and movements, amassing all their unchecked powers against people like MLK, Abbie Hoffman, anti-war priests, movement activists, Occupy Wall St etc. etc., including killing black power leaders like Fred Hampton (all the way back to its unseemly beginning when the gov't began deporting people like Emma Goldman in the Red Scare after WW1) but when it comes to really tackling a high profile politician, who have ties throughout the government which means they are financially connected also because their campaigns rely on such donors, then they just don't seem to have the muster to really get things done.

But if a protester or community organizer needs to be surveilled, shaken down, threatened or arrested they can really "get the job done."

Fact is, the FBI has primarily been in the business of shutting down radical LW dissent - that's all.

There is no such thing as a functioning democracy here in America. All the levers of government are used for the opposite effect of what they purport to be for.

Our job is to expose the charade of these agencies being for, by and of the People. They are not.

If she's elected, how the hell will she get security clearance?

I know the answer, of course: she just will.

But I think it's an angle that the supers need to consider.

Jesus, this woman is so damningly unelectable and yet here we are.

imagining the full brunt of the propaganda machine at work, paid for by the cabal of global financial elites/Wall St/Big Business, whose contributions go to paying legions of minions on the payroll of political players like the Clintons, who then blanket the media with a barrage of spin, arm-twisting, carefully crafted doublespeak, and other manner of PR, all in service of keeping their truly ugly, corrupt, venomous, and arrogant just agreeable enough to a gullible American public expected to vote for her.

At this moment I imagine the torrent of phone calls, emails, tweets, pressuring the media to read this as a great victory for Her Majesty, a vindication of sorts, by absolutely twisting around how truly harshly she was condemned. Again, the ugly head of true politics on full glaring display, that the FBI Dir basically couldn't suggest indicting the corrupt, hubris-filled and entitled SOS, because of the vast network of people who have something to gain from her unquestionably damaged and horrendous nomination.

They'll be releasing a hurricane of spin to fill, basically threaten, the MSM with, so that people get a softened image of her deep and troubling corruption and horrendous judgement.

The little media that I could stomach watching on the banal network news channels seemed to think she will have a cloud following her because of this and it will effect her credibility with voters, which is already low enough. They'll all be changing their tune by nightfall, when their editors will have heard from Clinton reps all day. She'll be looking victorious. They'll be showing her alongside Obama and the story of her reckless judgement and sheer arrogance goes overlooked.

Then on the sidelines, is the great, unassailable Sanders, with impeccable integrity, grace, vision and authenticity.

But we're going to have Drumpf vs. Monarchy?

If this doesn't do it for inspiring Revolution folks, we're done.

If the votes are actually counted fairly,(unlikely), he can beat Medusa and Drumph. I feel like he really needs to try though.

*sigh*

The future of our country is looking very bleak