EDIT: Cronewit sent me these with much additional information:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439852/hillary-clinton-obstruction...

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439804/clintons-e-mail-scandal-sti...

* * *

One of the un-named Platte River Networks guys has a deal - I toldj'all I suspected as much...

But I'm getting ahead of myself... and apparently there ARE two who were un-named in the FBI notes, as I thought. You'll learn the name of one of them below.

The 'Oh-Shit' moment story we recently learned sure sounded kinda fishy, yes? The un-named Platte River Networks guy (we have seen male articles used, so it's it's a 'he') realized he had apparently forgotten to delete the emails which had been sitting around as instructed, we learned from the FBI notes... he went and deleted them AT SOME POINT between the 25th and the 31st of March.

But here's the thing - That was ALSO the week he had a phone call and a work order, if I understood correctly, from Cheryl Mills and David Kendall. Looks kinda coincidental, doesn't it? Might NOT be, but, there's sure an possibility of overlap between those to events.

Hat Tip to Olinda -EDIT: Am removing Denver Post video b/c the autoplay feature is making my laptop slooooooow. Can't see a way to disable it. You can view the video through Olinda's link in comments.

We got the kids version of the FBI notes, the non-classified stuff. Congress, apparently, got a bit more. Catch this said by Jason Chaffetz:

“These emails are held for newly two years and then within hours of a [Clinton's lawyers] Cheryl Mills-David Kendall call with Platt River, they’re destroyed?” Chaffetz asked. “This is why we need to investigate… [so] we better understand how that happened and make sure it never ever happens again.”

So, Chaffetz confirms that there IS overlap.

Rachel Bade of POLITICO provided us with this today:

Hill Republicans: Clinton investigations won’t stop if she wins

Rachel also tells us Chaffetz is as confused as we are about why this fellow (well, this guy or the other PRN employee - hard to tell which is which at this point) claimed attorney-client privilege in refusing to answer questions from the committee on Homeland Security.

Chaffetz has been trying to get answers, and he's not happy with the tight-lippedness he's been getting. He wants to get to the bottom, she says, of what happened with destruction of evidence, and we learn that there's currently a bill being written to pull the security clearance of anyone who misused confidential information:

In fact, he’s already threatening to. In recent days, Chaffetz asked officials from State, FBI, the Justice Department and Office of the Director of National Intelligence to come to Capitol Hill for a private briefing on why some Clinton emails and parts of the FBI report are being redacted when he believes they shouldn’t. He also says his panel has noticed “inconsistencies” in what the agencies withholds from Congress. All refused his invitation. So, he scheduled a public hearing, and threatened the "s" word, subpoena.

In a Tuesday letter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Chaffetz asked the Justice Department to review whether Platte River Networks, the IT company that housed Clinton’s server after she left State, destroyed evidence and obstructed justice. The letter points to a section in the newly released FBI files on the Clinton investigation that said an unnamed Platte River IT employee deleted a Clinton email archive a few days after talking to Clinton’s lawyers. The New York Times reported Thursday night that the person, Paul Combetta, was given immunity by the FBI.

Here's the NYT piece:

Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails

So, this guy Combetta said early in the year that he had not seen the order to retain the information. Later, he reversed himself. Looks like that's all that is public at this time.

Moving on, we have what I believe is our first direct evidence that this IS an investigation of how Hillary's time at the State Department may have been impacted by what was going on at the Clinton Foundation - this is Senator Cornyn:

“Unfortunately, [FBI] Director [James] Comey's announcement back in July wasn't the end of the story… because last month even more e-mails came to light that revealed the line blurred between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department under Secretary Clinton,” Cornyn said. “It is clear that major Clinton Foundation donors enjoyed great access to Secretary Clinton while she was serving as our nation's premier diplomat. ... I hope, soon, that we all get some answers.”

Brian Fallon believes that the sum of all of this is that we should hate the Republicans. I beg to differ. What I hate is that we have a candidate with so much hubris she's willing to pollute the White House with more than the scent of corruption before she even gets there, guaranteeing us that the two parties will be fighting and focused on something other than the welfare of the nation.

Here's Fallon in the NYT piece saying Combetta went rogue:

“As the F.B.I.’s report notes,” Mr. Fallon said, “neither Hillary Clinton nor her attorneys had knowledge of the Platte River Network employee’s actions. It appears he acted on his own and against guidance given by both Clinton’s and Platte River’s attorneys to retain all data in compliance with a congressional preservation request.”