Open Thread - Thurs 21 Nov 2024 - Duh!
Duh!
Yesterday (Tuesday) there was an article in the news: 'Bill Clinton suggests US is more likely to elect female president if candidate is Republican'. Bill Clinton basically said that the first woman elected would probably be from the right wing. I wanna tell him all the upper ranks of his party are center or right-wing too. Hah.
The thing is, I've known this little truth for a long, long time. In English type countries, like America, Canada, Australia, UK (not New Zealand, go New Zealand!) the dislike isn't really over gender, it's over politics, and maybe over the way the person running for high office rose into their role in those politics. Electing a right-wing woman is easier than electing a supposed left-wing woman, especially if the right-wing woman has a political history of her own and is not riffing off that of her husband. An example: Thatcher (whom I despised), in the UK, had her own political history. She wasn't there because of who her husband was and the positions he'd 'served' in.
NOT her husband, but close enough, heh. (from the Washington Times)
In the USA who is offered for election has to do with who gets media attention, how that person is presented by their party, and also, the life history (to a certain extent) of the person offered. Of the two females offered by the Dems, #1 was the wife of a former president (Clinton), and that sure seemed to be one of her major good points. Yes, she served as Sec of State under Obama but... was she good at it? Did she do things people cared about? How many former Sec of States get elected pres? Ohh, 7, and the last one was Buchanan in the 1840s! #2 was some lady who was a not much liked attorney general for CA for a few years. She served as vice president after getting no votes and no approval from the common people in the 2020 primaries. She was foisted on those people as a presidential candidate for the Democrats by the powers that be without even the slighted hint of having to gain approval from the hoi polloi.
Could the Dems pick a woman to run who is not obviously just a puppet? Who has some ideas and principles of her own and can talk about them? Who did not get into her position by marriage? Who has a fairly favorable history? That might work, even if she is a 'lefty'. The right wing seems to have done that, at least in the case of Thatcher.
As a side note, I lived in the UK during some of the Thatcher years. It was, where I was living (the Northeast), bleak. I returned to the UK soon after 'we' elected Bush. He was visiting England and was slated to take a much ballyhooed walk along the beach in the northern part of the country. A fellow student of mine got angry at me for electing such a *ss - since I must have done so since I was a Yank. I told her I hadn't voted for him, and asked her if she had voted for Thatcher. I knew she hadn't, few in the Northeast had. She got really quiet, her eyes widened and she mouthed 'ohh', hugged me and never bothered me about that again.
Thanks for reading. Keep on keeping on. Here's the open thread - remember, everything is interesting if you dive deep enough, so tell us about where you're diving!
Comments
Happy Thursday!
It's cool here, and wet. And windy at times. And that's ok. Nikko has really gone into dog teenager-hood and its driving us nuts. He keeps 'forgetting' all the stuff he knew just a week or two ago, like, 'come' or 'sit'! Luckily, it won't last too long :).
Hope everyone is doing well. What's up with you?
If you're poor now, my friend, then you'll stay poor.
These days, only the rich get given more. -- Martial book 5:81, c. AD 100 or so
Nothing ever changes -- Sima, c. AD 2020 or so
Hey now
Not sure the gender of the various heads of state
is indicative of their relative moral compass headings.
Heard this Jackson Browne song this morning.
Sings about money in politics. Seems pertinent.
thanks for putting up the open thread Sima
Hey, lookee here!
Here’s a part of my white-flash nightmare, in real life. This has everything but the final flash.
Last night, in Dneipro. Coming soon, to a neighborhood near you. Thanks, Brandon!
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1859583958863757683
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1859520704422531294
Twice bitten, permanently shy.
Uh, Elenskiiyiyiyiyi says ....
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/nov/21/russia-fired-intercontinen...
Actually, it was a giant invisible Korean using holy hand grenades.
be well and have a good one
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
The current conjecture
is that this was one or more RS-26 Rubezh missiles, which are probably better thought of as MRBMs than ICBMs- but certainly long enough range to lay waste to anything in Europe. If that’s what it or they were. Those clusters of warheads showed little spread- but it seems to me that there was indeed MIRVing going on. So was it 6 missiles each with 5-6 warheads, or one with 30-36 (which was supposed to be banned under the Salt-II Treaty)?
I wonder what Brandon will decide to do next, since they pretty clearly didn’t get the desired full-on nuclear exchange. He’ll apparently keep poking the bear until he gets what he wants, the damned demented fool.
Twice bitten, permanently shy.
can someone please take the keys away
.
from Brandon? He'd be happy with
a toy steering wheel if he got an ice cream.
Why won't the camel press the 25th amend?
Oh, never mind. Rhetorical question. May be
better to storm Delaware (the state of rest).
I think
she’s still on vacation in Hawaii with her AIPAC handler/husband, sponging up Chardonnay as fast as she can go to soothe her wounds….
Twice bitten, permanently shy.
I think it's too early to tell
If this were an ICBM or IRBM the US could easily confirm that. The quality of the video evidence is poor imo, if not dubious. I saw one guestimate on DPA, one RS-26 with 6 mrv, each with 4-6 submunitions. If that's what it was. Why do we have to guess when our "space force" knows exactly what it was? This makes me suspicious to say the least. The spread is not characteristic of MIRV, maybe MRV. To me the spread looks too small for a nuclear launch vehicle. In another photo shown on the DPA video at 12:44, ostensibly demonstrative (as an exemplar) of "MIRV" appearance in the target zone, the photo looks more like tactical ballistic missile launches from different launch sites (it's a still picture).
The other thing that bothers me about this story, is why would Russia demonstrate it's IRBM/ICBM in this manner? It's the ballistic track that is most revealing in terms of detection and identifying launch vehicle type. This is what is ordinarily discussed in intelligence observations of such weapons being tested and typically discussed in open sources once the evaluation is complete.. But thus far that appears completely absent here. At least I haven't seen or heard any such reports yet. This is the DPA link-
ICBM STRIKES DNIPRO, UKRAINE.
語必忠信 行必正直
Agreed - it is
very early on. And I’m sure that the Space Force knows exactly what was launched, and from where.
I’m equally certain that the American public will be the last people to whom their masters would ever release information. We are to be kept fat, dumb, happy, and in the dark.
I’m just glad that we’re not on launch-on-warning status at the moment. Just the same, I’m sure that the guys at Schreiver were placing a lot of phone calls last night.
So, whaddaya figure the next poke will be? I think it’ll be an unannounced test launch from a boomer in the Indian Ocean towards the Kwajalein range. Something that gets a little closer to real than just giving the Ukies more toys, just for the thrill of it. I would have said an unannounced midnight elephant-walk of all the B-2s to just go cruise around the Arctic Circle for a few hours, but we only have 19 of them left, and they are pretty fragile- we don’t want to use them up for nothing, do we.
I have zero respect for the NCA at this point- whoever it is. This is now altogether too close to the edge for anyone’s comfort.
On edit: this from the BBC-
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c20726y20kvt
Twice bitten, permanently shy.
Putin says new IRBM called Oresshnik, not icbm.
be well and have a good one
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
Good morning sima!
Nikko must get on with adulthood before he gets to stand in the corner.
I honestly never gave gender much thought in re elections.
It doesn't matter if they stand or squat to pee as far as I am concerned.
Brilliant Bill knows the single "liberal" position Harris has in Rove v. Wade.
Must go have a brief trial with a client I have spent one hour with about 6 weeks ago. Let's hope I will recognize him.
sigh....
Thanks for the OT, chica!
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
Nice cartoon, wrong background
You know what it ought to be, and it ain't the Pearly Gates. (evil grin)
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
What Putin says
hypersonic non-nuclear missiles were fired on a Ukie defense facility.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20241121/putin-russia-strikes-ukrainian-defense...
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
Gaetz
has withdrawn from consideration for AG nomination.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981