered copycating (is that a word).

I'm just trying to come up with ways to help the Greens fund-raise b/c they need it.

Update: Pro left (hat tip) suggested $26.99 to allude to 99%, I like this, but am wondering about $29.99 to really rhyme?
Any more thoughts?

Update2: Ok, I'm raising my own comment. What about $19.99. Shorter. But less money. Good rhyme though.