Do dividend payouts harm workers?
There's been much wailing and gnashing of teeth over the fact that corporations used part of the Trump tax cuts to pay out dividends to shareholders. This certainly sounds like a case of the rich getting richer at the expense of workers.
But is it true?
According to an article in the Washington Post by Christopher Ingraham,
A relentless focus on maximizing shareholder value has contributed to stagnant middle-class wages in the United States and fueled the rise of a society increasingly divided between haves and have-nots, according to a new working paper published by the Roosevelt Institute, a progressive economic think tank.
The Alleged Proof
Ingraham includes the following chart to prove his claim:
Analyzing the Proof
The chart above shows that stock buybacks and dividend payouts went up by 1.3% of total corporate assets while wages declined 10.2%. That sounds really, really bad. But what caused the other 8.9% (10.2 - 1.3) of wage decline? That's a topic worthy of another essay. Bottom line, though, is that buybacks and dividends are a relatively small portion of the total. Obviously, there's more than just buybacks and dividends behind the impoverishing of American workers. [Note: Buybacks and dividends are each roughly half of the 1.3%, or 0.65%.)
Even worse, the chart is misleading or downright fraudulent because it leaves out an important factor. Namely, dividend payouts benefit employees, as do stock buybacks.
How is this possible? It's possible because the vast majority of employee retirement plans have changed over the past 30 years from defined benefit plans (traditional pensions) to "modern" 401K plans. Buybacks increase the value of shares in the 401K. And dividends are, by law, reinvested in the employee's 401K or paid out to the employee.
If you invest in mutual funds in your 401(k) account, any dividends paid by the funds you own are reinvested into more shares of the same fund. ...
The option to purchase company stock in your 401(k) plan can also classified as a qualified employee stock ownership plan, or ESOP. Under the ESOP rules you must be given the option to either reinvest the dividends paid on company stock into more shares of the stock or have dividends paid out directly to you.
Source: How 401(k) Dividends Are Paid
Conclusion
There are many, many valid reasons to criticize corporations and their behavior. Outsourcing. Short-term thinking. Offshore banking. Tax avoidance. But paying dividends is not one of them. Employees benefit from that, as do any other shareholders.
Raising valid complaints will make our case stronger and better. Creating a straw man, as the Roosevelt Institute and Ingraham did, will not.
Comments
What about buying their own stocks?
Seems to me the market is a ponzi when the big boys drive the price of their corporation higher and higher way above the REAL value of their holdings. So yes on paper the the bottom line looks better...but the real value isn't. Kinda like the dollar itself, what real value does it have? Paper printed endlessly... profiting an international banking system which operates the fed. The MMT folks suggest just printing more to pay for social programs.
The other issue is we are the world's primary arms manufacturers, marketers, and profiteers. Additionally profiting as a leading producer of oil and gas. But the rest of the planet may be tiring of our endless bullying.
It is a house of cards. But I'm no economist. Just a hillbilly homesteader.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
It is a Ponzi scheme.
But it's the stock market we're stuck with for now. Companies should focus on R&D and investment into new goods and services that benefit humanity. Instead, they're essentially forced to focus on pumping up short-term results and maximizing share prices. We absolutely need an overhaul of our financial system and its perverse current incentives, but I don't see that happening any time soon no matter who is president and who's in charge of Congress.
nor do I
They've been purchased buy the highest bidder and do not work for the people.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
2 possible counterarguments:
1. allocating tax benefits to stock dividends rather than to increasing wages is counterproductive in the broad scale. If everyone raises wages they will raise the amount of available resources society's consumers have to consume. i.e. Henry Ford's dictum "if I pay them they can afford to buy my cars" may not be true if no one else pays more, but economy wide if enough businesses pay more it will work, though if not enough pay more it won't.
2. giving employees stock dividends will indeed benefit those employees' 401ks, but how many people have a 401k, and how long before they can draw from it? How much is in the average 401k and how much will it benefit?
On to Biden since 1973
Answers
Here's a good article that answers #2 in detail -- Frequently Asked Questions About 401(k). Using its figures and BLS data, about 44% of full-time workers are in 401Ks.
As for #1, you're absolutely correct. Henry Ford, in many ways a despicable person, had it right about wages.
Disclaimer (and a minor quibble)
I am 62 and have a SEP IRA with about $215k, a similar amount in an investment account, and $500k in home equity. My best year when I worked was about $50k. I have always felt that our economic woes were caused by prices and lifestyle, not pay.
Now check my math: America has about 310 million people. about a quarter are retired and about a quarter are too young to be in the workforce. (leaving about 155mil workers) About 55 million people have 401Ks, leaving about 100mil people without 401Ks.
Now assume what seems obvious: the average worker with a 401K is higher paid than the average worker without, and "he" (don't blame me, blame the english language) probably has fewer children and is more likely to be a homeowner. (also retirees with 401Ks probably were higher paid while working) Also, thanks to being able to make larger contributions and compound interest his 401K is likely to be larger, often much larger. (and remember that you can borrow from a 401K to buy a home. This is a big advantage, especially in CA)
So, it appears that 401Ks naturally disproportionately benefit better paid workers, thus adding a new layer to wealth inequality. This would be an unintended consequence, but a consequence.
On to Biden since 1973
Surprisingly,
"higher paid workers have 401ks" is apparently not the full picture. Both Walmart and McDonald's as well as many other large but low-paying companies have 401Ks. According to BrightScope, "Walmart 401k Plan currently has over 1,655,000 active participants". I do know that many very small companies (100 or less employees) don't have them.
Perhaps we could amend your final statement to "401Ks naturally disproportionately benefit
better paidworkers employed by large companies".What about investing in more factories, raising
wages and creating jobs? Trump claimed the tax cuts for the corporations would be used to build more factories, create more jobs, and raise employee wages. That was pure bullshit. None of those have come to be because the corporations have largely used the savings to enrich the top classes in this country. Most citizens don't even have a 401k or any retirement savings at all and the pension benefits you mention primarily benefit those in the top 1-20 percentile in wealth. The huge benefits are for the top 1-5% regardless how this is painted. Those who defend the Trump tax cuts are in effect defending this capitalist system that funnels most of the wealth to the top while the rest of the population struggles to survive, as statistics prove.
You raise some good points.
But I have a few quibbles. First, about 44% of American workers participate in 401K plans. Second, about 5 million jobs added under Trump thus far. Third, traditional pensions benefited blue collar workers, too. Fourth, I have never defended Trump's tax cut. I think it was a bad idea and I would have preferred that the money be spent on infrastructure.
Ya, understand edg.
UniParty fight!
Watching a duopoly battle is like watching an empty Cadillac idling on the asphalt, wasting gas and polluting the atmosphere. Parked, going nowhere. Floor it.
I wonder what is happening to citizens in real life? Seems to me those who posts charts and graphs are doing pretty pretty good out of poverty, no matter what side their lobbyist sits on. R versus D, Them versus Us, the battles that titillate the echo chamber to mass reproduce, and consume ever more. "That's the system" The non-posting population seems to be just scrounging to survive every day. weird
Sigh, shake my head, blah blah blah. How do people enjoy life as they're shitting the bed every day? Having babies, doing drugs, watching cable news, and now social media. Roaring twenties here we come again. Again! flappers unite
Thanks edg, keep going because why not have fun and make profits as the world burns? More poor and more rich is good for both Ds and Rs and the ownership society. Rentiers, poners, cronies and fascists. That's how it looks to me in real life on my block, in my town, all over the state, more awful. California, meh.
prozac nation
NOBODY 2020
Good Luck
Huh?
I don't make profits as the world burns. I have no idea what gave you that idea. As for states, I live in Arizona and grew up in Michigan. I'm well aware of the struggles of people in real life in those states, and several others where I've lived or have friends.
What bad economy?
You posted another essay titled "What bad economy?" Huh? Never mind, go back to the charts and graphs if it makes you feel good. Go in peace.
That makes no sense.
You are right about one thing -- you did miss the point. What bad economy points out that trying to use the economy, which is improving, against Trump is as losing a strategy as was Russiagate. Do dividends harm doesn't defend tax cuts, it attacks the false claim that dividend payouts are responsible for reduced wages. I'm sorry that the concepts in these two essays are beyond your grasp.
Refusing to believe positive economic signs when they exist makes no sense. Is your belief system so fragile that you must rail against anything that contradicts it? The economy is getting better. Get over it.
If too many babies is a problem, fight against those that are working 24/7 to outlaw birth control and abortion. If drugs are a problem, work for more money for treatment centers and for eliminating the draconian drug laws that have ensnared and ruined so many young people in our society.
Why you're blathering about me, an old, anonymous guy on Social Security that posts essays on c99 is a complete mystery to me. I think you could do more productive things with your life.