to the election fraud suit. I hope they file soon!

election fraud, I get redirected to some unknown page that wants to install a firefox patch. Makes me wonder if Googles support of Clinton goes beyond just search result manipulation. It just happened again when I clicked on the link to Richard Charnin's blog.

I saw on Twitter or here(?) a compare/contrast pic of his rally next to her dinky, dark gathering of 50-100 people. I also saw the serious demonstration both inside and outside her pathetic visit in a YouTube video. I wouldn't be surprised if there were more demonstrators than attendees.

So, will the new, accurate counts in Cali actually change things for Bernie? I sure hope so!

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ZqA87dL5E]

machines, which are hackable and able to be programmed dishonestly, are again showing higher amounts for clinton than the hand count, which I assume can be easily checked for accuracy. Just like across the rest of the country.

so to avoid the risk of being criticized as a Luddite, I don't think the machines themselves are responsible for any kind of defective mechanical issues. There are none.

It's the secretive nature in which the votes are counted and hidden from public scrutiny. It's the closed-source software and mysterious 'patches' which are uploaded to the machines on Tuesdays when the votes are being counted. In short, it is human corruption at its highest level in US politics.

You don't need all the complex lines of code to do simple arithmetic anyway. Fractional vote counts! What a scam.

There comes a time when the majority of people will have to take action against the corrupt political system, which is essentially operating as a positive feedback loop cycle. Crooked officials are rigging the machines to keep re-electing themselves and to bring in more crooked officials, who in turn must provide job security for themselves, by expanding the fraud with rigging more and more voting machines and putting more like-minded scoundrels in office.

We haven't reached a saturation point, but each year the problem gets bigger.

it's the same old mystery, not why the dog barked but why the dog did NOT bark.

since our established parties are systemic and entrenched in political corruption, it never occurs to Hillary to question the discrepancies of the astronomically-high exit poll MOEs. Even if you were the legitimate winner of all those state primary elections, you would at least want to know what is going on here. If you have a real concern about democracy.

She is part and parcel of the same class that makes up the US oligarchy and which also controls the MSM. Newspapers, radio, TV.

Trump does operate a little independently but ultimately his allegiance is to the same economic class. Whether he works against Hillary or for Hillary, the end result will be the same.

At some point, I would think that Bernie needs to point out the inconsistencies of the published voting results by the election officials, in contrast to the randomly sampled population of votes.

If these are the only two choices, then the message must be a vote for the Green Party, no matter if Jill Stein will win or not, it is important to break away from the corruption of the two parties.

from the Institute for American Democracy and Election Integrity http://trustvote.org/

"The lawsuit is being delayed because new evidence recently found is going to make the lawsuit even stronger. It will be revealed when the lawsuit is submitted. Many people have questioned whether the lawsuit is real. It is very real. It is getting stronger each day with new evidence and new witnesses."

"...California election results and assessment of the exit polls can only be announced after all the vote-by-mails and qualifying provisional votes are counted. It will be then that the results of the citizen exit polls can be completed ..."

People's Summit, Bernie or Bust, Green/Jill Stein, Progressive Democrats. All are great political movements, but are we missing the forest for the trees?

The forest, the big picture, it is the normal standards associated with the election process: such as exit polling, hand-counts, and open-source software and rigorous inspection of any electronics hardware used to tabulate the election totals. Until then, our individual 'trees' may be fabulous and some will do better than others, but we will be spinning our wheels trying to get free from the vast wilderness of political corruption.

Radical election reform is the paramount issue of our times, that is, if we wish to remain as a democracy. Radical, as in, getting to the root of who is, and what exactly is, screwing with the final tallies of the votes.

But really, I think we pretty much already have it narrowed down to a few secretive rightwing corporate fascists and their paid henchmen, in collusion with Democratic and Republican elections officials. It requires the political will to shine the spotlight on this criminal activity, it's pure racketeering, and until people are found guilty and put in jail, the problems will persist.