Hillary won ONE election. Thereby proving by divine providence that She, Hillary, was to control DKOS.
"Look, strange states, deep in the south, is no basis for a system of government. SUPREME executive power, derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical 2% of the vote!"
Be Quiet!
"I mean, you can't expect to wield, SUPREME executive Power, just cause some lobbyist tossed a PAC donation at you."
SHUT UP!
"I mean, if I went round, calling myself the Democratic Candidate, Just because I won New Hampshire, they'd put me away!"
SHUT UP, WILL YOU SHUT UP! YOUR COMMENT IS OUTSIDE THE COMMUNITY GUIDELESS!
"OH, NOW we see the bias inherrent in the system!"
SHUT UP!
"COME AND SEE THE BIAS INHERENT IN THE SYSTEM! HELP! HELP! I'M BEING CENSORED!"
Bloody Bernie-bot!
"Oh, what a give away, did you hear that! Did you hear that! You saw em censoring me didn't you!"
You are not allowed to post a tweet from Edward Snowden? People are scared over there for their livelihood as political activists, it seems. Can't read the hiddens and the responses anymore.
I know that words have meaning, but same words have different meaning in different context. Context is lost to many readers online and I don't blame them, because it's hard in that mess of comments to keep up with context, and some ignore the context on purpose to have their harsh dismissal of your ranting wording justified.
In this case they censor even not your own wording, but some you quoted. That's charming...
For example to use the word "tribal policies" instead of "identity policies" is considered very, very bad. I don't know why people have a negative connotation with the word "tribal". There are tribes, clans, bands, casts etc. You are not allowed to use that word in combination with Afro-Americans. Apparently the expression "identity politicies" is much better than the expression "tribal politicies". May be because "tribal", you know, that reminds people too much of those ... ... ... in Africa in the jungle where the sun never shines.
So, don't use the word "tribal" anymore, it's an insult. You should sit down with your black friends and actually listen to them. I wonder, I have sat down with my black friends pretty often in my life and they talk about their tribal differences and features without hesitation. Does that mean I should tell them now not to use the word "tribal" anymore, because you know, that's racist now towards their black neighbors? Or is it racist only, if a white person uses the word "tribal" or is it racist only, if you use that word in the US in context of Afro-American votes or policies in the US?
Very confusing.
Are you still interested in the elections? I think I will shut myself out of the exposure a bit. Because it's just too painful. I think the most polite and kind and thoughtful people can use the most sophisticated wording and be racists in hiding behind good words. Those good words are not less hurtful, if you understand what the intention and meaning was in the context given.
So, heh, enough is enough. Yuuuuge differences in words ... too bad.
1. You have no choice but to acknowledge. Your appeal will not be heard. I have a complaint with a link in it to the diary about Gabbard Tulsi. The Hillary people shit all over it the minute it was published.
2. I don't know who is worse. The Hillarybros or the Bernie people who let them get away with their mocking, jeering, name-calling, and assorted bullying tactics. Go take a look at hiddens. Which side is in there? Not the Hillary people being dicks. It is the Bernie supporters like you who can't say anything without getting flagged. Instead of keeping quiet and flagging the hell back out of the Hillary people in Bernie diaries, Bernie people allow themselves to get suckered into endless and meaningless name calling in the back and forth comments that eventually hijack the whole diary. It stops nothing and gives the Hillary people everything they want.
3. Dailykos sucks.
up
0 users have voted.
—
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
-- John Lennon
Hillary Clinton is an imperialist warmonger and a de facto war criminal.
That works pretty good too.
But that's a good one. Basically they're flagging and site admin is supporting it, a comment by Snowden. Tells you all you need to know about the mainstream democratic party as represented by Daily Kos.
Why should you spend your time and energy to post anything over there? It adds to dk's credibility and you get Hillarybots in return. Everybody needs to quit contributing value to that site.
up
0 users have voted.
—
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
-- John Lennon
responsibility for what the U.S. and NATO did to Libya, which is what truly makes her a de facto war criminal.
I think it doesn't matter to them, the ruling class. Not unless we make it matter somehow. The voting turnout is going to be very low, probably the lowest turnout of any presidential election in history, following the lowest non presidential election year turnout in history in 2014. That's why I continue to believe in a presidential election boycott instead of a shift toward Stein of the Greens. I think we have to make a stand against this political system and simply shifting 1-3 percent to Stein won't do that.
The Sanders political revolution is over, it's time to start a new one.
…over the human atrocity that she and her fellow mean-girl harpies orchestrated in Libya. It's not like it's a secret what they did. I remember the day that Obama surrendered to their siren song; the day he was wangled into his second major fuck-up after the Afghan Surge.
That day, the New York Times wrote that the mad flapping of the harpy's wings around his head, and their incessant plucking at his hair; their shrill screeching for death and destruction — once the NGOs were engineering hsf finally succeeded in fomenting a phony revolution that the Syrian know-nothings joined like drunks in a mob.
Hillary, Susan Rice, and Samantha Power had a happy that day. They could finally torture and kill themselves sum peoples, destroy themselves an entire country, and privatize themselves sum Libyan oil. Those girls cracked the glass ceiling that day. It was a victory for women.
President Obama most certainly vomited into his mouth that day. And after that, he was not so easily bamboozled. He didn't fall like a ton of bricks over the tiny Turkish Sarin stink bomb that was supposed to pretend-be a state of the art Syrian military chemical attack. Especially after Netanyahu drew that frame from the Roadrunner cartoon in the UN, demonstrating the effectiveness of the Iran branch of the Acme Bomb Company. Putin protected Obama, then, and is protecting him now, well-aware ogf the infinitesimally minute amount of power a American President has over the well-established Neocon Military Junta.
The only time I feel less than sympathetic toward President Obama, truly, is when he sticks his neck up like a braying jackass crying, "Assad has to go!"
Meanwhile, the Libyan blood all over Hillary MacBeths's arms stinks to the high heavens. That putrid smell is never ever going away.
up
0 users have voted.
—
____________________
The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato
I learned yesterday that admins were cracking down on any comments that were designed to created a pie fight. A lot of Hillaryites were put into TO and some Bernie supporters too.
My advice is to acknowledge the red warning and go forward. Don't put yourself into a TO. Heck you had one of the few non election diaries to make the rec list yesterday.
I got one some time ago for uprating a comment that had only two HR's. The admins there are definitely in the bag for Clinton, but those of us who do not like her can still post about her negatives. It seems to be more of the case of where you post them, not what you post.
up
0 users have voted.
—
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
that I don't likeher or don't like Obama, it's that I don't like their policies and actions and rhetoric. That's nothing personal, that's a disagreement in policies. People make this into personal hate feelings or love feelings for or against a person, which is just the most mean spirited way to engage in campaigns.
I can't for my life understand why most people can't overcome that and see the difference in hating a person or hating a policy.
mom came through screaming and swatting and then went back to finish her nap. Nothing is any different. They destroy every Bernie diary, and they never get flagged. Make a comment in a Hillary diary, and they put you in hiddens. This pitiful minority has bullied and intimidated itself into total control of that blog.
up
0 users have voted.
—
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
Comments
Oh they've got their justification...
Hillary won ONE election. Thereby proving by divine providence that She, Hillary, was to control DKOS.
"Look, strange states, deep in the south, is no basis for a system of government. SUPREME executive power, derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical 2% of the vote!"
Be Quiet!
"I mean, you can't expect to wield, SUPREME executive Power, just cause some lobbyist tossed a PAC donation at you."
SHUT UP!
"I mean, if I went round, calling myself the Democratic Candidate, Just because I won New Hampshire, they'd put me away!"
SHUT UP, WILL YOU SHUT UP! YOUR COMMENT IS OUTSIDE THE COMMUNITY GUIDELESS!
"OH, NOW we see the bias inherrent in the system!"
SHUT UP!
"COME AND SEE THE BIAS INHERENT IN THE SYSTEM! HELP! HELP! I'M BEING CENSORED!"
Bloody Bernie-bot!
"Oh, what a give away, did you hear that! Did you hear that! You saw em censoring me didn't you!"
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
I'm really pissed
I want to protest this, but I'm not sure how to do that without checking that box. I need an email address.
I think it's time I took a break from my efforts at improving that sh*thole.
Wasn't trying to make fun of you.
And I apologize if it came across that way.
Was trying to point out that DKos is essentially defending insane ideas.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
I wasn't offended in any way
I'm not sure why you thought that.
At least not offended by you anyway.
Dkos on the other hand...
Do yourself a favor. Keep all your options in play.
Acknowledge the message. asap. A clock is ticking.
That way, you will have time on your side and remain in some control.
____________________
The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato
What kind of site rule is that?
You are not allowed to post a tweet from Edward Snowden? People are scared over there for their livelihood as political activists, it seems. Can't read the hiddens and the responses anymore.
may be they don't allow to post a link to Citizenfour too? /nt
I'm guessing its the "don't rain on our victory parade" rule
You might remember the "shut up, progressives" rule that happened right after Obama announced his neoliberal cabinet. It's like that.
there are people who hang blame on words
I know that words have meaning, but same words have different meaning in different context. Context is lost to many readers online and I don't blame them, because it's hard in that mess of comments to keep up with context, and some ignore the context on purpose to have their harsh dismissal of your ranting wording justified.
In this case they censor even not your own wording, but some you quoted. That's charming...
For example to use the word "tribal policies" instead of "identity policies" is considered very, very bad. I don't know why people have a negative connotation with the word "tribal". There are tribes, clans, bands, casts etc. You are not allowed to use that word in combination with Afro-Americans. Apparently the expression "identity politicies" is much better than the expression "tribal politicies". May be because "tribal", you know, that reminds people too much of those ... ... ... in Africa in the jungle where the sun never shines.
So, don't use the word "tribal" anymore, it's an insult. You should sit down with your black friends and actually listen to them. I wonder, I have sat down with my black friends pretty often in my life and they talk about their tribal differences and features without hesitation. Does that mean I should tell them now not to use the word "tribal" anymore, because you know, that's racist now towards their black neighbors? Or is it racist only, if a white person uses the word "tribal" or is it racist only, if you use that word in the US in context of Afro-American votes or policies in the US?
Very confusing.
Are you still interested in the elections? I think I will shut myself out of the exposure a bit. Because it's just too painful. I think the most polite and kind and thoughtful people can use the most sophisticated wording and be racists in hiding behind good words. Those good words are not less hurtful, if you understand what the intention and meaning was in the context given.
So, heh, enough is enough. Yuuuuge differences in words ... too bad.
Here's my bitch.....
1. You have no choice but to acknowledge. Your appeal will not be heard. I have a complaint with a link in it to the diary about Gabbard Tulsi. The Hillary people shit all over it the minute it was published.
2. I don't know who is worse. The Hillarybros or the Bernie people who let them get away with their mocking, jeering, name-calling, and assorted bullying tactics. Go take a look at hiddens. Which side is in there? Not the Hillary people being dicks. It is the Bernie supporters like you who can't say anything without getting flagged. Instead of keeping quiet and flagging the hell back out of the Hillary people in Bernie diaries, Bernie people allow themselves to get suckered into endless and meaningless name calling in the back and forth comments that eventually hijack the whole diary. It stops nothing and gives the Hillary people everything they want.
3. Dailykos sucks.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
Maybe now that HRC is the official BFF of kos, it was
taking the name of the holy G___ S___ in vain.
"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
-- John Lennon
Try saying
Hillary Clinton is an imperialist warmonger and a de facto war criminal.
That works pretty good too.
But that's a good one. Basically they're flagging and site admin is supporting it, a comment by Snowden. Tells you all you need to know about the mainstream democratic party as represented by Daily Kos.
Why I don't bother giving them content anymore.
I happen to think I'm a pretty good writer.
I don't think they deserve me any more, and anything I said would just get me banned in the current climate.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
I think you're a good writer, too.
A unique observer of timely events.
____________________
The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato
Getting real on today's Kos? I don't think so!
Glad to see you're still here on caucus99percent, dmw.
The "walking on eggshells" syndrome over on Kos is driving a lot of us here.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
Exactly.....
Why should you spend your time and energy to post anything over there? It adds to dk's credibility and you get Hillarybots in return. Everybody needs to quit contributing value to that site.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
Even though, in saying so you can back it up. Easily.
Just look at her associations.
Cites Henry Kissinger as a friend and advisor.
Endorsed by Robert Fucking Kagan.
And that's just a start.
"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
-- John Lennon
Exactly, and I was mentioning earlier about her
responsibility for what the U.S. and NATO did to Libya, which is what truly makes her a de facto war criminal.
I think it doesn't matter to them, the ruling class. Not unless we make it matter somehow. The voting turnout is going to be very low, probably the lowest turnout of any presidential election in history, following the lowest non presidential election year turnout in history in 2014. That's why I continue to believe in a presidential election boycott instead of a shift toward Stein of the Greens. I think we have to make a stand against this political system and simply shifting 1-3 percent to Stein won't do that.
The Sanders political revolution is over, it's time to start a new one.
Hillary's in blood up to her elbows
…over the human atrocity that she and her fellow mean-girl harpies orchestrated in Libya. It's not like it's a secret what they did. I remember the day that Obama surrendered to their siren song; the day he was wangled into his second major fuck-up after the Afghan Surge.
That day, the New York Times wrote that the mad flapping of the harpy's wings around his head, and their incessant plucking at his hair; their shrill screeching for death and destruction — once the NGOs were engineering hsf finally succeeded in fomenting a phony revolution that the Syrian know-nothings joined like drunks in a mob.
Hillary, Susan Rice, and Samantha Power had a happy that day. They could finally torture and kill themselves sum peoples, destroy themselves an entire country, and privatize themselves sum Libyan oil. Those girls cracked the glass ceiling that day. It was a victory for women.
President Obama most certainly vomited into his mouth that day. And after that, he was not so easily bamboozled. He didn't fall like a ton of bricks over the tiny Turkish Sarin stink bomb that was supposed to pretend-be a state of the art Syrian military chemical attack. Especially after Netanyahu drew that frame from the Roadrunner cartoon in the UN, demonstrating the effectiveness of the Iran branch of the Acme Bomb Company. Putin protected Obama, then, and is protecting him now, well-aware ogf the infinitesimally minute amount of power a American President has over the well-established Neocon Military Junta.
The only time I feel less than sympathetic toward President Obama, truly, is when he sticks his neck up like a braying jackass crying, "Assad has to go!"
Meanwhile, the Libyan blood all over Hillary MacBeths's arms stinks to the high heavens. That putrid smell is never ever going away.
____________________
The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato
Well said Pluto
Was your comment in a Hillary diary?
I learned yesterday that admins were cracking down on any comments that were designed to created a pie fight. A lot of Hillaryites were put into TO and some Bernie supporters too.
My advice is to acknowledge the red warning and go forward. Don't put yourself into a TO. Heck you had one of the few non election diaries to make the rec list yesterday.
I got one some time ago for uprating a comment that had only two HR's. The admins there are definitely in the bag for Clinton, but those of us who do not like her can still post about her negatives. It seems to be more of the case of where you post them, not what you post.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
it's not
that I don't like her or don't like Obama, it's that I don't like their policies and actions and rhetoric. That's nothing personal, that's a disagreement in policies. People make this into personal hate feelings or love feelings for or against a person, which is just the most mean spirited way to engage in campaigns.
I can't for my life understand why most people can't overcome that and see the difference in hating a person or hating a policy.
One of them demands that you shut up.
And feel bad for ever making the argument in the first place.
The other encourages discussion.
The DLC and their ilk have NO interest in discussion.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
right there, I felt plenty bad for making comments ... /nt
pft....
mom came through screaming and swatting and then went back to finish her nap. Nothing is any different. They destroy every Bernie diary, and they never get flagged. Make a comment in a Hillary diary, and they put you in hiddens. This pitiful minority has bullied and intimidated itself into total control of that blog.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon