Meme Thursday: Give your life for capitalism, commie!
Submitted by gjohnsit on Thu, 09/08/2022 - 3:37pm
I'm going with a theme today. And that theme is "How much do you love capitalism?"
That article leads us directly to this one, just five years later.
Of course America is not be outdone.
And then there is our dystopian future that we can all look forward to.
Won't someone think about the poor landlords.
Comments
Personally, I do not favor capitalism.
It has become a rich excuse to shaft the poor.
Bottom line is all that matters to the folks in charge is
if they get richer by destroying earth and the inhabitants
so much the bettor. Bet your a**. Making out like bandits.
With a little luck
Apparently robots are cheaper
than you and I. Not sure what an NPC is
but luck and video games have little in
common. Not my idea of gainful employment.
thanks for posting!
[video:https://youtu.be/Lg6pP4GSGLY]
NPC=
Non Player Character
"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?" ~Orwell, "1984"
OK then, had conjured up other more weird things
but still don't quite get the non player character
but then, I'm not a gamer.
thanks!
So our governments are worried about
youth in Asia (specifically China) but approve of euthanasia.
"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?" ~Orwell, "1984"
The landlords likely to lose...
are the 'mom and pop' level ones that often have (real) sweat equity in a modest number of properties, not the mega-players:
source: ZeroHedge
Here’s an article on ending life for the useless eaters
Link
This was discussed in 2014.
Current debates on end-of-life sedation: an international expert elicitation study
Increasing debate on whether it’s acceptable to euthanize the elderly, disabled, terminally ill or just old people who no longer add anything of value to society? Just who started the debate? Was it family members who were tired of watching their inheritance being eaten up by nursing home fees or maybe people in government who were watching how old people on Medicaid were draining the funds?
I think if people with terminal illness want to exit the scene because they are tired of the endless pain want to exit early that should be their decision. But it’s a damn slippery slope when anyone else is involved in the decision and especially the government. Unfortunately I’ve never had a dawg that has died a natural death and I’ve always been comfortable when I made the decision to let them go instead of suffering until they did. It was heartbreaking, but once we start doing it to people…I’m just not okay with it.
There were problems with running a campaign of Joy while committing a genocide? Who could have guessed?
Harris is unburdened of speaking going forward.
Isn't sedation different from euthanasia ?
If one must go, make it painless. Says so right in my health care proxy and living will.
Now about that clause in the life insurance policy ...
perhaps it is just terminology (pun intended) about assisted suicide and otherwise?
If the policy of eliminating the poor
on the rationale that it is easier/cheaper than eliminating poverty is due to capitalism, might we not expect its being pushed in say, Texas or Florida rather than woke/progressive Canada?
Not that there aren't more than a few Canadians that have their priorities straight:
https://citizenfreepress.com/column-1/canadian-lumberjack-knows-the-score/
(cowboy, actually, but not worth quibbling over)
It'll only be Capitalism
(with a capital C) when euthanasia is A) legal everywhere, B) available on every streetcorner, C) heavily advertised as being the only way out, and D) actually obtaining it requires that you first liquidate all your assets and hand over every dime you can dig up.
*That* will be the final development of Capitalism-As-A-Service.
Twice bitten, permanently shy.
Capitalism of the future