How did public bathrooms get to be separated by sex in the first place?

The Conversation has a very interesting, and relatively short post on the history of gender specific bathrooms.

How did public bathrooms get to be separated by sex in the first place?

For one thing, separate bathrooms is fairly new

In fact, laws in the U.S. did not even address the issue of separating public restrooms by sex until the end of the 19th century, when Massachusetts became the first state to enact such a statute. By 1920, over 40 states had adopted similar legislation requiring that public restrooms be separated by sex.

And the crux, as you might suspect was:

I’ve studied the history of the legal and cultural norms that require the separation of public bathrooms by sex, and it’s clear that there was nothing so benign about the enactment of these laws. Rather, these laws were rooted in the so-called “separate spheres ideology” of the early-19th century – the idea that, in order to protect the virtue of women, they needed to stay in the home to take care of the children and household chores.

Yes, it was part of the patrimony's eternal "War on Women."

The author discusses how, despite historical misconceptions, women were actually a major part of the industrial work force far earlier than most people today suspect.

For example, as early as 1822 when textile mills were founded in Lowell, Massachuetts, young women began flocking to mill towns. Soon, single women constituted the overwhelming majority of the textile workforce. Women would also become involved in social reform and suffrage movements that required them to work outside the home.

And when it comes to toilets in these factories

Well into the 1870s, toilet facilities in factories and other workplaces were overwhelmingly designed for one occupant, and were often located outside of buildings.

Take look at the article, it's not that long, but is a great primer for our current 'Toilette Wars'

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

riverlover's picture

It is toilets and sinks. And NEVER ask for a restroom, at least in GB. It's a toilet. If lucky, there are handwash facilities.

I think the invention of the urinal was a cause of segregation. Men did not want women to see teeny peenies peeing. Women don't. For the most part.

So it was plumbing spaces. And a urinal could be good for two or more when they were large. #2 was something to be done rarely. All designed by men. Cheaper to plumb.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

TheJerry's picture

However, in the US almost everyone says bathroom, even at work.

It starts at an early age by asking children if they need to go to the bathroom. "Going to the toilette" seems very crude to many Americans, and using bathroom as a euphemism for the other thing that happens in there seems more polite. Yes everyone knows what you are doing, but we can pretend you are just "washing up" This makes very good sense at a restaurant, for example. You are going to wash/bathe your hands. We won't think about what else you might be doing.

And, technically, as long as there is a sink, it is, historically a bathroom. For much of western history, bathing meant a bowl of water and a cloth. Fully body immersion was often believed to be unhealthy in many regions and times. So a bathing room, was by and large a place with a wash basin. Obviously certain cultures had communal bathes, which did not involve a toilet nearby.

Now, in fact, this all plays very well into the authors article. Fear of disease transmission in early factory toilets led for calls to modernize toilets and "protect women" "the weaker sex" from the dirty, disease ridden men who worked around them.
Total macho bullshit.

I do think the urinal plays a big part in this, as you say. But if you look at old bars and sports facilities, places women often didn't go; you find the trough urinal. For high volume, it is extremely fast and space efficient. And interestingly, the trough urinal concept goes back to Roman times if not before.

But yes, that being said, it has certainly been used in the last century or two to marginalize women. In particular, potty parity is particularly egregious.

I think that the common bathroom is a great solution; they are starting to come along, at higher end locations often still segregated, you have a common sink area, and private "water closets" literally.

Now this is great for potty parity if you desegregate; except for one thing and the reason I still advocate for urinals.

Men, by and large are lazy and sloppy. Women like to complain they never put the seat down...well actually what's worse in public toilets is when men don't put the toilet lid up before urinating and leave a wet trail of urine on the toilet seat.

So, I would argue, there is value to having urinals, if only to keep seats clean. Not sure how to resolve that other then to tell guys to get the freak over their paranoia and insecurity.

up
0 users have voted.

____________________________________________________________________________
"I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it. "
-Niccolo Machiavelli

"Sorry Hillary"
-TheJerry

leaving the seat up but the women not lifting the seat up upon dismount. It is far easier for the person to have a finger on the seat while raising up than it is to first reach out to drop the seat, then bend over after and straighten with seat in hand.
Can you tell this was once a bone of contention early in my marriage?

French aristocrats had two outhouses at their croquet and Plunder the Peasantry Pageants. Men's were embossed with a rayed sun, women's with a crescent moon. So if your outhouse has the crescent, it's a women's. As many outhouses are single headers only the moon is used since men, being the troglodyte animals we are, just unreel and hose down the countryside.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no such thing as TMI. It can always be held in reserve for extortion.

yellopig's picture

but I, for one, prefer the segregation, and here's why: from what I've been told (often!), the men's restrooms are vile, disgusting places. I've been in some women's restrooms that weren't all that nice, but nothing compared to what I've heard about men's restrooms.

And I'm baffled as to why men so often have felt the need to describe their restroom observations to me, but that's a different issue that I prefer not to explore.

up
0 users have voted.

“We may not be able to change the system, but we can make the system irrelevant in our lives and in the lives of those around us.”—John Beckett

In my experience men's bathrooms are much cleaner than women's,especially at concerts.Plus the lines are much shorter!For that reason alone I prefer to use the men's room.
Back in the 70's I went with some Americans to Paris and they were horrified by the gender neutral bathroom at McDonalds!!
I was just happy not being faced with a hole in the floor,like so many bathrooms in France. It takes some skill to use those......

up
0 users have voted.

" El pueblo unido jamás será vencido. The people united will never be defeated "