The POLICY: Lost In The Establishment Media Maelstrom

.

With our own Country falling apart at the seams, the National Debt standing at $20 Trillion dollars (that's right ... Trillion), and our Country hopelessly stuck in a failed ideology demanding endless and perpetual illegal Wars & "Regime Change" criminal operations all over the globe (7 Countries) while wasting Trillions of borrowed dollars far away Overseas every year, and as our Jobs are systematically outsourced away by design into 3rd-World "cheap labor" Nations, and with U.S. Covert Ops in Syria now building into escalating threats and open Warfare with Russia, one might ask ..... just how the heck do we get off this sinking ship?

Clearly this Country is currently lost, and its current political overclass has no vision, no ideals, no ethics, or regard for its own people (much less the people across the entire world).

Lost in the current superficial U.S. Mainstream Media maelstrom surrounding this Election is the subject of actual policy itself. The American people are longing for change, real policy change, some moment of awakening. Something ... anything ... that might finally move the needle away from the disaster that has become U.S. policy (and "talking-points") for the last 40 years.

But whether it is 3rd-Party challenges, Bernie Sanders, or Libertarian-Right challenges, The U.S. Mainstream Media has always aligned itself squarely against any change movement that is made against the corrupt status-quo interests.

They brainwash the public with War propaganda, conformity, character assassination, 'political correctness', and planted negative stories ....anything... to keep the American people distracted from thinking about real policy change, and from ever questioning what has really been going on in this Country -- as they dutifully protect the corrupt Elite Oligarch interests and status quo.

But this Election has policy consequences -- including whether we stop doing the things that have been crippling our Country, and creating chaos of Biblical proportions throughout the entire World. And one such consequence of this Election may just be whether we will be foolishly going into a state of direct Warfare against Russia ("no Fly Zone" standoff), with potential Nuclear consequences awaiting.

The Media will never talk about the actual policy changes that are really at stake. They don't want change.

And what I worry about most is that the existing corrupt policies continue to become legitimized as our Country continues mindlessly and unopposed on its downward spiral.

Most would agree that neither of these candidates offer wholesale reform, or are in anyway ideal candidates. But the fact that the Media is so transparently aligned against Donald Trump is somewhat instructive here. Can any of these candidates rock the boat? That is the central question of this Election.

Can any of them move the needle against the Oligarchs control of our Country? Maybe it's time to ignore the superficial Media narratives, and take a look at the prospects for any serious policy change.

---

---

For the most part, there is plenty on all sides to disagree with, for one to have something to hang his/her hat on here.

But one thing sticks out and is clear. You would never hear Hillary Clinton ever give a speech calling out the failed policy driving our wages down, and making our jobs disappear so clearly, and make a such total, clean break with that policy. And by Donald Trump doing that this would be a real game changer for the middle-class, and American Economic security.

"We're going to renegotiate our absolutely terrible trade deals. We're also going to replace a failed political class that has betrayed our workers, spent trillions on endless Foreign Wars without victory, and destroyed our Middle-Class. Your companies won't be leaving Maine under a Trump administration; not anymore, they're not going to be leaving.

Speaking in secret to a Foreign Bank, Hillary Clinton said her dream is for total open trade and open borders. There go the rest of your jobs. Hillary and Bill raised millions of dollars from Global interest groups who have no alligience to our Country or to our workers whatsoever -- they couldn't care less. By open trade she means that Foreign companies can cheat us out of millions of jobs, and trillions of dollars. What kind of a government allows its own people to suffer like we're suffering?

But if we're going to bring back hope to suffering Americans, we must solve our jobs and economic crisis. Because we have a tremendous jobs crisis. So many of our jobs have gone on to Mexico, to places like China -- the State of Maine has lost 1 out of 3 manufacturing jobs since NAFTA signed by Bill Clinton, and supported by crooked Hillary. And since China entered the World Trade Organization, another Bill Clinton disaster also backed by Hillary, 70,000 Factories have shutdown or left The United States.

We're living through the greatest jobs theft in the history of the World. If I win, we're going to announce our plans to totally renegotiate the disaster known as NAFTA. If we don't get the deal we want, we'll leave NAFTA and start over again, and make much better trade deals. I'm for free trade, but it also has to be fair trade. We want a two-way highway, not a one-way highway. We're going to start making things in America again. America's comeback begins on November 8th.

We're going to have back the American dream. I'm going to fight for every person in this Country who believes government should serve the people and not the donors. Once again we will have a government by, of, and for the people."

---Donald Trump, Bagnor Maine 10/15/2016

.

And beyond just rejecting and reworking the trade deals (which have far reaching impact for American workers and wages) , Trump's critique is also more broadly directed at the failed tyranny of Globalism itself, and the violent and bankrupt Neocon/Globalist agenda to achieve it at all costs. It becomes more clear then just why the Oligarchs and the Media are so mad at Trump, and have ganged-up on him.

Something's gotta change folks. And, as it turns out.....something actually can change. In this Election, the possibility is there.

I look forward to that change. It won't be perfect in all aspects. I would rather have Bernie Sanders. But the Oligarchs are squirming here for a reason, and the American worker and upward mobility may just be able to get a second chance once again in this Country.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOyma_8dFm0 width:640 height:480]

That's something to hang my hat on. When the Oligarchs are mad, you know you're doing something right for the 99%.

-----

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PhMu3f7Ehk width:640 height:480]

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Big Al's picture

issue, haven't heard him speak out against Israeli apartheid and war crimes. Relative to Russia, it's hard to say what he would actually do. This is a political campaign with politicians talking after all. I would have to admit his stance with Russia can't be as bad as Clinton's. There appears to be two camps in Washington D.C., one that wants to rule the world and crush any country that comes even close to challenging it, via war if necessary. And the other which seeks to remain the number one superpower, keep the dollar king, and work with Russia and China. War Criminal Ziggy Brzezinski is now in the 2nd camp as well. It doesn't mean peace on earth and an end to U.S. imperialism, it's a more realistic approach to global hegemony.
From that respect, Trump could very well be the lesser evil of Clinton. Relative to his stances on the War OF Terror and Iran. Wrong, he's a clear supporter of the War OF Terror and his statements about getting a "bad deal" from Iran clearly show not only the same false belligerent stance against Iran's non existent nuclear weapons program but support for Israel.

As far as globalization, words are cheap. A globalist billionaire telling us he wants to bring jobs back home. That's hard to believe for one. Almost like believing this guy:

[video:https://youtu.be/PF9gpvI2UfU]

Six degrees from Kevin Bacon, in the end it won't matter even if Trump was elected. He won't be however, the election has been clearly rigged for Clinton and that's who we'll get. We'd better prepare for it.

up
0 users have voted.
k9disc's picture

The rest is OK. But I don't think he's a billionaire, and I don't think he's a globalist. His mind is on dollar signs and petty power.

I'd be surprised if he understood global trade rackets. He certainly don't know much about business, not being able to sell steaks to Americans and whatnot.

up
0 users have voted.

“Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” ~ Sun Tzu

Actually, Obama is a good comparison here because it illustrates the point I was making.

When Obama said on the Campaign trail that he would renegotiate NAFTA it was clear (to me) that he was not being serious then. This is because one of Obama's own campaign guys was quoted in a newspaper telling Canadian officials admitting that it was just "campaign rhetoric". Obama also only talked about it while in the act of campaigning in Ohio and Wisconsin. He never at any time made a part of every stump speech, and it never was a central part of his agenda.

See:

"The meeting was first reported last week by Canadian television network CTV, which cited unnamed sources as saying that Goolsbee assured the Canadians that Obama's tough talk on the North American Free Trade Agreement is just campaign rhetoric not to be taken seriously."

"I think that's the kind of difference between talk and action that I've been talking about," [Hillary] Clinton told reporters while campaigning in Ohio. "It raises questions about Senator Obama coming to Ohio and giving speeches against NAFTA."

Link: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/canadian-nafta-remarks-rile-obama-campaign/

So Obama was caught in a lie long before the General Election ever started (in the middle of the Primaries).

-----

But Trump is completely different, and the difference between Trump and Obama is illuminating.

  • Trump very passionately makes this issue (killing and renegotiating the trade deals) one of the main, dominant discussion points and highlights of every single speech that he gives.
  • Trump has never made private comments, nor has his campaign people, that contradict the first point.

Trump is no policy wonk. Yet this issue is the one issue that he is very wonky about, and goes into great details about why it is bad for workers and our economy, and why he wants to fix it.

So there is a big difference here. I think Trump has been very consistent on this issue.

up
0 users have voted.

of what he says is true, then in most instances, he's better than Clinton.

Regarding NAFTA, CAFTA etc, they are not treaties like the USA's first trade treaty in 1794(I think) which followed the Constitution in that regard. Since they are not treaties, a strong president can say that national security compels me to ignore this part of this fake trade deal or that fake trade deal.

As for the Israeli occupation of Palestine, maybe the Clinton camp's calling Trump anti-Semitic last week may honk him off enough to make a distinction here between his professed stance and Clinton's total embrace of Likud.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

Style and class markers are what matter. Ugly hair is more important than World War 3, and coarse language is much more important than losing American national sovereignty.

People repeat Hillary's accusations and memes, whole deploring her, but still, in the end, fall in line. I recently talked to someone who said she could never vote for anyone who said, "bigly." Let's let someone take over who wants to fight with Russia and will make us colonial serfs by handing our national sovereignty over to foreign corporations. Then we can feel we've maintained our personal purity.

Does anyone think that a "little" war with Russia would not affect us here at home? Think about smoking ruins of cities at worst, at best, loss of our already shaky electric grid, going into winter. Replacement grid parts are outsourced to other countries these days (China?), you know. We don't make much here at home since NAFTA. Are we prepared to survive a winter without power? I don't think so. Terrible numbers of people would die. "Back to the Stone Age" can happen to us, too, "bigly." Everyone got the necessary skills and stockpiles?

Let's not even think about all our nuclear reactors losing power. That will be interesting.

up
0 users have voted.