Immigrant children being sent to Gitmo?
“the Defense Department awarded a $23 million dollar contract to construct a “Contingency Mass Migration Complex” at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Station”
I’ve Been to Guantanamo. It’s No Place for Kids. | American Civil Liberties Union https://t.co/49HXjkAQvY
— (@JeffBfish) June 30, 2019
I’ve Been to Guantanamo. It’s No Place for Kids
Over the last year, the country has been shocked by reports of the inhumane treatment of children and families in immigrant detention. Now, the Trump administration appears to be increasing the scope and severity of its immigrant detention scheme by potentially detaining immigrants at Guantanamo Bay.
News broke last week that the Defense Department awarded a $23 million dollar contract to construct a “Contingency Mass Migration Complex” at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Station with capacity to detain 13,000 people and built to last “a minimum of 50 years.” In April, we also learned that the Department of Homeland Security considered sending migrant children to an old “dormitory facility” at Guantanamo.
I’ve been to Guantanamo. I visited in 2015 as an observer of the military commission proceedings, staying in a dusty tent barrack for a week. With a stunning landscape and ugly history, it is full of contradictions—like selling Mickey Mouse-Guantanamo Bay souvenirs in the gift shop, mere miles from where men have languished in detention without fair trials, or even charges, for more than a decade. I left with a pit in my stomach, unsettled by this deeply strange place. It has been a site of torture, where our country’s leaders have long embraced or tolerated injustice. It is certainly no place for children.
No child should grow up in jail, no matter where it is located. Studies show that kids in immigration detention suffer emotionally and physically, with traumatizing conditions including “sleep[ing] on cement floors,” “insufficient foods and water,” and “extremely cold temperatures.”
But sending kids to Guantanamo is uniquely dangerous. It’s easy to imagine the Defense Department restricting or totally denying journalists, lawyers, and human rights groups access to monitor or investigate, enabling officials to commits abuses with little risk of being discovered. Members of Congress, who’ve already been refused access to visit detention facilities on the mainland, may have little or no ability to conduct effective oversight at Guantanamo. Kids sent to Guantanamo might be put in expedited removal proceedings (deported without the opportunity see a judge) that we’ve explained “invite, and guarantee, error.” The Trump administration might argue they have no rights at Guantanamo at all.
Bottom line: there’s a serious risk the government could deny immigrants sent to Guantanamo a real opportunity to seek protection from return to persecution or torture—contradicting Congress’ intent, and their rights under US and international law.
Guantanamo’s longer history helps explain why. In the 1990s, the U.S. Coast Guard intercepted tens of thousands of people from Haiti and Cuba fleeing violence and human rights violations at sea. More than 45,000 people were taken to Guantanamo and held in tent cities. In a striking parallel to today, hundreds of children were separated from their families, kept in inhumane conditions, and authorities had trouble keeping track of people in family units. Thousands of Haitian nationals were returned to Haiti despite having credible fears of persecution, forcing parents to leave their children behind.
By 1995 there were still more than 200 unaccompanied kids from Haiti languishing at Guantanamo, despite having relatives and other sponsors in the U.S. ready to welcome them. “The kids are isolated and fearful,” columnist Bob Herbert wrote. “They live in tents that tend to leak when it rains. They are ill-clothed (some do not even have shoes) and receive inadequate medical attention. Many of the youngsters are depressed and some have attempted suicide.”
Will this be enough to get the people who are supporting Trump's locking up immigrants to finally admit how absolutely heinous it is? Would they feel the same way if those children were white and American? Children are being treated as pawns in this debate. No child should ever spend one minute behind bars and separated from their parents. The children are going to be marked for life because of this.
Immigrants showed up to their court hearings 98% of the time so there is no reason to hold them in detention centers except for letting the private prison companies make obscene profits. And they are. Is that why the democrats gave Trump $330 million with no restrictions to build more centers? The private prison companies are huge donors to both parties and we know that nothing gets in the way of what the donors want. Private detention centers receive $775 a day to hold immigrants and yet they want us to believe that they don't have enough money to buy soap, toothpaste, toothbrushes and other sanitary products? Seriously? Or feed people decent food and not frozen burritos and other non nutritious food? How can congress justify spending billions to lock people up when they are preaching austerity? How did they find the billions on top of the other billions they have already allocated?
People have international rights to seek asylum and what this country is doing is breaking both international and US law by not allowing people to do that. Even holding them in Mexico or sending them back there is unconstitutional.

Comments
Thank You, snoopydawg, for posting this essay /nt
https://www.euronews.com/live
Please clarify
Did you mean private detention centers receive $775 PER detainee or something else? At any rate, separating children (preteens and younger) is certainly deleterious--but then so is most of our criminal injustice system.
ditto, snoopydawg, I was wondering about that
number too, when reading it. It seems too high for being per detaining one child üer day and too low for detaining all of them at once, if it is per day, not saying here that they should get ANY money at all. How many children do they contain at once?
Free the children, and imho, a child is a child til it becomes 14. I always wonder why seventeen years old teenager or young adults are counted as children. I mean all of it is awful, just want to know the legislation that defines a child in the US vs European countries.
I guess I should do the research myself. Arggghhhh.
https://www.euronews.com/live
At the tent city camps it is $775 per child per day
Trump admin's 'tent cities' cost more than keeping migrant kids with parents
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
Another Security State Boondoggle.
Declare a phony security emergency, let private contractors charge 3x to 'service' it, then blame the high cost on the victims being abused for profit.
Nice work if you can con enough suckers into buying it.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Cuba should retake and close Gitmo.
They'd be well within their rights to do so.
Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.
Guerrilla Liberalism won't liberate the US or the world from the iron fist of capital.
Homestead Florida detention center
Tulsi Gabbard was one of the debate participants who visited the Homestead detention center which is run by a for profit corporation. The Homestead detention center is the largest in the nation. This is probably where AE got the figure of $775 per day that it costs to house each child.
On Friday I watched a video put out by Tulsi's campaign on her visit. A number of activists were interviewed in that video and they painted a far different picture than that which has been painted by the federal government and CBS News which was given permission to go inside and film a propaganda segment. I will not link the CBS video, but it can be found on line by Googling Homestead Florida detention center.
Here is the video of the Tulsi Gabbard campaign of her visit. Tulsi did go inside, but there was no follow up video that I have been able to find. Still, interviews with activists were very enlightening. Niko House interviews one at the end of the video.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2sU7PgELQA]
I have since looked for other articles on the Homestead detention center and this one from NPR echoes a lot of what the activists were saying in the Tulsi video. The issue with Homestead is two fold for me. First it is being run by a for profit corporation which is why it is so expensive in the per day cost per child. The second issue is that no one is actually overseeing what if going on inside. Based upon reports by activists, the children are treated more like prisoners than like children. There are very strict rules they must abide by and these rules amount to a form of psychological torture.
Even HuffPost has covered the Homestead detention center with similar stories being told by child advocates who interviewed some of the children in the facility.
On a personal note, when I was involved with Occupy Tallahassee, one of the projects Occupy Tallahassee took on was lobbying the legislature to do away with private prisons in Florida. It is disgusting that any corporation or human being is allowed to profit from the misery of another human being. These children are being held in prison like conditions and are being psychologically traumatized.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Thank you for this addition, gulfgal
It's abhorrent what Tulsi witnessed at the camp and you can hear that in her voice.
"This is not a democrat or republican issue but a humanity issue"
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
Did you miss the part
dfarrah
Apparently you did
as I watched the video and saw that she was allowed to enter the center, but without any video of it. Gulgal mentioned that she has not been able to find any follow up material of that part of her visit.
I heard from her tone how upset she was when she heard stories from the people that had been inside and witnessed what was happening.
Apparently you have missed the multiple times I have said that Trump has cut funding for schooling as well as outdoor activity for kids.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
So what are the costs for?
Hmmmm. Wondering what type of bidding they used, if any.
Are the kids getting schooling there?
I'm trying to figure out why kids would cost so much more than the elderly.
dfarrah
30 days, not 90 days
Not half long enough in many cases. If you need 31 days or longer, too bad so sad watch out for your wallet.
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
You got one thing right.
Children are being treated as pawns in this debate.
By both sides.
[Edited] Really?
$775 per day? $282,875 per year per immigrant? Really? What, are they staying at the Four Seasons Hotel?
This whitepaper by the National Immigration Forum, a liberal-leaning on immigration policy organization, puts the daily cost at $208. See: The Math of Immigration Detention
If you cite phony statistics to support your case, as in your $775 figure, people will tend to disbelieve your message.
As long as we're talking phony...
From their 'vision' statement:
Yeah, a real bunch of hippies you're citing there.
You are also confusing costs with payments, but you know that.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
My Apology
I didn't know about the religious component of their policy. I suppose that makes anything they produce suspect.
Costs vs payments
I'm not sure what your point is. "the Forum divides the annual Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Custody Operations budget by the number of detention beds Congress mandates". The DHS budget is the total amount budgeted and spent. Payments cannot exceed that. If you have other data that supports the $775 figure, I'd like to see it.
Cited in my comment below
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
As if liberal sources
dfarrah
Yes, I can believe $775 per day per child detainee
Seeing the Tulsi video is an eye opener. Poseur prima AOC does photo ops of alligator tears at a fence adjacent to an empty lot. Did AOC go to the border to really view the situation? I doubt that.
Did you need to bring up AOC?
Why? Just to make some point that has nothing to do with with this essay that is about the possibility of children being sent to Gitmo? Oh well it's not like that is something that hasn't happened before right? People who aren't us can be treated any way just to send a message that they aren't welcome here in this great country.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
Sorry f my comment may have represented threadjacking
And to think of the faux outrage that Antifa threw milkshakes
And THIS can never be allowed to keep happening. Fascism MUST be made to die. Torn out by its roots. From under every rock and crevice. Aggressively, and with violence when required.
Maybe you prefer this antifa
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/todd-starnes-antifa-portland-mayor
dfarrah
Nope, not phony information. Straight from the US government.
per NPR article that I cited above. This is a private, for profit detention facility. From that article...
asDo I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
One particular center, yes.
From the same article: "The average cost for a migrant child at one of the 130 smaller, permanent shelters contracted to HHS is about a third of that."
It's wrong to cite the $775 figure without including the context that the figure applies to only a single company that got a sweetheart deal because of behind the scenes shenanigans. Trump's former Chief of Staff John Kelly is on the board of directors of that company.
Even with the lowest number
The centers are getting enough money to feed them properly and give them basic needs don't you think?
I can't believe that this is the issue that you find important to discuss. How much profit they get instead of what is happening.
How do you know that it's just one center that gets that much per person? Maybe others are getting even more?
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
When questionable statistics are presented
or facts are cited out of context, it distracts from your work. That $775 figure jumped out at me, to the exclusion of the rest of the diary. It was so far out there that it led me to research the number instead of focusing on what is happening.
Well, someone really needs to take a
It seems the HHS person is comparing costs related to start up with ongoing costs(?)
So now, I'm really confused as to how the costs are being counted.
Needless to say, I should go audit this.
dfarrah
Both snoopydawg and I were very clear
I am not sure why you are arguing this point solely when the bulk of snoopydawg's essay and my own comments pertained more to how these immigrants, the children especially, are being subjected to horrendous psychological conditions that are akin to being in a prison.
My point is that if they are being treated this poorly in the US, one has to wonder how much worse it would be if the government decides to move them to Gitmo where there is absolutely zero oversight. The obscene amount of money being paid to private contractors is tangential to the fact that this country is abusing children who are fleeing horrific conditions that this country created in their home countries.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
No, you weren't clear.
Here's what snoop wrote in the essay: "Private detention centers receive $775 a day to hold immigrants".
That's false. There's only one out of more than 100 that receives that amount.
Whatever point s/he was trying to make was undercut by that distracting out of context quote. When you're essaying or commenting on an important topic, it's crucial to avoid red flags, out of context quotes, and questionable statistics. Otherwise, expect your readers to be distracted. That's not hard to understand, is it?
Please give us some links or citations
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
@edg As per an article in
Business Insider, 71% of all immigrants are housed in private, for profit facilities. It does not state the daily cost of housing these people in these private, for profit facilities, but I am willing to bet it is not cheap.
As per an article inThe bottom line for me is that to quibble over a single figure that was clearly stated to pertain to a single, for profit facility in Homestead Florida, misses the bigger picture here. That is that we are treating people who are fleeing countries from which the United States has enacted regime change or has interfered in the internal affairs thereof as criminals when we should be treating them first as human beings and second as refugees. There is a simple solution to our border problem and that is to quit trying to effect regime change.
The fact that the government is contracting out to private for profit corporations to detain these people in prison like or even concentration camp conditions is shocking and speaks of the cavalier attitude this country has toward human beings who happen to be poor and mostly of color. It should make every American ashamed.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
With conditions being so
The population of these 3 countries approximates 32 million; around 300,000 left around 2018.
That is not even 1% of the total population.
Lets add a few more to cover more years. Say the number is around 600,000 in the last few years came to the US.
Wow, even 600,000 only reaches 1.875%.
Just tonight, I heard that 600,000 arrived in the US between January and June of this year. So, 1,200,000 divided by 32 million is a big whopping 3.75%.
Despite the 'horrific' conditions in these countries, at least 95% of the population (to be generous to your side here) have decided to stay in their home countries.
And here is an article that states that violence has dropped significantly in the last five years.
https://www.latimes.com/world/mexico-americas/la-fg-honduras-violence-20...
Somehow, I feel like I've been fed alot of bull when it comes to the horrors of being in those countries. Unless my math is way off (and I was really tired when I looked these numbers up)....
I'm also questioning the validity of the horror reports about the centers. Do you really believe that the centers are being run by sadists? Even the Obama guy in charge says that the facilities weren't sufficient for the volume during the Obama years. The activists you cite have one agenda, and that is open borders. And why would people believe people who are in the facilities who want to get out?
So you see deliberate cruelty while I see an overstressed system not designed to handle the volume.
And as a reminder (really, I'm not letting people off the hook about this), people on the left and center laughed off Trump well over a year ago when he was sounding the alarm.
AOC's toilet stories have already been debunked. Then she blathered how she was so a-scared of the personnel. All of this hysteria is reminding me of Kavanaugh, Trump's election and all those women screaming on a stage (remember Madge - she wanted to bomb the whitehouse?), the way a parent might coach their children to lie about what the other parent is doing (things like that can result in that large group of parents being accused of some sort of sex ring) and the hysteria about Clinton(s) decorating a tree with sex toys.
IMO, AOC and others are becoming the Julie Swetnicks of immigration.
dfarrah
Guess you didn't read my comment which
links that number? This seems to happen frequently here. It cost your number in 2014, but that was before we were separating children from their parents which is not legal or necessary. Or ethical. Or moral.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
Moral and ethical
These are prison facilities at best and in some cases, concentration camps. If detainees, either adults or minors are sent to Gitmo, they become more out of sight and out of mind for the public at large. One can only wonder what would happen to them there, when we are already seeing just how inhumane our present system of detaining this people.
It speaks to just how barbaric our nation continues to be.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Guess you didn't read my comment either
The one in response to GulfGal. Where I show that there's only one single center that is paid that much, and it's run by a company with Trump's former Chief of Staff John Kelly on the board of directors. Sounds like a sweetheart deal for that one company. According to the government spokesperson that introduced the $775 figure, the other 130 centers only cost about 1/3rd that much.
*BARF*
Hopefully, this will at least be a "the goddamn river is fucking on fire" moment for/against the entire post-9/11 police state.
Expect attempts to leave Trump with the full bill while W the Prime Mover and Obama the Collaborator try to sneak away. Don't let them.
In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.
Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!
I'm not leaving previous presidents off the hook
I've commented quite frequently that this stuff happened during Obama's tenure first and it was just as abhorrent then as it now. I called out Obama for being the deporter in chief when he was in office. But Trump has taken this much further than Obama did because he is separating children that came with parents just to make a point.
Remember the stories of babies and kids being taken from their parents and stuck in detention centers while the parents were deported back to their country? No previous presidents did that to my knowledge. This administration didn't/doesn't track the kids and now they have no idea what to do with them. Plus Trump is making people get fingerprinted which is acceptable, but he's sharing the information with ICE and DHS which scares people off because of their fear.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
Obama also separated
He's on tape, discussing immigration, and says that the migrants need to know that they risk separation from their children. (when he was warning migrants not to come).
dfarrah
I know that
and I have stated it many times here as well as in the comment you're replying to. How many times do I have to say that history didn't start the day Trump became president? But Trump is making it much worse than any previous presidents because of how he has changed the rules which is illegal both internationally and unconstitutionally. It's not illegal for people to ask for asylum at the border which most of them do. He's taking kids out of their parent's arms and deporting the parents while not keeping track of where the kids go. Plus he's making his friends very wealthy. If we can't afford to feed them then reunite them with their parents and send them home.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
Do u have link
It was under Trump, his AG Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, that a "zero tolerance" policy was initiated in Apr 2018 which led to children being separated from parents and custodial family members in order to punish and deter. Typically Trump lied and said it had started under Obama and his admin was doing its best to rectify the situation Obama created.
I found it today,
So I will look over the weekend.
My description was not precise - he was warning parents against sending their children here because they would be sent back. It sounds like he was talking about children sent over here alone.
dfarrah
Kitchen sink next?
This has nothing to do with the topic of this essay. I recently watched his video detailing what he was doing in regards to immigration and if I had just read the transcript I would have thought it was Trump. But as I have stated numerous times but will do so again, Trump is not doing anything Obama didn't do. Okay. Now can you let that go?
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
Geez, the person asked for a link.
dfarrah
Actually it was you that brought this subject up
Again.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
If this is what they do in front of congressmen
Imagine what the sick evil psychos will do in Guantanamo? This should spark civil war. It won't, because America is full of morally destitute cowards, but it should.
Pfffft.
This situation is beginning to remind me of the hysteria over the babies being torn from incubators and the many adults accused by children of sexual abuse when it turned out not to have happened.
AOC is a natural at hysteria. She also voted against the immigrant aid package, so this tells me if she has a choice between keeping the baby alive, and cutting it in half, she would choose the latter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_of_Solomon
dfarrah
ever the victim.
it's her modus operandi (poor little ol' me!) and once again she make the story about herself, not the incarcerated.
i appreciate your not staying silent.
i got a bit confused by reading too many of the links, although the 'old dormitory in gitmo' NYT piece is behind a paywall for me, and one Gitmo link only went to a long timeline.
now this DoD $23 million contract is on top of what you and wsws had featured in your 'Bipartisan anti-immigrant rampage'? and the immigration forum stats and funding bills afoot: are they watchdogs for immigrant abuses? i finall backed out on the aclu 'alternatives' as i'd read too much.
even the npr portions gulfgal had pasted in made me think of 'religious' indian schools, which had literally kidnapped kids to turn them into acceptable to the greater society white kids for their own good. no touching, no native language, shaved heads, scrubbed with anti-lice poisons, no cultural clothes or prayers, on and on.
i've already forgotten the funding bill's designation, but will it get the same bipartisan chicanery as w/ your 'bipartisan' one had? wish i thought aspie corner's remedy would work, but a hella lotta cubanos would die trying.
oh, and are we to assume these chirren have been free by now?
what a barbaric #shithole nation this is.
I don't make the links...
and have no control of where they go.
Just read the article that Joe posted in the EBs where it says that Anne Frank wasn't killed by the Nazis. She died from typhus and malnutrition. Lice are carriers of typhus as well as other diseases and there is the story of guards making children share two combs even though they all had lice. I once photographed lice using a special camera device and it gave me the heeby geebie for a week. I swear the damn thing looked at me just before I took the picture. Gahh!
what a barbaric #shithole nation this is.
Can't argue with that.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
My dad caught lice
dfarrah
i realize that you don't
make the links. my interest in the link to the Times was to discover more about this:
on edit: was it an anonymous source/rumor? i tried backwards bingling, but never found any reprints.
a café commenter brought this pro publica exposé to add to my earlier 'racist puerco-in-chief...' diary, but wsws has the depraved fascist story as well: US Border Patrol agents joke about immigrant deaths in secret Facebook group with 9,500 members', George Marlowe, 2 July 2019
large snip
i did just find this re: the NYT
april 22 2019 gitmo for children story:
unnamed = anonymous weasel words as always at the Times. 'unnamed generals are saying that trump means to leave nato': resulting in the reactionary 'defense of Nato' bill.
‘Seattle judge blocks Trump attempt to lock up asylum seekers indefinitely’ July 2, 2019, crosscut.com
Thanks for the addition and update
Judges ruled against Obama numerous times for trying to skirt the system and yet here we are still locking them up for longer periods than allowed by law and still fighting the same fights. A judge ruled over a year ago that Trump had so many days to reunite the kids with their parents or guardians and that is when we found out that he didn't keep records of who went were or what happened to the parents.
IIRC the ACLU are now in charge of doing that.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
- Kevin Alfred Strom
the aclu may
take charge of it, and yes, trump's fascist DHS don't comply. but my larger hope was to show that the NYT piece on 'detaining children at gitmo' was by way of two anonymous people, or: likely a NYT psyop against trump. they've done anti-trump 'whisper campaigns' like this any number of times, and dagnabbit, i had a link to the many times just over the past year or so, but i've mislaid it.
again, not that i'd put it past him or john kelly, but it may not have been so...in this case.
Sounds like some
dfarrah