Evening Blues Preview 3-18-15
This evening's music features Chicago blues guitarist and singer Johnny B. Moore.
Here are some stories from this evening's post:
Libya, ISIS and the Unaffordable Luxury of Hindsight
Gaddafi called them drug-addicted, Islamic fundamentalists; we know them as ISIS… it doesn’t seem much of a joke now, does it? And ISIS is what had been in store for us all along; the “revolutionary” lynching and sodomization of Muammar Gaddafi amid manic chants of “Allahu Akbar”, lauded by many at the time as some sort of a warped triumph of the good of popular will (read: NATO-sponsored mob rule) over the evil of dictatorship (sovereign state), was nothing but a gory precursor for the future of the country and the region; mass lynching of entire populations in Libya, Syria and Iraq and the breakup of key Arab states into feuding mini-statelets. The gruesome video of Colonel Gaddafi’s murder, which puts to shame the majority of ISIS videos in terms of unhinged brutality and gore, did not invoke the merest of condemnations back then, on the contrary; everyone seemed perfectly fine with the grotesque end of the Libyan “tyrant”… except that it was only the beginning of a new and unprecedented reign of terror courtesy of NATO’s foot-soldiers and GCC-backed Islamic insurgents.
The rapid proliferation of trigger-happy terrorist groups and Jihadi factions drenched in petrodollars in Libya was not some sort of an intelligence failure on the part of western governments or a mere by-product of the power vacuum left by a slain Gaddafi; it was a deliberate, calculated policy sought after and implemented by NATO and its allies in the Gulf under the cringe-inducing moniker “Friends of Libya” (currently known as the International Coalition against ISIS) to turn the north-African country into the world’s largest ungovernable dumpster of weapons, al-Qaida militants and illegal oil trading.
So it is safe to say that UNSC resolution 1973, which practically gave free rein for NATO to bomb Libya into smithereens, has finally borne fruit…
Proponents of Humanitarian Interventions must be patting themselves on the back these days; now that Libya has completed its democratic makeover from a country with the highest standard of living in Africa under Gaddafi’s rule into a textbook definition of a failed state; a godless wasteland of religious fanaticism, internal bloodletting and wholesale head-chopping, in fact Libya became so “democratic” that there are now two parliaments and two (warring) governments; each with its own (criminal) army and supported with money and caches of weapons from competing foreign powers, not to mention the myriad of secessionist movements and militias which the illegal coup against Gaddafi has spawned all over the country while free health care, education and electricity, which the Libyans took for granted under Gaddafi’s regime, are all now but relics of the past; that’s the “Odyssey Dawn” the Libyans were promised; a sanitized version of Iraq sans the public outrage, neatly re-packaged in a “responsibility to protect” caveat and delivered via aerial bombing campaigns where even the West’s overzealous Gulf Co-conspirators Club (GCC), driven by nothing beyond petty personal vendettas against Gaddafi, got to test the lethality of its rusted, American-made military aircrafts alongside NATO on the people of Tripoli and Sirte.
What is a famous "humanitarian interventionist" and supporter of demockery to do when faced with the fact that he has killed hundreds of thousands of people, created the vacuum of power for violent extremists to destroy civil societies and liquidate populations while assisting some of the most brutal and (undemocratic) dictators to manage their public relations? Deny, deny, deny!
Tony Blair Is Terrible at Promoting Human Rights, Great at Enriching Himself
After serving nearly eight years as special peace envoy for the “Quartet” powers mediating the Israel-Palestine conflict, Tony Blair is resigning, reportedly “over his poor relations with senior Palestinian Authority figures and [his] sprawling business interests.”
After almost a decade as envoy, it’s hard to see anything Blair has done to bring Israelis and Palestinians any closer to peace. ... But although he failed to broker peace, Blair did manage during his time as special envoy to transform himself into a well-paid and outspoken apologist for some of the most brutal autocracies in the world. The former prime minister, who once positioned himself as a principled supporter of democracy, even famously waging a war to bring democracy to Iraq, now leads a consulting firm that has reportedly received tens of millions of dollars doing advisory work for dictatorial governments in the Middle East and Central Asia.
Blair’s well-remunerated consulting work seems to have eroded his idealism when it comes to human rights. As prime minister, Blair characterized himself as a committed opponent of dictatorial regimes, even waging a war that killed hundreds of thousands of people for the supposed purpose of spreading democracy. But speaking last week at a conference in the Egyptian coastal resort city of Sharm al-Sheikh, Blair said it was important to be “realistic” that developing countries will lack “100% Western-style democracy.” As for helping lead the charge into Iraq, and as for that country’s postwar descent into chaos and religious extremism, Blair recently said that “we have to liberate ourselves from the notion that ‘we’ have caused this,” while at the same time advocating even broader military action in the region as a solution.
Since leaving office, Blair has continued to advocate for even more military adventurism, saying that “a substantial and not fringe minority” of Muslims support terrorism, and that military force must be deployed in a “generational struggle” against such people. Blair has also responded to criticism that his previous wars may have contributed to the rise of religious extremism by saying that terrorism has “very strong causes within the religion of Islam,” and has not been driven by any foreign policy decisions he may have made as prime minister. ...
Though Blair is now resigning from his role as a Middle Eastern “peace envoy,” it seems like a twisted irony that someone who played such an integral and unapologetic role in setting that region ablaze would have ever been selected for such a position in the first place. Despite a long history of what can only be described as folly and disgrace, Blair inexplicably continues to be rewarded with prestigious diplomatic posts, high-profile speaking engagements and lucrative contractual arrangements with foreign governments.
The Big Dick School of American Patriotism
Let’s face it: we live in a state of pervasive national security anxiety. There are various possible responses to this low-grade fever that saps resolve, but first we have to face the basis for that anxiety -- what I’ve come to think of as the Big Dick School of Patriotism, or (since anything having to do with our present version of national security, even a critique of it, has to have an acronym) the BDSP. ...
The BDSP is good citizenship conflated with JROTC, hosannas to sniper kills, the Pentagon’s commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War -- what are we celebrating there anyway? -- Rudolph Giuliani pining for a president who loves America in Reaganesque fashion, and the organizers of South Boston’s St. Patrick’s Day, who wouldn’t let the local chapter of Veterans For Peace march with their banners because, so the story goes, they didn’t want the word “peace” associated with veterans. ...
The National Security Strategy lists terrorism, cyber-vulnerability, climate change, and infectious diseases as rising threats to global security. That’s a frightening enough quartet and hardly a complete list of actual dangers. Amid them, our headlines fill regularly with “threats” that are nightmarish, but soon dissolve like bad dreams in the morning light. The latest, from a video by the Somali terrorist organization al-Shabab, was to the Mall of America in Minnesota and, farfetched as it was, the media and the political class ran with it. I found the Mall of America pretty scary on a regular shopping day, but such endless threats and the hysteria that surrounds them do make our self-protective instincts kick in. Jeh Johnson, the head of Homeland Security, even warned mall-goers to be particularly careful because, he said, “it's the environment we’re in, frankly.”
Is it? It’s increasingly hard to tell in BDSP America. Fear can be a useful political tool because people who believe they’re surrounded by enemies are primed to accept almost anything. When you feel you’re losing control, the response is often to try to get more control, which is part of the appeal of the BDSP crew, with their exaltation of swarms of people in uniforms equipped with tanks and guns.
Netanyahu deserves the Israeli people, and they deserve him
The first conclusion that arose just minutes after the announcement of the exit polls was particularly discouraging: The nation must be replaced. Not another election for the country's leadership, but general elections to choose a new Israeli people – immediately. The country urgently needs that. It won’t be able to stand another term for Benjamin Netanyahu, who emerged last night as the man who will form the next government. ...
Netanyahu deserves the Israeli people and they deserve him. The results are indicative of the direction the country is headed: A significant proportion of Israelis has finally grown detached from reality. This is the result of years' worth of brainwashing and incitement. These Israelis voted for the man who will lead the United States to adopt harsh measures against Israel, for the man whom the world long ago grew sick of. They voted for the man who admitted to having duped half the world during his Bar-Ilan speech; now he has torn off his mask and disavowed those words once and for all. Israel said "yes" to the man who said "no" to a Palestinian state. Dear Likud voters, what the hell do you say "yes" to? Another 50 years of occupation and ostracism? Do you really believe in that?
On Tuesday the foundations were laid for the apartheid state that is to come. If Netanyahu succeeds in forming the next government in his spirit and image, then the two-state solution will finally be buried and the struggle over the character of a binational state will begin. If Netanyahu is the next prime minister, then Israel has not only divorced the peace process, but also the world. Piss off, dear world, we're on our own. Please don't interfere, we're asleep, the people are with Netanyahu. The Palestinians can warm the benches at the International Criminal Court at The Hague, the Israel boycotters can swing into high gear and Gaza can wait for the next cruel attack by the Israeli army.
'People over profit': Report from Frankfurt Blockupy protest frontline
NASA: California Has One Year of Water Left
Plagued by prolonged drought, California now has only enough water to get it through the next year, according to NASA.
In an op-ed published Thursday by the Los Angeles Times, Jay Famiglietti, a senior water scientist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, painted a dire picture of the state's water crisis. California, he writes, has lost around 12 million acre-feet of stored water every year since 2011. In the Sacramento and San Joaquin river basins, the combined water sources of snow, rivers, reservoirs, soil water and groundwater amounted to a volume that was 34 million acre-feet below normal levels in 2014. And there is no relief in sight.
"As our 'wet' season draws to a close, it is clear that the paltry rain and snowfall have done almost nothing to alleviate epic drought conditions. January was the driest in California since record-keeping began in 1895. Groundwater and snowpack levels are at all-time lows" Famiglietti writes. "We're not just up a creek without a paddle in California, we're losing the creek too."
Also of interest:
Opposing Two States, Netanyahu Unmasks GOP-Likud Agenda of Fake Diplomacy
Dick Cheney’s Foggy Memory on Bush’s Plausible Deniability for Torture
Comments
Good article on Libya and ISIS.
I don't know about hindsight, we knew what was going exactly when it was going on, just like
we have in Ukraine, Syria, and again in Iraq and Syria.
During the Libya war was when I really had it with Daily Kos. The partisan's, led by MB, were so aghast at
Gaddafi that they wanted the U.S. to go "help", do their humanitarian/democracy thing. There was no
talking to them. That was when the "apologist" label really started up big, "Gaddafi apologist". I was called
that incessantly. Remember Clay Claiborne on Daily Kos, he was fairly regularly on the Rec List by spouting
the mainstream/government propaganda about Libya. A couple times I HR'd his diaries when he was getting hundreds
of rec's. I'd be the only one to HR it.
Libya is Obama's Iraq. As I've said, they went to the U.N. and lied just as Bush/Powell went to the U.N. and lied.
Then they bombed the shit out of the country for 7 months, all based on lies. If that isn't war crimes, I don't know
what could is.
That should be really simple.
by the time of the libya humanitarian event...
i had stopped paying attention to daily kos. many years ago, i stopped reading the front page and then when it became clear that daily kos was the province of obamapologists and neoliberals, i stopped reading the site other than the diaries of a handful of friends. i just lost any interest in verbally jousting with people who were a bad combination of nasty, hubristic and ill-informed. i decided at that point that the best thing that i could do was to introduce information to the site so that they would have a chance to educate themselves. i doubt that it's working, since much of the site seems allergic to information that cuts against their biases, but sometimes the windmills need someone to pay attention to them.
obama will have a string of iraqs before he's done. his criminality will be written in flaming craters across the middle east, africa and if we're damned lucky, not across ukraine, europe, russia and the united states. those that survive his brutal reign as the hellfire president will agree with him that he was surprisingly good at killing people - and damned little else.
I think your work does do some good
but more to a silent crowd, lurkers, and not to the hardcore partisans and the management of that site.
And of course the regulars who appreciate what you do.
They are what they are I guess, there has been no change from Libya to Syria to Ukraine, Putin, Russia and ISIS
as far that goes.
And they're fully willing to support Hillary Clinton to win the White House. I'd like to see what would happen if
someone posted diaries titled "Obama is a War Criminal and should be Impeached". and "Hillary Clinton is a
War Criminal who should be in Prison, Not Running for President".
They would fully accept that on the other side. I did write a diary titled, "George W. Bush is a War Criminal and it
was my most rec'd diary. But to state it for their side, they can't handle that because they believe the lies. They will
not consider anything else.
heh, you might have missed this since you had left the site...
i decided to post what i really thought after some lame-assed opologist got on me about a comment that i made suggesting that obama should be impeached for his war crimes. he said that sort of sentiment wasn't allowed at daily kos. i guess he was wrong. i guess we were both surprised. B)
A decent nation would have impeached Bush and Obama
I went back
and read that diary. Now it is like an echo chamber over there.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
my comment today
On a diary at dkos lamenting the constant meme of the stupid Republicans.
Here is the link to that diary which is titled Anyone Else Here Tired of Hearing How Bad the Republicans Are? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/03/18/1371716/-Anybody-Else-Here-Tire...
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Agree.
Kinda shows what they're really in it for, or how it evolves for them as opposed to how it evolves for some of us.
A couple few years back I wrote a diary on another blog titled "Daily Kos is a Hate Site". That's basically what it
was about, the incessant hate directed at the Republican party, republicans, tea partiers, conservatives, anybody
they don't like. All while ignoring the gigantic "mote" in their eyes, and the dem party and the Obama admin.
I wrote a comment a while ago on how I stopped into a right wing site, can't remember which one now, and saw the
same damn thing only in reverse. We have to remember that.
It's hard to think and act in an open, non hypocritical, consistent manner. But some of us at least try.
Yeah, I bit my tongue on that one.
I must say that the site over the time has messed up
my capabilities to understand anything about it.
I understand the word Obama apologist as meaning, that people don't accept criticism of Obama, because they can't accept criticism of a black president, because they see it as racial motivated criticism. There is clearly something pretty heavily going on in that regard, but that line of thinking goes only so far. It can't be that you can't be critical of Obama's policies because he is black. And there are people on dailykos who think all criticism of Obama means you are against him because he is black. That's to me one step too far and I will not play in that orchestra.
Neo-liberal, I am lost, for me neo-liberals are pseudo-rightwingers, who end up, willingly or not, in support of oligarchic or imperial or faschist conditions. I am German, you won't get this belief out of me. Left-wing libertarians are those kind of anarchists, who don't believe in any sort of regulations in society, which makes them as bad as right-wing libertarians in my books. And for that reason I have had it with the term neo-liberal and libertarian. but I am open to learn the "correct interpretation of these words".
So, how do you self-describe yourself and how does Big Al self-describes himself? Socialists? Anarchists? Left-wing Libertarians? Liberals? Leftist Liberals? My libertarianism on the left side doesn't go very far. Because I see them ending up allowing right-wing libertarians to mess up societies. So, shouting left-wing Libertarians get my doubts too.
Don't tell me you are a progressive. Because to me that doesn't mean much. I know I am the only foreigner here, who doesn't like the categorization progressive. Where are you progressing towards to?
So, I guess you describe yourself as a citizen ? OK. Good circumventing the question.
I consider myself a left-leaning social democrat. If I am not fitting in here and have misunderstood with whom I am chatting around here, let me know.
All in all the dailykos site has turned out to annoy me too often to call it healthy to read so much over there.
I would say the last 10 months or so are merely an unsuccessful struggle to get away from it.
I don't support the criticism of Meteor Blades very much. He has clearly not said much about very important issues. My feeling is I know why and I believe you can't be leading staff writer on dailykos and get involved in statements like "Obama is a war criminal" or some such. I assume you are not paid for your work for dailykos and you are not dependent on that kind of salary or income. Seems to me Meteor Blades is and he has a lot of reasons to stay out of certain policy issues, especially if at the same time he was coronated with the "beautiful task" to be a judge over the dickishness of dailykos writers and commentators. In addition he has written very, very well and very precisely about a lot of issues. So, I value that more than any possible criticism people might have about him being the "security police ceiling cat" or whatever else they don't like about him. I think that the site's community based judging system of diaries and comments is a failure and the overlords attempts to keep "risky" comments away through their warning system annoying and not that desirable. The people's based control system leads to stasi like surveillance addiction in some people.
I prefer a clear-cut "cutting off comment section for everybody" when the comments are getting too dickish. I think it's not the site's writers fault, but the designer's and Markos belief that this site's libertarian freedoms and financing or businemss model is ok and then, when it gets over the top heated up in comment or diary sections, that this censoring mechanism is an acceptable model. My biggest criticism of the site is that it lives off the clicktivism using emotional incitement through its free-style diary and commenting system. Psychologically the site is tricky and can be outright emotionally abusive.
In addition to that, I just want to mention that the coverage of the demo in Frankfurt didn't clearly enough explain how and when the riots started (basically before the main demonstration very early in the morning) and that the police actions were in response to those rioters, which are members of the black bloc with members from several countries. They basically destroyed the effectiveness of the real demonstrators' goals. I made a comment to gjohnsit about it and he didn't understand me or thought I am wrong. Police didn't attack sitting-in, standing-in or other walking and waiting demonstrators and they didn't cause them to flee. Black bloc demonstrators were able to disrupt and overrun police officers preparations, which were already extremely intense and blocked out the area around the ECB building. They say there has never been such demonstration with overrunning rioters in Frankfurt's history. The people said they support the demonstration, but are clearly against the black bloc style of rioters. As they often wear masks, it's also hard to know who might mingled into them under cover.
I think your EB diaries do much good. I would not be able to collect those stories and read them on a regular basis. They are too many, but they represent a very good archive to which one can go back to. They also do good as your commentators are all friendly people. It's a good atmosphere to hang out in. I almost only read the lists on dailykos and some authors. Seldom the ones who write most often on the FP. There are a lot of good and funny writers, but I can't read them more than a couple of times a year or so. Most readers come for those writers. So, I guess I am an outlier with regards to my reading style of dailykos.
I am tired. Good Night. And I hope I get away from reading comments on dailykos and from commenting myself. If you don't read and see any comments any more from me, it means I am doing GREAT.
https://www.euronews.com/live
hi mimi...
let me try to address some of this...
you are mostly right about obama apologists. there are two camps of them (which for convenience of reference i will create labels for), the "true believers," which are the people that you describe. they are excessively attached to the person/personality of obama and suspect that most criticism of him is motivated by racism or is performed by secret republican agents. the other group is the "partisans," who feel that they must suppress criticism of obama for the good of the party. these people, if you were to confront them with many of the bad policies and actions of obama would admit that obama is far from perfect, but due to their manichean view of the parties, they think tarnishing the democratic brand with powerful criticism enables the alternative which to them is virtually satan himself.
american neoliberals (and neocons) tend to be conservatives who believe in american exceptionalism, the need for the united states to dominate the globe militarily, politically, socially and economically. their economic beliefs are based on so-called free market capitalism (corporatism), austerity for the 99% - socialism for corporations and the rich, globalization and plutonomy. some neoliberals and neocons also have an excessive devotion to the state of israel.
regarding political labels, i can't speak for al and i have never found a comfortable label that really describes my political beliefs. i believe that we were put on earth to have fun. i believe that everything we need to live happy, authentic lives is here. i believe that we all jointly own the earth and that nobody has a right to hog things that they don't need that others do or screw the earth up for other people or future generations. i believe that a government could be a good tool for ensuring that everybody gets what they need and is able to meaningfully contribute to the well-being of others. i believe that a government could be a terrible tool for ensuring that everybody gets what they need and is able to meaningfully contribute to the well-being of others. i believe that it is up to us to work out that contradiction. that's where the trouble starts. i think that it's called the human condition.
i'll leave it up to you. what label should i use?
i oppose making mb responsible for everything that dailykos is or isn't. i appreciate that he brings things to dailykos that are not just about how awful the republicans are.
ok, gotta run.
Excellent response, Joe!
I doubt what I am about to write can remotely meet the standard of your comment, but I do feel I should add my abbreviated thoughts.
I think each of us here has different ideas about how we feel about certain issues. I have described myself as a socialist to others outside this venue. But probably the word humanist might describe all of us here in that we put human beings ahead of money, or power, or something similar.
In that vein, my personal involvement with a local Peace vigil was spurred by the realization that all of these wars we are involved in are wars of choice and none of them have been formally (or legally) declared. Every dollar spent on war and empire building is a dollar taken out of the mouths of human beings. The idea of proactively waging war against other human beings over something they or their neighbors might do in the future is repugnant to me. Those are real human beings who have just as much right to life as we do. Add to that, there is no such thing as a humanitarian reason to wage war. War is barbaric and the US is the single greatest threat to peace on this planet. So I get what Al is saying and I fully back his right to say it.
Politicians are not sacred cows. Politics is a dirty business and it takes a certain type to dive in to the arena. Many may start out with good intentions, but the system is so corrupt that most are compromised in fairly short order. We should not accept that from our elected officials. They are supposed to be working on behalf of the people, but too many owe their souls to their corporate donors and lobbyists. For that reason alone, I personally do not find it offensive that anyone calls a politician out for what they are doing and I will defend the right of each person here to do so.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
(Typos Corrected) Totally agree. And being a "paid
staffer" does not give one permission to 'play loose with the truth.'
(BTW, this is not about MB, for me--I've never read his diaries. And the few comments that I've read at EB, have not been that revealing. So I have no opinion about him, one way or the other.)
My experience last night was with another blogger at DKos.
Of course, I believe that the 'veracity metric' should apply to all bloggers--amateur and professional.
For instance, just last evening, a blogger used hyperventilating headlines about Repubs possibly not falling in line to vote for a proposed legislation regarding 'replacing the current SGR payment system for physicians--the 'Doc Fix,' but did not bother to state "what" that tradeoff would entail--several cuts to the Medicare program.
Long story short, I felt compelled to post a short blurb about the proposed Medicare cuts--both at the diary in question, and at EB.
My feeling was that the post was very deceptive. Of course, there is no way that I can ascertain whether or not it was a deliberate oversight.
[Since I posted my comments, I have furnished Joe a link to one of the pieces that I was referencing.]
OTOH, I have often seen this type of journalism at blogs that prop up the Democratic Party.
Which is one reason that I post very little at blogs with an extremely heavy partisan tilt.
I imagine the same could be said for Republican blogs. Needless to say, I don't waste my time reading them.
My point being--'labels' don't matter that much to me.
Off my soapbox . . .
***********
BTW--Just noticed the additional editing bar--fantastic!
Thanks JTC (and/or CL)!
Mollie
Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.
Newly installed...
i'll do a diary explaining in the morning.
thanks!
it's a great addition!
You're welcome Joe...
I spent the whole day perfecting it. It'll make the coding end of it much easier.
thanks for the link, mollie...
i'll run the story in tomorrow night's eb. by the time that i read it today, tonight's eb was full to the bursting.
You're welcome, Joe. "Thank you." ;-) N/T
Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.
I first want to have your smiley in text format, then
I am amazed to hear that you have not read MB's diaries. Just saying I don't think he ever played loose with the truth. Why don't you read his diaries? Most are very informative, some are not interesting to me, because I think there are areas he has to write about as being officially assigned to them, so it feels he is dutifully doing his homework and job. He writes very clearly. Easy to understand. Basically the only FP writer I read. The others are good and ok, but their issues don't interest me that much and they are in their selection very predictable. Anyhow, MB came only up, because I heard people being critical of him for reasons I can't quite understand.
https://www.euronews.com/live
oh, sorry for being late to read all of it - I'll respond to all
who responded downstairs of your response as well.
One thing might have crossed over wrongly or not in the way I wanted it to. It's true that I wonder about all those labels, but those labels mean in fact really very little to me. So, if I would label you and gulfgal98 and who else answered, then that you are honest fighting guys/gals for the good of the all those people who need it most. I admire your work ethics and how you are able to paint a picture of the daily political events with your story selection. Considering how long you have done it and having read some of your older diaries, I feel you have done and still do a great service to dailykos readers.
To be honest, it's clear that I have difficulties in engaging in local politics, though I am willing to put at least a minimal effort in it, when it seems to make some sense and I feel I could be of help (mostly I don't feel like that). It's the national and foreign policy issues that get more under my skin and in that regard, ethnic, tribal, racial issues of social, economic, financial and human/civil rights disparities get to me the most. Feeling very weak with my book knowledge and educational level that doesn't match at all to the ones most people on dailykos have is a problem for me. I have no skills to hold through a conversation or debate, it frustrates me. I suffer under memory loss since around 1996. No fun. And other set-backs.
There are reasons why I feel defeated in life and it's not easy to get over it at times, I guess that makes me more cranky. But having had personal exposure to things many haven't had, I am sensitive and also simply frustratingly alienated with regards to talking buddies, who are not arrogant and can answer questions in real life. And I have come to the conclusion that conversation online is simply too difficult for me to handle. I feel there is a lot lacking to talk to people one doesn't know and to pretend one does know someone from online blog interaction is imo delusional. Comments on dailykos often make me feel guilty either for not offering something useful to the site or for not being able to hold back my thoughts. Some groups trigger my itching tongue to talk in ways that are not always appreciated. I could explain why, but why should I do that.
I think my sensibilities with regards to the dailykos site and its commentators and/or writers are based on personal things, which are banal for most and not walkable for others in their shoes, but are not banal for me. It has destroyed my education and my capabilities to focus. I fight for regaining that and it's not as easy as I thought.
For me you would fall under the category of left-leaning social democrats, humanitarian liberal, and natural conservationist with regards to the environment, and a kind and funny musician-artists like your friends on EB are. That is wonderful. Who needs labels, when you can talk freely and honestly and clearly, so that people can understand each other.
As for MB's exposure to other ethnicities and people in Libya or Latin America or Native Americans, it is clear that he had access and exposure to experiences, we or I don't have and can't walk in with our/my shoes. It's similar to some of my situation. I would never be critical of people, who had experiences and access into other people's cultures, thinking and behavior, for their opinions that resulted out of them. How could I ? If I can't walk in their shoes, I have to accept what they feel they know as being right.
I don't need labels, I need honest, straight talk and the capability to ask question for the many things I don't grasp without feeling "like a typical (dummy) German"(even if I am one). And now I need time off-line to read books I wanted to read since ten years and more.
Thanks for your response.
https://www.euronews.com/live
Thank you for your thoughtful comment, mimi!
I really appreciate the time you took to write this very thoughtful comment.
Not all of us are talented or well read. I am neither. Most of my comments are based upon my personal values and some life experience, not so much on the number of books I have read although I wish I was more well read. But neither education nor talent is required to be a part of the discussions we have here. What we all seem to have in common are open minds and more importantly, open hearts. And that is what I see in you.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Meteor Blades has, or had, personal ties to Libya
I wonder if he feels regret now at not having taken a stand against the whole phony "responsibility to protect," let's-bomb-Libya war cheerleading effort over there, led by Clay Claiborne and his ilk.
Big Al
Great seeing you again.
And just as opinionated.
Don`t stop.
I`m already against the next war
Knucklehead
Ya, great to see you too man. And glad you came by this place.
Keep going or die brother K.
Still planning to take a trip down the coast, maybe pop in and say hi.
Like that PLayboy bunny only different.
Hey Knuck...
great seeing you here, pard!
OMG
It is good to see you here, Knucklehead!
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Seconded! Knuck, hope you'll post some of your
photography here from time to time!
Mollie
Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.
E komo mai ! Welcome Knuck !
Aloha and welcome to our little luau.
BDSP - love it.
Known too many chickenhawk patriots over the years.
is dailykos down for you guys too?
i've been trying to get the gos page to load for the last half hour and, um, bupkis.
Not coming up for me.
No problems here...
I just came from the EB.
it finally came up...
thanks!
Joe, I left a link to piece about "SGR"/Medicare piece at EB. NT
Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.
California Drought
I recently passed by Lake Irvine while driving through Santiago Canyon and saw two men playing catch with a football on a large swath of land that was normally covered by water. It's scary to see how little snow has fallen on the mountains over the last three years.
praenomen
The U.K. has gone full-on Stasi re dissent
In the U.K., women are being deceived into having long-term relationships with men who turn out to be police spies.
https://policespiesoutoflives.potager.org/
"Lily" (pseudonym) is one of the women so deceived.
https://policespiesoutoflives.potager.org/our-stories/lilys-story/
Lily recently travelled to Spain to speak at a conference of activists in the tech field, where she discovered a tracking device on her car.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/undercover-with-paul-lewis-and-rob-ev...
The German newspaper article linked to by the Guardian report:
http://www.taz.de/Polizeiliche-Ueberwachung/%21156061/
I'm in my late sixties now. Looking back, I have to wonder. Was there ever a time when the elites in the U.S. and the U.K. — countries touted during the Cold War period as the exemplars of fair play, freedom, and democracy — truly believed in and practiced those values? Or has it all been propaganda, a media barrage, a mirage?
I wonder too and I doubt it. Nice to see you here. /nt
https://www.euronews.com/live