campaign has volunteers outside telling voters this?

This young woman has recorded a youtube video explaining how she was told during poll worker training that 'no party preference' voters were always to be given a provisional ballot. Furthermore nothing in the training mentioned anything about "crossover" ballots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o800P2MyWSw&feature=youtu.be

After calling the country registration office she was notified that the trainer was wrong. However, the other people in the training session started today unaware they were being used as tools to suppress the no party preference vote (which is usually around 80% pro Bernie).

It's looking more like a widespread attempt to suppress the vote across the state by giving NPP voters the wrong ballots or provisional ballots by "accident." I hope there's someone collecting this and investigating.

This morning my daughter voted successfully with a Dem crossover ballot in Sherman Oaks...no problems. Her husband was registered Dem but she was NPP...both, vote by mail. Weeks ago when she saw that Bernie was not on her mail-in-ballot, she contacted me.

On reddit at Kossacks_for_Sanders, Mahakali Overdrive2's research helped me a lot! From her I learned about swapping the NPP ballot for the Dem crossover ballot at the polling station. I also encountered that video by the Orange County poll worker being trained to give NPP voters provisional ballots.

So, there were numerous emails between daughter & me on coaching her to build confidence in case she encountered an uninformed or ill-trained poll worker who might try to push the provisional. Didn't happen & all went well.

VISUALIZE: President Sanders.

http://imgur.com/6hBsuEy

voter suppression

http://www.gregpalast.com/california-stolen-sanders-right-nowspecial-bul...

This is from the official Election Officer Training Manual page 49:

"A No Party Preference voter will need to request a crossover ballot from the Roster Index Officer. (Do not offer them a crossover ballot if they do not ask)."

Someone raised their hand and asked a follow-up question: ‘So, what if someone gets a nonpartisan ballot, notices it doesn't have the presidential candidates on it, and asks you where they are?’ The answer poll workers are instructed to give: ‘Sorry, NPP ballots don't have presidential candidates on them.’ That's correct: even when people ask questions of that nature, obviously intending to vote with a party.

The author, Greg Palast, is the author of The New York Times bestseller, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy"

the voting practices in the US. Obviously this country is on a level of third world countries when it comes to voting practices. What the hell has happened to this country??? (Rhetorical question only - but sad, none the less)

The California Secretary of State seems to say provisional ballots do count:

Q: I am a voter with no party preference, and I received a vote-by-mail ballot with no presidential candidates. What can I do to request a ballot with presidential candidates?

Contact your county elections office no later than May 31 to request a vote-by-mail ballot with presidential candidates from the Democratic Party, American Independent Party, or Libertarian Party. Click Here for County Elections Contact Information; OR

Bring your vote-by-mail ballot to an early voting location or the polls on Election Day and exchange it for a ballot with presidential candidates from the Democratic Party, American Independent Party, or Libertarian Party.

NOTE: If you have lost your original vote-by-mail ballot, you will have to vote a provisional ballot at the polls—your vote will still be counted. More information on provisional ballots can be found here: http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting-resources/provisional-voting/

I could be interpreting it wrong, but he seems to say that if you get there and ask to vote with a provisional ballot at the polls, it will count.

chance of being indicted or at the very least found negligent in the performance of her required SOS duties. I cannot believe the democratic party is ignoring all the risks associated with Hillary. They are going to try to blame Bernie if Hillary loses but Hillary was always going to be a problematic candidate.

Hello there. Since I’ve been on record here repeatedly saying I expect Sanders to win Cali by over 20%, and that is clearly not the official result, here’s my take:

....Supposedly, Hillary won my county by over 20%. This is the county where, in the last couple of weeks while I’ve been wearing Bernie shirts & hats, 60 yr old white women, Hillary’s key demographic, when I gesture to them to get the shopping cart 1st, get it and give it to me, saying “Because you’re voting for Bernie.” An older black man, again, her key demographic, who I’ve never met before, walks up to me and shakes my hand and says “Bernie all the way.”
To pick somewhere else I once lived at the time of said election, this result is the equivalent of claiming Mondale beat Reagan by double digits in Alabama in 84. It didn’t happen. THIS didn’t happen. And neither did a Hillary win in Cali in 2016. (and lest you think I just have no decent sense of things, I called 2008 for Obama after Iowa and can provide a link if you want, even tho I hated him & did everything I could to fight the inevitable; I have a pretty good sense of these things, not that 2008 was a particularly hard call)

......If it stands, and no one does anything, it’s the death of democracy. Seriously. We’re not talking small cheating here we’re talking about something truly massive. We might as well live in Soviet era Russia for all the validity of this result.
At least half of you probably think I just don’t like who won but I’m telling you, this result is NOT POSSIBLE. It’s not real. If these results are legit may I wake up paralyzed tomorrow. I’m that sure.....................At this point anyone voting for Clinton is voting for an end to democracy. Really. This is so not good I don’t have words. If

I'm seriously depressed about this.

did Maddi ever give Hillary that $1?