Gun Control and Nonviolence

Some good news for gun control:

Dismissing a lawsuit filed by gun retailers and the Gun Owners' Action League of Massachusetts, which sought to challenge the constitutionality of the state's 20-year-old law, U.S. District Judge William Young wrote (pdf) in a 47-page ruling, "The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to 'bear Arms.'"

"In the absence of federal legislation, Massachusetts is free to ban these weapons and large-capacity magazines. Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens.

What appears to a common sense decision for any rational person is a radical step forward considering our current judicial and political climate.

Protect children not guns. Foster peaceful communities.

"Strong gun laws save lives, and we will not be intimidated by the gun lobby in our efforts to end the sale of assault weapons and protect our communities and schools."

The rising tide of protest is getting results. Nonviolent tactics do work and are working:

The decision comes amid marches, town halls, and walkouts across the country to pressure policymakers to enact tougher restrictions on firearms, including bans similar to Massachusetts' law.

Upholding Assault Weapons Ban, Federal Judge Says Constitution Has Nothing To Say About Restricting the AR-15

Switching gears to a Counterpunch article, the real message is that Nonviolence works:

“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral; begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth.

—Martin Luther King Jr.

This is a battle for hearts and minds. A quest for inner peace that replaces hatred with compassion:

“Peace cannot be built on exclusivism, absolutism, and intolerance. But neither can it be built on vague liberal slogans and pious programs gestated in the smoke of confabulation. There can be no peace on earth without the kind of inner change that brings man back to his “right mind.”

—Mohandas Gandhi

Nonviolent protest and demonstrations are the only way forward. Violent political and social forces are empowered by and crave a violent response:

This is why non-violence must be embraced as a principle. As long as violence can be used, it will be used by the wrong people for the wrong ends. This is a practical truth that must counter the idealism of militants who believe that they can defeat force through force.

Violence never solves any problem:

One can bomb a terrorist, but as long as people remain hungry and desperate, a new terrorist will rise. These assumptions too assume that the authorities who use such tactics are acting in the interests of society, rather than the interests of power. This is rarely the case.

The only way to stop violence is to embrace non-violence. It is through this discipline that a new society may emerge. Without such a discipline the victims of violence will continue to be mostly innocent.

Violence begets violence and plays into the hands of the powerful oppressive forces we are fighting:

It is only through the creation of a society that has no interest in using violence to solve its problems that justice will be achieved. As long as violence exists, it will be used by the wrong hands for the wrong ends. We will continue to react, rather than transform. It should be the way we act, not the way we react, that dictates the world we live in. Violence exists as a force that acts on abstract principles. As long as it remains it will be used by various actors for various ends.

It's good to have goals. Is a nonviolent society an achievable goal?
Well nobody said it was gonna be easy.
We have a long, hard road ahead of us. It is vital to remind ourselves that compassion conquers violence. Nonviolence and compassion are transformational forces.

Non-violence on the other hand is a refusal of violence that can be applied to any situation. It need not rely on anything. In an unjust and unfair world, it is the only act that gives us order. It is the only act that creates a possibility for fairness, justice and peace. If we let it guide us we can transform. If we fall to the whims of violence, our lives are out of our hands.

Nonviolence As A Principle

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

snoopydawg's picture

He based it on one of the Supreme Court cases that Scalia wrote. Next we have the California politicians who are trying to make cops accountable for killing unarmed civilians. This too addresses a SC ruling where Scalia again wrote the decision. His decision was that if cops just feel threatened for their lives, then it's okay for them to shoot first ask questions later.

We know that the protests start out being peaceful and then the cops show up with their riot gear and under cover police sabotage them to make them more violent. One thing I'd like to see is for the protests to be silent. No signs or shouting, just thousands of people walking through the streets. Wouldn't that make a bigger point?

Boycotts. Any time someone in the media spouts off people find out who their advertisers are and boycott them. This worked with Rush and it's working on Ingram right now. There is a good chance that she is off air permanently. So why haven't we started our boycott of Walmart yet? Bring them down and move on to the next conglomerate.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Meteor Man's picture

@snoopydawg
I recently saw photographs of young protesters sitting down and reading books. I thought it was in Gaza, but couldn't find it. This popped up:

Standing Man Protesters

The following images explore one aspect of the protest in Taksim Square, ongoing since before the communal standing took off. Public reading and informal education has been notable since the earliest days of the protest, but has since merged with the Standing Man to form "The Taksim Square Book Club".

The chosen reading material of many of those who take their stand is reflective, in part, of the thoughtfulness of those who have chosen this motionless protest to express their discontent.

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

Alligator Ed's picture

“Peace cannot be built on exclusivism, absolutism, and intolerance. But neither can it be built on vague liberal slogans and pious programs gestated in the smoke of confabulation. There can be no peace on earth without the kind of inner change that brings man back to his “right mind.”

—Mohandas Gandhi

To paraphrase the mahatma: "there can be no peace on earth without the kind of inner change that brings man back to his 'right mind'". Psychopaths have no right mind. They have and continue to use violence in all its forms to obtain their goals. Until psychopathy can be eliminated from those in the government and their puppet masters, such well-intentioned articles of faith will fail. The only reason the Brits got out of India had more to do with their bankruptcy and domestic ruin, and not to benign wishes for peace.

In several countries, citizens are forced to own weapons, like Finland and Switzerland--how high are their homicide rates? Why is that?

up
0 users have voted.
thanatokephaloides's picture

@Alligator Ed

In several countries, citizens are forced to own weapons, like Finland and Switzerland--how high are their homicide rates? Why is that?

Almost nonexistent.

Why?

Because those nations don't use their militaries as agents of foreign policy. You don't have Swiss or Finns running around in the streets, armed, after spending years fighting in someone else's wars. Or the children of such broken people.

Here in the USA, our steets teem with those who are mentally damaged from participation in foreign wars. The consequences are obvious.

Sad

up
0 users have voted.

"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar

"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides

Meteor Man's picture

@Alligator Ed
but psychopathy will still exist. We can try Psychopathology:

1. the branch of medicine dealing with the causes and processes of mental disorders.
2. abnormal, maladaptive behavior or mental activity.

I really don't see the solution arriving any time soon.

Can any mental illness be "cured" with violence? Can we eliminate the drive for power, fame and fortune with violence? I admit I still have more questions than answers, but I just don't see a violent approach that the American police state cannot overwhelm with a superior response.

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

Alligator Ed's picture

@Meteor Man Neuroscientists do not know to rewire the maladaptive circuitry. It is easier to pervert the good (mk ultra, propaganda, blackmail, coercion) than to repair the bad.

Ideally, the best solution would be to ban psychopaths from political office and lobbying--but that technology is non-existent.

up
0 users have voted.

@Alligator Ed

No-one lacking in empathy is qualified for the public service. There should be a test, live-streamed and published, for anyone wishing to attain public office, so that the public has some idea of who - and what - they're hiring as a public servant. Especially as the lack of ethics goes hand in hand with the condition, resulting in no conscience.

Let's have real transparency in politics; entering public life needs to mean having that public life in the public eye, as far as capacities, suitability and intentions go.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.