@The Liberal Moonbat

If you watch the video posted here and look at the others that you can find elsewhere you will see that he touches women and girls all the time. Look at the photos posted above and if you can't see how inappropriate he is then I'm not sure what to say. People have told him numerous times that his touching needs to stop and after the last time he got called out on it he offered an apology and said that he understands what people are saying to him. Then he joked about it the very next he did it and said that he got permission to touch the kid that he did. So it's obvious to most people that what he does is not acceptable. This is much different from your aunt putting her hands on your shoulders. Look at the pictures and hopefully you can see how this is different.

Joe Biden may be a naturally touchy person (which is not and should not be a crime, even if I don't like it

This shouldn't matter if you think it's not a crime. What Biden is doing is using his position to do whatever he wants whether it makes women and young girls uncomfortable. How many women who were there to be sworn in or were watching their spouses be would feel comfortable telling him to stop touching them?

This is reactionary, near-totalitarian "fainting-couch feminism

No it is not. This has nothing to do with feminism and I'm sorry if you don't see that.

Putting your hands on a woman without her express consent is assault.
Sniffing a woman or child’s neck and hair should be met with baseball bat justice.
Doing these things to a child should be met with a testicle-smashing lynch mob. Then baseball bat justice.
This is simply common sense to most people in 2019.

This is reactionary, near-totalitarian "fainting-couch feminism". Biden's not okay for any number of reasons, but neither is this - and we must not board or encourage a wayward bandwagon just because it's headed for someone we don't like this time.

There is nothing progressive about a sex-based double-standard, which this implicity states.

Sexism means treating males and females differently.

Feminism is NOT a progressive force in the 21st Century, as it assumes (it being right there in the name) the preservation of gender roles and identity, and opposes their destruction.
Gender = sexism. Gender politics were one of the few things that had been going WELL in the 21st-Century. All the rules were proving to be bullshit, the Chaos was glorious, anybody could be anything they wanted...then suddenly, FEMINISM!

I am pretty a hypersensitive fellow. I always have been. I am autistic, not a sexual creature, and a naturally ascetic personality to boot. I have been sexually harassed by a girl at least once, and that is/those are the only times such behavior has occurred, by anyone, to anyone, in my presence. It made me feel gross and not want to be around that person, but I've experienced MUCH worse.

I remember seeing a John Walsh PSA that repeatedly ran during my Saturday morning cartoons in the early 1990s about "sexual abuse" - of course, since it was directed at people who weren't supposed to even know what "sexual" really meant, he couched it in vague terms about "touching that doesn't make you happy, or even makes you feel afraid" or something to that tune.
V
Flash-forward to me meeting one of my aunts for the first time: She put her hands on my shoulders, and I matter-of-factly stated, "that's sexual abuse."

I was doing exactly what John Walsh told me to do: She was touching me, I didn't like it, therefore it was sexual abuse.

This was in a room full of people, my mother included (who explained the situation to both sides, but was as shocked as everyone else to hear what I said) - but it was in the lobby of a restaurant, i.e. in public. I don't think anyone beyond the bundle of family heard me, but can you imagine what might have happened if that occurred today, with camera-phones and the social media gossip-engine everywhere??? My aunt, who just wanted to lovingly greet her nephew she'd never met before, could have been LYNCHED (just as this article effectively said she should have been - or does it not count, because I'm a boy??? Boys are made of snips and snails and puppy-dog tails, you know...dirty, tough, untrustworthy, and expendable; God help them if they fail to be anything other than strong but malleable guardians).

I've lost track of the rest of what I was going to type. Am I getting my point across See the multiple problems here?

Joe Biden may be a naturally touchy person (which is not and should not be a crime, even if I don't like it - both extremes must be respected), or he may be an authentic predator (which I'm frankly skeptical of - Dennis Hastert was an authentic predator, but did he LOOK like one when the cameras were rolling? The appearance of guilt may, sickeningly, be the strongest evidence of innocence), but if his being favored by the Establishment manages to dash the Neo-Feminist Inquisition against the rocky coast of history, let that be a silver lining to his coronation - focus on bringing him and all the other MFISC-puppets down with the power of uncompromising truth and real Justice, and let them drag this particular facet of crypto-fascism down with him.

This simply shouldn't be a thing in 2019.