I like his goals. Wish they would add in the repeal of the patriot act..isn't that the one that lets the president start wars without congressional approval?
On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), codifying indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. (To learn more about the NDAA, visit www.aclu.org/NDAA).
The law is an historic threat because it codifies indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. It could permit the president – and all future presidents – to order the military to imprison indefinitely civilians captured far from any battlefield without charge or trial.
This kind of sweeping detention power is completely at odds with our American values, violates the Constitution, and corrodes our Nation’s commitment to the rule of law, which generations have fought to preserve.
The breadth of the NDAA’s worldwide detention authority violates the Constitution and international law because it is not limited to people captured in an actual armed conflict, as required by the laws of war.
Under the Bush administration, claims of worldwide detention authority were used to hold even a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil in military custody, and many in Congress assert that the NDAA should be used in the same way. The ACLU does not believe that the NDAA authorizes military detention of American citizens or anyone else in the United States. Any president’s claim of domestic military detention authority under the NDAA would be unconstitutional and illegal.
Nevertheless, there is substantial public debate and uncertainty around whether Sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA could be read even to repeal the Posse Comitatus Act and authorize indefinite military detention without charge or trial within the United States.
The law does not require even an allegation that a detained person caused any harm or threat of harm to the United States or to any U.S. interest. Mere allegation of membership in, or support of, an alleged terrorist group could be the basis for indefinite detention. Under the American justice system, we don’t just lock people up indefinitely based on suspicion.
Congress and the president should clean up the mess they created. Congress should repeal the NDAA’s detention provisions.
More than ten years after the 9/11 attacks, with the United States withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States should not be asserting new worldwide authority for the military to imprison persons seized in any country.
We have seen how disregard for the rule of law has disastrous results for America’s standing in the world. It is time for a return to the rule of law. It is time to turn that page.
Signed New Years eve in Hawaii late at night so people wouldn't hear nor understand his draconian act. Chris Hedge's sued, but was dismissed because "he lacked standing" Whaaat?
We lost our last shred of democracy when this passed.
Canada lost theirs this week with the emergency act.
The good news is that at least some people standing up against the power grab.
up
8 users have voted.
—
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
The NDAA 2012 and the Patriot Act 2001 are extremely dirty messes.
Unconstitutional and illegal in so many ways.
Is the Patriot Act still in effect in 2020?
In November 2019, the renewal of the Patriot Act was included in the stop-gap legislation The expired provisions required renewal by March 15, 2020. The Senate passed a 77-day extension in March 2020, but the House of Representatives did not pass the legislation before departing for recess on March 27, 2020.
Does the Patriot Act violate the 1st Amendment?
John Whitehead, founder of the Rutherford Institute, has written that “the Patriot Act violates at least six of the ten original amendments known as the Bill of Rights — the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Amendments — and possibly the Thirteenth and Fourteenth as well.”
What did the USA Freedom Act 2015 do?
The USA FREEDOM Act of 2015 bans the bulk collection of Americans’ private records under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. The bill enacts significant reforms to the national security authorities that the government has used to justify collecting Americans’ telephone records and Internet metadata in bulk.
I like his goals. Wish they would add in the repeal of the patriot act..isn't that the one that lets the president start wars without congressional approval?
On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), codifying indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. (To learn more about the NDAA, visit www.aclu.org/NDAA).
The law is an historic threat because it codifies indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. It could permit the president – and all future presidents – to order the military to imprison indefinitely civilians captured far from any battlefield without charge or trial.
This kind of sweeping detention power is completely at odds with our American values, violates the Constitution, and corrodes our Nation’s commitment to the rule of law, which generations have fought to preserve.
The breadth of the NDAA’s worldwide detention authority violates the Constitution and international law because it is not limited to people captured in an actual armed conflict, as required by the laws of war.
Under the Bush administration, claims of worldwide detention authority were used to hold even a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil in military custody, and many in Congress assert that the NDAA should be used in the same way. The ACLU does not believe that the NDAA authorizes military detention of American citizens or anyone else in the United States. Any president’s claim of domestic military detention authority under the NDAA would be unconstitutional and illegal.
Nevertheless, there is substantial public debate and uncertainty around whether Sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA could be read even to repeal the Posse Comitatus Act and authorize indefinite military detention without charge or trial within the United States.
The law does not require even an allegation that a detained person caused any harm or threat of harm to the United States or to any U.S. interest. Mere allegation of membership in, or support of, an alleged terrorist group could be the basis for indefinite detention. Under the American justice system, we don’t just lock people up indefinitely based on suspicion.
Congress and the president should clean up the mess they created. Congress should repeal the NDAA’s detention provisions.
More than ten years after the 9/11 attacks, with the United States withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States should not be asserting new worldwide authority for the military to imprison persons seized in any country.
We have seen how disregard for the rule of law has disastrous results for America’s standing in the world. It is time for a return to the rule of law. It is time to turn that page.
Signed New Years eve in Hawaii late at night so people wouldn't hear nor understand his draconian act. Chris Hedge's sued, but was dismissed because "he lacked standing" Whaaat?
We lost our last shred of democracy when this passed.
Canada lost theirs this week with the emergency act.
The good news is that at least some people standing up against the power grab.
“When there is no such thing as truth, you can’t define reality. & when you can’t define reality, the only thing that matters is power."@MaajidNawaz to @joerogan, part of a powerful discussion on relativist thinking increasingly dominating.
I like his goals. Wish they would add in the repeal of the patriot act..isn't that the one that lets the president start wars without congressional approval?
On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), codifying indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. (To learn more about the NDAA, visit www.aclu.org/NDAA).
The law is an historic threat because it codifies indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. It could permit the president – and all future presidents – to order the military to imprison indefinitely civilians captured far from any battlefield without charge or trial.
This kind of sweeping detention power is completely at odds with our American values, violates the Constitution, and corrodes our Nation’s commitment to the rule of law, which generations have fought to preserve.
The breadth of the NDAA’s worldwide detention authority violates the Constitution and international law because it is not limited to people captured in an actual armed conflict, as required by the laws of war.
Under the Bush administration, claims of worldwide detention authority were used to hold even a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil in military custody, and many in Congress assert that the NDAA should be used in the same way. The ACLU does not believe that the NDAA authorizes military detention of American citizens or anyone else in the United States. Any president’s claim of domestic military detention authority under the NDAA would be unconstitutional and illegal.
Nevertheless, there is substantial public debate and uncertainty around whether Sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA could be read even to repeal the Posse Comitatus Act and authorize indefinite military detention without charge or trial within the United States.
The law does not require even an allegation that a detained person caused any harm or threat of harm to the United States or to any U.S. interest. Mere allegation of membership in, or support of, an alleged terrorist group could be the basis for indefinite detention. Under the American justice system, we don’t just lock people up indefinitely based on suspicion.
Congress and the president should clean up the mess they created. Congress should repeal the NDAA’s detention provisions.
More than ten years after the 9/11 attacks, with the United States withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States should not be asserting new worldwide authority for the military to imprison persons seized in any country.
We have seen how disregard for the rule of law has disastrous results for America’s standing in the world. It is time for a return to the rule of law. It is time to turn that page.
Signed New Years eve in Hawaii late at night so people wouldn't hear nor understand his draconian act. Chris Hedge's sued, but was dismissed because "he lacked standing" Whaaat?
We lost our last shred of democracy when this passed.
Canada lost theirs this week with the emergency act.
The good news is that at least some people standing up against the power grab.
up
7 users have voted.
—
I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish
"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"
Nawaz try to make the case that because (some) people treat (some) truth(s) as relative, then there is no such thing as truth, complaining not so much about propaganda and lies as about things like the fact that many believe gender to be non-binary and a variety of other things to have a relativistic component. That's a horse of a different color.
“When there is no such thing as truth, you can’t define reality. & when you can’t define reality, the only thing that matters is power."@MaajidNawaz to @joerogan, part of a powerful discussion on relativist thinking increasingly dominating.
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
I like his goals. Wish they would add in the repeal of the patriot act..isn't that the one that lets the president start wars without congressional approval?
On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), codifying indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. (To learn more about the NDAA, visit www.aclu.org/NDAA).
The law is an historic threat because it codifies indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. It could permit the president – and all future presidents – to order the military to imprison indefinitely civilians captured far from any battlefield without charge or trial.
This kind of sweeping detention power is completely at odds with our American values, violates the Constitution, and corrodes our Nation’s commitment to the rule of law, which generations have fought to preserve.
The breadth of the NDAA’s worldwide detention authority violates the Constitution and international law because it is not limited to people captured in an actual armed conflict, as required by the laws of war.
Under the Bush administration, claims of worldwide detention authority were used to hold even a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil in military custody, and many in Congress assert that the NDAA should be used in the same way. The ACLU does not believe that the NDAA authorizes military detention of American citizens or anyone else in the United States. Any president’s claim of domestic military detention authority under the NDAA would be unconstitutional and illegal.
Nevertheless, there is substantial public debate and uncertainty around whether Sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA could be read even to repeal the Posse Comitatus Act and authorize indefinite military detention without charge or trial within the United States.
The law does not require even an allegation that a detained person caused any harm or threat of harm to the United States or to any U.S. interest. Mere allegation of membership in, or support of, an alleged terrorist group could be the basis for indefinite detention. Under the American justice system, we don’t just lock people up indefinitely based on suspicion.
Congress and the president should clean up the mess they created. Congress should repeal the NDAA’s detention provisions.
More than ten years after the 9/11 attacks, with the United States withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States should not be asserting new worldwide authority for the military to imprison persons seized in any country.
We have seen how disregard for the rule of law has disastrous results for America’s standing in the world. It is time for a return to the rule of law. It is time to turn that page.
Signed New Years eve in Hawaii late at night so people wouldn't hear nor understand his draconian act. Chris Hedge's sued, but was dismissed because "he lacked standing" Whaaat?
We lost our last shred of democracy when this passed.
Canada lost theirs this week with the emergency act.
The good news is that at least some people standing up against the power grab.
Although any “public health crisis” is big bucks for big pharma, the drive behind a “new AIDS variant” maybe more than greed.
Just yesterday we ran a story highlighting the sudden shift in news coverage, away from Covid and towards HIV/AIDS.
In brief, testing drives and government vows to “end the AIDS epidemic” accompanied news of a scary “new variant”. We won’t detail it all again, you can read it here.
Our article reasoned that this was likely just a play to keep people scared, and sell a lot of mRNA “vaccines”, and while that is definitely a factor, further research has shown other potential angles to take on this story.
Whilst there’s not enough information to form any definite conclusions there are some very interesting questions to be asked and theories to consider.
Firstly, there’s the idea that the “scary new AIDS variant” is not just a phantom used to sell vaccines, as COVID has always seemed to be, but could actually be a cover for illnesses and injuries caused by the vaccines themselves.
An October 2021 study, published in the Lancet, found that over time the effectiveness of Covid “vaccines” dropped below zero, meaning that eventually, a vaccinated person was more likely to get “Covid” than an unvaccinated person.[note]
America’s Frontline Doctor’s speculate that the vaccines could have even broader effects on the immune system, producing what they call Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome or “VAIDS”.
There is currently no hard evidence to support this theory, but if they are correct millions upon millions of people could become ill, and soon.
We have already seen a plethora of predictions of increases in strokes and heart attacks, all attributed to very much non-vaccine causes. Everything from increased energy prices to lockdown-related depression has been blamed.
That certainly appears to be pre-emptive ass-covering behaviour. And this “new variant” of AIDS could be too.
If the Covid “vaccines” cause millions of people to suddenly develop dysfunctional immune systems, or some kind of antibody-dependent enhancement a “more dangerous new strain of AIDS” is a pretty good cover story, don’t you think?
Again, there’s no direct evidence of this being the case yet, but it’s certainly possible.
In October 2020 one group of researchers, quoted in Forbes, warned that any potential Covid “vaccine” could increase your risk of being infected with HIV.
One of the few abandoned Covid vaccine candidates, from the University of Queensland, actually used a protein from HIV as a “molecular clamp” to bind their artificial spike proteins together, the researchers claimed. This potential “vaccine” was apparently discarded after test subjects returned “false positives” on HIV tests.
There’s an excellent video included in the article. There’s the video of Schwab talking about how he’s infiltrated governments everywhere and the audio is perfectly clear if that Canadian speaker wants to listen to it again and then answer the question about Trudeau. They also name more people who have been captured by the WEF. In the article I posted the other day Biden and Pelosi were named. Big club, thank gawd I’m not in it.
I found this video very interesting. He says that HIV does not cause AIDS. He was destroyed by Fauci and his career ruined. He might be who Kennedy wrote about in his book. He also has a book on his findings.
If anyone hasn’t yet read “The Real Anthony Fauci,” please read it immediately (or listen to it on Audible). Talk about pattern recognition. The book shows the long, long pattern of Fauci setting up the current medical mafia, and how he perfected it, all the parts, his whole sordid process. And, yes, I remember the interview where Dr Montaigner said that he found a snippet of HIV inserted into the covid bioweapon. We read in the aforementioned book that HIV was proven to be a minor contributor to AIDS, not the cause, but that Fauci (and others) fraudulently blew it up as the cause. Many people test positive for HIV but DO NOT have AIDS. But as long as Fauci can convince people that anyone that tests positive for HIV has AIDS and that he has the cure, he can pivot his medical tyranny back to his old “cures for HIV and AIDS” injections that were proven to cause so much damage or deaths in so many people. This is all documented in the book. But that is irrelevant data to Fauci. He has other purposes than a healthy population.
I’ve got to get back to reading the book. I got overwhelmed just a bit when he started talking about Fauci and AIDS.
Although any “public health crisis” is big bucks for big pharma, the drive behind a “new AIDS variant” maybe more than greed.
Just yesterday we ran a story highlighting the sudden shift in news coverage, away from Covid and towards HIV/AIDS.
In brief, testing drives and government vows to “end the AIDS epidemic” accompanied news of a scary “new variant”. We won’t detail it all again, you can read it here.
Our article reasoned that this was likely just a play to keep people scared, and sell a lot of mRNA “vaccines”, and while that is definitely a factor, further research has shown other potential angles to take on this story.
Whilst there’s not enough information to form any definite conclusions there are some very interesting questions to be asked and theories to consider.
Firstly, there’s the idea that the “scary new AIDS variant” is not just a phantom used to sell vaccines, as COVID has always seemed to be, but could actually be a cover for illnesses and injuries caused by the vaccines themselves.
An October 2021 study, published in the Lancet, found that over time the effectiveness of Covid “vaccines” dropped below zero, meaning that eventually, a vaccinated person was more likely to get “Covid” than an unvaccinated person.[note]
America’s Frontline Doctor’s speculate that the vaccines could have even broader effects on the immune system, producing what they call Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome or “VAIDS”.
There is currently no hard evidence to support this theory, but if they are correct millions upon millions of people could become ill, and soon.
We have already seen a plethora of predictions of increases in strokes and heart attacks, all attributed to very much non-vaccine causes. Everything from increased energy prices to lockdown-related depression has been blamed.
That certainly appears to be pre-emptive ass-covering behaviour. And this “new variant” of AIDS could be too.
If the Covid “vaccines” cause millions of people to suddenly develop dysfunctional immune systems, or some kind of antibody-dependent enhancement a “more dangerous new strain of AIDS” is a pretty good cover story, don’t you think?
Again, there’s no direct evidence of this being the case yet, but it’s certainly possible.
In October 2020 one group of researchers, quoted in Forbes, warned that any potential Covid “vaccine” could increase your risk of being infected with HIV.
One of the few abandoned Covid vaccine candidates, from the University of Queensland, actually used a protein from HIV as a “molecular clamp” to bind their artificial spike proteins together, the researchers claimed. This potential “vaccine” was apparently discarded after test subjects returned “false positives” on HIV tests.
There’s an excellent video included in the article. There’s the video of Schwab talking about how he’s infiltrated governments everywhere and the audio is perfectly clear if that Canadian speaker wants to listen to it again and then answer the question about Trudeau. They also name more people who have been captured by the WEF. In the article I posted the other day Biden and Pelosi were named. Big club, thank gawd I’m not in it.
I found this video very interesting. He says that HIV does not cause AIDS. He was destroyed by Fauci and his career ruined. He might be who Kennedy wrote about in his book. He also has a book on his findings.
there are only 15 copies, and 88 holds ahead of me
what does this tell you?
restriction of access to incriminating information
the current modus operendi of our masters
If anyone hasn’t yet read “The Real Anthony Fauci,” please read it immediately (or listen to it on Audible). Talk about pattern recognition. The book shows the long, long pattern of Fauci setting up the current medical mafia, and how he perfected it, all the parts, his whole sordid process. And, yes, I remember the interview where Dr Montaigner said that he found a snippet of HIV inserted into the covid bioweapon. We read in the aforementioned book that HIV was proven to be a minor contributor to AIDS, not the cause, but that Fauci (and others) fraudulently blew it up as the cause. Many people test positive for HIV but DO NOT have AIDS. But as long as Fauci can convince people that anyone that tests positive for HIV has AIDS and that he has the cure, he can pivot his medical tyranny back to his old “cures for HIV and AIDS” injections that were proven to cause so much damage or deaths in so many people. This is all documented in the book. But that is irrelevant data to Fauci. He has other purposes than a healthy population.
I’ve got to get back to reading the book. I got overwhelmed just a bit when he started talking about Fauci and AIDS.
Good! I bought the kindle for $3 cuz it has working links. Kennedy said that there are over 2k or 22k links in it. You know me and my brain. Either way that’s a lot of links. So apparently Johnson has lots of information about what has been done. What will he do with it? And why is he the only one who is looking into this scam?
Let me know what you think of it after you get it.
there are only 15 copies, and 88 holds ahead of me
what does this tell you?
restriction of access to incriminating information
the current modus operendi of our masters
up
4 users have voted.
—
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
I am just throwing this out of my junk filled head, not expecting any sort of answer although many opinions are nicer than one, or none. Not asking Richie Rich, asking another Richie my dead brothers names were Richmond Franklin but I always called him wishie. lol Don't ask what he called me. thank you
IAVI, the nonprofit scientific research organization, and biotechnology company Moderna announced today that first doses have been administered in a clinical trial of experimental HIV vaccine antigens at George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine and Health Sciences in Washington, D.C.
The Phase 1 trial, IAVI G002, is designed to test the hypothesis that sequential administration of priming and boosting HIV immunogens delivered by messenger RNA (mRNA) can induce specific classes of B-cell responses and guide their early maturation toward broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) development. The induction of bnAbs is widely considered to be a goal of HIV vaccination, and this is the first step in that process. The immunogens being tested in IAVI G002 were developed by scientific teams at IAVI and Scripps Research and will be delivered via Moderna's mRNA technology
"We are tremendously excited to be advancing this new direction in HIV vaccine design with Moderna's mRNA platform. The search for an HIV vaccine has been long and challenging, and having new tools in terms of immunogens and platforms could be the key to making rapid progress toward an urgently needed, effective HIV vaccine," says Mark Feinberg, M.D., Ph.D., president and CEO of IAVI. "We are grateful to all of our partners and especially to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for funding this trial."
[...]
All hail Bill Gates! Any chance to live longer. Sadly, I think that's what Richmond would say today before ripping me to shreds for being so dull. Come on. I still have his business card with the great seal of the city and county of san francisco, when he was a member of The Citizens Advisory Committee on Elections. omg lol Anyway, the embossing is cool you can see it on the back side too. tactile relief
But I do have lots of questions about whether we have been taken for a ride with a scam that has made lots of people very rich. Here is another video saying that HIV is not the cause of AIDS.
Chamakhe Maurieni, of the Gafi Research Institute, Tunis, has some very striking revelations about HIV/AIDS, something he calls a "fraud" which feeds "a 300 billion dollar industry" which rests on flimsy evidence that HIV caused AIDS, which, he claims, is not a disease but rather a "state".
Pravda.Ru: Chamakhe, you work for the secretive Gafi Research Institute, Tunis and your latest investigation has been on AIDS. Congratulations on having been appointed the lead writer for the Institute. What do you have to reveal to us?
CM: It is simply a hoax, the Gafi research team termed it the 21st century's greatest fraud. The HIV/Aids industry is a 300 billion-dollar industry of manipulative fraud, lies, deceptions, more lies and many more lies. From a ploy by a few people running into hundreds, it has risen over two decades and has been invested-in by private individuals, co-operations and various governments across the world. It's simply been used over and over to balance government corrupt books.
What kind of weapons shoot blanks? Whoever proved HIV CAUSED Aids? The answer is a big gaping Nobody. Ask yourself a question majority of the world population, including the so-called HIV patients, have never asked themselves or put to world governments, organisations, NGOs who go about preaching HIV kills, safe sex and a host of other sickening slogans. Where are the scientific references establishing HIV as the cause of AIDS? Presently, there are none.
Pravda.Ru: What do you mean? What about all the research carried out by the world's top professors?
CM: If you think a virus is the cause of Aids, do a control without it; this has surprisingly never been done. The current epidemiology of Aids is simply a pile of anecdotal stories, selected to fit the AIDS hypothesis. The Hiv/Aids story is a multi-billion/dollar/pound fraud, racket which is based on two fallacies: Aids is a single disease/aids is a disease and secondly that Aids is caused by the HI virus or the HIV VIRUS as some choose to call it - perhaps they think V in HIV stands for volcano.
Taking a look at the fallacies, fabrications; it need be stated: Aids is not a single disease but rather a state where the immune defence system in a human is, simply put, DEAD, WEAK, INEFFECTIVE...
Thus, the said human is vulnerable to every form of disease attack, it can be Malaria, measles, papilloma and so much more... The second fabrication claims Aids is caused by HI, which is false.Hiv is a retrovirus, a retrovirus is an RNA virus duplicated in a host cell using the reverse transcriptase enzyme to produce DNA from its RNA genome. Retroviruses are unlike flu viruses, they don't cause diseases
Hiv .....is one thousandth the size of a regular cell. Hiv is simply a harmless piece of dead tissue, not unlike the numerous other retroviruses which exist in the human body. Thus, it is not even probable, let alone scientifically proven, that HIV causes AIDS. If there is any such real evidence, there should be scientific documents which demonstrate the fact,.....right now, presently, at the moment, there are no such documents. All we have at the moment are hear-says, fictitious stories, lies and mere-propaganda by the mainstream media.
A major problem with the AIDS definition is that it ignored the man-made environmental causes of immune suppression. Exposure to toxin, alcoholism, heavy drug use or heavy antibiotic use; all of these can cause an onset of the list of diseases which provide the same symptoms/identical symptoms indicative of AIDS.
The Hiv/Aids propagandists all intentionally forget to inform the world that Hiv positive response in humans can be triggered by vaccination, malnutrition, measles, influenza, papilloma virus, war, leprosy, hepatitis, syphilis and over forty different other conditions.
Pravda.Ru: And who is behind this?
CM: This racket includes Governments, pharmaceutical companies such as Glaxo/Borough Wellcome - MANUFACTURER of AZT, the condom industry - if you choose to differentiate it from the pharmaceuticals, celebrities, NGOs and the list goes on.
The condom industry is worth an estimated thirteen billion dollars presently, and this turns out to be big money. Our research showed 82 percent of condom users buy condoms solely as a result of the fear of contacting Aids. Meaning of every one thousand condom buyers, 820 of these buyers make the decision to buy a condom because of the fear of AIDS.
You can put this to yourself...without the whole Hiv/Aids hoax or better still, if the world realises the truth behind the whole Hiv hoax, the condom industry stands to lose 82 percent of its customers; in financial terms, it loses 82 percent of its thirteen billion dollar worth. With this to play for, the condom companies will continue to share around the Aids hoax.
The pharmaceutical companies for their part are responsible for breeding and increasing the number of immune deficient patients around the world, most especially in Africa. The AZT which is a major drug sold by pharmaceutical companies like Glaxo/Borough Wellcome was found to destroy the immune system, thus allowing the human body to develop identical systems indicative of Aids.
AZT was found by our research team and even by American toxicologist and pathologist- Ali Al-Bayati Ph.D. to be responsible for the following diseases/conditions, among others: neutropenia, granulocytopenia, anemia, thrombocyte, nail pigmentation, sinusitis, acne, dyspnea, mouth ulcer, body odour,hyperbilirubinemia, vasculities, lactic acidiosis, sensitisation reactions, myositis, heptamegaly with steatosis, syncope, edema of the tongue, cough, abdominal pain, back pain, pancreatitis... amongst a list of many others.
Other Aids drugs such as Nevirapine, protease inhibitors and Arts have adverse effects similar to that of the Azt drugs. These drugs ensure users are dependent on them for life, failure to use them results in an almost instant death. There are thousands of people who have been diagonized with Aids, and have courageously refused Aids medication. Our research team came across hundreds of such people, amongst them being GOLDIE GLITTERS, who has lived for 30 years after being declared HIV POSITIVE. In his own words, he said:
"I have known so many people who have died of aids.... and all of them took the drugs prescribed by doctors....I have never taken any of these drugs and I haven't gotten sicker. Not even a cold. The doctors told me I had just 5 years to live....I have lived 30 years since then. These drug companies producing the aids medications are getting very rich....everyone I know who were hiv positive and taken the aids medication, have all died after taking these drugs, and that is a whole lot of people".
Pharmaceutical companies are in the driving seat in terms of increasing the so-called AIDS patients, around the world. THE MORE THE NUMBER OF PERSONS DOWN WITH DESTROYED IMMUNE SYSTEMS,THE MORE THE PROFIT. That is the HIV/AIDS rule.
Read the rest if you’re interested, but it’s sure looking like the world has been deceived by those who put profits over people’s lives. It’s also seems that they are repeating their murderous ways with the mRNA shots that are making people dependent on having to be constantly injected so they have some type of immune system function. AIDS patients have to get blood transfusions so that they can stay alive. I know that my brother had a problem with alcohol and that he had many sexual partners. I do not know if he used street drugs tho. I also know that he was on a boatload of drugs after his AIDS diagnosis that made him feel lousy and didn’t seem to work well to keep him alive.
This information has been available for a very long time and yet the people who brought this to us are still able to keep it covered up. It’s been ignored and now they get to do it again on a much bigger scale. Kennedy’s book has blown the whistle on the fraudulent Fauci and yet he’s still running free and has total control over our public health. How much longer is he going to get away with it?
Amen!
I am just throwing this out of my junk filled head, not expecting any sort of answer although many opinions are nicer than one, or none. Not asking Richie Rich, asking another Richie my dead brothers names were Richmond Franklin but I always called him wishie. lol Don't ask what he called me. thank you
IAVI, the nonprofit scientific research organization, and biotechnology company Moderna announced today that first doses have been administered in a clinical trial of experimental HIV vaccine antigens at George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine and Health Sciences in Washington, D.C.
The Phase 1 trial, IAVI G002, is designed to test the hypothesis that sequential administration of priming and boosting HIV immunogens delivered by messenger RNA (mRNA) can induce specific classes of B-cell responses and guide their early maturation toward broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) development. The induction of bnAbs is widely considered to be a goal of HIV vaccination, and this is the first step in that process. The immunogens being tested in IAVI G002 were developed by scientific teams at IAVI and Scripps Research and will be delivered via Moderna's mRNA technology
"We are tremendously excited to be advancing this new direction in HIV vaccine design with Moderna's mRNA platform. The search for an HIV vaccine has been long and challenging, and having new tools in terms of immunogens and platforms could be the key to making rapid progress toward an urgently needed, effective HIV vaccine," says Mark Feinberg, M.D., Ph.D., president and CEO of IAVI. "We are grateful to all of our partners and especially to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for funding this trial."
[...]
All hail Bill Gates! Any chance to live longer. Sadly, I think that's what Richmond would say today before ripping me to shreds for being so dull. Come on. I still have his business card with the great seal of the city and county of san francisco, when he was a member of The Citizens Advisory Committee on Elections. omg lol Anyway, the embossing is cool you can see it on the back side too. tactile relief
@snoopydawg
thanks snoopydawg, I was wondering your thoughts especially. You know the phrase "suspension of disbelief" that is what I need most days. To suspend my disbelief and get on with it, whatever it is. I will consume that video later when I have more appetite for it. Thanks.
Here is that right wing racist guy spreading misinformation again. They don't talk about covid or vaccines for fifteen minutes but I agree with Coleman Hughes. After giving a second listen I want to find out the math he speaks of, and the programs. He sounds interesting to me. good luck
But I do have lots of questions about whether we have been taken for a ride with a scam that has made lots of people very rich. Here is another video saying that HIV is not the cause of AIDS.
Chamakhe Maurieni, of the Gafi Research Institute, Tunis, has some very striking revelations about HIV/AIDS, something he calls a "fraud" which feeds "a 300 billion dollar industry" which rests on flimsy evidence that HIV caused AIDS, which, he claims, is not a disease but rather a "state".
Pravda.Ru: Chamakhe, you work for the secretive Gafi Research Institute, Tunis and your latest investigation has been on AIDS. Congratulations on having been appointed the lead writer for the Institute. What do you have to reveal to us?
CM: It is simply a hoax, the Gafi research team termed it the 21st century's greatest fraud. The HIV/Aids industry is a 300 billion-dollar industry of manipulative fraud, lies, deceptions, more lies and many more lies. From a ploy by a few people running into hundreds, it has risen over two decades and has been invested-in by private individuals, co-operations and various governments across the world. It's simply been used over and over to balance government corrupt books.
What kind of weapons shoot blanks? Whoever proved HIV CAUSED Aids? The answer is a big gaping Nobody. Ask yourself a question majority of the world population, including the so-called HIV patients, have never asked themselves or put to world governments, organisations, NGOs who go about preaching HIV kills, safe sex and a host of other sickening slogans. Where are the scientific references establishing HIV as the cause of AIDS? Presently, there are none.
Pravda.Ru: What do you mean? What about all the research carried out by the world's top professors?
CM: If you think a virus is the cause of Aids, do a control without it; this has surprisingly never been done. The current epidemiology of Aids is simply a pile of anecdotal stories, selected to fit the AIDS hypothesis. The Hiv/Aids story is a multi-billion/dollar/pound fraud, racket which is based on two fallacies: Aids is a single disease/aids is a disease and secondly that Aids is caused by the HI virus or the HIV VIRUS as some choose to call it - perhaps they think V in HIV stands for volcano.
Taking a look at the fallacies, fabrications; it need be stated: Aids is not a single disease but rather a state where the immune defence system in a human is, simply put, DEAD, WEAK, INEFFECTIVE...
Thus, the said human is vulnerable to every form of disease attack, it can be Malaria, measles, papilloma and so much more... The second fabrication claims Aids is caused by HI, which is false.Hiv is a retrovirus, a retrovirus is an RNA virus duplicated in a host cell using the reverse transcriptase enzyme to produce DNA from its RNA genome. Retroviruses are unlike flu viruses, they don't cause diseases
Hiv .....is one thousandth the size of a regular cell. Hiv is simply a harmless piece of dead tissue, not unlike the numerous other retroviruses which exist in the human body. Thus, it is not even probable, let alone scientifically proven, that HIV causes AIDS. If there is any such real evidence, there should be scientific documents which demonstrate the fact,.....right now, presently, at the moment, there are no such documents. All we have at the moment are hear-says, fictitious stories, lies and mere-propaganda by the mainstream media.
A major problem with the AIDS definition is that it ignored the man-made environmental causes of immune suppression. Exposure to toxin, alcoholism, heavy drug use or heavy antibiotic use; all of these can cause an onset of the list of diseases which provide the same symptoms/identical symptoms indicative of AIDS.
The Hiv/Aids propagandists all intentionally forget to inform the world that Hiv positive response in humans can be triggered by vaccination, malnutrition, measles, influenza, papilloma virus, war, leprosy, hepatitis, syphilis and over forty different other conditions.
Pravda.Ru: And who is behind this?
CM: This racket includes Governments, pharmaceutical companies such as Glaxo/Borough Wellcome - MANUFACTURER of AZT, the condom industry - if you choose to differentiate it from the pharmaceuticals, celebrities, NGOs and the list goes on.
The condom industry is worth an estimated thirteen billion dollars presently, and this turns out to be big money. Our research showed 82 percent of condom users buy condoms solely as a result of the fear of contacting Aids. Meaning of every one thousand condom buyers, 820 of these buyers make the decision to buy a condom because of the fear of AIDS.
You can put this to yourself...without the whole Hiv/Aids hoax or better still, if the world realises the truth behind the whole Hiv hoax, the condom industry stands to lose 82 percent of its customers; in financial terms, it loses 82 percent of its thirteen billion dollar worth. With this to play for, the condom companies will continue to share around the Aids hoax.
The pharmaceutical companies for their part are responsible for breeding and increasing the number of immune deficient patients around the world, most especially in Africa. The AZT which is a major drug sold by pharmaceutical companies like Glaxo/Borough Wellcome was found to destroy the immune system, thus allowing the human body to develop identical systems indicative of Aids.
AZT was found by our research team and even by American toxicologist and pathologist- Ali Al-Bayati Ph.D. to be responsible for the following diseases/conditions, among others: neutropenia, granulocytopenia, anemia, thrombocyte, nail pigmentation, sinusitis, acne, dyspnea, mouth ulcer, body odour,hyperbilirubinemia, vasculities, lactic acidiosis, sensitisation reactions, myositis, heptamegaly with steatosis, syncope, edema of the tongue, cough, abdominal pain, back pain, pancreatitis... amongst a list of many others.
Other Aids drugs such as Nevirapine, protease inhibitors and Arts have adverse effects similar to that of the Azt drugs. These drugs ensure users are dependent on them for life, failure to use them results in an almost instant death. There are thousands of people who have been diagonized with Aids, and have courageously refused Aids medication. Our research team came across hundreds of such people, amongst them being GOLDIE GLITTERS, who has lived for 30 years after being declared HIV POSITIVE. In his own words, he said:
"I have known so many people who have died of aids.... and all of them took the drugs prescribed by doctors....I have never taken any of these drugs and I haven't gotten sicker. Not even a cold. The doctors told me I had just 5 years to live....I have lived 30 years since then. These drug companies producing the aids medications are getting very rich....everyone I know who were hiv positive and taken the aids medication, have all died after taking these drugs, and that is a whole lot of people".
Pharmaceutical companies are in the driving seat in terms of increasing the so-called AIDS patients, around the world. THE MORE THE NUMBER OF PERSONS DOWN WITH DESTROYED IMMUNE SYSTEMS,THE MORE THE PROFIT. That is the HIV/AIDS rule.
Read the rest if you’re interested, but it’s sure looking like the world has been deceived by those who put profits over people’s lives. It’s also seems that they are repeating their murderous ways with the mRNA shots that are making people dependent on having to be constantly injected so they have some type of immune system function. AIDS patients have to get blood transfusions so that they can stay alive. I know that my brother had a problem with alcohol and that he had many sexual partners. I do not know if he used street drugs tho. I also know that he was on a boatload of drugs after his AIDS diagnosis that made him feel lousy and didn’t seem to work well to keep him alive.
This information has been available for a very long time and yet the people who brought this to us are still able to keep it covered up. It’s been ignored and now they get to do it again on a much bigger scale. Kennedy’s book has blown the whistle on the fraudulent Fauci and yet he’s still running free and has total control over our public health. How much longer is he going to get away with it?
I could understand a lot of medical information about AIDS and I thought I had a good handle on what I knew, but now I’m wondering if I was following rabbit holes instead. I haven’t made up my mind on the HIV issue, but I do believe that many people who died from AIDS didn’t have to because they could have been saved with bactrim and possibly not taking AZT. I’ve thought that since I read Larry Kramer's article on how Fauci screwed people who were sick and looking to him for help. Pneumonocystic pneumonia should have been easily treated bactrim and other antibiotics and people who had the sarcoma cancer should have been treated by cancer doctors but Fauci cut them out. The name of it is on the edge of my brain, but I can’t grasp it. Starts with a K…almost.
One thing I’m not going to do is take on the hurt and anger again. It won’t help and I already think that Fauci is a despicable person. I’ll let you watch the video on math and hopefully you will let me know if I might enjoy it. Math literally hurts my brain. It’s unpleasant.
Take care, eyo. My pm's are always open if you ever want to talk.
#3.1 thanks snoopydawg, I was wondering your thoughts especially. You know the phrase "suspension of disbelief" that is what I need most days. To suspend my disbelief and get on with it, whatever it is. I will consume that video later when I have more appetite for it. Thanks.
Here is that right wing racist guy spreading misinformation again. They don't talk about covid or vaccines for fifteen minutes but I agree with Coleman Hughes. After giving a second listen I want to find out the math he speaks of, and the programs. He sounds interesting to me. good luck
I could understand a lot of medical information about AIDS and I thought I had a good handle on what I knew, but now I’m wondering if I was following rabbit holes instead. I haven’t made up my mind on the HIV issue, but I do believe that many people who died from AIDS didn’t have to because they could have been saved with bactrim and possibly not taking AZT. I’ve thought that since I read Larry Kramer's article on how Fauci screwed people who were sick and looking to him for help. Pneumonocystic pneumonia should have been easily treated bactrim and other antibiotics and people who had the sarcoma cancer should have been treated by cancer doctors but Fauci cut them out. The name of it is on the edge of my brain, but I can’t grasp it. Starts with a K…almost.
One thing I’m not going to do is take on the hurt and anger again. It won’t help and I already think that Fauci is a despicable person. I’ll let you watch the video on math and hopefully you will let me know if I might enjoy it. Math literally hurts my brain. It’s unpleasant.
Take care, eyo. My pm's are always open if you ever want to talk.
up
2 users have voted.
—
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
Public health authorities knew about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID-19 before there was a COVID-19 — because they had figured it out for the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2012 MERS epidemic. But they hushed it up.
In 2020, I compiled a list of more than 50 ways authorities and pharma companies in multiple countries stopped the use of chloroquine drugs for COVID. This was (and is) a stunning collection, widely read and reproduced on many websites.
When you read it, you are astounded to learn that all the U.S. (and many international) public health agencies took many different actions that led to increased deaths and destruction from COVID and prolonged the pandemic.
“Avoiding the Trump drug” served as a great cover story. Taking hydroxychloroquine for COVID was equated to drinking bleach.
But here’s the kicker: The authorities knew all about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID-19 before there was a COVID-19 — because they had figured it out for the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2012 MERS epidemic, both caused by related coronaviruses. But they hushed it up.
Five Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U.S. scientists (employed by the U.S. government), along with three Canadian government scientists, in 2005 published a paper showing chloroquine was an effective drug against SARS coronaviruses. European scientists showed the same thing in 2004.
I have to repeat myself because the information is so shocking and I don’t want you to miss it: Our governments already knew of options for treating COVID before it appeared — but instead of immediately trying these already identified, safe, cheap and available drugs, and offering early treatments, they did everything they could to stop people from obtaining the chloroquine drugs.
Please read my long article on this suppression and the two articles I wrote here and here about how patients were administered borderline lethal doses of hydroxychloroquine to give the drug a black eye.
Check the links. Verify that what I have just written is correct. Human beings planned and carried out these medical crimes against humanity. Who are those humans? What are they doing now?
Lots more to read. But it sure looks like a smoking gun that can be used for any lawsuits against Fauci and big pharma. Also the WHO saw the results of using ivermectin in Utter Pradeshh (sp I’m sure) and they could have told the world that it works, but instead covered it up. I cannot wrap my mind around this type of evil.
Be sure to check out the link.
The next question is why didn’t Trump push for getting it released to everyone? Someone blocked him from doing it, but who was it and why would he go along with it? Just so people would take the mRNA shots? That’s cold blooded!
up
5 users have voted.
—
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
sort of like dejoy destroying the usps
without consequence
ingrained sociopathy.
have a nice life
Or worse…
Public health authorities knew about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID-19 before there was a COVID-19 — because they had figured it out for the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2012 MERS epidemic. But they hushed it up.
In 2020, I compiled a list of more than 50 ways authorities and pharma companies in multiple countries stopped the use of chloroquine drugs for COVID. This was (and is) a stunning collection, widely read and reproduced on many websites.
When you read it, you are astounded to learn that all the U.S. (and many international) public health agencies took many different actions that led to increased deaths and destruction from COVID and prolonged the pandemic.
“Avoiding the Trump drug” served as a great cover story. Taking hydroxychloroquine for COVID was equated to drinking bleach.
But here’s the kicker: The authorities knew all about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID-19 before there was a COVID-19 — because they had figured it out for the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2012 MERS epidemic, both caused by related coronaviruses. But they hushed it up.
Five Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U.S. scientists (employed by the U.S. government), along with three Canadian government scientists, in 2005 published a paper showing chloroquine was an effective drug against SARS coronaviruses. European scientists showed the same thing in 2004.
I have to repeat myself because the information is so shocking and I don’t want you to miss it: Our governments already knew of options for treating COVID before it appeared — but instead of immediately trying these already identified, safe, cheap and available drugs, and offering early treatments, they did everything they could to stop people from obtaining the chloroquine drugs.
Please read my long article on this suppression and the two articles I wrote here and here about how patients were administered borderline lethal doses of hydroxychloroquine to give the drug a black eye.
Check the links. Verify that what I have just written is correct. Human beings planned and carried out these medical crimes against humanity. Who are those humans? What are they doing now?
Lots more to read. But it sure looks like a smoking gun that can be used for any lawsuits against Fauci and big pharma. Also the WHO saw the results of using ivermectin in Utter Pradeshh (sp I’m sure) and they could have told the world that it works, but instead covered it up. I cannot wrap my mind around this type of evil.
Be sure to check out the link.
The next question is why didn’t Trump push for getting it released to everyone? Someone blocked him from doing it, but who was it and why would he go along with it? Just so people would take the mRNA shots? That’s cold blooded!
Comments
US convoy...
Excellent conversation with a participant... (14 min)
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_XAHG4A8ro]
I like his goals. Wish they would add in the repeal of the patriot act..isn't that the one that lets the president start wars without congressional approval?
And also Obummer's 2012 NDAA Act...
from the day when the ACLU was still a champion of civil rights...now they have sold out.
https://www.aclu.org/other/talking-points-2012-national-defense-authoriz...
Signed New Years eve in Hawaii late at night so people wouldn't hear nor understand his draconian act. Chris Hedge's sued, but was dismissed because "he lacked standing" Whaaat?
We lost our last shred of democracy when this passed.
Canada lost theirs this week with the emergency act.
The good news is that at least some people standing up against the power grab.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Congress and the president should clean up the mess they create
The NDAA 2012 and the Patriot Act 2001 are extremely dirty messes.
Unconstitutional and illegal in so many ways.
Is the Patriot Act still in effect in 2020?
Does the Patriot Act violate the 1st Amendment?
What did the USA Freedom Act 2015 do?
Thanks for the trucker clip!
Zionism is a social disease
Nawaz has pretty much the same message about the truth
and reality being subdued by State Propaganda
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2022/02/debt-rattle-february-23-2022/
I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish
"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"
Heard from Margaret Kimberley
I watched a small part of that discussion and heard
Nawaz try to make the case that because (some) people treat (some) truth(s) as relative, then there is no such thing as truth, complaining not so much about propaganda and lies as about things like the fact that many believe gender to be non-binary and a variety of other things to have a relativistic component. That's a horse of a different color.
be well and have a good one
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
"This is about every person on this planet"
Quote from the interviewed trucker Ron Coleman.
Indeed it is. Thanks for posting, LO - that and the and NDAA reminder.
btw - I am subscribed to very few Youtube channels, but have subscribed to that LiveFEED one, looks promising.
So what’s going on with the new HIV push?
There’s an excellent video included in the article. There’s the video of Schwab talking about how he’s infiltrated governments everywhere and the audio is perfectly clear if that Canadian speaker wants to listen to it again and then answer the question about Trudeau. They also name more people who have been captured by the WEF. In the article I posted the other day Biden and Pelosi were named. Big club, thank gawd I’m not in it.
I found this video very interesting. He says that HIV does not cause AIDS. He was destroyed by Fauci and his career ruined. He might be who Kennedy wrote about in his book. He also has a book on his findings.
He injected himself with HIV numerous times and never got AIDS. It’s hard to know what to believe anymore.
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
From the comments
I’ve got to get back to reading the book. I got overwhelmed just a bit when he started talking about Fauci and AIDS.
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
ordered the book thru the state library system
there are only 15 copies, and 88 holds ahead of me
what does this tell you?
restriction of access to incriminating information
the current modus operendi of our masters
Zionism is a social disease
It tells me that it’s getting read
Good! I bought the kindle for $3 cuz it has working links. Kennedy said that there are over 2k or 22k links in it. You know me and my brain. Either way that’s a lot of links. So apparently Johnson has lots of information about what has been done. What will he do with it? And why is he the only one who is looking into this scam?
Let me know what you think of it after you get it.
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
What would Richie say
I am just throwing this out of my junk filled head, not expecting any sort of answer although many opinions are nicer than one, or none. Not asking Richie Rich, asking another Richie my dead brothers names were Richmond Franklin but I always called him wishie. lol Don't ask what he called me. thank you
1984 Richie gets HIV diagnosis.
...
June 1989 most virulently disliked minority.
1995 Richie gets full blown AIDS and dies on his birthday age 43.
...
January 2022 investors dot com announce
Moderna - IAVI and Moderna Launch Trial of HIV Vaccine Antigens Delivered Through mRNA Technology
All hail Bill Gates! Any chance to live longer. Sadly, I think that's what Richmond would say today before ripping me to shreds for being so dull. Come on. I still have his business card with the great seal of the city and county of san francisco, when he was a member of The Citizens Advisory Committee on Elections. omg lol Anyway, the embossing is cool you can see it on the back side too. tactile relief
Flying_Circus - Season 2 - Main Theme
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL6ton0Dbz4 width:420]
Peace and Love
and foot salad
I don’t have any answers for you
But I do have lots of questions about whether we have been taken for a ride with a scam that has made lots of people very rich. Here is another video saying that HIV is not the cause of AIDS.
I read this awhile back and have been thinking about how we may have been deceived by Fauci and friends on the actual cause of AIDS.
Read the rest if you’re interested, but it’s sure looking like the world has been deceived by those who put profits over people’s lives. It’s also seems that they are repeating their murderous ways with the mRNA shots that are making people dependent on having to be constantly injected so they have some type of immune system function. AIDS patients have to get blood transfusions so that they can stay alive. I know that my brother had a problem with alcohol and that he had many sexual partners. I do not know if he used street drugs tho. I also know that he was on a boatload of drugs after his AIDS diagnosis that made him feel lousy and didn’t seem to work well to keep him alive.
This information has been available for a very long time and yet the people who brought this to us are still able to keep it covered up. It’s been ignored and now they get to do it again on a much bigger scale. Kennedy’s book has blown the whistle on the fraudulent Fauci and yet he’s still running free and has total control over our public health. How much longer is he going to get away with it?
Amen!
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
Perhaps technology will eventually kill us all
thanks snoopydawg, I was wondering your thoughts especially. You know the phrase "suspension of disbelief" that is what I need most days. To suspend my disbelief and get on with it, whatever it is. I will consume that video later when I have more appetite for it. Thanks.
Here is that right wing racist guy spreading misinformation again. They don't talk about covid or vaccines for fifteen minutes but I agree with Coleman Hughes. After giving a second listen I want to find out the math he speaks of, and the programs. He sounds interesting to me. good luck
Is There a Limit to Technological Innovation
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fpys01SZ43c width:420]
Peace and Love
and rabbit holes
Suspension of disbeliefs indeed
I could understand a lot of medical information about AIDS and I thought I had a good handle on what I knew, but now I’m wondering if I was following rabbit holes instead. I haven’t made up my mind on the HIV issue, but I do believe that many people who died from AIDS didn’t have to because they could have been saved with bactrim and possibly not taking AZT. I’ve thought that since I read Larry Kramer's article on how Fauci screwed people who were sick and looking to him for help. Pneumonocystic pneumonia should have been easily treated bactrim and other antibiotics and people who had the sarcoma cancer should have been treated by cancer doctors but Fauci cut them out. The name of it is on the edge of my brain, but I can’t grasp it. Starts with a K…almost.
One thing I’m not going to do is take on the hurt and anger again. It won’t help and I already think that Fauci is a despicable person. I’ll let you watch the video on math and hopefully you will let me know if I might enjoy it. Math literally hurts my brain. It’s unpleasant.
Take care, eyo. My pm's are always open if you ever want to talk.
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
Grabbed it
Kaposi's sarcoma
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
Conspiracy to depraved indifference murder?
Or worse…
Lots more to read. But it sure looks like a smoking gun that can be used for any lawsuits against Fauci and big pharma. Also the WHO saw the results of using ivermectin in Utter Pradeshh (sp I’m sure) and they could have told the world that it works, but instead covered it up. I cannot wrap my mind around this type of evil.
Be sure to check out the link.
The next question is why didn’t Trump push for getting it released to everyone? Someone blocked him from doing it, but who was it and why would he go along with it? Just so people would take the mRNA shots? That’s cold blooded!
Apparently holocaust denial is not an issue anymore. Lots of people are denying the one in Gaza with absolutely no repercussions.
why is fauci immune to political castigation?
sort of like dejoy destroying the usps
without consequence
ingrained sociopathy.
have a nice life
Zionism is a social disease