First, watch it for yourself... and see the audience booing Hillary's triangulated BS:
[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY1cDl2dao0]
New Yorkers have a BS meter and it went off in spades last night and they promptly booed Hillary letting her know she was seen for the empty suit that she is.

And what do the $HillBots do overnight?

They publish a diary the very next morning at 4:36 AM pushing the sexist meme to cover up Hillary's failed triangulation BS, attempting to claim — that when Sanders puts Hillary on the spot demanding a "YES or NO" answer in order to get her to take a definitive stand on "legislation to lift the cap on taxable income and expand Social Security" — that it is sexism.

#AsIF

• In what reality is it sexist to demand a straight-forward answer to a straight-forward question sexist?

Okay, so when Bernie does exactly what so many of us Americans would just love to do, which is to putting Hillary on the spot, and thus get Hillary (Heck, it would be nice to get ANY politician) to finally answer a straight-forward question with an unqualified definitive unequivocal straight-forward "YES or NO" answer, to which she, in complete Clinton Triangulated character, predictably responds with yet another parsed NON DEFINITIVE qualified parsed talking point:

SANDERS: Are you or are you not supporting legislation to lift the cap on taxable income and expand Social Security for 58 years and increase benefits, YES OR NO?

CLINTON: I am .... I have said yes, we are going to pick the best way, or combination of ways...

(causing the audience to understandably justifiably erupt in boos)

Note this bullshit piece on DailyKos (Daily-Hillary):
The angry sexism of "YES OR NO?!!" by dhonig.

And here is the BS meme and money quotes, so you don't have to click the link to earn money for Markos:

Last night, one of Sanders’ big applause lines came when he thundered his demand that Clinton answer his question whether she would save Social Security by lifting the cap. “YES OR NO?!?!” he thundered at her......

SANDERS: Are you or are you not supporting legislation to lift the cap on taxable income and expand Social Security for 58 years and increase benefits...

CLINTON: I am...

SANDERS: — YES OR NO?!?

Note how the diarist transcribes the verbal exchange to make it appear as if Bernie interrupted Hillary when it was Hillary who interrupted Bernie with her stuttering "I am..." before Bernie was finished phrasing his question. Clearly Hillary was so eager to push her spin that she could not wait until Bernie had finished his sentence.

Transcription should have been, as I included above:

SANDERS: Are you or are you not supporting legislation to lift the cap on taxable income and expand Social Security for 58 years and increase benefits, YES OR NO?

CLINTON: I am ... I have said.... [snip]

Watch the video. See for yourself.

And here's the BS sexist meme deflection:

First, the privilege was the idea that there is only one simple solution to a complex problem, and he had it. It’s pretty typical, frankly, and any female in an office has seen it. A guy gets an idea and then demands everybody agree, rather than consider other ideas, or even that a big problem may have multiple solutions. How many of us have been there, where a guy has an idea, and if a woman says, “well, I think we should think about X, too, because it’s not so simple,” he answers, “you’re trying to change the subject — answer whether you agree or not”?

Second, the privilege was the idea that he, not the moderator, gets to demand that she answer his question.... [snip]

Third, the privilege that he gets to interrupt her.... [snip]

And fourth, that he gets to raise his voice .... [snip]

In real life, in a real debate, each person asks the other person direct questions. These MSM moderated debates are BS because the biased moderator all-too-often allows the politician to sidestep answering straight-forward questions that put them on the spot, which is a farce.

TOO BAD, HILLARY!

Bernie ignored the BS farce.

THE TRUTH:

FishOutofWater IB JOHN Apr 15 · 05:37:12 AM

Tone police & typo police. Team Hillary at work.

Sanders pushed Hillary for a concise answer because Hillary filibustered all night. Dragging the sexism canard into a matter of debating style is a predictable tactic of team Hillary. Hillary has faced enough real BS all these years that there’s no need for her supporters to make them up.

FFS, lets fight real battles over substance not make shit up over tone.

$HillBot Defense:

RASalvatore FishOutofWater Apr 15 · 05:45:45 AM

Sorry, she answered that question right out of the gate. She said she’d support a raise in the cap on SS if that was the way they decided to fund SS benefit increases and longevity.
[snip]

More truth...

Tool dhonig Apr 15 · 05:40:06 AM

Lifting the cap is the only solution unless you love cat food. What other options are there? Privatize? Savings accounts? You achieved the maximum effect by raising the cap on taxable social security income. Millions of seniors can have their income raised without anyone needlessly suffering.

Bernie only wants a modest increase to 250,000 a year for FICA; up from the 118k it is at now after being raised from 113k. This is a very incremental position. I'd rather Bernie be bolder and say that SS should apply to income upwards of 10,000,000 a year. It affects earners in those brackets very little.so much so they would never even notice the change.

This problem has been studied. This is the only realistic solution for people who are serious about making social security solvent for future generations and ensuring seniors don't face their golden years in poverty.

webranding Apr 15 · 04:45:34 AM

In this Diary you are doing the same thing you are accusing Sanders of. He “thundered.” He “demanded.”

His question was very straightforward. Try as you might to muddy the waters, a lift on the cap would get you, me, our kids and our kids kids Social Security.

That ain’t a small thing.

There is very real sexism in this world, but this ain't it, and it is an insult to those who have suffered from such abuse to be using this BS in this manner. It devalues and pollutes the discussion thus weakening the effort to address this pervasive problem of authentic sexism. And yet Hillary and her supporters claim to care about Women issues.

Not-so-much.

It really disgusts me when false claims of sexism are used to protect a triangulating Corporate Puppet from having to take a definitive stand, especially when it is regarding something so fundamental to the Democratic Party's core values, namely, SOCIAL SECURITY. These people are insulting our intelligence with these BS games, but fortunately, in this internet savvy information age, the NYC audience saw through Hillary's BS in a New York Second and responded with a resounding booing.

Bet that one left a mark on her ego.

And if Hillary loses NY State? Now THAT will really leave a mark on her ego that she will NEVER live down. It will prove what everyone knows, that Hillary is a Faux New Yorker, just like she is a Faux Democrat.