@WoodsDweller @WoodsDweller
the old 'third time's the charm' run for the Oval Office. It's been done before;

Those who ran multiple times and first lost, and then won the Presidency are (with unusual case of Grover Cleveland described below):

Thomas Jefferson, Presidential Elections of 1796, 1800 and 1804
Andrew Jackson, Presidential Elections of 1824, 1828 and 1832
William Henry Harrison, Presidential Elections of 1836 and 1840
Grover Cleveland, Presidential Elections of 1884, 1888, and 1892 (winning in 1884, losing in 1888, winning in 1892)
Richard Nixon, Presidential Elections of 1960, 1968 and 1972

Also, Jackson and Cleveland won the popular vote in the elections they lost in the Electoral College, so both actually won the popular vote three times, the only candidates to do that, other than Franklin D. Roosevelt, who won the popular vote and electoral vote four times, in the Presidential Elections of 1932, 1936, 1940, and 1944!

Additionally, Martin Van Buren ran a third time in 1848 on the Free Soil Party line and lost; and Theodore Roosevelt ran a second time in 1912 on the Progressive Party line and lost.

http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=22567

But your scenario sounds every bit as plausible as mine. In fact, it's making me doubt my own opinion.

Hmmmm. Gotta think about this for a while.

EDIT: sound/sounds

#3.1 #3.1 #3.1
OK, now I understand.
If anyone read my posts yesterday about influence peddling and PACs, we now know what Her game is.
The big game is over, the Clintons will never again have enough influence to peddle to need the Clinton Foundation to launder the money.
But there is still big money to be grifted from a PAC. Not hundreds of millions, but tens of millions.
Raise lots of money, spend very little on actual politics, subsidize the Clinton jet set lifestyle.
It's the Gingrich retirement plan, brought to you by Bill and Hill.
Just make your checks out to Her.

EDIT: Let me be a little more clear. The Clintons are no longer in the business of politics, where they peddled influence for profit. They are now in the business of political theater where they whip the rubes into a frenzy so that they send checks to Onward Together, the Clintons' retirement plan.
Don't get me wrong, the Clintons are vindictive people and will seize any opportunity to stab their opponents in the back. That isn't going to change. But they know they'll never have real power again, and the longer they go without holding office the less influence they will have in the Democratic Party.
Hillary isn't relitigating the last election because she can't get over it (though she probably can't), she's relitigating it to squeeze money from supporters who can't get over it. The more outrage she can instill in them the bigger the checks that come in.
That's why she seems to us to be deranged. She isn't talking to us. She's creating a fantasy world for Her supporters to inhabit where She (and they) were horribly wronged and the only way to relieve the rage is to send money.
Along the way, of course, she's doing lasting damage to the progressive wing, but that's just a bonus.