The Split of the Take

The Split of the Take

Long before there was capitalism, and therefore long before there was socialism, humankind built civilization — a division of labor that created cities, roads, aqueducts, ships and fuckall kinds of ways to kill. For all the variation in language, ethnicity, environmental constraints and opportunities, there is one thing in common to every social organization in the history of our species: somebody has to give direction and a lot of somebodies have to follow it.
Without social hierarchy, our relative physical weakness dooms human beings to be eaten by predators. Instead of teeth, claws, strength or speed, our Darwinian advantages are opposable thumbs and language. The myth of the “rugged individualist” is utterly absurd. There is one word to describe a human being that is completely “free” of social obligations — breakfast.

The individuals who call the shots can use their position of power to hog the fruits of everybody’s common labor, but history is full of cautionary tales of Emperors being assassinated. The art of ruling over people involves two fundamental assessments — how many people do you need on your side to stay in power? How little can you give to the rest of your polity without them ganging up on your allies?

Viewed from the other end of that equation, for the vast multitude of powerless souls in today’s global “civilization,” those two questions for the ruler become the challenge of life for the ruled. What will it take to get a new ruler? How hungry do I have to be to risk trying to gang up on the ruler and his retinue?

I developed this thumbnail sketch of political economy when I was an English major as an undergraduate in the early 1970s. I was taking a class in medieval literature and learned a bit about the social order in medieval Europe. Kings tended to suffer from what a modern reader would identify as existential angst as they could never be completely sure of the loyalty of their retinues. The story of King John, son of Henry II, was all about the split of the take. The second tier of bosses, called Nobles, ganged up on Little Johnny Plantagenet and forced him to sign a deal (the Magna Carta) acknowledging that he did not have the Divine Right to split up the take any way he wanted.

King John and his successors, along with most of the monarchs on the planet, had to find a balance between sharing wealth and power with an elite while making sure that the masses did not form up a lynch mob. The Romanovs came to a bad end during World War I because the general population of Russia had lost all hope and respect for their rulers.

In the centuries since the Magna Carta, advances in communications technology have knit the world into an interlocking global culture, and there are no Emperors or Kings with personal power over their political units. Instead, there are bureaucracies and aristocratic families that tend to staff them generation after generation.

In every era, and under every putative “system” of government, so long as the split of the take seems fair to the bulk of humanity, the average person does not bother with ideology. Whether it’s the colonial rule of Britain over India, or the czarist rule over Russia, or the capitalist rule of the USA today, the powerful few can tell whatever story they like to explain their position of power — and most people will “believe” it because they don’t have any reason to worry about such things one way or the other.

Thus the Kennedy Assassination was a great tragedy and polling over the decades shows that significant numbers of people have doubts about the story they were told about it, but such thoughts never lead to any concrete action. In stark contrast to the lethargic public response to the murder of a President, the Vietnam War posed a huge problem for the powers that be as millions of families’ lives were seriously disrupted by the draft. Those powers that be (the collective and bureaucratic analog to King John) were forced to abolish the draft — and the war machine has bounced along with hired guns ever since.

Today, most progressives look at these decades of general docility while the neoliberal and neoconservative movements have established war forever for no reason, coupled with corporate control of everything, as national policy and fall into despair. The thought is that propaganda works and that stupid people refuse to employ critical thinking skills and believe all manner of stupid shit, rendering revolution impossible.

I have to agree that if you are waiting for a mass “awakening” as the bulk of the citizenry embraces the concept of socialism, you are going to be disappointed.
Nevertheless, we are watching a replay of the Magna Carta right now, as people are not content with the split of the take. It does not matter what particular ideology any given individual espouses to explain her alienation from the current regime. What matters is that more and more people realize that the story being told by the power structure is nothing but self-serving lies, akin to The Divine Right of Kings.

What I call the Asteroid Virus is obscuring just about everything now, and it will change almost everything about how we live. The most significant aspect will be that the Take itself just shrunk by about 20%, and it could well keep shrinking indefinitely.

Our corrupt political structure is staffed by hacks who do not even bother to think about what they are doing as they continue to represent the wealthy individuals and institutions that fund their campaigns and pay the lobbyists who write the legislation. So, as the Take evaporates, it is replaced by what conservatives call, quite accurately, Fiat Money -- and the bulk of it will be shoveled to the already fat and sassy.

We were already headed for revolution after all the Democratic Stalking Horse Campaigns (Pete, Bloomie, Amy and Liz) committed mass hari kari, basically apologizing for having beaten Joe Biden in prior primaries. This spit in the face of democracy took place while Sleepy Joe snoozed his way into the nomination due to nothing he said or did. All that seems like ancient history now in the Age of the Asteroid Virus -- but it gave the game away once and for all.

With the Take in free fall, and the Split going in the wrong direction, we are headed for what the nice folks in the Business Press call, "A correction."

Tags: 
Share
up
27 users have voted.

Comments

CB's picture

there must be a preponderance of the population in agreement. Not only with the end goal of the revolution but also the means to achieve it. TPTB in the US have a century of sophisticated manipulation of the public mind in order to disrupt or usurp such means and goals. EDIT: I might add that this is the real purpose of the American gong show held every two years.

The manipulation of the American mind: Edward Bernays and the birth of public relations

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, and our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…. It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind."
...
What Bernays’ writings furnish is not a principle or tradition by which to evaluate the appropriateness of propaganda, but simply a means for shaping public opinion for any purpose whatsoever, whether beneficial to human beings or not.

This observation led Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter to warn President Franklin Roosevelt against allowing Bernays to play a leadership role in World War II, describing him and his colleagues as “professional poisoners of the public mind, exploiters of foolishness, fanaticism, and self-interest.”
...

I don't see the youth of today even desiring a revolution. BTW, whatever happened to our "revolution" back in the day?

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MbqzDm1uCo]

up
8 users have voted.
QMS's picture

@CB @CB

this is a good starting point

the end goal of the revolution

without parsing separation issues

rebellion, en mass, begins with discomfort

getting ripped of by the state has caused lot of above

seems people need to be discomfited to an extreme state before

it starts to find more appropriate references to our make-believe authorities

up
8 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

@QMS will mass discomforture lead to putting the blame on the right causes and lead to the right changes in society? As a society, our critical thinking skills have been suppressed by the system, so we may end up going the wrong direction.

The American empire is collapsing before our very eyes which I why I believe that Congress has been so hell bent on extracting the last bits of wealth left for their oligarchic masters.

up
13 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

I laugh at those thinking the "capitalism vs socialism" has any real bearing on the ultimate outcomes. Not that there aren't meaningful distinctions twixt the two; but unless there's a way found to block the criminally insane from taking charge, ....

Sometimes I wonder if Athenian democracy could be implemented:
Public officials chosen by lot. Other times if we introduced the Roman Tribunes of the people, with power to block laws and to advocate for others officials fail to promote.

Bottom line: without finding a way to keep psychos away from power, there's not going to be a successful revolution of any sort.

up
11 users have voted.

Orwell: Where's the omelette?

@jim p

up
9 users have voted.

Orwell: Where's the omelette?

@jim p
And the Roman republic into the Roman Principate, a process remarkably like what's happened in my lifetime (post WWII).

up
4 users have voted.

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

@The Voice In the Wilderness in the end because ruthless self-aggrandizing psychopaths took power.

up
5 users have voted.

Orwell: Where's the omelette?

@jim p
One supposedly representing the pedigreed rich (the Optimates or "best people"),
the other purportedly representing the common man (the Populares or populists. At the height of their power and wealth, BOTH parties consisted of ruthless self-aggrandizing psychopaths. cf. Caesar & Pompey.

Sound familiar? Uncomfortably familiar?

up
8 users have voted.

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

@The Voice In the Wilderness @The Voice In the Wilderness up to a dozen (or was it ten?) Tribunes of the People, and by law the patriarch families could not run for the office. Had to be a pleb. You're thinking of the Consuls, the Executive branch as it were.

Worked for a few decades actually, but after Sulla came it just became megalomaniacs on parade in the Caesars, Pompeys etc

up
2 users have voted.

Orwell: Where's the omelette?

@jim p
Caesar had himself adopted by a non-patrician relative. That made him eligible for offices reserved for the commons.

Lots of lead pipes. Lots of adoptions? Poor fertility from lead poisoning?

up
1 user has voted.

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

@The Voice In the Wilderness @The Voice In the Wilderness and it was Caesar who arranged his adoption. Caesars whole universe was based on his aristocratic lineage; he'd never give that up.

(Just finished reading a ton on the Republic and its fall, so it's all fresh in my mind)

up
3 users have voted.

Orwell: Where's the omelette?

Alligator Ed's picture

There is one word to describe a human being that is completely “free” of social obligations — breakfast

Always begin a serious essay with a joke--or breakfast.

A public consensus is needed but only in the sense of a passive willingness to along with a new societal / governmental / economic order. The analogy of a tipping point is the requisite driving force behind energizing a new social-political dynamic. Call it revolution if you will, whether violent or not. But there will never be a majority of actively engaged citizens who by themselves can foment meaningful change. I don't know the percentage of popular activists required to get a new social force moving. It should be 5% or it could be 20% of the population.

Humans have an inordinately well-developed capacity for stupidity. In our own local part of terra infirma, we have people who think Trump is doing a marvelous job on SARS2. But even worse is the the huge plurality of New Yorkers who think Andy Cuomo is doing a good job on SARS2. He has been amongst the worst. Only Mayor Bill is worse on such a grand scale.

Never underestimate human stupidity.

This has been an operating model for me in my years of dealing with humanoids. Can a person be called human, culturally-speaking (leaving the obvious ethical flaws of the argument out for now) if they do not have the wits to understand, much less care what is going on about them.

From the mundane to the grotesque:

Although the modus exterminatus of humanity will be similar in this go around to that of Das Dritte Reich, our citizens are slowly entering the delousing chambers of Sachsenhausen awaiting their cleansing bath of Zyklon B (thank you Bayer Gmbh). Now our kindly Sonderkommandos are led by JoJo the smiling clown of terror, inviting you to a refreshing shower of a new variety.

The way to start a revolution is much like starting a climbing vine from a single shoot to a massive wall-obscuring overgrowth of foliage. A network is needed of like-minded individuals, sufficiently dispersed and relatable enough to convince those willing to open their eyes and those already wide-eyed to act upon new social norms. Call it evolution. Call it revolution. But by all means, to make things change, we must reach a tipping point of activated, enlightened and empathic citizens in order to promote the social good. Without empathy, any new social system is immediately fertile ground for despotism.

up
6 users have voted.

up
4 users have voted.

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

longtalldrink's picture

"With the Take in free fall, and the Split going in the wrong direction, we are headed for what the nice folks in the Business Press call, "A correction.""

I've always said that in order for the regular folks to get off their couch-potato azzes (enough Netflix already) there would have to be some major suffering going on. And btw, while we are being hypnotized by Netflix...our "government" is writing bills to spy even harder on us. You know...to thwart our efforts to organize. NO ORGANIZATION FOR YOU!!!

up
9 users have voted.

Well done is better than well said-Ben Franklin

Lookout's picture

..of the sun and moon. Maybe we should too? You know get into the flow of the planet and universe?

Often it seems we miss the big things looking for the little things. Might be why climate collapse and mass extinction is upon us?

up
3 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”