OMG, why would I want to click on the following SPONSORED post?

Sign the petition: We have to stand together with the DLCC and fight back against right-wing voter suppression laws. sponsored

And here's the one they put in the subject line, presumably as click-bait:

"Bernie Sanders, what the hell have you done for us lately?"

Thankfully, it does actually appear to be a list of things Bernie has done for We The People.

Without reciting everything that's been recited a 1,000x, I don't know what to say. If she becomes the President, it will destroy all pretense of a democracy in this country. She belongs in jail for 1000 reasons, not in the WH.

another prime example of what we are now taught

"That gross negligence must somehow lead to the loss of classified information, basically the same thing as if a courier left a briefcase full of classified documents in a public place. That’s not what happened here".

Even imbibing too much this logic alone does not fly. Must be fly shit.
Leave top secret documents unattended, gross negligence. Leave the football alone for a second and see what happens to that fool.

These could be copied, but that is Spy School 101. As soon as she used an unsecured server she lost them. She could not say who or how many received that information.

You may be able to take this ball and run with it. I"m concerned that we've become so "fixated on the email target" that we are missing the bigger picture of the implications of HRC lying to the American people and Democratic voters to win the primaries on a fraudulent basis.

---------------------------------------------

If Cllinton lied to Democratic voters she must be replaced

In Atlantic City Hillary Clinton lambasted Donald Trump for taking "destructive risks with other people's money" and for denying American voters an "informed choice." what a poignenty unfortunate themes she chooses to highlight the day after FBI Director Comey's report that Hillary Clinton knowingly lied when she first said, "I never received, nor sent any classified information" from her private account. We already knew from the scathing IG report that she lied when she assured Democratic voters and delegates that her illicit basement server was authorized by the State Department.

Her Democratic primary victories were based on deliberately fraudulent representations which have besmirched her character, and damaged her already low "trustibility," even more than the poor judgment she displayed when she decided to take such reckless risks with our national security for selfish reason in the first place.

A besmirchment reminiscent of John Edwards' willingness to gamble the Democratic Party's election chances and the well being of the United States in order to pursue his obsession with becoming president despite the disqualifying affair he was hiding while his wife was dying of cancer. Democrats were outraged, most especially, those of us who were his supporters. Both were willing to take "destructive risks" with the Democratic Party's election chances in order to selfishly pursue their own obsessions with becoming president based on equally delusional presumptions that they would not get caught. Clintons' destructive gamble was worse as she also has jeapordized our national security. John Edwards immediately withdrew in shame once his deception was discovered, Hillary Clinton, however, appears intent on trying to bulldoze her way to a Democratic Party "lock-in" and has shown little sign of remorse.

Is this implausible denial of reality not a continuation of the same judgement order she continues to fall victim to? The Democratic Party convention delegates must not endorse these shameful and reckless choices. Unlike the Republicans who appear to be stuck with Donald Trump, the Democratic Party rules apparently contain an exception that allows even pledged delegates to change their vote in the event of a major issue of conscience. This is such an issue.

If she does not withdraw within the few weeks she will put the Super Delegates and even her own pledged delegates, in the awkward position of having to replace her or knowingly endorse this deception which will be a disaster for their own reputations, the Democratic Party, and our Nation.

What kind of a person would do this? Knowingly lying to her own supporters, voters, and delegates telling us we have nothing to worry about, when she has known all along what she has done. We see two independent disqualifying issues - her character, and her judgement. The Democratic leadership needs to start a call for her to withdraw before the convention or be replaced.

If she withdraws now, she still may be able to do so retaining some few shreds of grace and legacy. If, on the other hand, she chooses to try to bulldoze through with the apparent strategy of getting "locked-in" at the Democratic convention, we know the Republican drumbeat for her prosecution or impeachment will escalate and expand to include influence peddling and public corruption at the Clinton Foundation. She will eventually go down like Richard Nixon, in complete disgrace and breaking the hearts of young women and girls everywhere for whom she is a hero.