"Killing for the sake of killing": The catastrophe in Afghanistan that the media ignores

If you listen to the media, our withdrawal from Afghanistan was a "betrayal", while our occupation of the country was benevolent and costless. That assumes the media reported on our 20-year long occupation at all.

It took a nationwide resurgence of the bearded, brutal, cruelly misogynistic Taliban — picture-perfect antagonists for American audiences — to wrench Afghan civilians from the bottom of the priority pile, as if life in Afghanistan before last weekend had been a rosy affair.

You can't make our withdrawal into a "catastrophe" unless you first make the assumption that things were going well. It's hard to square that with the fact that Afghanistan became the most drone-bombed country in the world.

“The status quo of two weeks ago was far better than what is coming...America should keep a few thousand forces in a country that have prevented the atrocities that are now unfolding.”
- Eli Lake

The reality is the EXACT opposite.

As the missile fired off of the drone’s rails, there would be about a five-second delay until it struck the man on the motorcycle.

Suddenly, the man in blue hit an intersection in the road just as another motorcycle with two adult riders who were also carrying a toddler passed by coming in the other direction. The missile was already in flight, and there was nothing anyone in the strike cell or any of the drone operators could do to stop it. The missile impacted the ground at the intersection, stirring up a cloud of gray and brown dust.

The man in blue, the Afghan with the radio who they had been tracking for six hours, “like a Bond villain goes through the cloud of smoke and drives off,” said a U.S. military official involved in the operation who spoke on the condition of anonymity. No one ever knew his name or who he was, or if he ever had any actual Taliban connections. “The two adults and a toddler on the other motorcycle, they were killed right off,” the official said.

Everyone on the conference call stopped talking. “It got real quiet,” the official recalled.

That same year, 2019, a U.S. drone strike killed 32 poor Afghan farmers. Just days later in 2019, the U.S. drone'd yet another Afghanistan wedding, killing at least 40 civilians.
That is at least the seventh Afghan wedding that we've bombed.
To give you an example, take a look at the 2008 Haska Meyna wedding massacre. The first bomb killed the children in the wedding party. The second bomb killed most of the rest of the wedding participants. However, the bride and a few bridesmaids survived the first two bombs and tried to run, which was when the final bomb was dropped.

“We are like ants for them. The murderers need to face a trial. If it’s not happening, it just reveals that the Western world does not care about the Afghans they are murdering.”
- Islam Khan

The American news media feels no need to shed any tears over these pointless deaths. After all, they are just Afghanis. It's not like we were responsible for murdering actual human beings, amirite?
Well, they weren't actual human beings that we were murdering by the thousands, until we pulled out our troops. Then suddenly, every death there becomes our responsibility. Unlike when we were intentionally slaughtering Afghanis. At least this is what the news media is trying to convince you of. When we were actually pulling the trigger, we had no responsibility of any kind for slaughtering innocent children. It wasn't even important enough to verify.

According to a recent analysis of 228 official U.S. military investigations conducted in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria between 2002 and 2015, most investigations of alleged civilian casualty incidents didn’t include even one visit. The military conducted site inspections in only 16 percent of the casualty investigations reviewed for the study by researchers from the Center for Civilians in Conflict and the Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute.

The news media completely ignored a U.N. report a couple months ago that detailed how 40% of the people killed by U.S. bombings were children, and that a majority of civilians that died were murdered by NATO, not by the Taliban.

I don't want to overload this essay with examples of our war crimes, but it's necessary not to leave an impression that these instances were rare.

The airstrikes happened after Afghan forces asked for American air support. American forces bombed crowded houses and a mosque. AIHRC’s findings indicated 97 people died, including 21 women and 65 children, and 19 people were injured. The community and the survivors live in poverty, the compensation by the Afghan government has been ad-hoc, and there has been no full acknowledgement of all the harm caused by U.S. forces.

An earlier example that sent shockwaves throughout Afghan society was the airstrike and bombing in Azizabad, Herat Province on Aug. 22, 2008. In this incident, in a joint operation of U.S. and Afghan forces, 91 people were killed. Sixty children (from a 5-month old to an 18-year old) and 16 women, as well elderly, were among those killed. The bombing started at 2 a.m. local time, and went on till 8 a.m.

When the International Criminal Court began collecting material for a war crimes case involving Afghanistan, it got a staggering 1.17 million statements from Afghans who say they were victims. Because one statement might include multiple victims and one organization might represent thousands of victim statements, the number of Afghans seeking justice from the ICC could be several million.
The U.S. not only refuses to investigate our war crimes, we have done everything possible to obstruct the ICC. When Australia did an independent investigation of their troops in Afghanistan, it found multiple war crimes, some of them were committed along with other NATO forces.

Daniel Hale testified at his trial, about our indiscriminate murder-by-drone of innocent Afghans that led him to become a whistleblower "military contractors bonding by watching footage of old drone strikes, mocking the deaths of men they’d never know."
Some soldiers deployed to the country were just genuine sadists who liked to torture and kill for the fun of it.

It’s apparently so bad among elite US soldiers, in fact, that the leader of the US Navy’s special forces has outright stated that “we have a problem,” and the Pentagon’s inspector general has now launched an inquiry into war crimes they committed.
Share
up
25 users have voted.

Comments

Unfortunately in real life there are human casualties or as the military might say collateral damage.

up
12 users have voted.

@humphrey
There's been at least half a dozen drone whistleblowers.

up
11 users have voted.
ggersh's picture

by taking victory (americans leaving) and turning it into defeat. Imagine what foresight our SOS, POS(piece of shit), had in calling that a terror attack would happen just as the Taliban had victory right in the palms of its hands.

up
6 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

@ggersh
It's not gonna happen.
At least it won't happen without creating a FAR larger disaster. It's too late.
People that are saying that we are re-invading are full of sh*t, unless Biden says it.

up
10 users have voted.
CB's picture

@gjohnsit
But they will funnel money and enable any terrorist group they control to fuck things up so badly for the Taliban the country will be kept in the dark ages and be a headache for Russia and China.

The CIA is going to Pirouette into Asia in the coming months. They will be in need of a new source of funding after having lost their base. I'm thinking it will be Laos/Myanmar supplying methamphetamine, fentanyl and precursor chemicals.

up
9 users have voted.

@gjohnsit

until there is no more blood money
to be sucked from them
too much opium and oil proceeds
to give up, except for the policy
megaphone, no one would guess

up
7 users have voted.

but in WW2 the army did a study and discovered that only about 5% of soldiers could actually try to kill someone. My source, a British military historian (amateur) said that a British army officer told him (proudly) that in Afghanistan they had increased that to 95%.
This may be a misdefinition; it was probably a boast,but my first thought was Joe Haldeman's Forever War. (yeah, that's where we got that from)

up
12 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

From Watson Institute, Brown University

About 241,000 people have been killed in the Afghanistan and Pakistan war zone since 2001.

Key Findings:

As of April 2021, more than 71,000 Afghan and Pakistani civilians are estimated to have died as a direct result of the war.

The United States military in 2017 relaxed its rules of engagement for airstrikes in Afghanistan, which resulted in a massive increase in civilian casualties.

The CIA has armed and funded Afghan militia groups who have been implicated in grave human rights abuses and killings of civilians.
Afghan land is contaminated with unexploded ordnance, which kills and injures tens of thousands of Afghans, especially children, as they travel and go about their daily chores.

The war has exacerbated the effects of poverty, malnutrition, poor sanitation, lack of access to health care, and environmental degradation on Afghans’ health.

We create the conditions for extreme terrorism, or we recruit the terrorists, train them, arm then and pay them as in Syria, or help the terrorists (the Mujahedeen) to defeat democratically elected, secular, human rights respecting governments as we did in Afghanistan from 1979 to 1989, to settle a score against the Soviet Union. When we bomb innocent civilians we create terrorists. How would you feel if most of your family was destroyed and your children dismembered by a bomb dropped from a warplane? I'd damn well want revenge.

So the goal was to eliminate terrorists in Afghanistan. How'd we do? And how many innocent people did we kill in the process? Who are the terrorists? We are outraged when the terrorists kill, but there is hardly a mention in the NYTimes or WaPo when we kill far more people.

I think that we are numb, or something else is wrong. During the Vietnam war we were outraged at the killing of Vietnamese people and the useless loss of life of our soldiers. We protested and protested and protested. At times there were 300,000 people on Boston Common. Why don't we give a shit as human beings anymore? I think the the community here at C99 does, but hardly true for society at large.

up
4 users have voted.

Capitalism has always been the rule of the people by the oligarchs. You only have two choices, eliminate them or restrict their power.