There are too many paragraphs in the article to quote here so I encourage people to read it.

Hillary's supporters are deluding themselves about her and what her core beliefs are.
I'm sure that if this was a republican SOS and the spouse who did these types of activities they would believe that the couple is corrupt.
There was a time when progressives were against everything that the Clintons stand for and have done. The conflict of interest between what Hillary did as SOS and the obscene amount of money that both Bill and the Clinton foundation made should disqualify her for president.
They have made money from people's misery in Haiti. Anyone or any corporations that wanted in on the reconstruction of Haiti had to get approval from the foundation and the state department.
The Clintons have been involved in all types of shenanigans in Honduras since 2001 and their friends like Lanny Davis and others have gotten very rich because of the Clintons.
And then there's Bluementhal and what he did during the Libyan war. He would find business opportunities there and forward them to Hillary on her private email server and a lot of the information he sent to her was classified. He also outed an undercover CIA agent through her email server.
The list of corruption is too long for a comment here.
But anyone can search for 'Clinton foundation scandal' and see how many hits come up.

Even Democrats who aren’t concerned about the agenda of Big Finance ought to ask themselves if America is best served by a president and first spouse who care so little about preserving the confidence that the public can reasonably have in the integrity of their actions. They are far from the only members of our elite who’ve put a payday ahead of the common good, but it’s hard to think of a more flagrant example.

needn’t believe that there’s ever been any quid pro quo to see that this matters.

“Any suggestions that Hillary Clinton was driven by anything but what’s in America’s best interest would be false. Period,” a campaign spokesman told The Guardian. Oh, come on. Clinton may well have thought that intervening on behalf of UBS was good for the U.S. There are reports that the Swiss helped our government in various ways in exchange for shielding the bank from a worst-case scenario.

super pacs They can make ads of whatever they want (cf. swiftboating) without repercussions on the candidate. Can you imagine the ads that Haiti and Honduras alone would engender? Then the whole list of money laundering episodes? They could be run like a soap opera.

you can't "prove" that there's been corruption. I guess that would be a fallacy:
"Argument from silence (argumentum ex silentio) – where the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence, rather than the existence of evidence."
Could it be argued that them trying to make all examples of Clinton corruption invalid by default because some of the examples were fake right wing talking points be a fallacy of composition?
"Fallacy of composition – assuming that something true of part of a whole must also be true of the whole."
Maybe:
"Inconsistent comparison – where different methods of comparison are used, leaving one with a false impression of the whole comparison."

Honestly, looking through the list of fallacies, it's hard not to find one that Clinton supporters haven't used yet.

This isn't even close to the biggest haul Bill pulled in for using Hillary's influence at State to benefit large corporations (that would be the $16 million he got for being an honorary chairman of Laureate International Universities) but it is symbolic of her reliance on the financial industry to fund her campaigns. How anyone can believe she has a better plan to "break up the banks" - much less that she would even attempt to do that - is beyond me. But emotions cloud the mind, and Hillary supporters are in the running for the biggest emotion fueled cult of all time.

The estimated figure the Clintons have made, in total, since leaving the White House is over $3 billion. That's $3 BILLION folks. It includes the speaking fees, fundraisers, Clinton Foundation pay-to-play deals, Wall Street donations, and even the usury interest they charged on micro loans to poor women in Third World countries.

She wasn't just "helping" the Swiss bank. Her real service was to wealthy Americans with secret accounts, i.e. her donor base. There were thousands of them and she kept their names out of the news.

"BULLSHIT"