I will highlight the two that instantly struck me.
First, was her comment about Afghanistan which confirms she was warmongering in 2008.
Second, Lawrence O'Donnell's comment about her negatives being 48 and how that will not help her in the general if she got the nomination. Her current negatives are higher (over 50%) and we are being told that we should not pay attention to them.
And yes, this is definitely fair game.
up
0 users have voted.
—
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
I posted something on one of Markos pronouncement diaries that Hillary would be the nominee that her negatives were already very high (low 40's) at that time. I also noted that is almost impossible to bring down negatives for a candidate who was so well known as Clinton and they would almost certainly rise. I was right. She is over 50% negative among all voters. IMO, she is unelectable. I think O'Donnell was making the same argument in 2008. Markos has repeatedly tried to quash any talk of her negatives. Now as of the Ides of March, he will get his wish with his Napoleonic decree of what cannot be written about Clinton. He will find that his blog has become an echo chamber which is exactly what he wanted and may the clicks go away too.
up
0 users have voted.
—
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
That was the synposis of the pundit in regards the argument she'd need to make to the super delegates.
Gee, now where I have I hard that before? Oh right. DailyKOS. In fact, according to the VSP there, not only does she not need the left edge of the Democratic party but she also doesn't need independents.
up
0 users have voted.
—
A lot of wanderers in the U.S. political desert recognize that all the duopoly has to offer is a choice of mirages. Come, let us trudge towards empty expanse of sand #1, littered with the bleached bones of Deaniacs and Hope and Changers.
-- lotlizard
Comments
There are so many interesting things in this clip
I will highlight the two that instantly struck me.
First, was her comment about Afghanistan which confirms she was warmongering in 2008.
Second, Lawrence O'Donnell's comment about her negatives being 48 and how that will not help her in the general if she got the nomination. Her current negatives are higher (over 50%) and we are being told that we should not pay attention to them.
And yes, this is definitely fair game.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Lawrence O'Donnell's use of
Lawrence O'Donnell's use of the word "math" made me jump after kos's fixation on his own "math" problems....
Please help the Resilience Resource Library grow by adding your links.
First Nations News
Back in July 2014
I posted something on one of Markos pronouncement diaries that Hillary would be the nominee that her negatives were already very high (low 40's) at that time. I also noted that is almost impossible to bring down negatives for a candidate who was so well known as Clinton and they would almost certainly rise. I was right. She is over 50% negative among all voters. IMO, she is unelectable. I think O'Donnell was making the same argument in 2008. Markos has repeatedly tried to quash any talk of her negatives. Now as of the Ides of March, he will get his wish with his Napoleonic decree of what cannot be written about Clinton. He will find that his blog has become an echo chamber which is exactly what he wanted and may the clicks go away too.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
"Corridors of power"
"Corridors of power"
This is what drives her and and many of her most ardent supporters including Markos.
They want in.
Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.
I can win this without the left edge of the Democratic party
That was the synposis of the pundit in regards the argument she'd need to make to the super delegates.
Gee, now where I have I hard that before? Oh right. DailyKOS. In fact, according to the VSP there, not only does she not need the left edge of the Democratic party but she also doesn't need independents.
A lot of wanderers in the U.S. political desert recognize that all the duopoly has to offer is a choice of mirages. Come, let us trudge towards empty expanse of sand #1, littered with the bleached bones of Deaniacs and Hope and Changers.
-- lotlizard
Hubris
The Greeks knew better than to invite it, as it always attracted Nemesis.
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
I get the feeling...
that she doesn't think she needs any of us "little people".
Please help the Resilience Resource Library grow by adding your links.
First Nations News