he used only original source.
I do not view this as an opinion piece.

the world's population to approximately 500 thousand to 1 million controlled by a one-world government. This was nearly accomplished with the downfall of the USSR in 1991. Fortunately, China and Russia did not agree to this plan.

The Fabian Society, Eugenics and the Historic Forces Behind Today’s Systemic Breakdown
Matthew Ehret Mar 12

The financial system is clearly careening towards a point of dissolution.

It isn’t an exaggeration to say that the collapse itself has already happened and we simply have not yet felt the full brutal force of the shockwave accelerating toward us. This process is comparable to a tectonic snap deep in the crust under the ocean. The snap happens and a tsunami has begun. It will hit the beach front with devastating consequences and only by breaking the habit of living in the myopic “moment” might those on the beach have a chance to get to safer ground before it is too late.

The question isn’t “will the system collapse”, but rather when will the full tsunami hit?

Additionally, WHAT will be the operating system that is brought online to replace the chaos of supply chain meltdowns, hyperinflation, scarcity and violence that will ensue?

Two Systems Clash

Already we can clearly see two opposing patterns that have taken form, illustrated in the remarks recently made by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres who said:

“I fear our world is creeping towards two different sets of economic, trade, financial, and technology rules, two divergent approaches in the development of artificial intelligence—and ultimately two different military and geo-political strategies. This is a recipe for trouble. It would be far less predictable and far more dangerous than the Cold War.”

Guterres is speaking of two divergent paradigms, so what are they?

On the one hand, there is the ideology that Guterres himself devoutly supports which has taken on the title in recent years of “The Davos Agenda”, or “The Great Reset”.

Guterres even went so far as to sign UN-WEF integration treaty in June 2020 uniting both globalist bodies into one Borg-like operating system, announcing: “The Great Reset is a welcome recognition that this human tragedy must be a wake-up call. We must build more equal, inclusive and sustainable economies and societies that are more resilient in the face of pandemics, climate change and the many other global changes we face.”

While the Great Reset professes to use the current pandemic to push through a complete overhaul of human society under a technocratic world government, the opposing system driven by those nations not invited to the recent “Global Democracy summit” and labelled “authoritarians” by Soros and the Davos clique wish to avoid being sacrificed.

Where one system is premised on a scientifically managed depopulation agenda from the top, the other system asserts the right of sovereign nations to continue as the only legitimate basis for international law and scientific progress to be the basis of economic ideology. The terms of the new system were recently re-emphasized throughout the 5000 word Russia-China Joint Statement on the terms of the New Era now emerging.

Putin himself recently laid out these terms stating: “Only sovereign states can effectively respond to the challenges of the times and the demands of the citizens. Accordingly, any effective international order should take into account the interests and capabilities of the state and proceed on that basis, and not try to prove that they should not exist. Furthermore, it is impossible to impose anything on anyone, be it the principles underlying the sociopolitical structure or values that someone, for their own reasons, has called “universal”. After all, it is clear that when a real crisis strikes, there is only one universal value left and that is human life, which each state decides for itself how best to protect based on its abilities, culture and traditions.”

What a breath of fresh air!

Compare that to Klaus Schwab’s infamous “you’ll own nothing and be happy”.

From where did the dystopic world order of the Davos Crowd emerge?

H.G. Wells’ Open Conspiracy

It might surprise you, but to answer that question, we will need to jump back nearly one century into the past and meet an ageing misanthropic social engineer named Herbert George Wells who wrote a 1928 opus called The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution calling for world government, and depopulation saying:

“The Open Conspiracy rests upon a disrespect for nationality, and there is no reason why it should tolerate noxious or obstructive governments because they hold their own in this or that patch of human territory.”
...
HG Wells was explicit in his many works of non-fiction writing in 1904: “The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failure, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies.”
...
A New Operating System Emerges

I am here referring to the moment that Xi Jinping made it known to the world that China would not continue as the cheap labor hub of the west indefinitely and instead a new program dubbed the “Belt and Road Initiative” was unveiled as the driving force of China’s foreign policy. Soon this program merged with the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union, and won over 140 nations of the world to its operating system with branches stretching into the Arctic dubbed the Polar Silk Road. The multipolar system of Eurasia which had been slowly moving forward between 1999-2013 began to take on an accelerated rate of growth with new financial institutions, large scale infrastructure projects, and new diplomatic platforms built up along the way.
...
Now Russia and China, both encircled by the U.S. military industrial complex, have released a powerful joint statement establishing a manifesto for a new operating system that enshrines the principle of sovereign nation states, and activities that promote win-win cooperation and population growth as a bedrock of order.
...
Might the current freedom movements springing up across the trans Atlantic force a shift in the elements of the political class that have not lost their humanity to a World Economic Forum borg-like commitment to assimilate everything into a unipolar transhumanist priesthood? That remains to be seen.

puppet mastered by the foundation owning elites. Sounds about right.

the engine of production, capitalism, has effectively squandered the possibility of finding a sustainable relationship between the human population and the rest of the life forms on the planet by rapacious consumption of natural resources and ignoring the reciprocal nature and balance of the natural world.

These wounds in the web of life on this planet can not be healed so long as we continue with our outsized human presence, which continues growing. The WEF solution is totalitarian control and culling the human herd. I do not see this as a viable solution, primarily because it fails to address the destructive nature of the avarice capitalism embodies as well as its complete disregard for the reciprocal order of the natural world.

If there is to be a solution to our current conundrum, it must of needs come from an impulse of mutual benefit, not dominion. It must arise from love and respect for each other and all life forms. But it must also acknowledge the inescapable reality that there are already far to many humans on the planet to support our collective lifestyle. Perhaps with a combination of consuming less and procreating less we can find a more sustainable future.

on who directly and indirectly owns everything and on how it all interlocks. Not so crazy about his "tested in every communist country" bit (like many others) in part because I'm not sure it is even meaningful can it be proved, can it be disproved, can we even define what a communist country is, etc.

I personally don't go along with the attempt to imply that the covid-19 outbreak was all part of a plot - evidence is a bit thin. Iy you wargame a nuke attack on the US you obviously limit the foes to nuclear nations, with enough power to try it, and some sort of sufficient grievance or causus belli. If you wargame a massive viral outbreak you probably will go with some member of the coronavirus family because they are multitudinous and arguably common, known to mutate and jump species, etc., and you will probably source it to China because historically a lot of them have come from there; so the existence of such a wargame isn't really the big red flag he seems to be trying to imply it is.

All the same, the video needs to be widely disseminated IMHO, and I intend to forward it as soon as I figure out how (I have no clue how to embed a rumble in anything, let alone an e-mail).

be well and have a good one

how all-encompassing the monopoly is. It looks as if a very few own everything. George Carlin was wrong, it's not a big club. It's a very very small club. It's tiny, microscopic. Carlin was right though about the fact that "you (meaning just about everyone) ain't in it.
On the other hand, ninety-nine point nine percent is a large percentage.

edited to ad TY for the video, it's a good one.