I can see the cracks in it all the way from over here

an act of good faith has me wondering about this place now.

*
From KOS:

"Now the way this works is that DWS will keep her title. You can’t just fire the party chair on a whim."

*

That may be true but calling this an 'act of good faith'? No, not really. It's a way to get Sanders voters votes. DWS isn't losing a damn thing. And considering the relationship between Shills and DWS, she'll come out smelling like a rose anyway. Who know, she too can be Secretary of State with the right connections. and she certainly has those.

Yeah Sanders demanded this but don't act like this is some big concession. Like KOS says:

""Now the way this works is that DWS will keep her title.

She should have been gone long ago for her shennanigans. This isn't a freaking 'concession'. This is righting an egregious wrong. Her actions all through this primary have been on a par with David Brock's.

Wasserman Schultz welcomed Mook and Davis to party headquarters on Thursday morning. While she will remain in her position as the party's chairwoman, at least through the convention next month in Philadelphia, her role diminishes with the Clinton campaign's takeover of the committee.

It is a standard transition, as Clinton becomes the presumptive Democratic nominee.

In an interview on Thursday, Dean recalled how he transitioned immediately to simply raising money and campaigning for Barack Obama in 2008 after Paul Tewes, a trusted Obama aide, stepped in to lead the committee.
"We basically just turned it over to him and I left the building to him. He ran the DNC," Dean said.

When I read "out" I think it means out, gone. She is still in her same position, but others will be in charge day to day.

What CNN says:

Wasserman Schultz welcomed Mook and Davis to party headquarters on Thursday morning. While she will remain in her position as the party's chairwoman, at least through the convention next month in Philadelphia, her role diminishes with the Clinton campaign's takeover of the committee.

It sounds like this is normal transition stuff, and happens when there is a party nominee.

There is no good faith move by Clinton. She and DWS are buddies. DWS did exactly what she needed to do as chair of the DNC to facilitate Clinton's selection as the nominee. DWS is not being thrown under the bus. She will be rewarded for all of her good work on behalf of Hillary Clinton. This is just a made for tv kabuki.

I hated the Clintons before this primary started, so you cannot imagine the depth and breadth of my disgust now.
There's no such thing as a "spoiler vote" in this election. What would you be "spoiling?"

Vicky Nuland for her reward of the Ukraine coup.
Vicky's husband Robert Kagan is advising her on foreign policy. And all the guys behind PNAC are in Hillary's corner. And why not, she helped Obama continue doing their work in the Middle East.

[deleted]

turn everything financial over to Slick Willie? He's a financial whiz she says.

If I were her, that's exactly what I'd do as well. That way he can make sure The Clinton Family Slush Fund gets its cut (preferably up front).

I despise DWS and what she's done to assist Clinton's ascension to the nomination. But when you start attacking people for physical characteristics, you are degrading and minimalizing your policy views and perpetuating the idea that how someone looks has some effect on policy. Please don't conflate the two. Because Progressives don't want H. Clinton to be president- and are supremely pissed off at the way DWS tilted the primaries- is NOT a reason or an excuse to start making degrading comments about how various Democratic (or Republican, for that matter) women LOOK.
IF YOU WANT OUR REVOLUTION TO SUCCEED, STOP DENIGRATING PEOPLE FOR THEIR LOOKS.
Or at least that would be a good beginning.