Open Thread Sunday 01-17-16

Good morning 99percenters!
Morning news dump and music by Del McCoury

How Neocons Banished Realism

In a widely remarked upon article for the online version of Foreign Policy last week, Harvard’s Stephen Walt asked a very good question. Why, Walt asked, are elite outlets like the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times “allergic to realist views, given that realists have been (mostly) right about some very important issues, and the columnists they publish have often been wrong?”

Walt then went on to do something pundits are generally loath to do: he admitted that he’d didn’t really know the answer. This is not to say that I do, but I think Walt’s question is worth exploring.

Why indeed? My own hunch is that we realists are a source of discomfit for the Beltway armchair warrior class not so much because we have been right about every major U.S. foreign policy question since the invasion of Iraq, but because we dare to question the premise which undergirds the twin orthodoxies of neoconservatism and liberal interventionism.

ISIS: US-Saudi Plague Reaches Indonesia?
ISIS attacks conveniently mesh with Washington's growing frustration with Jakarta and its expanding ties with China.

Coordinated bombings and mass shootings struck Indonesia's capital of Jakarta on Thursday leaving several dead and many more wounded. The pattern matched that of attacks carried out last year in Paris, France, where known terrorists Western intelligence agencies were tracking, some for years, were somehow allowed to mobilize large caches of weapons in Belgium and execute their coordinated mass murder with virtually no effort to stop them ahead of the attacks.

The so-called "Islamic State in Iraq and Syria" quickly claimed responsibility for the attack and the Western media has begun stoking fears that the terrorist organization has now spread to Southeast Asia.

G.I. Jihadis: Wherever US Foreign Policy is in Trouble, ISIS is There... 

A pattern is beginning to develop. Wherever the US wants to put its military, ISIS shows up and conveniently justifies it. And whenever the US is having a problem persuading a foreign government to do what Washington desires, ISIS shows up. In fact, pretty much everywhere US foreign policy is in trouble, ISIS and similarly state-sponsored terrorism seems to show up and save the day.

Fill Up Your Gas Tank — and Support Repression, Tyrants, Wars, Terrorism and Atrocities
Fool’s Gold -- The Link Between Natural Resources and Violence

No matter how bad a tyrannical regime is, chances are that there is a western government or corporation just waiting to do business with it. That has to stop, says professor and author Leif Wenar in conversation with WhoWhatWhy’s Jeff Schechtman.

Only by turning off the spigot that supplies us with energy — but fuels repression where it is pumped out of the ground — can we effect meaningful change.

The amazing wealth being displayed by oil billionaires across the globe has caused many people to equate abundant natural resources with prosperity. However, more often than not, these treasures have benefited only a few while causing hardships for everybody else. And there’s worse.

There seems to be a direct and long-standing historical nexus between those nations that have in-demand natural resources — such as oil, diamonds or precious metals — and corrupt, brutal and inept rule.

Ultra-Rich 'Philanthrocapitalist' Class Undermining Global Democracy: Report
As foundations and wealthy individuals funnel money into global development, what "solutions" are they pursuing?

From Warren Buffett to Bill Gates, it is no secret that the ultra-rich philanthropist class has an over-sized influence in shaping global politics and policies.

And a study (pdf) just out from the Global Policy Forum, an international watchdog group, makes the case that powerful philanthropic foundations—under the control of wealthy individuals—are actively undermining governments and inappropriately setting the agenda for international bodies like the United Nations.

The top 27 largest foundations together possess assets of over $360 billion, notes the study, authored by Jens Martens and Karolin Seitz. Nineteen of those foundations are based in the United States and, across the board, they are expanding their influence over the global south. And in so doing, they are undermining democracy and local sovereignty.

Climate Change Disaster Top Threat to Economy in 2016

A catastrophe caused by climate change is seen as the biggest potential threat to the global economy in 2016, according to a survey of 750 experts conducted by the World Economic Forum.

The annual assessment of risks conducted by the WEF before its annual meeting in Davos on January 20-23 showed that global warming had catapulted its way to the top of the list of concerns.

A failure of climate change mitigation and adaptation was seen as likely to have a bigger impact than the spread of weapons of mass destruction, water crises, mass involuntary migration and a severe energy price shock — the first time in the 11 years of the Global Risks report that the environment has been in first place.

The report, prepared by the WEF in collaboration with risk specialists Marsh & McLennan and Zurich Insurance Group, comes a month after the deal signed in Paris to reduce carbon emissions. The WEF said evidence was mounting that inter-connections between risks were becoming stronger. It cited links between climate change and involuntary migration or international security, noting that these often had “major and unpredictable impacts.”

Jane Goodall: Power of Corporations Is Destroying World’s Rainforests

Jane Goodall is one of the world’s leading voices on climate change and environmental conservation. Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! had the chance to catch up with Goodall at the Paris climate summit last month.

A renowned primatologist, best known for her groundbreaking work with chimpanzees and baboons, Goodall was at the summit to talk about saving the rainforest as a way to mitigate climate change. She shared with Goodman her thoughts on climate denial among the GOP presidential candidates, particularly Donald Trump. She offered some of her insights into why the world’s rainforests are being destroyed at an unprecedented rate, why she chose to be a vegetarian and ways in which we can all reduce our impact on the Earth.

Watch the Democracy Now! interview here:

A Scourge Returns: Black Lung in Appalachia

Once a month, a group of men in t-shirts, jeans, and baseball caps gather around a long table at the New River Health Clinic. The clinic, a small, one-story yellow clapboard building, is located in the tiny town of Scarbro, nestled in the bituminous hills of southern West Virginia. The members of the Fayette County Black Lung Association greet each other by name while they pour bitter black coffee into small Styrofoam cups.

Amidst the chatter and the coffee are the coughs. Some of the men hack loudly, others more quietly. All of them have advanced black lung, a disease they acquired working in the local mines. Although roughly 22% of underground miners smoke,[1] compared with about 18% of U.S. adults in general,[2] none of these men do. They gather not just as a support group but also to help one another complete the stacks of paperwork necessary to apply for government-mandated benefits for black lung and navigate the tortuous appeals process.

Aside from the group's leader, a bespectacled septuagenarian named Joe Massie, all the other members are in their 50s or early 60s. That's relatively young for someone with advanced black lung, and other workers are getting sick even earlier. These miners, who have gotten so sick so fast, are on the forefront of a wave of new black lung cases that are sweeping through Appalachia.

Giant Calving Icebergs May Slow the Pace of Climate Change

LONDON—British scientists have identified the monsters that fertilise the Southern [or Antarctic] Ocean and help remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Giant icebergs drifting northwards could be responsible for storing up to a fifth of all the carbon that sinks into the south polar waters.

Geographers at the University of Sheffield report in Nature Geoscience journal that they analysed 175 satellite images of ocean colour—an indicator of phytoplankton activity.

They learned that each huge iceberg, as it breaks off the ice shelf and begins to float away, also begins to cascade iron and other vital mineral nutrients in its melting waters. This is enough to stimulate ferocious plankton productivity for up to a month in its wake.

The latest threat to the rainforests: A Peruvian highway could displace the Amazon’s last uncontacted tribes
Under international pressure, Peru has declared a new national park in Sierra del Divisor. There's just one catch

LIMA, Peru — Peru has been basking in kudos from officially declaring a vast new national park in the remote Amazonian wilderness known as Sierra del Divisor.

President Ollanta Humala traveled there over the weekend to unveil the park — nearly 5,500 square miles of stunning tropical rainforest, home to numerous threatened species, including jaguars and various kinds of monkey.

He was under international pressure to protect the area from illegal logging, the cultivation of coca — the key ingredient in cocaine — and the construction of clandestine roads.

Humala even claimed the park will “help us purify the air of the world.”

Eating the Fossil Fuel Elephant, One Bite at a Time

During the December 2015 global protests over the feeble results of the Paris climate conference, more than 500 of us Portland environmentalists donned woollies, overcoats and hats, raised our umbrellas and marched across the Tilikum - the newest bridge in Portland. The disheartened were later cheered up by 350.org's successful environmental achievements in 2015, as shared by the organization's executive director May Boeve. We are eating the fossil fuel "elephant" one bite at a time. As she wrote us:

• We showed that we are greater than tar sands.

• We made fracking a contentious political issue in Brazil.

• We shut down one of the biggest coal mines in Europe.

• We pushed California to divest the United States' second-largest pension fund from coal.

• We called out one of the richest, most powerful corporationson the planet.

• We mobilized against "free trade" agreements that consolidatecorporate power.

• We raised the bar on fossil fuel divestment commitments - to $3.4 trillion (and counting).

• We stopped the Keystone XL pipeline.

• We helped make the Paris Climate Agreement happen.

We Portlanders also had victories such as the sensational spectacle on the St. Johns Bridge in September: Hundreds of kayakers and 13 Greenpeace danglers blocked a Shell icebreaker headed for Alaska's Chukchi Sea to help that gargantuan Dutch corporation drill for fossil fuels.

Patrick Henry’s Liberty and Obama’s Climate Action

Mainstream acceptable heroes now and lasting long into the future have in common perfect understanding of what should be done, fraudulent pretenses of doing it, and calculating weakness as the true driver of their actions.

Exhibit one from nearby here in Virginia: Patrick Henry. Like Jesus, his story was written up third-hand decades later, with him gone from the earth. While his speeches usually warned of the need to keep the Native Americans on the run and the slaves in slavery (yes, that was part of what the revolution was for and what the Second Amendment was for), we’ve been handed down a hearsay composite memory of a speech without any such unpleasantries.

In this speech, Henry cries for war, and even in this age of recognizing the barbarous idiocy of choosing war, popular “progressive” history books depict Patrick Henry not as a war monger but as a fortune teller who simply looked into the future and recognized the “necessity” of starting a war earlier than did mere mortals — or, for that matter, the Canadians who still haven’t done it.

Del McCoury Band - 1952 Vincent Black Lightning

Del McCoury Band - High on the Mountain

Del McCoury Band - The Bluegrass Country

Del McCoury - Let An Old Racehorse Run

Del McCoury & David Grisman - Walkin the Dawg

Del McCoury & The Dixie Pals - Take Me To The Mountains

Del McCoury Band - 40 Acres and a Fool

Del McCoury Band - Rambling Boy

Del McCoury Band - The Times They Are A Changin'

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

thanks for the ot.

fine selection of music today! i was in del mccoury country last night checking out the seldom scene at the strand capitol theatre in york, pa. it often looked like this:

seldom scene 20160116_200351

up
0 users have voted.

Seldom Scene, wow, lucky you! I know it's a tall order, but how does Fred Travers do filling in for the late, great Mike Auldridge, that's some big shoes to fill.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

and if you spend a lot of time comparing the current members to the legends that they replace (there are no original members left), well it just isn't productive.

fred travers is a fine dobro player and also brings a great singing voice to the mix. his playing style is very different from auldridge's, far less flashy but very tasteful. the fellows in the band now play really well together, they are a really smooth ensemble. they lack some of the instrumental flash and grit of the former group, but they have the finest vocal mix you're likely to hear and they are far more than competent on their instruments.

up
0 users have voted.

I have to admit that I haven't heard the new Seldom Scene, but now you've piqued my interest. Auldridge had that deep jazzy style, I don't think anyone could replace him in that regard. A fine vocal mix is a must for a good bluegrass band, IMHO, especially that high lonesome. Time marches on and so does the music. Thanks brother.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

—The establishment mastodons at The Economist pen a brief and mournful obituary for Bush III, the failed sequel.

—In news that should surprise no one, pollsters have determined that the one single consistent unifying factor among those who would support The Hairball, regardless of party, is that they are those people most likely to slip on a swastika armband.

—Slippery con man Shaun King will apparently be doing black-college outreach for the Sanders campaign. Probably not the wisest of moves. : /

—A British law firm has dispatched a letter to the UK government, stating that the sale of British arms to Saudi Arabia violates international law. If the government doesn't respond within two weeks, the firm will sue.

—Lawyers for Joaquin Guzman are fighting extradition to the US on the grounds that it would not be possible for him to receive a fair trial "given the hostile environment there toward Mexicans created by Donald Trump."

—Cuban rum is coming to the US.

up
0 users have voted.

--Lindsey endorsed him, so at least there's flowers on the grave.

--Trump: "Who's your daddy"?

--In the comment section, Angus McDung must be Trump using an alias.

--Good intetntions--Good luck with that though.

--Now that's some serious rationalization.

--Yo Ho Ho

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

Heb. He could probably use some dead flowers.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_emq_NzO7H8]

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

not risen.

Here's a song the Stones wrote about David Brock, the cat's-paw of the Mad Bomber, Brock out there chundering that Sanders is Old and should be in a Home, and that is why he has not released his medical records.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JISfO7YC2xA]

up
0 users have voted.
enhydra lutris's picture

and the thoughts, information and ideas they convey. Thanks tons.

up
0 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

you're welcome a metric boatload of tonnage.

up
0 users have voted.
Shahryar's picture

ok, if Henry were alive today and had slaves he'd be a pretty disgusting man. Maybe 200 years from now people will all be vegetarians and look back at us with the same disgust. "They talked about giving up eating meat but they kept having lamb steaks!"

Yes, the revolution should have freed everyone. Yes, the people in the 1700s should not have killed the natives. Moving into the mid 1800s we know that Lincoln was an incredible racist by today's standards. But were ending British rule and ending slavery bad things because those who did so were people we wouldn't want over for dinner...if they held the same views today?

We read about ISIS and Saudi Arabia beheading people with horror but the Western world did that only a few hundred years ago. London roads had heads stuck on pikes as warnings during Shakespeare's time. But standards change. Yes, we're bombing the $%^$& out of places and killing innocents but we're not putting their heads on sticks!

Anyway, I'm just thinking....if we somehow helped the government collapse, breaking up the country into smaller units where everyone didn't have to worry about "the feds" 3000 miles away and then way in the future some writer criticized me for having chicken last night...wait, that doesn't sound quite right. Maybe because at the moment we don't think it's terribly wrong to murder animals by the billions. That's just the way it is. We'd like to have a healthy diet but...maybe our grandchildren will have figured it out.

Evolution isn't just physical. Society moves along, hopefully towards enlightenment. Sometimes I feel that criticizing long dead people for ideas that don't fit today's thinking is like criticizing the Wright brothers for not building a jet or the Beatles for not starting with Abbey Road.

That is to say people like Henry or Jefferson started out not thinking twice about slave owning and then became uncomfortable with it. That's the start of a process. I'm reminded of a terrible movie I saw, can't remember the name. It was set in the deep South in the 50s (I think). In the face of racism a young girl gives a speech to a bunch of redneck creeps about equality. When she's done there's a pause and then there's that slow clap thing that grows into wild applause. Well no. That wouldn't have happened. They'd have spit in her face. They wouldn't have had a miraculous conversion on the spot because people have to go from nowhere to the right thing. It's a path and criticizing someone who's on the path for not being at the end of it is a little too easy.

up
0 users have voted.

good points. But I'm not sure we have the time for Obama or the next President (supposed Leader of the Free World) to evolve beyond their climate change hypocrisy. In that respect we need a quick conversion.

up
0 users have voted.
Shahryar's picture

short term profit. They know what the right thing is, in terms of morality. But they're not very moral and there's moolah to be made.

up
0 users have voted.

stand in the way of making a buck. Morality is for the little people, thus spake the sociopath.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

putting heads on the sticks, but we do put them on twitter and facebook. So, I think, may be Shakespeare might turn in his grave watching our standards today...

I like your comment and I just wanted to say (triggered by your one sentence of "societies move along") what I saw this morning on TV from our local University of Maryland University College TV, a documentation about how in the new world continent (Mexico and Middle America) in the old world (Africa, Egypt) the same development of slavery, serfdom, empires and kingdoms formed when the hunter-gatherers or early human society, in which most or all food is obtained from wild plants and animals, changed into agricultural societies. As soon as people found a way to gather and distribute water into formerly unfertile and dry desserts, as soon as they started to grow food locally for harvesting it with the goal to provide for the consumption of the whole clan or tribe, towns, cities, kingdoms and empires evolved. As soon as they obtained that capability, kings and empires then seized those territories to own it and gathered serfs or slaves to work for them.

It reminded me of the tribes I became a little bit familiar with in equatorial African regions. Even up til the mid of the 20th century the tribes living deeply in the rain forests used to survive on hunting and gathering plants more than cultivating fields (pretty difficult in the real rain forest kind of jungle areas). So they might be the closest we had still living more like the hunters and gatherers of the ancient world.

Compared to other tribes, which are more agricultural and survived on domesticated animals and the crops of their fields, the former ones were way more egalitarian and didn't really have property of land. People declared themselves owners of a certain area of land, but did not much more than made it available to their women (serfs in a way) to use for some small sustainable plant growing for their own family only.

Out of those original egalitarian attributes, embedded in those tribal societies, result two aspects, which are expressed, when they were confronted with the power that came with money and property of the formerly colonial and today corporate powers. Both steal from and bribe the local population. Tribes that have more resemblance to hunter gathering societies are wildly more upset, if some members of their tribes gain "property, money and prestige" through colonial preferential treatment of some of their own, compared to the more agricultural tribes, which were already politically organized with kings and property themselves.

It seems that corruption and bribery is easier and stronger among those tribes and the rebellion against those colonialist that engaged in those activities stronger and more cruel. They don't take it lightly, if one of their own, has more than the rest of the tribe and they demand fiercely equality among the tribes' members. That makes a fertile ground for gruesome "wars" among them, when members get corrupted.

Well, I am just talking about that, because I actually remember my former husband, who came from a tribe that had more hunter-gatherers attributes historically, and me talking about the fact that his tribal origins were very egalitarian, which somehow is difficult to "see" for any outsider. But it's true, if one compares that to other tribes in his country, which were more agricultural due to the different geology of their terrain.

Which makes me thinking that the most important aspect of equality between members of a tribe / society might be their individual capabilities to have a livelihood on their own without needing to relate to other members. If the family unit or clan can survive without any other family or clan's help and interaction, if there is little to no interdependency necessary for the family's survival, the more peacefully and less prone to war like activities they might be. The need of gaining power, property and exploitation of other people for profit is not as profound, when you can survive on your own and are more self-sustainable.

That again reminds me that most of the shenanigans corporations today are involved in, even in those developing energy solutions that could make families completely independent from the dependencies of an electrical grid or the energy needed for transportation, ie companies, who develop the technology for families to becomes independently sustainable, those companies on the other hand make sure there is a middle man between the consumer and them, always interested to prevent the end consumer from becoming independent from them and thus maintaining interdependency as much as they can and is of profit to the corporation.

Oh, well, my brain ... talking to itself. Sorry for that. Your sentence

Evolution isn't just physical. Society moves along, hopefully towards enlightenment triggered my drifting into those thoughts.

ok, it's time to watch THE debate... Smile

up
0 users have voted.
Shahryar's picture

I found that highly informative and thought-provoking

up
0 users have voted.
Pluto's Republic's picture

…as far as I'm concerned, Shahryar.

I've been thinking similar thoughts, although I attribute angst and blame to my singular cause, for which I am the only advocate in the United States of America.

So sayeth me:

On average, a national Constitution is revised or rewritten every 20 years. Emerging Human, Civil, Social, and Environmental Rights are continuously incorporated into these Constitutions as the consciousness of humans evolves. The United States Constitution is the sole exception to this, and as a result, the US Constitution is designated as "entrenched" (at the end point where it can no longer be amended or revised). Its meaning and intent was forged in a distant time when slavery was economics, the idea of human rights was unthinkable, human life was often short and cruel, work was a tedious life-long toil, education sporadic, communication completely blocked by time and space, psychology and sociology were unexplored, the impact of technology unanticipated, and world itself unmapped.

By the time Americans realized their Constitution was obsolete — even after a burst of amendments patched over some of the truly shameful parts — it was too late. So, in lieu of a modern, living roadmap for self-government and individual actualization, Americans came to rely on the shifting political winds of appointed judges and partisan moods to interpret for them the intent of the Constitution's increasing dated notions and obscure language. Thus, the US Constitution became a sacred totem; an object of American worship. Its words were the voice of a national deity with a mysterious knowledge. It's authority was unquestioned and unquestionable. The document became the very opposite of a Constitution. It did not describe the way forward in an evolving world of complexity and astonishing possibility. It ruled from a narcissistic and amoral past, which was easily distorted by the political versions of strip mall preachers. Somewhere along the way, it crushed the nation's moral compass.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

when I am entering an address in the url bar, the cat walks on the keyboard, and changes the destination. Below is where the cat took me this morning. I have no idea what it's about, but it must be popular with cats the world over, as there are 2.1 million views, and counting.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxGkQjiX8Tw]

up
0 users have voted.

once you've read the translation...it's about a worldwide banana plantation rebellion, led by cats, thus the pelvis thrusting, toothless Adolph Hitler impersonator.

"Dayal baba, kala khaba
Gas lagaiye khao
Porer gaser pane keno mitmitaiya chao?"

Dayal baba, If you want to eat banana
Plant your own tree
Why do you look at other people's Banana plantation with greedy eyes?

"Mansher vire chapachapi
Doyal babae kore kapakapi
Baba tomar bangladeshe koto kola chao
Kola bagan chash koira kosto koira khao"

(When) Mankind is getting cramped for space
Doyal baba is shaking merrily (As in boogie-woogie)
(Doyal) Baba, How many bananas do you want in your Bangladesh?
You desire a banana plantation, you work hard and eat your own bananas

"Babar kola chai eto boro
Ke kothae aso amae dhoro
Kola ante jabo kothe babai bole dao
Kine tomar khati hoyna shob-i khaddo fao baba re"

Baba needs bananas of huge size
(That kind of Banana) Where do i find it or get hold of
Baba, Tell me where to go to get such bananas
(If you know how to eat) You dont need to buy them, you get them for free

"Asen jara janto baba
Aha, tarai ekhon doyal baba
Ei jonogone dhorle thaishe korba haumau
Bolbe shobai thaishe dhore baper kola khao tomar"

Of all the people that exist
Aha, Dayal Baba rules over them
You will cry in pain when people get crazy at you
(They will force you on your knees and) All of them will say "You can go, eat your Dad's Bananas"

"Nijer kola age ano
Keno porer kola dhore tano?
Sheshe kola eto sulle keno ebar bujae deo
Shob kola khaowa shesh hole ebar nijer kola khao"

Bring your own banana to the front
Why are you holding on to other people's bananas?
Please make me understand why have you peeled off all the Bananas
You are done eating all the other bananas, now start eating (from) your own.

Pretty obvious, no?

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

for that. Apparently my cat is Bakunin.

up
0 users have voted.

Comrade.

up
0 users have voted.
shaharazade's picture

That video woke her and started her caterwauling, she a loud one and managed to yowl louder then the music. Could be that she was just rocking out and singing along but I doubt it. Her tastes run to classical and the only rocker she likes is Jack White.

up
0 users have voted.

contains subliminal messaging that only cats can hear, it is a call to arms, erm, paws and claws.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

The Mad Bomber has announced that, if elected president, she will place The Clenis in a blind trust. That way she will not be aware of what it is doing, nor will she be responsible for it.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

electoral system you might want or wish you had.

[video:https://youtu.be/_95I_1rZiIs]

With a system that has that many complications, who would want to vote? German TV would throw out an animated video like that to explain the electoral primary voting system, because it's so long and too complicated for any German to understand. Out attention span before we get to "fuck it", is rather short. Luckily you are not Germans.

Have fun. Or not. My son said I shouldn't get angry watching the debate. I promised I wouldn't. Smile

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

Martin O'Malley won't win the primaries. So, why is he still in the debates? Lester Holt gives him too much time and prevents Sanders to directly answer to HRC's comments, the only thing people would be interested in, imo.

So far, I can't find a way this debate to be really helpful. If at all, HRC and Sanders should battle it out among themselves.

Ok, I promised to not get angry.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

commercials. Losers!

up
0 users have voted.
Big Al's picture

Is there something on TV?

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

... I am desperately searching through the channels where the comedy of errors is playing...

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

responding and talking IMMEDIATELY after some attacks have launched against him by HRC and that M.O'M takes time away from both the others.

I think I am engaging in primary debate monologues. Smile
OK. Good Night.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

I didn't hear anything in the debate that would make anyone, who hasn't decided upon a candidate, to switch his/her opinion about HRC or Sanders candidate. Amazing how NBC pads itself on the shoulder for a "lively" debate. Both Andrea Mitchell and Lester Holt were biased and couldn't help showing of their republican talking points, both had their little tricks to take away spontaneous responses from Sanders in allowing M.O'M to play the "charming" boy and steal time and subjects away from Sanders. That didn't help one bit. Gosh, it's so awful to see that all of it is nothing worth.

Sorry for you, folks. It has been a long time I watched TV. Don't miss it one bit.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

Chris Hedges -
The Mirage of Justice

The reality is that almost no one who is imprisoned in America has gotten a trial. There is rarely an impartial investigation. A staggering 97 percent of all federal cases and 95 percent of all state felony cases are resolved through plea bargaining. Of the 2.2 million people we have incarcerated at the moment—25 percent of the world’s prison population—2 million never had a trial. And significant percentages of them are innocent.
..
Close to 40 percent of those eventually exonerated of their crimes originally pleaded guilty, usually in an effort to reduce charges that would have resulted in much longer prison sentences if the cases had gone to trial. The students I teach in prison who have the longest sentences are usually the ones who demanded a trial. Many of them went to trial because they did not commit the crime. But if you go to trial you cannot bargain away any of the charges against you in exchange for a shorter sentence.
...
If all of the accused went to trial, the judicial system, which is designed around plea agreements, would collapse. And this is why trial sentences are horrific. It is why public attorneys routinely urge their clients to accept a plea arrangement. Trials are a flashing red light to the accused: DO NOT DO THIS. It is the inversion of justice.
...
The wrongly accused and their families, as long as the fiction of justice is maintained, vainly seek redress. They file appeal after appeal. Those convicted devote hundreds of hours of study in the law library in prison. They believe there has been a “mistake.” They think that if they are patient the “mistake” will be rectified.
...
Those who do not understand the American system, who are not mentally prepared for its cruelty and violence, are largely helpless before authorities intoxicated with the god-like power to destroy lives.
...
The power elites—our corporate rulers and the security and surveillance apparatus—rewrite laws to make their criminal behavior “legal.” It is a two-tiered system. One set of laws for us. Another set of laws for them. Wall Street’s fraud and looting of the U.S. Treasury, the obliteration of our privacy, the ability of the government to assassinate U.S. citizens, the revoking of habeas corpus, the neutralizing of our Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures, the murder of unarmed people in the streets of our cities by militarized police, the use of torture, the criminalizing of dissent, the collapse of our court system, the waging of pre-emptive war are rendered “legal.”

That's pretty serious stuff, may be next Presidential Debate should be hosted by Chris Hedges. At least he would nail the candidates to show their colors on the real issues that destroy this country.

up
0 users have voted.