Black America is fed up with its Democratic elites
Recently at the Georgia Aquarium, Tom Perez, the Democratic National Committee chairman, decided to do something long overdue.
“I am sorry,” Perez said.
...
Perez, however, soon made clear that his apology was much more specific. “We lost elections not only in November 2016, but we lost elections in the run-up because we stopped organizing,” he said. “We stopped talking to people.“We took too many people for granted,” Perez continued, “and African Americans—our most loyal constituency—we all too frequently took for granted. That is a shame on us, folks, and for that I apologize. And for that I say, it will never happen again!”
That sounds good, but very vague. Then, after you dig down in the article, you discover just how worthless this apology actually is.
Representative Cedric Richmond of Louisiana, the chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, chided Democratic politicians for not talking to black voters “in a language they can understand.”“We can’t talk to them in these Ivy League terms,” Richmond added. He went on to rib the Yale-educated Booker, but he could also have been referring to the often high-minded, Harvard-educated former president.
How patronizing is that? He may as well have said "those dumb yokels can't understand".
I'm not black, but I know what talking-down looks like.
However, this is the state of the black community versus the black elites.
To give you an idea, consider how the black elites talk about Obama.
President Obama’s historic tenure ends as the nation celebrates what would have been Martin Luther King’s 88th birthday. As I see it, Mr. Obama is the only figure to ever give Dr. King a run for his money as Greatest Black Man in American history. More than a gentle rivalry for supremacy in the history books joins the two.
Gag!
Now let's compare this "Greatest Black Man in American history" to how he responded to the black community when it was in a crisis.
President Obama’s statements seem designed to divert blame and diffuse responsibility. The language about a “deep distrust” existing “between law enforcement and communities of color” sounds meant to evoke notions of a mutual combativeness that Americans endorse when thinking about our country’s modern race relations.That rhetoric collapses on itself, especially when applied to events it’s meant to explain. When the President uses such speechifying to explain the facts and factors surrounding the Brown and Garner cases, he indicts communities of color. The nation is delivered the suggestion that communities of color are complicit in those tragedies and contribute to the troublesome policing that victimizes us.
I don't want to spend too much time picking on Obama, but he makes such a good example of the huge gap between black elites and the general African American community.
It applies to the African community as well. Recently Obama was scheduled to travel to South Africa to deliver the Nelson Mandela Foundation annual lecture.
This sparked outrage.
In an open letter, the Cage Africa advocacy group said that during his eight-year tenure as president and commander-in-chief of the US army, Obama was directly responsible for a massive expansion of US military operations in Africa, including special operations and drone attacks."Giving this man a platform would be tantamount to condoning these actions, something that Nelson Mandela would surely have stood against," the letter, published earlier this month, read.
"This is especially pertinent given Nelson Mandela's legacy as an individual who was also once designated a 'terrorist' and suffered torture and imprisonment as a result, and who despite this is now regarded as one of the pre-eminent figureheads for justice around the world."
To put it another way, in a different decade, Obama would have tortured and assassinated Mandela.
But let's get back to Ferguson.
When the protests started, some black leaders traveled to Ferguson. They included Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and NAACP president Cornell William Brooks.
What frequently gets forgotten is how all three of them were booed off the stage in Ferguson by the black communities that they claimed to represent.
That's mind-blowing.
In fact, after Brooks' contract expired, the NAACP made an extraordinary announcement.
The organization announced that it will engage in a “listening tour” of its members for the first time in its history before it hires a new president.“In the coming months, the NAACP will embark upon a historic national listening tour to ensure that we harness the energy and voices of our grassroots members, to help us achieve transformational change, and create an internal culture designed to push the needle forward on civil rights and social justice,” said Derrick Johnson, vice-chairman of the NAACP board of directors, in the statement.
Groups that are in touch with their communities don't need to have listening tours.
I don't want to single out the gap between the black elites and the black community, because you can see the exact same dynamic with labor unions.
For decades the Democratic Party ignored the destruction of labor unions.
Despite that, labor unions spent a record amount in 2016 for Hillary and the Democrats.
Then labor unions were shocked by their members.
Organized labor is searching for answers after union households failed to turn out for Hillary Clinton despite a massive voter mobilization effort -- a sharp departure from decades of union support for Democratic presidential candidates.
Clinton’s poor performance among union households appeared to especially damage her in crucial Midwestern states. Obama won Ohio in 2012, besting Romney in those households by 23 percentage points. Clinton actually lost Ohio’s union households to Trump by 9 points, according to exit polls. The state went to Trump.
...
The AFL-CIO’s political director, Michael Podhorzer, told POLITICO that Clinton “ran a really good campaign” but appears to have lost votes to third-party candidates. Indeed, exit polls showed Trump’s share of union households only rose by 3 percent compared with Romney in 2012.
As for the broader reasons why union households might have spurned Clinton, Podhorzer said, “We’re still digging into that.”
Ya think the AFL-CIO needs to go on a listening tour too?

Comments
It seems like all out "leaders"
or anyone who makes it big, never look back to where they came from, politicians, performers, sports stars. They can't turn their back fast enough and forget their life before. Any listening tour would be useless, they think they know what our lives our like but it's through briefings, or they have staffers "listen", or some vague memory. When they show up they can't handle the criticism (Pelosi) or you get a song and dance (Schumer) but in the end whatever they hear is not what was said, and somehow the time is never right to address those problems.
In the end the most important thing for them is to have the warm bodies show up and vote d. Everything else is by their discretion.
scorning the base degrees
This is hardly new:
-- Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, Act II, Scene 1
And it still sucks, of course.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
Didn't anyone ask if union members
stayed home or voted for Stein or quit the union? I'm sure they have the stats. I don't think they want to face the answer.
As for the racial turnout, I think the real tellimg stat is the hispanic turnout - under 50%. Why should they turn out? They had a choice, the man who called them all rapists and drug dealers or the woman who sponsored central american death squads. Maybe more people would have come out if she hadn't said to send children to be killed. You think?
On to Biden since 1973
Especially since, if they replayed the man’s words on YouTube,
enough of them may have been able to concede — at least to themselves if not publicly — that, okay, the man was saying that among immigrants from Mexico there were some rapists and drug dealers and that the formulation with “all” was from people who disliked him putting words in his mouth.
https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trumps-epic-statement-on-mexico-2...
Considering that many Politicians are now
using the NAACP as just a stepping stone on their way to power (Ben Jealous) it's not surprising that they have zero association with their supposed constituency.
I don't trust anybody in a suit.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
Here's Evidence of Democrats Turning Against Elites
A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma
I marched and participated in die-ins with BlackLivesMatter,
as a very natural outgrowth of Occupy.
It's complicated.
To backup, I canvassed for Obama '08 in three states. With the hindsight of what we know now it would have been different. But I will say this: symbolism is not completely unworthy. And in that sense I don't regret - and remember crystal clear thinking as I dragged myself around so many precincts of PA and one in Ohio - that from now on there will not be a black child born in this country who won't think he can't become president. Given the deep legacy of racism and slavery that meant something to me, and still does. I'm not going to further get into Obama's disastrous legacy. I voted for Jill Stein more than any presidential candidate in my life, for reasons that don't need to be explained here.
One of the major takeaways and epiphanies of my experiences with #BLM was the great awakening that was occurring within the protest movement. I'll never forget packing in to the rec hall of a Bklyn apartment complex to hear some of the young leaders from Ferguson and St. Louis speak, after Mike Brown was gratuitously murdered by a racist thug cop and left in the street uncoverd like a dog to send a message. It was maybe a 10% white crowd and the place was alive with animation and elucidation. One protest leader remarked something that I thought captured the zeitgeist of the movement. Which was that they didn't want to be thought of as the "New Civil Rights Movement," which is why they shunned people like Sharpton and Jackson, but embraced radicals such as Cornel West and Rev. Sekou. They instead referred to themselves as the "Oppressed People's Movement," explicitly seeing the connections between not only institutional racism in America, but the struggles in Palestine, the class struggles of the economically disenfranchised and the LGBTQ movement. It's was very moving and had powerful ramifications. Which is why the RW media still spends so much time trying to malign it.
Regarding the Dems losing their taken-for-granted grip on the black voting bloc, this NY Times piece really captured that.
I'll just say another thing. Those self-important, Neoliberal clowns at TOP would go into hysterics and denigrate Cornel anytime he was mentioned, such was their frenzied, knee-jerk defense of Obama. It always confounded me. They could never put up another intellectual who was as willing to put his body on the line and get arrested, nor one who could hold a candle to his powers of cogency, brilliance, historical and philosophical skill, and oration gifts.
And one more. I wrote an essay at TOP called (warning: it's a link to there) "Big Turnout for #LawyersMarch To Crooked Staten Island DA, Demand GJ Case Unsealed/Console Garners." In it I observe the protesters not trusting the old guard of the Sharpton wing to be the face of Garner family instead of the #BLM movement. In the end, Garner's daughter Erica broke with the establishment and went with Bernie to became a surrogate of his and denounced the Neoliberal Democratic Party as supporters of blacks.
"If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:
THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS MUSIC"
- Kurt Vonnegut
Exactly right on all counts
bought and paid for, i.e. union leaders, planned
parenthood and you mention the NAACP most likely
the ACLU the list goes on and on, money and CU
trumped good, we are living in times when evil
is winning.
I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish
"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"
Heard from Margaret Kimberley