The West issue revisited
Submitted by Cassiodorus on Sun, 10/22/2023 - 1:24pmHere's the Revolutionary Blackout video:
Here's the Revolutionary Blackout video:
If you believe the election hype, either 1) Trump made America great, and if you re-elect him he'll keep making America great, or 2) America was great before Trump, who came out of nowhere to make America a bad thing, and America will be great once again when Joe Biden shows up in January to claim the White House.
I just found this written by Matt Taibi in our local online expat newspaper.
Many of us have written about the necessity to abandon the two party system in favor of a multiparty system. Although a parliamentary system would be superior to the current set-up, providing it wasn't a duopoly, even a three-party system would most likely. This is a matter of simple arithmetic and past history. The Senate is easier to analyze for a few reasons. First, 100 is an easy number to deal, certainly handier than 435.
It's beginning to look unlikely that Jill Stein will merit 5% of the vote this year. This reality shouldn't keep us from trying, though. The question on my mind, however, is one of whether or not the Green Party needs to be replaced with some other party, or a new party, capable of challenging the Democratic Party in the election cycles ahead.
I wrote an essay some time ago, Election reform and voter rights: a legislative agenda, in which the first two paragraphs read:
(My apologies to Thomas Jefferson)
When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the citizen long guaranteed by our Constitution, a decent respect to the opinions of humankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to that separation.
When you mention revolution, most people’s thoughts tend to scenarios that begin with pitchforks, proceed to guillotines, and end up in the Gulag. No doubt there are revolutions that have ended badly, betraying the people for whom they were putatively staged and directing violence at them rather than the overseers of the regime that made revolution necessary.
Here's a fact: progressives are a minority in the Democratic Party. Or, at least, a minority of its voters. This is true for a variety of reasons that are far too many and too complicated to fit inside a single blog post. It's a great way to start a related conversation, though: moving on from traditional party machine politics.
(I wrote this a few years ago - 2012 - and even though it's been published before, I think it's more pertinent this primary season than it ever has been. apologies for publishing again.)
(My apologies to Thomas Jefferson)