and was free to sell them to anyone (you can fit a ton of emails on a thumbdrive). Not saying it happened, but Hellery opened up a HUGE security hole doing this.

Also the black van parked on the street infront of Hellery's mansion could hack into her wifi and read all this unencrypted stuff. Geezus H Chrise.

She didn't know about keeping official records? She was working on the watergate investigation, she was first lady of Arkansas and the US, US Senator with multiple committee assignments.

for it...just in case it got "lost." Where is the receipt proving this was mailed or the insurance claim?

OT maybe: Something that has been on my mind for some time now: What is up with Huma Abedin? She is the person who has occasionally said things--out loud, not in hacked emails-- that put HRC in boiling water, and all of a sudden Abedin's husband goes completely bonkers. Conspiracy theory: HRC was blackmailed into taking on and keeping Abedin (who has Saudi Arabian ties), and HRC occasionally strikes back.

that certainly won't take long.

Fri, 10/28/2016 - 5:36pm — Goin South

Fox is reporting a statement by Obama that HRC should...

"examine her conscience." I can't find any confirmation of it elsewhere.

We had a pool going here about who would have the nerve to tell Hillary to drop out. If this story is true, Obama drew the short straw, at least for a public statement.

I can't find any confirmation of her having a conscience either...

were they the chairs of the committees?

And that Obama was willing for adviser her to listen to her conscience.

Its likely very bad

Clinton said Comey sent letter to only Republicans. That's 100% FALSE. See attached images of who was on letter -- at least 8 Dems. pic.twitter.com/ywJL90kAfe

— Steve Kopack (@SteveKopack) October 28, 2016

if she didn't down it willingly because OMG TRUMP!!!!

Too many otherwise good and smart people have been scared absolutely witless by the Trumposaurus.

what Wikileaks is trying to accomplish. Yes, Trump is scary and an idiot, but that's self-evident, even to most Republicans. The Republican establish is effectively broken, nobody trusts it anymore, thus Trump.

The problem is that the Democratic establishment still has a degree of credibility and legitimacy, in spite of being in the bag with big business, the banks, and the war-mongers. The Bernie voters know what's wrong, but many Dems still don't.

Wikileaks is attacking the Dem. party establishment to erode their credibility, to show people that both party establishments were two sides of the same evil coin. Done effectively, these leaks will destroy the machines and the insiders of both parties, and allow for a genuine populist take over, eventually.

The google says he is worth 2.9 Billion dollars, a media mogul
Israeli/Egyptian/American.... I suppose he could bankroll her whole campaign.

No wonder we will do the bidding of Israel in the middle East...

Anyone but Trump could have beat her.

She's made many promises to Saban, and if you haven't read this, please do read it in full at source, if the device you're using allows for it.

https://theintercept.com/2015/09/09/hillary-clinton-goes-militaristic-ha...

Hillary Clinton Goes to Militaristic, Hawkish Think Tank, Gives Militaristic, Hawkish Speech
Glenn Greenwald

September 9 2015

... Brookings is funded in part by one of the Democratic Party’s favorite billionaires, Haim Saban, who is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Israel and once said of himself: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.” Pollack advocated for the attack on Iraq while he was “Director of Research of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy.” Saban became the Democratic Party’s largest fundraiser — even paying $7 million for the new DNC building — and is now a very substantial funder of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. In exchange, she’s written a personal letter to him publicly “expressing her strong and unequivocal support for Israel in the face of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanction movement.”

So the hawkish Brookings is the prism through which Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy worldview can be best understood. The think tank is filled with former advisers to both Bill and Hillary Clinton, and would certainly provide numerous top-level foreign policy officials in any Hillary Clinton administration. ...

... She vowed that in dealing with Iran, she will be tougher and more aggressive than Reagan was with the Soviet Union: “You remember President Reagan’s line about the Soviets: Trust but verify? My approach will be distrust and verify.” She also explicitly threatened Iran with war if they fail to comply: “I will not hesitate to take military action if Iran attempts to obtain a nuclear weapon, and I will set up my successor to be able to credibly make the same pledge.” She even depicted the Iran Deal as making a future war with Iran easier and more powerful:

Should it become necessary in the future having exhausted peaceful alternatives to turn to military force, we will have preserved and in some cases enhanced our capacity to act. And because we have proven our commitment to diplomacy first, the world will more likely join us.

As for Israel itself, Clinton eagerly promised to shower it with a long, expensive, and dangerous list of gifts. Here’s just a part of what that country can expect from the second President Clinton:

I will deepen America’s unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security, including our long standing tradition of guaranteeing Israel’s qualitative military edge. I’ll increase support for Israeli rocket and missile defenses and for intelligence sharing. I’ll sell Israel the most sophisticated fire aircraft ever developed. The F-35. We’ll work together to develop and implement better tunnel detection technology to prevent arms smuggling and kidnapping as well as the strongest possible missile defense system for Northern Israel, which has been subjected to Hezbollah’s attacks for years.

She promised she “will sustain a robust military presence in the [Persian Gulf] region, especially our air and naval forces.” She vowed to “increase security cooperation with our Gulf allies” — by which she means the despotic regimes in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others. She swore she will crack down even further on Hezbollah: “It’s time to eliminate the false distinction that some still make between the supposed political and military wings. If you’re part of Hezbollah, you’re part of a terrorist organization, plain and simple.”

Then she took the ultimate pledge: “I would not support this agreement for one second if I thought it put Israel in greater danger.” So even if the deal would benefit the U.S., she would not support it “for one second” if it “put Israel in greater danger.” That’s an unusually blunt vow to subordinate the interests of the U.S. to that foreign nation.

But when it comes to gifts to Israel, that’s not all! Echoing the vow of several GOP candidates to call Netanyahu right away after being elected, Clinton promised: “I would invite the Israeli prime minister to the White House during my first month in office to talk about all of these issues and to set us on a course of close, frequent consultation right from the start, because we both rely on each other for support as partners, allies and friends.” She then addressed “the people of Israel,” telling them: “Let me say, you’ll never have to question whether we’re with you. The United States will always be with you.” For good measure, she heaped praise on “my friend Chuck Schumer,” who has led the battle to defeat the Iran Deal, gushing about what an “excellent leader in the Senate” he will make. What’s a little warmongering among friends? ...