U.S. committing massive war crimes at Raqqa

Remember when U.S. Secretary of Defense James ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis announced that we would be using “annihilation tactics” from now on?
Good news. It worked.

UN war crimes investigators have denounced a “staggering loss of civilian life” caused by the US-backed campaign to reclaim Raqqa, the de facto capital of Islamic State.
The independent commission of inquiry tasked with investigating violations of international law, war crimes and crimes against humanity in Syria said the intensification of airstrikes by the US-led coalition had led to the deaths of at least 300 civilians in the city.

300 innocent civilians here, 300 innocent civilians there, and pretty soon you have a My Lai party.
We are annihilating ISIS, and whoever else happens to get in the way.
Innocent women and children simply get upgraded to "militant".

“We note in particular that the intensification of airstrikes, which have paved the ground for an SDF advance in Raqqa, has resulted not only in staggering loss of civilian life, but has also led to 160,000 civilians fleeing their homes and becoming internally displaced,” Paulo Pinheiro, the chairman of the UN commission of inquiry, told the human rights council in Geneva.

Here's where liberal open their bleeding heart for those poor refugees and say they will do anything for them, as long as "anything" doesn't include not bombing their homes and killing their families.

The civilian cost of the campaign was highlighted last week when footage emerged of coalition planes deploying white phosphorus in the city, which is home to tens of thousands of civilians, prisoners of war, enslaved Yazidi women, and a few thousand Isis militants.

Ah, yes. Willie Pete.
Isn't using white phosphorus over urban areas full of innocent civilians considered a war crime by the Geneva Convention? Why yes it is.
We Amurica, and we don't give a damn, yall.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

and every single diary there was either Trump, Putin, or racist white people.
Not a single mention of our wars.

I was thinking, just as an experiment of course, of creating an account there and posting this essay, plus this one, and this one.
Just to see what reaction I would get, if anything. How would they react to news of something real and important?

up
0 users have voted.
thanatokephaloides's picture

@gjohnsit

Just took at look at TOP and every single diary there was either Trump, Putin, or racist white people. Not a single mention of our wars.

Or anything else of substance.

Markos has sent his blog into la commode, gjohnsit. It's not worth your effort any more.

Bad

up
0 users have voted.

"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar

"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides

dervish's picture

@gjohnsit for not repeating the proper mantras. Independent thought is punished there, severely. If you want to branch out, there are plenty of places all over the internet to cross-post it to. Don't even waste your time thinking about that worthless pit of groupthink. Their day is done.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

@dervish
Would they reject news that Trump, a man they hate more than Satan, is committing war crimes, be rejected because it came from me?

up
0 users have voted.
dervish's picture

@gjohnsit the current narrative. Essays like yours leave readers with the inescapable conclusion that this sort of thing has been going on for a very long time, and that would tarnish the images of both Obama and Hillary.

Wars aren't particularly unpopular there, but progressives views are.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

snoopydawg's picture

@gjohnsit
The person who wrote it has connected the dots and has decided that Pence is going down.
The amount of speculation she took to arrive at her opinion that he is toast is amazing.
One person wrote that a Pence presidency would be worse than Trump's because of his connection to Eric Prince and his sister DaVos. I think pretty much everyone agrees with this, so why are people hoping that Trump is punted out of the WH?
Trump is doing everything that TPTB wants him to do, so why are they trying to kick him out?
My opinion is that the Trump/Russia slide show is just a distraction from what the republicans are doing behind closed doors. Jeeeebbbuuss.
What would happen if you created a new account and posted your essays over there? I'm sure you'd be labeled a Trump lover and you should go and live with his BFF Putin, you commie.
Let us know if you do it. Wacko

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

dervish's picture

that we had been using WP there. Trolls (likely DOD) appeared from nowhere choking up the threads with the idea that WP is not actually a chemical weapon, that it's only used for signaling purposes, and that if civilians were harmed, it was strictly unintentional.

How things have changed in a dozen years or so. Now the DOD doesn't give a damn if we know that they slaughter civilians intentionally. They act with impunity and don't even attempt to sugarcoat it.

At least the honesty is refreshing.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

snoopydawg's picture

watching as the US and the Saudis just to name the two countries that are committing. Now that they have decided that "yes those two countries are committing war crimes, why aren't they doing something about it? Or is the UN just a causal observer and toothless to do anything about it?
As you mentioned, this country is using white phosphorus in Syria just like they did in Iraq and who knows how many other countries, and nothing is being said about it either.

I don't understand why other country's leaders do anything while the US has broken every law that the Nuremberg trials said were illegal, crimes against humanity and against international law.
NATO was created to stop a new Hitler from rising up, but they have sat back and watched as millions of people were slaughtered by this country and too many times they have joined us.

IMG_1032_0.JPG

IMG_1031.JPG

White phosphorus

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Steven D's picture

@snoopydawg on the Security Council as do others who are our allies.

The UN is and always has been toothless.

up
0 users have voted.

"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott

The news in your essay is horrifying. The Dems certainly won't care - wouldn't want to be soft on anything ya know. How much uglier can we get as a nation.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

TheOtherMaven's picture

@dkmich
We are becoming everything we fought in WWII, and TPTB not only don't care - they revel in it as "proof" that they were "right" all along to back the worst and most vicious elements in Germany and also here.

We had a long, long stay of execution thanks to the courage and patriotism of Smedley Butler. There's no one even remotely like him on the scene today, more's the pity.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

I mean, doesn't the Constitution require a vote as a condition precedent to war? And how can you have a war crime without a war? IOW, this is even lower than a war crime. However, the only ones with standing to sue love it. Catch 22!

https://caucus99percent.com/content/did-obama-draw-red-line-syrian-sand-...

up
0 users have voted.
dervish's picture

@HenryAWallace is just a crime. They are criminals.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

@dervish

legitimate war--"legitimate war" being an oxymoron in my book, but many still imagine there is such a thing.

up
0 users have voted.
Steven D's picture

smells like Fallujah all over again.

up
0 users have voted.

"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott

Like when suddenly members defending TPP when Trump got out of it. Owning up to the bombing would be like comparing us to the civilian butchering hospital bombing election stealing Russians.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

I was wondering how long it would take before another country started using drones and targeting US troops.
It's too bad that this type of technology is being used to kill more and more people instead of using it for something good. Imagine if governments had taken this technology and the money spent on it and used it to make our lives better.
My favorite Next Generation Star Trek episode was the one about the Enterprise finding people from our time in stasis and telling them that they no longer used money for anything.

ISIS drones are attacking U.S. troops and disrupting airstrikes in Raqqa, officials say

Islamic State drones are attacking U.S. Special Operations forces located around the group’s de-facto capital of Raqqa in Syria, U.S. officials and Syrian fighters said, sometimes disrupting the ability of American troops to call in airstrikes.

The Pentagon, in response, is looking to send additional anti-drone equipment and troops into Syria, according to one official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss planning.

Unlike in Mosul, where U.S. forces have deployed an array of drone-stopping systems, U.S. troops on the ground in Raqqa are operating with fewer resources and have a limited ability to defend against the small, hard-to-spot aircraft, the official said. The off-the-shelf drones, sometimes used in swarms by the extremist group, are often rigged to drop small 40mm grenade-sized munitions with a relatively high degree of accuracy.

~~snip~~~
The Iranians are also using drones to target US troops

The drone attacks around Raqqa come as U.S. Special Operations forces contend with larger unmanned aerial threats in southern Syria. Last week, an Iranian Shahed-129 — a drone roughly the size of a U.S. Predator — attacked U.S.-led Special Operations forces near the border outpost of al-Tanf, according to an intelligence official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the aircraft type. The munition launched by the drone appeared to be a dud and did not cause any casualties. The drone was subsequently shot down by a U.S. Air Force F-15E strike aircraft.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

MarilynW's picture

there's no one left.

"we are winning in Yemen!" What's left of the population is starving to death.

The slaughter continues as expected when the the Secretary of "War" is truly a "mad dog" and his Commander-in-chief has given his authority over to him.

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.