Democrats that move right lose elections

The median voter theorem was developed by Harold Hotelling in 1929, although it wasn't until the 1970's that the Democrats took it seriously. It states that "a majority rule voting system will select the outcome most preferred by the median voter".
His thinking was to compare politics to businesses selling similar consumer products.
Selection_001_2.png

Simple, easy to understand, and absolutely wrong.

“When parties fail to show ideological differences, centrist abstention is higher,” he wrote in the article, “When the Kingmaker Stays Home,” which was published in the journal Party Politics.

Democrats believe in their hearts a common paradigm:

"Republicans on the right, Democrats on the left, independents/swing voters in the middle".

To which the proper reply is:
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."
- Mark Twain

The first thing Dems get wrong is where independents are.

Libertarians and Post-Moderns are largely white, well-educated and affluent. They also share a relatively secular outlook on some social issues, including homosexuality and abortion. But Republican-oriented Libertarians are far more critical of government, less supportive of environmental regulations, and more supportive of business than are Post-Moderns, most of whom lean Democratic.
Disaffecteds, the other main group of independents, are financially stressed and cynical about politics. Most lean to the Republican Party, though they differ from the core Republican groups in their support for increased government aid to the poor.

2011-typology.png
Now we could debate all day what this or that label means. That's what they do on TOP.
I want to break this down to election results.
To do that I want to look at the three major Democratic groups:
Blue Dog Coalition (fiscal and social conservatives)
New Democrat Coalition (fiscal conservative, social liberal)
and Congressional Progressive Caucus (liberal to leftist)

Election Year Blue Dogs +/- New Dems +/- CPC +/-
2008 54 ? 59 -4 79 ?
2010 26 -28 42 -17 75 -4
2012 27 +1 53 +11 76 +1
2014 14 -13 46 -7 70 -6
2016 18 +4 61 +15 76 +6

This table doesn't include retirements or already elected members joining the coalitions.
Someone else could break that down.
What stands out is how consistent the Progressives are, while the Republican-lite Blue Dogs account for most of the losses by the Democrats since 2010.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

dervish's picture

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

all the establishment money and support their candidates get.

In some respects, the sniping over the Democrats’ campaign message mirrors a larger divide in the Democratic Party, dating to the 2016 presidential primary contest and earlier. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and his supporters have pressed Democrats to embrace a more bluntly populist message, assailing wealthy special interests and endorsing the expansion of social welfare programs, while more moderate Democrats in the party leadership have favored an approach closer to Mr. Ossoff’s.

But in four contested special elections in Republican districts — including two, in Kansas and Montana, featuring Sanders-style insurgents - neither method provided the party with a breakthrough victory.

In the absence of a smashing win that might have settled the left­versus­center debate, Democrats may face a longer process of internal deliberation before they settle on an approach that is broadly acceptable in the party. [link]

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

@dkmich Yes, it would be interesting to see how much of the Party's monetary resources have been wasted on the losing races of Conservative Dems. I'll venture a guess to say most of the money raised since 2008 has been squandered in this effort.

up
0 users have voted.

"If you can't eat their food, drink their booze, take their money and then vote against them you've got no business being in Congress."

@Betty Pinson
It would have been the clincher to this essay.

up
0 users have voted.
enhydra lutris's picture

@gjohnsit

up
0 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

dervish's picture

@Betty Pinson Great to see you here, welcome!

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

jorogo's picture

What Hotelling got fundamentally wrong was that his graph curve is upside-down. Instead of a peak in the middle, and I have no idea where that invalid presumption came from, there should be a dip, representing that sparsely-populated zone about which Jim Hightower says, "There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos".

up
0 users have voted.

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

health care reform in 2009-2010?

Blanche Lincoln -- defeated
Mark Pryor -- defeated
Evan Bayh -- chicken shit retired
Byron Dorgan -- chicken shit retired
Joe Lieberman -- chicken shit retired
Ben Nelson -- chicken shit retired
Mary Landrieu -- defeated

Imagine where we would be now if these assholes hadn't killed the public option!

up
0 users have voted.