@usefewersyllables
I'm holding out for it here. Especially since it seems the mRNA vaccines are totally ineffective against the new strains and require new vaccines.

Will the Fed's ever spend a few paltry millions on developing treatments in addition to the billions for vaccines?

in the Covid-vaccine queue, so I'll be heading off to get my first dose of the Pfizer jab tomorrow, and the second on April 9th. My wife will be getting her first on Saturday, and her second on the 10th. So this household will be fully participating in the experimental gene-therapy process soon. Woohoo, I guess. Who knows what will happen next?

Have a great day, everybody...

@Blue Republic

The article the quote below is from discusses the situation in Israel and considers the claims of Geert Vanden Bossch that the current mass vaccination programs may lead to spread of hotter virus variants and actually contribute to their spread. The experience with the deadly (to chickens) Marek virus suggests that the scenario Vanden Bossch is warning about appears credible and potentially disastrous on a monumental scale.

Article from newsfromtheperimeter.com is here.

Can people who have been vaccinated become super-spreaders of a more virulent and lethal form of the virus?

Yes, they can. They can become carriers of a more deadly strain of the infection and kill hundreds of others they come in contact with before dying themselves. Just look at this excerpt from a 2015 article at PBS. It helps to explain the phenomenon that Atzmon suggests in his observations. The article is titled, “This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous”:

“The deadliest strains of viruses often take care of themselves — they flare up and then die out. This is because they are so good at destroying cells and causing illness that they ultimately kill their host before they have time to spread. But a chicken virus that represents one of the deadliest germs in history breaks from this conventional wisdom, thanks to an inadvertent effect from a vaccine. Chickens vaccinated against Marek’s disease rarely get sick. But the vaccine does not prevent them from spreading Marek’s to unvaccinated birds. “With the hottest strains, every unvaccinated bird dies within 10 days. …

In fact, rather than stop fowl from spreading the virus, the vaccine allows the disease to spread faster and longer than it normally would, a new study finds. The scientists now believe that this vaccine has helped this chicken virus become uniquely virulent... The study was published on Monday in the journal PLOS Biology….

The reason this is a problem for Marek’s disease is because the vaccine is “leaky.” A leaky vaccine is one that keeps a microbe from doing serious harm to its host, but doesn’t stop the disease from replicating and spreading to another individual. On the other hand, a “perfect” vaccine is one that sets up lifelong immunity that never wanes and blocks both infection and transmission.

In recent years, experts have wondered if leaky vaccines were to blame for the emergence of these hot strains. The 1970s introduction of the Marek’s disease immunizations for baby chicks kept the poultry industry from collapse, but people soon learned that vaccinated birds were catching “the bug” without subsequently dying. Then, over the last half century, symptoms for Marek’s worsened. Paralysis was more permanent; brains more quickly turned to mush….

Read’s group started their investigation by exposing vaccinated and unvaccinated Rhode Island Red chickens to one of five Marek’s disease strains that ranged from hot to cold. The hottest strains killed every unvaccinated bird within 10 days, and the team noticed that barely any virus was shed from the feathers of the chickens during that time. In contrast, vaccination extended the lifespan of birds exposed to the hottest strains, with 80 percent living longer than two months. But the vaccinated chickens were transmitting the virus, shedding 10,000 times more virus than an unvaccinated bird.

“Previously, a hot strain was so nasty, it wiped itself out. Now, you keep its host alive with a vaccine, then it can transmit and spread in the world,” Read said. “So, it’s got an evolutionary future, which it didn’t have before.”

But does this evolutionary future breed more dangerous viruses?

This study argues yes. In a second experiment, unvaccinated and vaccinated chickens were infected with one of the five Marek’s disease strains, and then put into a second arena with a second set of unimmunized birds, known as sentinels…. The virus spread to sentinel birds nine days faster if it came from a vaccinated chicken versus an unvaccinated one. In addition, sentinels died faster when exposed to vaccinated chickens versus unvaccinated chickens.

“One way to look at that experiment is that shows vaccinating birds kills unvaccinated birds. The vaccination of one group of birds leads to the transmission of a virus so hot that it kills the other birds, said Read said……

“Our concern here, primarily and foremost, is whether this is going to happen with any of the vaccines that we give to people,” said molecular biology James Bull of the University of Texas Austin, who specializes in the evolution of viruses and bacteria….

To test the imperfect vaccine hypothesis in humans, you would need monitor the vaccine response for either a large or isolated population for a long time. Doing this would allow a researcher to gauge how the vaccine interacts with the virus and if that relationship is evolving. Does the vaccine merely reduce symptoms, or does it also keep patients from getting infected and transmitting the virus?”

Original PBS article here “This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous” PBS

"It is easier to con people than to convince people they have been conned." - Mark Twain

https://be.linkedin.com/in/geertvandenbossche

Who would appear to know a little something about vaccines, has put out an open letter calling for a halt to mass vaccination for Covid. Not on grounds of efficacy (to the original Covid strain) or safety (not that there are not plenty of concerns there) but because he believes (as I understand it) that the mass vaccination itself will drive the production of variants that, instead of combining greater infectivity with decreased virulence - as is usually the case, may cause deadlier ones.

He is also (I gather) concerned with lockdown measures weakening innate immune response - isolation is known to weaken immunity and if the immune system is not stimulated by exposure to pathogens it starts to shut down or weaken.

Suggest a stroll through the comments to the video where he is interviewed, especially that of "Daniel" about the situation in Israel and mandatory vaccination there (Pfizer)

Quick and dirty summary, but am off to catch the rest of a beautiful (vaccine-free) spring afternoon.

India and Bangladesh win with Ivermectin and HCQ

https://trialsitenews.com/an-unlikely-nation-is-kicking-this-pandemic-guess-which-then-why/

Canadian Doctors Speak Out (and are censored for it)

https://rumble.com/veg3uf-canadian-doctors-speak-out.html

Vaccine Death/Injury VAERS

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/79388/facebook-posts-back-up-vaers-reports-linking-covid-vaccines-to-injuries-including.html