What Have You Learned, Dorothy?
From The Wizard of Oz, I have learned many things. Like: Kansas is a yeehaw preserve. Goobers row boats in tornadoes. When you first meet someone, you should sing them a song. Scarecrows are basically crucified. If you stand in the rain, you will rust. Lions have thick Brooklyn accents. Monkeys look stupid in clothes. Trees are filled with Hate and Violence. Bad witches ride brooms, good witches float in bubbles, wizards prefer hot-air balloons. Poppies put you to sleep. Border agents are bipolar: first they blither and blather, then they Cry. Water is a weapon of black mass destruction. Rat dogs smoke out humbug. Ruby slippers are Necessary. Etc.
But I have always, and to this day, been utterly buggered, as to what in the sam hill Dorothy is on about, with her big climactic wisdom-pearl. Which comes when the woman who rides around in the bubble, and speaking with that annoying smugness that is so often the way of oracles, tells Dorothy that, through all the tsuris she has recently endured, she actually possessed the power, all along, to return to Kansas. As if anyone would want to. It's just that Dorothy, she had to learn this for herself. Because if anybody had tried to tell her, she wouldn't have believed it. The Straw Man then asks: "What have you learned, Dorothy?" To which Dorothy replies:
"Well, I think that it wasn't enough just to want to see Uncle Henry and Auntie Em. And it's that if I ever go looking for my heart's desire again, I won't look any further than my own backyard. Because if it isn't there, I never really lost it to begin with."
"Is that right?" Dorothy asks the bubbler.
"That's all it is," bubblingly returns she.
Yes, fine—but what does that even mean?
Are we really supposed to cabin our heart's desire to just our own backyard? What if the backyard is but a scotch-broom forest over a septic tank? What if we live in a BF Skinner experiment, twenty stories up, and don't even have a backyard, just a bunch of foul city air? What if the backyard is a pallet of damp cardboard under a railroad bridge, with Steve Bannon sitting around the Sterno can, plucking the one-string banjo and moaning songs about the globalists? Is that, truly, all that is allowed to be?
No. Say it ain't so, Dorothy.
For many years, I kept my mystification to myself, figuring there must be meaning evident in Dorothy's big speech so blindingly obvious that everyone got it but me: I simply suffered from some brain hole. But no. For once I did begin to inquire of others, if they could make sense of this Dorothy word-cluster, I discovered that no one, had any clue, at all.
And these were people, with many brain folds. University professors, draped in degrees, all of them got an "F," on this question. Jesuits, they pronounced it more baffling, even than theodicy. Physicists, they said they would rather any day grapple with quarks and strings and gluons, than Dorothy and her brain-numbing backyard quanta.
Then, desperate, I asked a new human—for whom, after all, the film was made. And was told by the tyke: "It means you shouldn't run away from home."
Yes! Yea, verily—and a child shall lead them!
But this answer raises its own unsettling questions. Because Dorothy only fled the hog-wallow of home when the Gulch woman arrived to imprison her dog in a basket—for alleged crimes against flowers and cats—cycling off to needle the beast at the dog-knackers.
So does this mean that when the witch-women of Animal Control arrive to arrest our animals, we are just supposed to take it? I think not! Any of us, I believe, we would gather up our hounds and our horses, our fish and our fowl, our lemurs and zebras and wildebeest, and head for the hills, hoping therein to find, like Dorothy, some kindly quack with a snake-oil wagon, who will let us marry our fortunes together, until we get conked on the head by a house, and wake up in a place that is, like, real pretty, if decidedly Weird.
It is simply Wrong, that this film concludes in a fashion more obscure than the chickens dancing out the end of Stroszek. Or the Richard version of Dale Cooper, standing baffled in the street, wondering what year it is, while the Carrie variant of Laura Palmer, she screams the lights out in the Jowday house, thereby closing the door to Twin Peaks: The Return.
As always, when attempting to penetrate this Wizard mystery, my head, it is hurting. And so I am going to find some poppies. And lie down with them. And there sleep. Maybe the answer. Will there come.
![Share](/sites/all/modules/addtoany/images/share_save_171_16.png)
Comments
In the end we discover
...that Dorothy has needs. Special needs.
And like the White Rabbit, we're checking our pocket watch at this point in the story. We're done and need to be gone.
Her eccentric homily blows through the soul like a cold lonely wind. The same wind no doubt blows between her ears. For all her sincerity, it's clear that Dorothy is a placeholder, an icon of the meek who shall one day inherit the earth. Typically, Dorothy will produce her share of methane, reproduce more than she should, and then begone. Future generations will race to mitigate her over-size carbon footprint.
By way of contrast, the exasperated Alice shows pluck and defiance as she weathers the tumultuous storms of reality. Where Dorothy is kind-hearted and true, Alice is ingenious and constantly adapting. Sometimes she is empathetic:
And sometimes she is glib:
And she always questions authority.
She claims to entertain as many as six impossible things before breakfast.
alice
at least had the sense to know there is no sense, that nothing is real until you look at it, that the dream is all. Her ultimate wisdoms were that her black and white kittens were also queens of red and white, and that the people of the politics, Tweedledum and Tweedledee, were most probably right, in their observation that she herself was but a player in a dream of the Red King, the snoring idler. Like how some of the humans think all the terrans are moving to and fro in a tubes simulation overseen by some 12-year-old cackling and Cheetoing in a basement. But the boy in the basement, he probably doesn't want to know, that he too is but a dream, of yet another dreamer.
A lot of the humans become sad when it is said that the only sense is nonsense, that reality isn't real, there is only the real of how you are looking, and that all are abob, on an ocean of dream. Einstein, for one, had a great hate for this. But that is too bad, because it is proven. Like, one of the other haters, Louis de Broglie, he desperately proposed "pilot-waves," to try to keep everything classically normal. But that hope is totally over now, because his pilot-wave brainshower has been subjected to various testings, and there been shown to be wrong, wrong, wrong.
Because things just want, for instance, to be in two places at once, travel through two doors simultaneously, be two different things at the same time. But if you are looking at them, and such things give you the fear, they will settle down, and look and behave like what you think might be more real. Because they are nice that way. But. Really. Nothing is real. So: nothing to get hung about. Just strawberry fields forever.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sg-0_tuME9s]
There was a tree
In a park near Leo Carillo Beach in Southen California that looked like it belonged to Alice.
My Sister and I would pretend to fall down inside that tree and create our own Wonderland.
In the sunshine, by the creek, catching tadpoles.
The rocks in the creek slick with moss on our bare feet.
Climbing mountains, collecting rocks.
Sliding down.
The Call to Lunch.
The spell broken.
Until next time.
There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier
Sometimes a movie
is just a movie. It was set in agrarian times, back when generations continued working their farms.
dfarrah
yes,
but not a lot of them were flying houses to midget communities to there do battle with flying simians and cackling longnoses because a floating head with fire coming out of it Told them to.
I'll repeat this cliché
Dorothy didn't dream the whole thing, and though she went back to Kansas (where her family was), it cost her the silver slippers in doing so. Also, Glinda is much more bad-ass. Dorothy too.
She returned to Oz in later books and, by book 6, Ozma brought her Uncle Henry and Aunt Em to live in retirement. "Forget Kansas. You'll never miss it." (not a quote)
Instead, live in the Land of Oz, under a system of utopian socialism, rules by a benevolent despot (Ozma) a transgender fairy, along with a whole host of strong female characters.
The movie is great entertainment though. "I'll get you, and your little dog too! A-Hahahahahahahaha!"
what
you say is true. The book is better, and in the later books the whole family decides there is so much the matter with Kansas they abandon the place permanently for Oz. And, as you also say, the books are shot through with the socialism, and an acknowledgement that women are humans. As well as very special hens, rainbow daughters, littly tiny glass people, magic dishpans, etc. There are many of these books, and it is curious they have not made it into the movies, especially in this current wave of churning out eleventy-billion versions of every Marvel who has ever been in a comic book. Probably the problem is the Baum books don't have near enough of the Killing.
You hit that on the nose
But yea. Not enough killing. Tik-Tok doesn't fit into the the meme of "Scary AI murders us all," either. (Or the idea that artificial intelligence is any scarier than real stupidity.) The Nome King makes a good villain--in fact, he is a lot like Trump--though Baum did not believe in absolute evil.
If Trump drank from the Fountain of Oblivion, would anyone notice?
The Wizard of Oz while stoned
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Has no one watched this?
Trust me it's worth the time.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Poppies, poppies, poppies . . .
I don't remember the "fishy fishy fish" part though. LOL!
a movie is just a movie
Did you know that the drab black-and-white (grayscale) opening scenes in the movie, shifting suddenly to riotous Technicolor in Oz, were specified by L. Frank Baum's original book text?
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
She dreamt the whole thing,
meaning she never left in the first place. I think the message is to think small and be satisfied with what you've got... it was made during the Depression.
"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."
if
they'd wanted people to think small, they shouldn't have shown them another world.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvvkeYubL28]
Living is easy, with eyes closed.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
the
Red King had his eyes closed throughout pretty much the entirety of Through The Looking Glass, and yet it is said he was running the joint.
And
I agree with the new human
Don't run away from home.
Unless you have to.
In which case a Lion with a Brooklyn accent might be helpful.
Cuz he's got courage
To help you
Follow the Yellow Brick Road.
Ya got that?
[video:https://youtu.be/THbY7EL8k5w]
There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier
In her defense
actually,
she did run off, when the Gulch woman came for the rat dog, and she was going to take up with the snake-oil man, except he showed her a sly phony vision of Auntie Em having the Tears, and so she ran back to the hog-wallow, and there she was hit in the head by a house, because sometimes they are Mean that way.
Another thing Wrong with the ending is
What about Toto?
You are right, the reason she ran away in the first place was to save Toto from the clutches of that horrible woman, who was the wicked witch there in Oz and got melted by water into a puddle of goo. Good riddance.
But back in Kansas — no place like home — the wicked witch isn’t melted and is no doubt peddling her way back for the dog while Dorothy takes her medicine about not running off. And no one seems to care about poor Toto anymore. I always thought of Toto as a boy, but he/she was played by a female dog named Terry. Who was a rat dog, and also a movie star who, it is said, was paid more than the munchkins.
And Lassie was played by males.
I don't know about Rin Tin Tin's real life gender. I don't think I've ever seen Rin Tin Tin. Don't ask me how I even know his or her name.
you're
right about Toto! If I recall correctly, the Gulch woman even claimed to possess a Sheriff Paper authorizing her to seize the ratster. And she didn't seem like a woman who could easily be Stopped. Perhaps pursuant to the theory that sometimes what happens in one universe can bleed a bit into the next, maybe at least part of the Gulch woman was melted, the part that had such a great Hate for Toto.
As for the munchkins, earlier this year an Australian man pronounced a metoo jihad in which he demanded that the last living munchkin—then 98 and in a Home—speak out on whether it was true he and/or his fellow munchkins ran wild thrusting their hands up Dorothy's dress.
But then Maren up and died, and so now the truth will never for sure be Known.
Melting
I like this theory.
That seems reasonable to me. Perhaps that’s why no one worries about Toto once they return, because the Melting has changed her, everyone knows this and we feel it, even though we don’t see it on screen.
Or maybe it’s that Dorothy defeated her in Oz, so we know she can do it and unconsciously accept that she and Toto will somehow overcome the witch back in Kansas too.
I had no idea about the munchkins’ bad behavior. The things I learn here! Thank you.
It is my understanding that Garland was a raconteur—
that is, she bent the truth about a lot of things. Do we really need Neuremburg trials for the last surviving munchkin who was probably a child too at the time.
"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?" ~Orwell, "1984"
It does seem garbled.
Maybe Judy Garland said her line wrong?
She was, after all, a sixteen year old trying to look maybe half that. And, the story does, the studios had her on speed to control her weight and then on sleeping pills so the speed would not keep her awake at night.
And then, there's...
https://www.syracuse.com/celebrity-news/index.ssf/2017/02/judy_garland_m...
As for Alice, whether Lewis Carroll was a pedophile has been a subject of controversy.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Lewis+Carroll+pedophile&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-...
All of which is to say, sometimes, we may be happier not looking very closely.
she
was rudely used by the studio, no doubt about that, even if they didn't turn a blind eye while drunken munchkins tried to crawl up her dress.
When considering Dodgson, it is well to remember that throughout most of his life the age of consent in the UK was 13.
but what if your backyard
gets washed away by a hurricane?
Stop Climate Change Silence - Start the Conversation
Hot Air Website, Twitter, Facebook
good
point. I guess pursuant to the Dorothy wisdom you're supposed to stick with whatever remains.
The hurricane was in the third book :)
That was the book after the one
where the pine island glacier slid into the ocean and the sea level went up six meters. Of course they were on a boat. Smarties.
Stop Climate Change Silence - Start the Conversation
Hot Air Website, Twitter, Facebook