I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is.

http://www.joanchittister.org

And some medical reasons for late term abortions:

Life Threatening Complications That May Require Late Term Abortion

http://m.selfgrowth.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selfgrowth.com%2Farticles%...

And anencephaly:

In almost all cases, anencephalic infants are not aggressively resuscitated because there is no chance of the infant's ever achieving a conscious existence. Instead, the usual clinical practice is to offer hydration, nutrition, and comfort measures and to "let nature take its course". Artificial ventilation, surgery (to fix any co-existing congenital defects), and drug therapy (such as antibiotics) are usually regarded as futile efforts. Some clinicians and medical ethicists view even the provision of nutrition and hydration as medically futile.[

Under "Prognosis" at wiki:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anencephaly

[The link also includes several examples of the short life span of several enencephalic "miracle babies" who survived for a couple of years.]

Here's an interesting poll result that has been obscured:

Nearly 99 percent of abortions occur before 21 weeks, but when they are needed later in pregnancy, it’s often in very complex circumstances. For example, severe fetal anomalies and serious risks to the woman’s health — the kind of situations where a woman and her doctor need every medical option available.

20-week bans are also highly unpopular throughout the country. 61% of all voters say abortion should be legal after 20 weeks. Plus, Democrats (78%), Republicans (62%), and Independents (71%) say this is the wrong issue for lawmakers to be spending time on.

https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/abortion/20-week-bans

This vote had passed the House and a Senate vote is expected today. Crickets from pro-choice Dems or other pro-women groups in 2018. Here's what popped up from a Bing search:

For some odd reason I couldn't copy the text, but the Newsweek opinion article praised the support of Senator Joe Manchin, Sen. Joe Donnelly and Sen. Bob Casey:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-us-must-ban-abortions-after-20-wee...

An editorial at The L.A. Times:

The GOP is craven and the Democrats are extremist on an abortion restriction most Americans favor

Only eight years ago, a quarter of the Democratic House caucus bucked pro-choice party leadership and voted for a pro-life amendment to Obamacare. The amendment spelled out that government-supported health insurance could not be used for abortions. But in the 2010 midterm backlash, Republicans and anti-abortion activists worked overtime to defeat even pro-life Democrats, paving the way for abortion extremists to dominate the party.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-camosy-20-week-abortion-ban-2...

Maybe the Democratic leadership will oppose this vile piece of legislation. Can anybody here find some articles I missed about any Democrats who have taken a position on this upcoming vote?