@Lookout

when the shitlibs were making fun of people using it. Yep. This and the other treatments that could save ones life are all just stupid things that dumb Trump supporters use instead of taking the totally safe vaccines that haven’t caused any deaths. And yes I’m serious because Trump supporters have ruined VAERS.

It’s something I can use because the betadyne spray and mouthwash gives me horrible insomnia. I have an abundant supply if anyone wants some. I’ll keep one of each just in case of exposure.

From Reuters

We'll all be dead before FDA releases full COVID vaccine record, plaintiffs say

advance of a court hearing before a federal judge in Fort Worth, Texas, Tuesday, the Food and Drug Administration has offered by the end of January to make public 12,000 pages of data that it relied on to license Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine.

At first glance, that sounds like a lot of material.

Except a group of scientists and doctors who’ve sued the agency under the Freedom of Information Act is seeking an estimated 400,000-plus additional pages of information about the vaccine’s approval. Under the FDA’s proposed schedule – the agency pledges to release “a minimum” of 500 pages a month after the initial dump – the full trove might not be made public until the year 2097.

The plaintiffs want all the information in 108 days – the same amount of time they say it took the FDA to approve the vaccine.

You know if Fauci can read all those pages in just a few months then I see no reason why it needs to take 75 effing years to release them to the public. But why is it up to the FDA to release them? Get em from the source. Unless Fauci is being the door jam to keep them locked up?

https://vrevealed.com/c19/viewing

I learned about nebulizing hydrogen peroxide (1-3%) to cure illness. Below is the story which was told.
Several doctors are successfully treating COVID in this way...
Download Levy's book, Rapid Virus Recovery, for free https://rvr.medfoxpub.com/

http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v17n13.shtml

Over the course of this past year, she treated 20 different individuals with COVID infection. Most of these individuals were already significantly ill with their infections when they first came to her. Seven of the 20 cases had decided to be tested for COVID, and all of them tested positive. The rest had not taken a test, yet they had similar clinical profiles, and they could reliably be assumed to be dealing with COVID infections in the setting of a pandemic. Of particular note is that some of the patients had such advanced infections that severe respiratory difficulty was apparent. In a similar setting in the United States early in 2020, all of the patients having such severe shortness of breath would have been promptly intubated and given mechanically-assisted ventilation on respirator machines.

As she already had some experience with treating colds and flu among friends and family with the HP nebulization, along with what had worked well in her own personal experience, she began all of her "COVID patients" on the following protocol of HP nebulization:

Several milliliters of undiluted 3% hydrogen peroxide was placed in the nebulization chamber that was connected to a tabletop air compressor/pump-style nebulization machine.
Nebulization was initiated with a mask covering the nose and mouth to deliver the nebulized HP into the nose, sinuses, throat, and airways.
Each nebulization was continued for a full 30 minutes. Three treatments a day were given for a full five days.

All of the patients reported significant improvement after the completion of the first 30 minutes of nebulization, including near-immediate improvement in the ease of breathing by those who had the most advanced infections. Some noted nasal and throat irritation with increased mucus production, but all declined the option to dilute the 3% solution as they expressed the desire to resolve their infections as rapidly as possible. After the first two days of nebulization (6 treatments for a total of 180 minutes) all patients felt much better, well on the path to complete resolution of their viral symptoms. At that time some opted to take a 50% dilution (1.5% HP) for the remaining 9 treatments over the last three days. At the end of 5 days, all 20 patients appeared to have achieved complete clinical cures.

I didn't know what a nebulizer was...

So many treatment options have been dismissed and suppressed.

@Lookout

is also up - This was in episode 8 or 9 I think.
https://vrevealed.com/c19/own/martin

https://vrevealed.com/c19/viewing

I learned about nebulizing hydrogen peroxide (1-3%) to cure illness. Below is the story which was told.
Several doctors are successfully treating COVID in this way...
Download Levy's book, Rapid Virus Recovery, for free https://rvr.medfoxpub.com/

http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v17n13.shtml

Over the course of this past year, she treated 20 different individuals with COVID infection. Most of these individuals were already significantly ill with their infections when they first came to her. Seven of the 20 cases had decided to be tested for COVID, and all of them tested positive. The rest had not taken a test, yet they had similar clinical profiles, and they could reliably be assumed to be dealing with COVID infections in the setting of a pandemic. Of particular note is that some of the patients had such advanced infections that severe respiratory difficulty was apparent. In a similar setting in the United States early in 2020, all of the patients having such severe shortness of breath would have been promptly intubated and given mechanically-assisted ventilation on respirator machines.

As she already had some experience with treating colds and flu among friends and family with the HP nebulization, along with what had worked well in her own personal experience, she began all of her "COVID patients" on the following protocol of HP nebulization:

Several milliliters of undiluted 3% hydrogen peroxide was placed in the nebulization chamber that was connected to a tabletop air compressor/pump-style nebulization machine.
Nebulization was initiated with a mask covering the nose and mouth to deliver the nebulized HP into the nose, sinuses, throat, and airways.
Each nebulization was continued for a full 30 minutes. Three treatments a day were given for a full five days.

All of the patients reported significant improvement after the completion of the first 30 minutes of nebulization, including near-immediate improvement in the ease of breathing by those who had the most advanced infections. Some noted nasal and throat irritation with increased mucus production, but all declined the option to dilute the 3% solution as they expressed the desire to resolve their infections as rapidly as possible. After the first two days of nebulization (6 treatments for a total of 180 minutes) all patients felt much better, well on the path to complete resolution of their viral symptoms. At that time some opted to take a 50% dilution (1.5% HP) for the remaining 9 treatments over the last three days. At the end of 5 days, all 20 patients appeared to have achieved complete clinical cures.

I didn't know what a nebulizer was...

So many treatment options have been dismissed and suppressed.

@ovals49

I have asked how these people live with their conscience, but I guess that’s self explanatory. What’s it like knowing you can save lives, but choose not to? I can’t even kill spiders. I put them outside.

and refuses to correct his Ivermectin study to reflect actual, data based, positive conclusions that indicate 80% improvement in survival rates. The ghost written conclusions of his paper recommends “further study”, leading to a non recommendation by the sponsor of the study and the continued suppression of this safe, cheap and highly effective COVID therapy.

12,000 unnecessary deaths per day is apparently no big deal for Andrew. He suggests that he needs six weeks to sort it out. That 80% survival improvement would save over 500,000 lives in that six weeks. The clip of the conversation between Hill and Dr. Tess Lawrie took place in January!

@snoopydawg

While these recommendations have been implemented in many overseas sites, logistical and procurement issues still limit their full implementation in some.

All Middle Eastern, Asian, North African, Latin American, and Caribbean refugees should receive presumptive therapy with:
Albendazole, single dose of 400 mg (200 mg for children 12-23 months)
AND
Ivermectin, two doses 200 mcg/Kg orally once a day for 2 days before departure to the United States.

Guidelines for Overseas Presumptive Treatment of
Strongyloidiasis, Schistosomiasis, and Soil-Transmitted
Helminth Infections for Refugees Resettling to the
United States
February 6, 2019

Refugees lack COVID shots because drugmakers fear lawsuits

Tens of millions of migrants may be denied COVID-19 vaccines from a global programme because some major manufacturers are worried about legal risks from harmful side effects, according to officials and internal documents from Gavi, the charity operating the programme, reviewed by Reuters.

Nearly two years into a pandemic that has already killed more than 5 million people, only about 7% of people in low-income countries have received a dose. Vaccine deliveries worldwide have been delayed by production problems, hoarding by rich countries, export restrictions and red tape. Many programmes have also been hampered by hesitancy among the public read more .

The legal concerns are an additional hurdle for public health officials tackling the coronavirus – even as officials say unvaccinated people offer an ideal environment for it to mutate into new variants that threaten hard-won immunity around the world. Many COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have required that countries indemnify them for any adverse events suffered by individuals as a result of the vaccines, the United Nations says.

But that buffer does not have any mechanism to offer compensation. Gavi, which operates COVAX with the World Health Organization (WHO), says that where those applying for doses, mainly NGOs, can't bear legal risks, deliveries from that stockpile can only be made if vaccine-makers accept liability.

I don’t know if it’s true, but I’m seeing reports that immigrants here are getting ivermectin. I can’t find where it has been confirmed tho. Will keep an eye open.

@snoopydawg Here is a comment form an acquaintance from another website

From: THE ANT 12/17/2021 12:14:00 PM
of 181585

J and J appears to have protected me from COVID Omicron coming for all the mRNA crowd. Wildfire ending to COVID in many places Never been a case of a recovered patient passing on COVID

Notice how he believes that J&J which isn't gene therapy worked against Omicron, while Covid is attacking everyone who had the Moderna/Pfizer shot's. I wonder is anyone following this theory or if it's a thing, for I saw tptb are attacking the J&J shot again as unsafe.

I try my best to throw spiders outside also

Fauci wants Covid mandate to be rebranded

White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said that he can get more Americans to comply with vaccine mandates if they’re rebranded as “requirements.”
Asked by CNBC whether coronavirus vaccine mandates are “counterproductive,” and might make Americans more hesitant to take future vaccines, Fauci said on Friday that dropping the word “mandate” seems to make people more willing to get jabbed.

“Mandates – that's a radioactive word,” he said. “‘Requirements,’ people seem to respond better to that. They work.”

In addition to rebranding mandates as the friendlier-sounding “requirements,” Fauci also suggested that the definition of “vaccinated” could be changed from meaning anyone who’s received two doses of Pfizer’s or Moderna’s vaccine, or one dose of Johnson & Johnson’s shot, to someone who has received this initial dose plus a booster shot.

Fauci, read my lips! But one thing that does need to be change is calling them vaccines. They are not even according to the drug company’s websites. They are classified as gene therapy.

@CB

I'll try to catch up.

Right now and through the weekend the COVID Revealed people are running a replay where you can watch as many of the episodes as you like

@CB

* End of Phase III Clinical Trial
The long term safety data that was supposed to be assessed at this point is no longer possible to ascertain as the placebo group crossed over two years previously.

PFIZER’S 6 MONTH REPORT DATA
LEVEL 1 EVIDENCE OF HARM

* Pfizer’s most recent report indicates an Efficacy of 91.3%. (Which means a reduction in positive cases compared to placebo group.)

* But it also showed, compared to the placebo group, an increase in illness and deaths.

• There is no benefit to a reduction in cases if it comes at the cost of increased sickness and death.

* The basis for the Emergency Use Authorization was the Confirmed COVID cases of 8 vs 162, which meant a Relative Risk Reduction of 95%. But when dealing with such a small number of cases, any change can impact the results significantly.

* Lost to follow up means they lost touch with those subjects and can’t confirm whether they got sick or not. They don’t know.

* Suspected, but unconfirmed means these people were symptomatic for COVID-19, but were never tested. (Discretion for testing was left up to the investigator.)

*The fact that the Lost to Follow Up and Suspected but Unconfirmed numbers are higher - and here they are even significantly higher - than the End Point numbers means that this data is unreliable.

* The study should not have been accepted in this state. In normal scientific practice they should have returned to investigate further

This doesn’t shine a good light on Pfizer’s trials and it just shows that they have no right to mandate it and I question whether it should have been given the go ahead in the first place. You’d think that with all the time they had planning this event they would be further ahead on answers for whether it works or not. As the revealed series has shown this was a planned event.

Good read.

This is a damning report!

MORE HARM THAN GOOD
THE PFIZER INOCULATIONS FOR COVID-19 - PDF
December 16, 2021

Our alliance of over 500 independent Canadian doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners is committed to providing quality, balanced, evidence-based information to the Canadian public about COVID-19 so that hospitalizations can be reduced, lives saved, and our country safely restored to normal as quickly as possible.

WE SUPPORT

• The doctor/patient relationship and personalized care
• Informed consent and treatment options
• Free and open scientific discourse
• Safe & effective vaccines

FIRST, DO NO HARM

The federal, provincial and municipal governments in Canada have a responsibility to protect the health of Canadians as well as our Charter Rights and Freedoms. Any medical interventions approved by Health Canada must first be PROVEN SAFE.

Due diligence in research, as well as adherence to established protocols of the doctor/patient relationship, informed consent and scientific inquiry are essential to carrying out that responsibility.

Deviating from those practices, causing harm and failing to disclose risks of harm is negligent at best.
...