The neoliberal politicians that dominate Britain's Labour Party keep trying to lead their membership, but for some strange reason the membership refuses to follow, and nothing represent this betrayal of the peasants better than Jeremy Corbyn.

Jeremy Corbyn's landslide victory - the largest mandate ever won by a party leader - will at least come as no suprise to him...
No leader in the party's 115-year history has ever been elected with so little support from MPs. Corbyn, the most left-wing figure to hold the post, won the public backing of just 14 (6 per cent) of his colleagues.

Labour MPs tried to explain how Corbyn would destroy the party, and they were right. If your definition of "destroy" means a huge surge in membership.

Almost every constituency party across the country we contacted reported doubling, trebling, quadrupling or even quintupling membership, and a revival of branches that had been moribund for years and close to folding...
The survey findings are borne out by Labour’s national figures, released to the Guardian in a break with party tradition of keeping them secret. Membership jumped from 201,293 on 6 May last year, the day before the general election, to 388,407 on 10 January.

Since the membership wouldn't listen to their political Betters, maybe they would listen to their Betters in journalism. What happened was almost unprecedented in British history.

The media researchers found that in 52 per cent of articles about the Labour leader, his own views were not included – while in a further 22 per cent they were “present but taken out of context” or otherwise distorted.
In just 15 per cent of 812 articles analysed, Mr Corbyn’s views were present but challenged, and in only 11 per cent were they present without alteration.
“Our analysis shows that Corbyn was thoroughly delegitimised as a political actor from the moment he became a prominent candidate and even more so after he was elected as party leader,” Dr Bart Cammaerts, the project director concluded.
“These results relating to sources and ‘voice’ are evidently troublesome from a democratic perspective.

Then came Brexit and the MPs coup attempt. Corbyn lost a no-confidence vote badly.

Labour MPs do not just want to oust a leader with massive support among party members. They have hamstrung him from the outset so that he could not lead the political revolution members elected him to begin. And now he is being made to pay the price because he privately backs a position that, as the referendum has just shown, has majority support.

The peasants just won't listen to reason. They must be shown that this is all being done for their own good. Corbyn is a dangerous radical that must be removed.
So how did the lowly workers respond to their leaders coup attempt?

The Labour Party has gained at least 100,000 new members in the space of just 10 days, and most are believed to be supporters of under-pressure leader Jeremy Corbyn.
The party's membership has surpassed half a million for the first time since its records began, according to the Huffington Post.
The report adds that 80% of the new members who disclosed their motive for signing up cited their support for Corbyn.

That's insane. It's almost as if the peasants don't believe all the slanderous news articles and neoliberal politicians.

The Labour leader has been told to resign by the vast majority of his own MPs in the wake of a "vote of no confidence" against him, and a host of shadow cabinet resignations.
However, despite his popularity plummeting among Labour MPs, it is clear that Corbyn continues to enjoy strong grassroots support.“It’s a huge surge for Jeremy,” a source told the Huffington Post. It is the latest symptom of just how severe the disconnect between the parliamentary Labour party and the membership really is.
This news comes as some of the Labour MPs who supported an attempted coup against Corbyn appear to have given up any hope of removing the former rebellious backbencher.

If I didn't know better, I would think that Britain's working class doesn't like or trust Their Betters.
In fact, their recent measurable actions, both at the ballot box and in membership dues could be interpreted as a Big FU.