Resilience: An Upwelling

These are “interesting” times. And I haven’t seen much coming forth from the Resilience community lately. Interesting times are when we should look to that community most closely, I think. So, in an attempt to replace the depressing with the pro-active, even the Polyanna-ish if only as a catalyst, I’m going to set a little dish of . . . well, something . . . on the table to see if anyone can be enticed.

All this talk of reforming the Democratic Party (while the present leadership is still in place and not about to step aside graciously), or taking over the Green Party (which has failed miserably in its every outing and has its own leadership that may not want to just hand the reins over to outsiders), or creating a new political party with all the hurdles that that task entails – and just when and how did we think we could accomplish that in the four years we have until the next presidential election? – may be missing an opportunity, or at least one dimension of where our efforts might be directed.

As there is enough on this planet to enable everyone to have a rewarding and comfortable life, but as we also see some covet what others need, see some insist on grabbing it all for themselves, we are talking about wresting power from those who have it, while that power they have enables them to resist anyone’s wresting anything valuable from them. But what if we are thinking about this wrong, thinking in their brutal terms instead of the ones we need. What if we don’t have a chance to wrest power from them, but rather need to drain power from them? Why are we talking about parties at all if the party hierarchies are what got us where we are now in the first place? What if we were to delegitimize the parties by simply considering them to have no legitimacy and withdrawing our support and consent altogether?

Yeah, I realize that opens the door for the powers that be to do all kinds of nasty stuff to all of us, crippling our health and healthcare and social security, sending more of us into more wars, destroying the planet through more resource extraction, but they’re doing that anyway, just maybe slightly more cosmetically for the moment, and are not going to stop just ‘cuz we decide to cobble together a fledgling political party that they can stomp like a bug.

This is not a new idea at all, but what if some of us at this site were to concentrate again, at this juncture, on starting a movement and not a political party? What if, at the most granular local level, we put our heads together to create a network of people who build small things, very manageable improvements, of a local impact in every community here (and abroad?) that incrementally, collectively, make up a bigger impact. Yes, I said it: incrementally, because short of revolution we can’t replace the system overnight, and collectively, because it is the aggregate of innumerable local changes that constitutes larger change. We would not be the glacier that dramatically scoops valleys from between mountains – those walls of ice are the big parties, the nation-states, and their armies and militarized police forces. We would be the grains of darker dust and pebbles dotting the ice surface or the path the glacier aims to take that absorb the sun’s rays and warm and melt the glacier until it’s gone. I’m asking, what if we were to become the climate change?

We’ve seen something like this already, with Occupy. And yes, we’ve seen it brutally crushed by the big-party powers that be, too, but that is because the Occupiers of Zucotti Park and other sites overtly opposed the powers that be. And those with the power still have all the tools and resources to crush any such movement again – and they’d use them again in a heartbeat, whether they’re conservatives or liberals. I’m suggesting, though, that we don’t oppose, but replace, the power. We drain the power until the power is us. Occupy (in which many among us participated) was a step, a most valuable and needed step, an ancestor, toward something more fundamental and more effective.

I propose we each imagine one thing that will improve our communities, every community, or tie one community to another in a mutually beneficial way, and we implement that small thing, individually or in small groups. We start a food co-op. We swap books or computer skills with others in our neighborhoods. We share our abilities – teaching, programming, doctoring, lawyering, building – helping someone else with something we can do and receiving from them something they can do. We take a lesson from the Amish: we come together to “raise barns” for each other, everyone contributing knowledge and skills or labor or lunches to achieve tasks that would be beyond an individual or single family. We steer excess resources to shelters or marginalized or remote families that are now receiving nothing. We help someone, somewhere, get a necessity that has been denied them. We do it on every street, in every town, the smaller the better. We think granular. We think in tiny steps, many little momentary actions. We do it more than we each do presently; we do it as part of a collectively planned endeavor.

At the same time, we starve the Powers That Be. We abandon the consumerist society that made them wealthy and powerful. We seek only what we genuinely need, and we get it from those who share our mission and philosophy. We spurn the latest and most special whatever that the Powers That Be have manufactured for us to buy. But we produce what they and their families want: foods, art, landscapes, even the bricks for their walled communities. Let them compete with each other for status, as we gradually, quietly, pull tiny increments of their wealth away to more beneficial purposes. We probably can’t stop their plunder of the resources in the current and forthcoming administrations, but we can make that plunder effectively worthless to them.

Above all, with each benefit we provide to someone, each bit of good will that our actions accrue, we build a network of mutuality, of allies. Those doing the good will acquire new skills and support along the way. We wonder where the next generation of leaders will come from, when the neoliberal Democrats have been so intent on concentrating rewards at the top. This is where those new leaders arise.

All of this would come about almost invisibly. There’d be no riots or marches. No armies. No mega-factories or industrial farms. No “disruptions” of the stock market – their own greed will produce those. Even at the simple level of taxation, the change would be so small – with benefits that cannot be taxed – as to be unremarkable. The change will be personal, at the individual-to-individual level, adding up to something more significant. It would be an upwelling, as of a richer, deeper, higher soil level after years and years of applying thin layers of compost.

If runaway climate change will kill us all, it doesn’t matter what we do now. It’ll all be for naught. But if there is any chance we will survive the circumstances the Powers That Be insist on creating for us, we need a plan. We likely won’t change the System through the structures that enable it to perform poorly for us. Those reins of power are always going to be denied to us. And we, frankly, at c99p, won’t be the violent Revolution. Others will take up Second Amendment remedies or sabotage of the System. But when this System fails, as it seems inevitable it will, probably soon but not soon enough, or when a Revolution overturns the status quo and devolves into squabbles of its own, this network we would create will be the only cohesive, effective, and respected entity to receive the reins of power, if power is to be of any use at that time. We’d be the only ones trusted to have everyone’s survival and comfort in mind.

I said this patchwork of thought is not a new idea, not a single piece of it, and it isn’t. It may be gravely inadequate, too. I present it here not because I think I’ve worked anything out, but to get us thinking about more than one path at this moment of political turmoil, to solicit more discussion from others also wondering what are our next steps. So have at it.
Others have thought about this before me, before us. Long before. And certainly better than I am doing. But this is one simple consideration: if we don’t have power, where will we get it? And should anyone get it?

Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

dance you monster's picture

Yeah, it's more Pollyanna-ish than I am, but I wanted to get something out sooner than later. Four days is enough time to absorb the election outcome; I'm wondering what we do next.

up
0 users have voted.

Permaculture groups are another linking point. Lots of hand (non-powered) tools seem like a good idea, practicing some primitive or even last-century skills. Getting experience growing food, raising small livestock, foraging, herbal remedies, building quick shelters.

They say we evolved to live in small groups, around 20 people, so maybe that's all we can handle well. Millions of people are a lot more of a challenge, one we haven't evolved to meet.

I saw an article recently about energy. To oversimplify horribly, it is taking more energy to produce energy all the time. The easy oil is gone, and it's getting very close now to taking as much energy to get oil as is in the oil. When that even point is reached, everything stops.

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

Forget political parties. The first nations have created the moment for the movement. They have opened an opportunity.

Can we all unite around this crystallized event which is about all the issues...the environment, climate, water, race, culture, inequality, government, police, imprisonment, and on and on?

If not, then I pity us.

edit - PS nice essay and community is key.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

dance you monster's picture

Every community the Democrats abandoned, and the Republicans will also abandon, is the seed of the future. They made sure we knew that on Tuesday. And we'd be fools, or worse, not to respond.

up
0 users have voted.
WaterLily's picture

Collecting the last few items for my contribution to a group shipment to Sacred Stone Camp today.

We can all support the Water Protectors in myriad small ways that add up. More information here:

http://sacredstonecamp.org/supply-list/

(Check out their FAQs, too).

up
0 users have voted.
QMS's picture

Market it. Make a theme, build a slogan. Print stickers. Invent a symbol for the cause. Print tee shirts (fashion statement). Use social media to spread the idea. It will get a lot of exposure. Seems people can absorb it better that way. Target your message. Cheers

up
0 users have voted.
Lady Libertine's picture

What if we were to delegitimize the parties by simply considering them to have no legitimacy and withdrawing our support and consent altogether?

Considering the options, Im leaning pretty strongly with you, dym, on this one.

Easier said than done but still. Of course I can still continue to yell into the wind too, why not.

re "power" I re-visited a 1980 video (audio) by John Trudell several weeks ago, it has stayed with me and seems relevant here. Let me see if this is the right one. Hmmm well theres more than one... but this one addresses it about the 6:00 mark..

[video:https://youtu.be/WNr4Lw4XBHU]

up
0 users have voted.
dance you monster's picture

Been missing you around these parts!

Thank you for the video. Seems this comment thread is taking more of a turn toward the First Nations than I anticipated, but that's most cool. I have long shared the campfire and maybe it surfaced in the writing. I think theirs specifically are communities with whom we should ally more closely here at c99p, but there are 2300 voices here whose owners need to speak up.

And the wind was made for yelling. Wink

There's time for everything if we husband it well.

up
0 users have voted.

My Open Thread essay on Saturday was raising some very similar questions. My earlier Open Threads had a similar focus:

Open Thread

I've also tried raising some very fundamental issues by recalling the Boathouse Summit:

What Then Must We Do in a World Without Flying Cars?

up
0 users have voted.
dance you monster's picture

Love the photos of the Croatian town!

As for the "Flying Cars" essay, which I had caught, I am (probably rather obviously) thinking along the lines of the Catalonians. I do not in any way think of it as dropping out, however, but rather as being more engaged. Nor does it preclude more traditional political action at the same time. I see community as the building block -- if you don't have them solidly joined for a foundation, the greater structure above will fall. And that community-building can be done by anyone, not just the well-to-do or well-connected. In many of the most needful communities, it is best done by the penurious and ostracized, who'd have greater empathy, understanding, and credibility.

up
0 users have voted.

talks about "accompaniment," activists living among they people they're trying to organize, etc., sharing their lives and circumstances.

up
0 users have voted.
riverlover's picture

I vote granite for me, but many colors are available. I understand the concept. I think I practice it, but must talk with more neighbors and volunteer in my community, first in the USA to ban fracking. I want our community to lead further. Mostly they dig or enlarge ditches. Bah.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

QMS's picture

you really have it right with the neighbors , volunteer, community concept. Ditches we dig will need to be for draining the swamp of authority trying to swamp us.

up
0 users have voted.
Lady Libertine's picture

EDIT: this was meant to reply to dym up-thread...

yeah what a crazy freakin' week!! keerrrist.

I fell asleep on the couch early Tuesday night convinced that HRC had it in the bag, which I had believed for at least six months (or more) anyway. Then my 20 y.o. daughter burst in the room at 2a.m., hollering to wake me up, with her "TRUMP WON! OMG!!" so I watched his victory speech in real time. egads.

Bounced around off and on over at GOS just to see how they were taking it, lol. So typical. So predictable.

Bounced around here a bit but nursing a bad tooth-ache, might be back around more after I get that taken care of this next week.

One of the things I always loved about John Trudell was how broad and wide he was in his thinking, inclusive. He was rooted in Native activism and thought but he never limited himself to it, nor did he allow himself to be limited by it either.

I'm just a human being trying to make it in a world that is very rapidly losing it's understanding of being human.

up
0 users have voted.
QMS's picture

We drain the power until the power is us.

I can work with you on this idea. Local co-ops, trading goods for services, bartering, authoring our own agreements, collectively negotiating what is best for us, en-on. pm me to discuss before publish.

up
0 users have voted.
dance you monster's picture

There may be things we need to discuss privately, but more will be gained from the things we discuss openly in this c99p community.

up
0 users have voted.
QMS's picture

Thanks dym.

up
0 users have voted.
Bisbonian's picture

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

The difference is, I don't see this as an either/or. I'm looking back to the Black Panthers. No reason not to build a political party, it just shouldn't be the kind of political party we've seen over the past few decades. A real political party would be doing that kind of community work and would be interwoven with the community it served.

But if the phrase "political party" is too upsetting because of its 30 or 40-yr association with disgusting badness and lies, then yes, let's jettison the term.

Here's my vague first beginnings of thoughts in the direction you're proposing.

http://caucus99percent.com/comment/210881#comment-210881

Problems/obstacles in the way of such things include: isolation/lack of trust amongst the populace, demoralization, lack of money (bad), and lack of time (related to lack of money, and worse).

One of the elephants in the room is that we need to be able to trust each other enough to be able to at least network, if not pool, our economic resources. Another elephant: we need to understand what those resources actually are. Despite all poo-poohing to the contrary, I think an alternative currency would be a good idea. I have a few ideas about that.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

dance you monster's picture

. . . what I outlined here is a part of the path, for some of us more than for others, as we all want our wiggle room to pursue different elements that appeal to us.

Personally, I think the emphasis on party is a distraction. I do not see us in the 99%, short a revolution, grasping power through the existing framework, at least not for decades we may not have. I suspect the Constitution, and with it the political parties or even the political system, will not survive Climate Change. That's going to be "interesting" itself. But power, real power, lies in the people and the communities, and I hope we can strengthen those as we withhold them from the grasp of the covetous.

The problems/obstacles you cite are our strengths. Isolation makes those communities our communities, not the oligarchs'. Demoralization is what opens a space for re-moralization of a new character. Lack of money removes us from the oligarchs' gaze, so we can replace money with a new measure of worth. Time we reclaim as we reject the distractions that are placed in our path to slow us. And trust on a horizontal dimension, among equals, is much easier to establish than trust on a vertical dimension between owner and owned.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

This is the isolation I mean: we lack communities. Individuals, and individual families, are isolated from each other. People distrust strangers, and even their neighbors. This is not a strength. In fact, I believe it's been engineered, but then I'm a conspiracy theorist. Smile

Lack of money means lack of resources we need like food, medicine, shelter, etc. As long as people are desperately running running running to try to gain the money to pay their bills, they will have little money to spare for things like starting community gardens, putting solar panels on roofs, installing rainbarrels, etc. And this panicked, desperate running running running to try and make the bills eats time. That's the lack of time I'm talking about, not the hour or two a night Joe Schmo spends watching sports or reality TV.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

dance you monster's picture

I am not saying we won't have challenges. We'll have plenty of those. But from my own neighborhood I know that many of these are surmountable, and with more participants' heads at work, more solutions reveal themselves. Okay, maybe not the solar panels, yet. And medicine's the big hurdle. We'll figure it out, we have to and we will.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

thanks for writing this.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

dance you monster's picture

up
0 users have voted.
riverlover's picture

But we cannot exclude our Millennial children for sure. That is the generation we work to improve. And beyond, with smaller numbers. I had two children, the replacement rate. My husband is dead, my daughter's husband's father is dead. She will be over 30 before she has any children. I was 33. My mother was 33. One grandmother was 33. We are late producers. 2 or less.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

dance you monster's picture

Those of us who can will make time for those who cannot. That's how community works, by distributing effort.

[edited to say: Damn, I hate this commenting format! This was supposed to be in response to riverlover just above.]

up
0 users have voted.
Zenza's picture

Small example of trying to move folks forward in sustainable ways...a group for novice gardeners here was discouraging students from propagation at all, saying it was better for them to buy seedlings so as not to get in over their heads. I countered that everyone should grow at least one or two things from seed...maybe tomatoes seedlings indoors and radishes or spinach or peas direct seeded. I was trying to get the group leading it to think about what happens when there are no seedlings at the store. "Buy online" was the response. Guess that UPS truck will always be rolling in their minds. In any event I did manage to convince a few of the students that growing a seedling was not beyond their abilities, and that it might be better to learn from mistakes now while there are still commercial plants in abundance as backup. Same for making compost as compared to buying those bags of whatever at Wal-Mart or Home Depot. For now I'm inviting some of them to bring their food scraps to my compost bins and see the magic unfold. Also teaching them about some homemade bokashi buckets to start small.

up
0 users have voted.