Caitlin Johnstone on the only hope
Nobody’s Coming To Humanity’s Rescue; We’ve Got To Save Ourselves
Nobody’s Coming To Humanity’s Rescue; We’ve Got To Save Ourselves AI isn’t going to save us. Tech innovation isn’t going to save us. Your favorite politician isn’t going to save us. The Epstein files aren’t going to save us. China isn’t going to save us. The aliens aren’t going to save us.
No one is coming to save us. There is no deus ex machina resolution to the plotline of the human story.
We’re going to have to save ourselves.
In ancient Greek theater they used to resolve plays by having gods come in at the end to punish the villains and reward the heroes. The actors playing the gods would either be lowered onto the stage by a crane or raised by machine from a trap door below, hence the term deus ex machina. Today it’s used to refer to any lazy plot resolution where the protagonists are rescued out of the blue by an external force rather than by the fruit of their own struggles and character development; if the gods just come in to save them at the end, then nothing they did up until that point mattered, leaving the audience dissatisfied and staring at the writer instead of at the story.
When you look at the existential crises facing humanity today, it’s tempting to find hope in some belief about external forces coming to our rescue without our having to struggle and change ourselves. You see such salvation stories everywhere:
Elon Musk is going to automate everything so we don’t have to work and then help humanity become an interplanetary species.
Artificial superintelligence is right around the corner and it will explode our scientific understanding of the universe and give birth to transformational new technologies.
The release of the Epstein files will expose all the corruption that’s been poisoning our society and lead to the arrest and disempowerment of all the evil bad guys.
Electing progressive Democrats or populist Republicans can put heroes into office who will transform the American political system for us.
The rise of China is going to reshape the world order and help bring about the end of capitalism.
UFO disclosure is happening any minute now and it’s going to bring in alien technologies that will save humanity from destruction.
And it never happens. The Greek god never makes his entrance. The actors are left standing there in a long, awkward silence while the set collapses around them.It’s never gonna happen, folks. Apollo missed his entrance and Zeus is a no-show.
Nobody’s going to save us but us. We’re going to have to change. We’re going to have to act. We’ll keep hurtling in the direction of tyrannical dystopia, environmental catastrophe and nuclear armageddon until we do.
We’re going to have to help each other snap out of the hypnotic trance of propaganda and awaken to the truth of what’s really going on in our world, and show each other that real change is both necessary and possible.
We’re going to have to wake up enough that we can use the power of our numbers to force our rulers to stop stealing from us, oppressing us, killing our biosphere and murdering people.
We’re going to have to awaken from the trance of ego and become a truly conscious species, so that we can build a healthy world without falling back in to our self-destructive patterning when the revolution is over.
Everyone wants change, but no one wants to change. That’s why the deus ex machina plot resolution is preferable in our minds.
It’s just a fantasy, though. Change is coming from nowhere but ourselves. Maintaining hope in the fantasy is the first obstacle preventing us from waking up to reality.
Every species eventually hits a juncture where it must either make adaptations to changing conditions or go extinct. We are at that juncture today. We’ll either pass that test or we won’t, and if we pass it, it will be because of our own efforts, sacrifices, and self-transformations.
Nobody’s going to do it for us.
I got nothing to add.


Comments
Autonomy and heteronomy
This is the dichotomy you see in the utopian dream of Cornelius Castoriadis.
Autonomy = when a society takes responsibility, collectively, for the institutions which guide their behaviors (or, specifically, the laws which they create and follow).
Heteronomy = when a society shags off responsibility for their laws, behaviors, and so on to some imagined external entity (God, or money, or the dictator, or progress or whatever) that "made them do it."
One has the feeling that the vast majority of social behaviors are heteronomous and that autonomy, like Athenian democracy or like Occupy, is a small and evanescent light that appears in the social fabric now and then.
Johnstone, IMHO, is arguing for autonomy...
"It hasn't been okay to be smart in the United States for centuries" -- Frank Zappa
I have to confess
that I have no idea what heteronomy means. I don't recall ever seeing it before now. So I am OK with rejecting it in favor of autonomy assuming it accurately represents what Caitlin said:
I cried when I wrote this song. Sue me if I play too long.
For most of civilized existence --
-- what, ten thousand years or so -- people have behaved as if they were in one of a variety of trances, and in your quote above, Johnstone names two: the "trance of propaganda" and the "trance of ego." In such trances, the people in a particular society assign to an imaginary entity ("money," "God," "government") control over their wills and their lives. That is what Castoriadis called heteronomy. Heteronomy specifies a universal fetish which occupies all of our time.
In this regard, heteronomy is a far more important concept than autonomy. Autonomy, for Castoriadis, specifies the good society, with genuine democracy or genuine socialism or genuine collective responsibility. In historical time, autonomy has not happened often.
The current favorite version of heteronomy is the collective trance of money. This is why the podcasters note the general trend among those in the political class claiming to support "America first" or to "make America great again": take the money, and fool the people. Or, to be more specific, the spell is that they, our so-called "elected representatives," take AIPAC money, money supplied by Zionist billionaires, and get out there telling the world why genocide is such a great thing, or that it's not really genocide (while in fact it is), or something like that.
"Propaganda" is, to continue the example, like all the babble about "Israel's right to exist," and "ego" is like how our political class behaves all the time.
"It hasn't been okay to be smart in the United States for centuries" -- Frank Zappa
Apropos juncture — “Realtivity at the Juncture” by Skippy Ioane,
Hawaiian musician, kupuna (elder), and sovereignty activist …